Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2011 Salivary Osmolality and Hydration Status in Children With Cerebral Palsy
2011 Salivary Osmolality and Hydration Status in Children With Cerebral Palsy
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jop
BACKGROUND: Unstimulated whole salivary parame- by saliva, the earlier this condition is identified the
ters have been identified as potential markers of hydra- greater the chances of administering preventive mea-
tion status. Reduced salivary flow rate and increased sures. Moreover, salivary osmolality is a reliable param-
salivary osmolality have been shown to be useful to eter that reflects changes in plasma and urine.
identify dehydration, even when minimal loss of body J Oral Pathol Med (2011) 40: 582–586
water occurs. This study aimed to evaluate whether
unstimulated salivary flow rate and salivary osmolality Keywords: cerebral palsy; plasma osmolality; salivary flow rate;
from individuals with cerebral palsy correlate with plas- salivary osmolality; urine osmolality
ma and urine osmolality.
METHODS: Thirty-five male and female children, aged
9–13 years old, diagnosed with cerebral palsy were com-
pared to 27 nondisabled children (10–12 years old). Introduction
Unstimulated whole saliva was collected under slight
suction and salivary flow rate (ml ⁄ min) was calculated. Cerebral palsy (CP) describes a group of chronic
Plasma without venostasis and urine were also collected. disorders that involves movement and posture develop-
Salivary, plasma and urine osmolality were measured ment, often accompanied by epilepsy, secondary mus-
using a freezing point depression osmometer. culoskeletal problems and disturbances of sensation,
RESULTS: Cerebral palsy children presented a reduction perception, cognition, communication and behavior (1).
in salivary flow rate (50%) compared to the control group It is the most common cause of severe physical disability
(P < 0.01). Moreover, an increase in salivary (50%), plas- in childhood (2), with an estimated prevalence of 2.4 per
ma (3%), and urine osmolality (20%) was also observed in 1000 children (3).
the cerebral palsy children compared to the control Previous studies in CP individuals have demonstrated
group (P < 0.01). Salivary flow rate was negatively cor- a reduced salivary flow rate (4), decreased sodium
related with the salivary, plasma and urine osmolality concentrations, increased potassium levels (5), reduction
(P < 0.01). Salivary osmolality correlated positively with in digestive and antimicrobial enzymes activities, such as
plasma and urine osmolality (P < 0.01). amylase and peroxidase, respectively (6), increased sialic
CONCLUSION: Cerebral palsy children seem to present acid concentrations that could be related to increased
impaired adequate hydration status. Since the possible saliva viscosity (6) and delayed recovery of salivary
hypohydration condition may be reflected in saliva fluid, pH, involving compromised ability to buffer exogenous
which could compromise the protective function exerted acid (7).
Water is essential for several physiological processes,
including biochemical reactions, metabolism, substrate
for transport across cellular membranes, temperature
regulation, and circulatory function. Body turnover of
fluid and electrolytes changes constantly due to water
Correspondence: Maria Teresa B Santos, DDS, PhD, Individuals loss from the lungs, skin and kidney and water gain
with Special Needs Division, Universidade Cruzeirio do Sul; Director from food and fluids (8). Several methods have been
Dentistry Division Lar Escola São Francisco, Rua Constantino de
Souza, 454, apto 141, 04605-001 São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Tel:+55 11
used as markers of hydration status, including stable
9972 2301, Fax:+55 11 5093 0865, E-mail: [email protected] isotope dilution, bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy,
Accepted for publication January 26, 2011 body mass change (9), hematological and urinary
Saliva and hydration status in cerebral palsied
Santos et al.
583
parameters (10). The ideal selection of hydration Saliva collection
markers should be based on a compromise between Unstimulated whole saliva was collected using slight
their capacity to identify hydration status with simple suction through a soft plastic catheter. Saliva produced
noninvasive measurements that provide immediate in the first 10 s was discarded and the subsequent saliva
results requiring minimal technical expertise (11). was collected for exactly 5 min in a graduated cylinder
Unstimulated whole salivary parameters have been to calculate the flow rate (ml ⁄ min). During the collec-
identified as potential markers of hydration status (12, tion period, all children remained comfortably seated in
13). Reduced salivary flow rate and increased salivary a ventilated and illuminated room. When it was not
osmolality have been shown to be useful to identify possible to collect saliva from a child due to crying, he
dehydration, even when minimal loss of body water or she was excluded. Soon after collection, saliva was
occurs, like during light exercise and heat stress (12). frozen in dry ice, transported to the laboratory and
Unstimulated salivary flow rate and osmolality were stored at )80C until analysis.
demonstrated to strongly correlate with plasma and
urine osmolality (11), which are widely accepted hydra- Blood and urine collection analyses
tion indices (10). Reduced unstimulated salivary flow Blood samples were collected without venostasis from
rate, increased salivary osmolality and total protein an antecubital vein into a separate Vacuteiner tubes
from cerebral palsy individuals could be caused by containing heparin (Becton Dickson, Juiz de Fora,
hypohydration status (14). Brazil). Blood samples were spun at 1500 g for 10 min in
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a refrigerated centrifuge to obtain plasma, which was
unstimulated salivary flow rate and salivary osmolality immediately stored at )80C until analyses.
from individuals with cerebral palsy correlate with Urine samples were collected into universal containers
plasma and urine osmolality. It was hypothesized that when the child was able to perform this or with probe
if salivary osmolality shows a good correlation with relief they could not.
plasma and urine osmolality, salivary osmolality could
be used as a routine test to identify hydration status in Measurement of salivary, plasma and urine osmolality
CP individuals. parameters
Salivary, plasma and urine osmolality were measured
using a freezing point depression osmometer (Model
Methods Wide-Range Osmometer 3W2, Advanced Instruments,
Subjects Massachusetts, USA).
This project was reviewed by the Human Research
Ethics Committee and approved by the Cruzeiro do SuI Statistical analysis
University Institutional Review Board (IRB) and To evaluate the differences between the groups studied
granted under protocol approval 045 ⁄ 2010. After being in relation to proportions, the chi-square test was used.
informed of the aim of the investigation, written The Student’s t-test was used to verify the hypothesis of
informed consent for participation and publication equality between two groups. When the supposition of
was obtained from the adult responsible for each data normality was rejected, the nonparametric Mann–
individual. Whitney test was used. Spearman’s correlation coeffi-
Thirty-five male and female children, aged 9–13 years cient was used to associate the behavior of four
old, diagnosed with CP who were referred to specialized variables. The significance level was set at P < 0.05.
rehabilitation center, in Sao Paulo, Brazil, were consec-
utively included in this study. The inclusion criteria were
individuals with a clinical medical diagnosis of cerebral
Results
palsy, classified as quadriparesis, diparesis and hemi- The CP group was composed of 57.8% of individuals
paresis (15), and the exclusion criteria were the use of with quadriparesis, 30.6% with diparesis and 11.6%
any drugs that interfere with saliva secretion (anticho- with hemiparesis. The CP and control groups did not
linergic and neuroleptic drugs, benzodiazepines) for at differ significantly regarding sex (P = 0.68) or age
least 72 h prior to examination, a history of head (P = 0.59) (Table 1).
and neck radiation and surgical procedures to reduce Data of salivary flow rate (ml ⁄ min) and salivary,
drooling. plasma, and urine osmolality (mOsm ⁄ kg H2O) from
The control group consisted of 27 nondisabled CP and control groups are presented in Table 2. CP
children, aged 10–12 years old, and the primary inclu- children presented a reduction in salivary flow rate
sion criterion was absence of neurological damage. (50%) compared to the control group (P < 0.01).
None of the participants reported any complaint Moreover, an increase salivary (50%), plasma (3%),
suggestive of salivary-gland dysfunction or were using and urine osmolality (20%) was observed in the CP
any medication that could affect salivary secretion. group compared to the control group (P < 0.001).
The caregivers from both groups were previously Table 3 and Figs 1 and 2 show the values of the
advised that the children should receive normal feeding Spearman correlation coefficient for the values of
and water as in their usual daily routine. Samples were salivary flow rate, salivary, plasma and urine osmolality
collected in the first period of the morning in the of the two groups studied. The salivary flow rate
following sequence: saliva, blood and urine. was negatively correlated with salivary, plasma and
584
Table 1 Distribution of cerebral palsy and control children according
to sex and age Discussion
A previous study by our group demonstrated that the
Cerebral palsy Control saliva of individuals with CP has increased salivary
(n = 35) (n = 27) P-value* osmolality, total protein concentration and reduced
Sex, n (%) salivary flow rate, suggesting a state of hypohydration in
Female 20 (57.1%) 14 (51.9%) 0.68a these individuals (14). These results led us to question
Male 15 (42.9%) 13 (48.1%) whether the salivary parameters could be correlated with
Age (years) 11.5 ± 2.1 11.2 ± 1.1 0.59b
other indicators of hypohydration, for example, plasma
a
The data was compared by chi-square test. and urine osmolality. In fact, the present results verified
b
The data was compared by Student’s t-test. that salivary osmolality is a reliable parameter for
*P > 0.05. evaluating hydration status in CP individuals, since it
correlates with plasma and urine osmolality. Further-
more, the reduction in salivary flow rate, often observed
Table 2 Salivary flow rate (ml ⁄ min) and salivary, plasma, and urine in CP individuals (4–6), can also be related to osmolality
osmolality (mOsm ⁄ kg H2O) for cerebral palsy and control children
variations.
The physiological regulation of total body water
Parameters Cerebral palsy Control P value* volume and fluid concentration is a complex and
Salivary flow rate 0.56 ± 0.24 1.16 ± 0.22 <0.001 dynamic process, which makes it difficult to establish a
Saliva osmolality 86.5 ± 11.1 57.7 ± 8.0 <0.001 gold standard for hydration assessment.
Plasma osmolality 294.0 ± 4.2 286.1 ± 3.0 <0.001 Osmolality is the number of osmotically active par-
Urine osmolality 925.6 ± 120.3 748.2 ± 121.1 <0.001
ticles of solute contained in 1 l of solution and it is
Mean (±SD). expressed in milliosmoles of solute particles per kilo-
*Mann–Whitney’s test comparing cerebral palsy and control groups gram of water. Plasma osmolality is the usual maker of
P < 0.05. hypohydration for several conditions, such as associated
with age (16), water and food deprivation (17), progres-
sive acute dehydration and post-exercise (12, 13).
Table 3 Values for Spearman’s correlation coefficient between the Plasma and urine osmolality have been described as
values of salivary flow rate, salivary, plasma and urine osmolality.
useful tools to identify hydration status (9, 18); however,
they are somewhat invasive and need the individual’s
Salivary Plasma Urine cooperation. Taking blood samples in CP individuals is
osmolality osmolality osmolality
a hard task due to the presence of their involuntary
Salivary flow rate (ml ⁄ min) )0.75* )0.68* )0.41* movements; while urine collection is also difficult, since
Salivary osmolality (m0sml) – 0.72* 0.47* CP individuals may not present voluntary control of
Plasma osmolality (m0sml) – 0.66* their urethral sphincter, requiring catheterization.
*Spearman’s correlation coefficient, P < 0.01. Saliva has been studied as a tool for the diagnosis of a
healthy condition or disease status (19, 20). Some
salivary biomarkers, including DNA, RNA, proteins,
immunoglobulin, metabolites, cellular material, have
urine osmolality (P < 0.01). Salivary osmolality corre- been used for diagnosing microbiological infection, head
lated positively with plasma and urine osmolality and neck carcinoma, cardiovascular and autoimmune
(P < 0.01). disease, periodontitis and for monitoring and detecting
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 280 290 300 310 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
Salivary osmolality Plasma osmolality Urine osmolality
Figure 1 Illustration of Spearman’s correlation comparing the salivary flow rate and salivary (A), plasma (B), and urine (C) osmolality for control
(s) and cerebral palsy (d) individuals (R = Spearman’s correlation coefficient, P < 0.01).
585
A 110 r = 0.72 B 110 r = 0.47 C r = 0.66
Salivary osmolality
Plasma osmolality
90 90
300
80 80
70 70
290
60 60
50 50
280
Groups Groups Groups
CP CP CP
40 Control 40 Control Control
280 290 300 310 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
Plasma osmolality Urine osmolality Urine osmolality
Figure 2 Illustration of Spearman’s correlation between salivary, plasma and urine osmolality values for control (s) and cerebral palsy (d)
individuals (R = Spearman’s correlation coefficient, P < 0.01).
drugs in the body (19, 20). The present study showed significantly lower than that of healthy controls, with
that salivary osmolality reflects plasma and urine protein and sialic acid levels significantly higher (27). In
osmolality. Salivary, urine and plasma osmolality all the present study, the reduction in salivary flow rate,
presented a negative correlation with the salivary flow previously reported in the literature in CP individuals,
rate in CP individuals. was confirmed and could be associated with the hypo-
Hypohydration is a condition presented in CP hydration condition. The alterations in salivary flow
individuals probably due to the fact that they are rate could explain the changes in the composition of
mainly dependent on the initiative of their caregivers to saliva from CP individuals published previously (4–7).
offer them liquids; they usually do not complain of In conclusion, cerebral palsy children seem to present
thirst and can hardly drink water by themselves, impaired adequate hydration status, as verified by
moreover, it is difficult for them to swallow all the increased salivary, urine and plasma osmolality. Since
water that is offered (21). These difficulties involved in the possible hypohydration condition may be reflected
CP justify the use of saliva to monitor systemic in saliva fluid, which could compromise the protective
conditions. The collection of saliva is an excellent and function exerted by saliva, the earlier this condition is
noninvasive option, because these individuals have identified the greater the chances of administering
distinctive characteristics, such as motor dysfunction preventive measures. Moreover, salivary osmolality is
and poor cooperation, which make it difficult to collect a reliable parameter that reflects changes in plasma and
urine, blood or other body fluids. urine
Salivary fluid and electrolytes secretions occur in the
acinar cells and along the duct system of salivary glands.
References
The acinar cells membrane has ion-transporter channels
and regulatory protein responses for the transport of 1. Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, et al. A report: the
electrolytes and water into the lumen of the salivary definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006.
glands (22–24). This secretion has a concentration Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl 2007; 109: 8–14.
isotonic to blood and plasma-like composition. The 2. Kuban KC, Leviton A. Cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med
1994; 330: 188–95.
salivary gland duct system plays an active role in the
3. Hirtz D, Thurman DJ, Gwinn-Hardy K, Mohamed M,
secretion of salivary fluid and electrolytes. When saliva Chaudhuri AR, Zalutsky R. How common are the
passes through the salivary ducts, it undergoes signi- ‘‘common’’ neurologic disorders? Neurology 2007; 68:
ficant changes involving reabsorption of electrolytes 326–37.
and bicarbonate release, influencing the salivary osmo- 4. Santos MT, Guaré R, Leite M, Ferreira MC, Nicolau J.
lality (24). Does the neuromotor abnormality type affect the salivary
Some studies have considered a relationship between parameters in individuals with cerebral palsy? J Oral
salivary flow rate and salivary composition for several Pathol Med 2010; 39: 770–4.
conditions. With the increase of the age, an increase is 5. Siqueira WL, Rodrigues Santos MT, De Oliveira E,
observed in the unstimulated salivary flow rate, followed Nicolau J. Comparison of electrolyte concentrations in
whole saliva of individuals with and without cerebral
by the pH, and a protein level decrease (25). The palsy. Quintessence Int 2007; 38: 301–6.
influence of stimulation of the salivary flow rate on the 6. Rodrigues Santos MT, Siqueira WL, Nicolau J. Amylase
secretion pattern was investigated and the concentration and peroxidase activities and sialic acid concentration in
of total protein was different in the resting and stimu- saliva of adolescents with cerebral palsy. Quintessence Int
lated whole saliva, while no differences were observed in 2007; 38: 467–72.
the concentration of mucin (26). A study showed that 7. Siqueira WL, Santos MT, Elangovan S, Simoes A,
the salivary flow rate of Down’s syndrome subjects was Nicolau J. The influence of valproic acid on salivary pH
586
in children with cerebral palsy. Spec Care Dentist 2007; 27: 19. Freudenberg JA, Bembas K, Greene MI, Zhang H.
64–6. Non-invasive, ultra-sensitive, high-throughput assays to
8. Shirreffs SM. Markers of hydration status. J Sports Med quantify rare biomarkers in the blood. Methods 2008;
Phys Fitness 2000; 40: 80–4. 46: 33–8.
9. Armstrong LE. Assessing hydration status: the elusive 20. Pink R, Simek J, Vondrakova J, et al. Saliva as a
gold standard. J Am Coll Nutr 2007; 26: 575S–84S. diagnostic medium. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky,
10. Popowski LA, Oppliger RA, Patrick Lambert G, Johnson Olomouc Czech Republic 2009; 153: 103–10.
Rf, Kim Johnson A, Gisolf CV. Blood and urinary 21. Dos Santos MT, Nogueira ML. Infantile reflexes and their
measures of hydration status during progressive acute effects on dental caries and oral hygiene in cerebral palsy
dehydration. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 747–53. individuals. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 880–5.
11. Oliver SJ, Laing SJ, Wilson S, Bilzon JL, Walsh NP. 22. Murakami M, Murdiastuti K, Hosoi K, Hill AE. AQP
Saliva indices track hypohydration during 48h of fluid and the control of fluid transport in a salivary gland.
restriction or combined fluid and energy restriction. Arch J Membr Biol 2006; 210: 91–103.
Oral Biol 2008; 53: 975–80. 23. Proctor GB, Carpenter GH. Regulation of salivary gland
12. Walsh NP, Laing JS, Oliver JS, Montague CJ, Walters R, function by autonomic nerves. Autonom Neurosci 2007;
Bilzon J. Saliva parameters as potential indices of hydra- 133: 3–18.
tion status during acute dehydration. Med Sci Sports 24. Nauntofte B. Regulation of electrolyte and fluid secre-
Exerc 2004; 36: 1535–42. tion in salivary acinar cells. Am J Physiol 1992; 263:
13. Walsh NP, Montague JC, Callow N, Rowlands AV. Saliva 823–37.
flow rate, total protein concentration and osmolality as 25. Wu KP, Ke JY, Chung CY, et al. Relationship between
potential markers of whole body hydration status during unstimulated salivary flow rate and saliva composition of
progressive acute dehydration in humans. Arch Oral Biol healthy children in Taiwan. Chang Gung Med J 2008; 31:
2004; 49: 149–54. 281–6.
14. Santos MT, Guaré RO, Leite MF, Ferreira MC, Durão 26. Rayment SA, Liu B, Soares RV, Offner GD, Oppenheim
MS, Jardim JR. Salivary osmolality in individuals with FG, Troxler RF. The effects of duration and intensity of
cerebral palsy. Arch Oral Biol 2010; 55: 855–60. stimulation on total protein and mucin concentrations in
15. Kuban KC, Allred EN, O’Shea M, et al. An algorithm for resting and stimulated whole saliva. J Dental Res 2001; 80:
identifying and classifying cerebral palsy in young chil- 1584–7.
dren. J Pediatr 2008; 153: 466–72. 27. Yarat A, Akyüz S, Koç L, Erdem H, Emekli N. Salivary
16. Ship JA, Fischer DJ. The relationship between dehydra- sialic acid, protein, salivary flow rate, pH, buffering
tion and parotid salivary gland function in young and capacity and caries indices in subjects with Down’s
older healthy adults. J Gerontol, Ser A, Biol Sci Med Sci syndrome. J Dent 1999; 27: 115–8.
1997; 52: M310–9.
17. Shore AC, Markandu ND, Sagnella GA, et al. Endocrine
and renal response to water loading and water restriction Acknowledgements
in normal man. Clin Sci 1988; 75: 171–7. This study was supported by the Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do
18. Manz F, Wentz A, Sichert-Hellert W. The most essential
Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) under protocol number 08 ⁄ 00960-6.
nutrient: defining the adequate intake of water. J Pediatr
2002; 141: 587–92.