Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Inductive Method

The opposite of direct method and deductive method is inductive method. This is also
called indirect instruction.

The inquiry method problem or problem solving method and project method fall under
indirect, guided and exploratory approach to instruction. They begin with questions,
problems and details and end up with answer, generalizations, and conclusions. Therefore,
they will fall under the inductive method of teaching, the opposite of the deductive method.
Advantages

1. The learners are more engaged in the teaching-learning process. With our facilitating
skills, learners formulate the generalization or rule.
2. Learning becomes more interesting at the outset because we begin with the
experiences of our students. We begin with what they know.
3. It helps the development of our learners’ higher-order-thinking-skills (HOTS). To see
patterns and analyze the same in order to arrive at generalizations requires analytic
thinking.
Disadvantages

1. It requires more time and so less subject matter will be covered. We need much time
to lead our students to formulation of generalization.
2. It demands expert facilitating skills on the part of the teacher. We’ve got to ask the
right questions, organize answer and lead the learners to the generalization or
conclusion.

Inductive Method

The opposite of direct method and deductive method is inductive method. This is also
called indirect instruction.
The inquiry method problem or problem solving method and project method fall under
indirect, guided and exploratory approach to instruction. They begin with questions,
problems and details and end up with answer, generalizations, and conclusions. Therefore,
they will fall under the inductive method of teaching, the opposite of the deductive method.
Advantages

4. The learners are more engaged in the teaching-learning process. With our facilitating
skills, learners formulate the generalization or rule.
5. Learning becomes more interesting at the outset because we begin with the
experiences of our students. We begin with what they know.
6. It helps the development of our learners’ higher-order-thinking-skills (HOTS). To see
patterns and analyze the same in order to arrive at generalizations requires analytic
thinking.
Disadvantages

3. It requires more time and so less subject matter will be covered. We need much time
to lead our students to formulation of generalization.
4. It demands expert facilitating skills on the part of the teacher. We’ve got to ask the
right questions, organize answer and lead the learners to the generalization or
conclusion.

You might also like