National Disaster Management Guidelines
National Disaster Management Guidelines
Management Guidelines
1
Contents
Foreword
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations
Glossary of Terms
Executive Summary
1.0 Introduction
Chapter 5, the final chapter, depicts the CBDRR best practices and
3
strives to learn and document lessons on the resilience of communities
in disaster risk reduction and coping with climate change as well.
ABBREVIATIONS
5
Glossary of term
Capacity
The combination of all the strengths, attributes and resources available within a community,
society or organization that can be used to achieve agreed goals.
Capacity may include infrastructure and physical means, institutions, societal coping abilities, as
well as human knowledge, skills and collective attributes such as social relationships, leadership
and management. Capacity also may be described as capability. Capacity assessment is a term for
the process by which the capacity of a group is reviewed against desired goals, and the capacity
gaps are identified for further action.
Capacity Building
It includes (i) identification of existing resources and resources to be acquired or created; (ii)
acquiring or creating resources identified under (i); (iii) organization and training of personnel and
coordination of such training for effective management of disasters
Capacity development
The process by which people, organizations and society systematically stimulate and develop their
capacities over time to achieve social and economic goals, including through improvement of
knowledge, skills, systems, and institutions.
Capacity development is a concept that extends the term of capacity building to encompass all
aspects of creating and sustaining capacity growth over time. It involves learning and various types
of training, but also continuous efforts to develop institutions, political awareness, financial
resources, technology systems, and the wider social and cultural enabling environment.
Disaster
Disaster means a catastrophe, mishap, calamity or grave occurrence in any area, arising from
natural or man made causes, or by accident or negligence which results in substantial loss of life or
human suffering or damage to, and destruction of, property, or damage to, or degradation of,
environment, and is of such a nature or magnitude as to be beyond the coping capacity of the
community of the affected area
Hazard
A dangerous phenomenon, substance, human activity or condition that may cause loss of life,
injury or other health impacts, property damage, loss of livelihoods and services, social and
economic disruption, or environmental damage.
Resilience
The ability of a system, community or society exposed to hazards to resist, absorb, accommodate
to and recover from the effects of a hazard in a timely and efficient manner, including through the
preservation and restoration of its essential basic structures and functions.
Vulnerability
The characteristics and circumstances of a community, system or asset that make it susceptible to
the damaging effects of a hazard.
7
Chapter - 1
Introduction
8
Chapter - 1
Introduction
Globally communities are facing a series of new challenges and disasters are
increasingly recognized as a threat to development gains, poverty reduction, and
achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
i. Disaster risk reduction measures are most successful when they involve the direct
participation of the people most likely to be exposed to hazards. Community is the first
to respond to a disaster.
Investments in community- based preparedness and early warning systems have proved
to save lives, protect property, and reduce economic losses.
ii. Failure to understand the risk behavior and culture of local communities
can lead to badly designed preparedness measures including early warning systems .
iii. The involvement of local people promotes self-reliance and ensures that
emergency management plans meet local needs and circumstances. indigenous
knowledge, wisdom and innovation with respect to hazards and mitigation.
iv. Disaster relief and recovery responses that do not directly involvethe affected
communities frequently provide inappropriate and unsustainable forms of assistance.
v. Organized communities are better able to demand downward accountability.
A community-level focus facilitates the identification of vulnerable groups.
Therefore, community based disaster risk reduction has emerged as a key priority area
in disaster risk management. Being the first responders in such situations, the
community assumes significance in disaster response, mitigation and management
interventions.
―Where communities are equipped and prepared, disasters clearly have much
lesser impact, especially in terms of the loss of lives‖. (UNISDR)
9
(b) Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction:
After the Hyogo Framework of Actions efforts are now focused on building risk resilience
as mandated in priorities of Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (2015-2030)
by helping communities mitigate the impacts of inevitable disasters.
India is one of the ten worst disaster prone countries of the world. The country is prone
to disasters due to number of factors; both natural and human induced, including
adverse geo climatic conditions, topographic features, environmental degradation,
population growth, urbanisation, industrialization, non scientific development practices
etc. Climate change is further expected to increase the frequency and intensity of extreme
weather events and gave rise to new vulnerabilities with differential spatial and socio-
economic impacts on communities.
Since community is the first responder in case of any disaster occurrence the
government is reinforcing the need to encourage community level initiatives for disaster
preparedness in various policy documents.
These policy instruments empower communities to plan and implement programmes and
respond to disasters effectively. This would include increasing their awareness,
enhancing their skills to respond better with training and capacity building on rescue and
relief services. Providing for early warning systems and development of community
based Disaster Management Plan.
Section 22(2)(i) of the DM Act 2005 promote general education, awareness and
community training in regard to various disaster to which States/UTs are vulnerable. It
also emphasis on taking suitable measures to prevent, mitigate and respond to disaster.
Section 30(2)(xiii) facilitate community training and awareness programmes for
prevention of disaster or mitigation with support of local authorities, governmental and
non-governmental oganisations. It encourages participation of non- governmental
organizations and voluntary social-welfare institutions working at the grassroots level in
10
the district for disaster management.
The most powerful mention for community involvement is in the context of State Disaster
Management Authorities(SDMAs) and District Disaster Management Authorities
(DDMAs). The DDMA headed by Collector or District Magistrate or Deputy
Commissioner and co-chaired by an elected representative is encouraged to involve
non-governmental organizations and voluntary social welfare institutions working at the
grassroots level in the district for disaster management.
The National Policy on Disaster Management 2009 (NPDM) lays special emphasis on
community based disaster preparedness (Para 5.3.1 and 5.3.2 of Chapter 5 on Disaster
Prevention, Mitigation and Preparedness).The policy recognizes community as the
bedrock of the process of disaster response. It also gives emphasize on training,
simulations and mock drills of vulnerable sections. It also promote stakeholder
participation including encouragement to Non-Governmental Organizations for
community empowerment.
On response matters, the community has been given due recognition in all the relief and
response processes including animal care and relief camp management. In the
reconstruction phase, the policy outlines the concept of the owner driven reconstruction.
It also prioritizes training for developing community based DM systems for their specific
needs in view of the regional diversities and multi-hazard vulnerabilities.
The National Disaster Management Plan (NDMP) 2019 reinforces the need for
enhancing the capacity of communities, as they are the first responders to disasters and
this capacity building includes awareness, sensitization, orientation and developing skills
of communities and community leaders.
1.2. Community Based Disaster Risk Reduction (CBDRR) – Brief Overview:
11
Equity and inclusion of marginalized segments of the society and bringing the vulnerable
groups to the center stage of planning and implementation of the CBDRR, has to be
prioritized to make the efforts participatory and inclusive. Disasters affect the entire
community, however, persons with disability, women and children, under-privileged,
older persons and pregnant women need special attention at the implementation level.
Capacity building and training of community is the mainstay of community based disaster
risk reduction for building disaster resilient community. Considering the large number of
stakeholders and community representatives that needs to be sensitized and trained, it is
important that capacity building and training interventions be meticulously planned and
decentralized.
The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments recognize Panchayati Raj Institutions
(PRI) and Municipalities as „institutions of self – government‟.
They were put in place to decentralize and devolve financial and administrative
powers through a tiered structure from the district downwards right up to the Gram Sabha
level. In the case of urban self- government, the devolution is to be up to the ward level.
The paradigm of CBDRR is entirely in keeping with this constitutional recognition of the
importance of decentralization and devolution of powers. It, further, intends to extend it to
the arena of disaster management.
The community based organizations shall work in overall partnership with local
authorities in States/UTs. The elected representatives of these local bodies are the key
stakeholders through whom effective participation and ownership by local communities
can be achieved in CBDRR.
Sustainability
A targeted CBDRR strategy calls for integration with other major non-government
stakeholders such as NGOs, community based organizations, human rights
organizations, community leaders, volunteers, business and industry groups, etc. All
these stakeholders must see their roles as mutually complementary and should share
common views and goals regarding CBDRR.
The scope of these guidelines is and to outline the roles and responsibilities of
various stakeholders in CBDRR and to provide a framework for mainstreaming
community based disaster risk reduction in the ongoing programmes and schemes of the
Government of India.
12
Chapter 2
13
Chapter-2
The resilient community is the one which, thus, can absorb, respond, adapt and
transform wherever it is necessary. Practices across India have been empirically
successful in addressing disaster risks and vulnerabilities by using knowledge –
including traditional or those learnt as a result of experiences and comprehending
resources from the several government programmes and schemes. The important
aspect, however, has been the demonstration of community fortitude and
resilience. The attempts of this chapter is to focus upon relevant concepts and
theories in order to develop an operational framework for all stakeholders –
community, institutions enabling community participation, government as well as
non-government entities undertaking community based disaster risk reduction
interventions. The stakeholders, further, shall integrate the theoretical as well as
empirical knowledge to result in resilience building in the community as the first
responder in the case of disaster. The aim is to enable eminent practices of
community based disaster risk reduction.
Before comprehending on to the (key) elements of resilience communities, a
glimpse on the following would be helpful:
14
a) Community-at-risk
Large number of people has an existential reality with disasters and majority of
them believe that disasters are innately related to their fate. Many amongst
functionaries – ordained for disaster management – too reinforce their mindset or
attitude by merely providing relief when disasters occur but take no action or effort
to prevent or mitigate the impact of in any development intervention. Access to
information, knowledge skill and resources for disaster risk reduction and climate
change adaptation often prove to be a big challenge. The problem gets further
compounded by various inequities existing in our society. However, several studies
have proved that communities or people-at-risk have indeed a keen interest and
capacity to come together and work with the various governmental institutions to
make the community resilient.
CBDRR, by its very content and purpose, needs to be identified with engaging
processes, as mentioned below, that can bring resilience in its operations.
a) Engaging community and enabling creation of volunteers in a reflective exercise
so as to fundamentally bring attitudinal shift for proactive and resilient action.
15
b) Engaging with institutions, government and non-government as well, and
developing the appropriate programming framework of such engagement by
realizing their own capacities for resilience.
c) Comprehending the developmental processes of government, especially through
various government schemes/programmes directly and indirectly related to
responding, preventing or mitigating disasters.
d) Indentifying vulnerable and risk reduction measures prioritizing by the
communities themselves, especially with respect to sensitive sections of
population such as women, children and weaker sections who are more often
susceptible to the vulnerabilities.
e) Understanding and enlisting livelihood opportunities.
f) Preparing Disaster Risk Reduction Plans and drawing out outcomes by intensive
engagement with government and governmental institutions.
g) Implementation of Disaster Risk Reduction plan.
h) Documentation of lessons learnt after a disaster and bringing out aspects of
community resilience therein .
In brief, CBDRR process comprises localized action, enabling participating risk analysis,
and preparing disaster management plan by mainstreaming disaster risk reduction and
climate change adaptation concerns onto the development process.
16
b. Participatory Approach with community as lead:
Every individual participates as per his or her perception about the gaps and needs for
resilience. A participatory approach shall be worked out for participatory learning and
voluntary action for ―risk aware disaster and development planning‖ through the
coordination of various stakeholders from community to PRIs.
As the process takes these individuals through various learning experiences and
exchanges the perception of the Individuals gradually change and he or she starts to
realize the importance of collective thinking and action. This results into formation of
formal community based institutions and informal groups which help individuals to
express their concerns and needs for development and risk reduction.
These levels of participation are participant, concerned citizen, actor and leader. These
levels of participation are dynamic in nature and for managing this dynamism a
facilitator is brought in.
While it is important that we follow a process and do it efficiently within a given time
frame and resources (human, physical and financial), further it needs to be ensured,
that no step is left midway or incomplete without achieving the desired result. CBDRR
processes are not just steps but a process of change (attitude, behavioral and capacity)
for enhancing resilience of the community. It requires long term commitment by the
community as well as facilitators as its impact is not visible in economic terms gains.
17
awareness generation and must devise locally and culturally appropriate participation
methodologies.
f. Inclusive Approach:
2.4 Road map for implementation of CBDRR – Steps for Preparing Communities
for DM planning and action
This is a systematic step which helps to identify area of intervention based on the criteria
of vulnerability and probability of disasters. The purpose of area identification is to
gather primary information about disaster affected community and verify readiness of the
community to participate in the CBDRR process. This is also an opportunity for the
facilitator to build initial rapport with community leaders, PRI members and government
frontline workers. Area identification is done using a checklist explaining criteria for
community selection and a primary visit to the community. The basic information
gathered from this process step also needs to be consolidated in a brief village/local
area profile.
2.4.2: Inception Meeting in village: Inception meeting as the first activity in the
18
village shall help to disseminate information about the CBDRR process to the key
stakeholders and sets formal relationship with Gram Panchayat (GP) level functionaries.
The meeting shall also ensure the participation of elected representatives and
government frontline workers especially the Panchayat Mukhiya, GP Secretary, ASHA
worker, Rojgar Sewak, ICDS worker, Shiksah Mitra and community leaders . This
meeting shall help in identifying the problems faced for service delivery and identify the
mechanisms to ensure that the services remain functional during disaster situation. This
process initiates a dialogue within all stakeholders including PRIs that continues
throughout the CBDRR process especially during mainstreaming DRR into Gram
Panchayat planning.
These meetings shall provide opportunity for the community to discuss its own
experiences of past disasters which have affected the village/ local area emphasizing on
real life individual experiences besides discussing the changing weather scenarios and
likely implications. The idea of VDMC/LADMC (Village Disaster Management
Committee/Local Area DM Committee) shall also be introduced in these meetings. The
discussion in these meetings shall focus around history of disasters, destruction,
mitigation efforts, adaptability, preparedness, and review of what happened in the
village during the last disaster that the village has experienced. The community
members shall also discuss ―what needs to be done to deal with these situations?‖ The
idea of VDMC (Village Disaster Management Committee) shall also be introduced in
these meetings. Extracts/Abstracts from Newspapers or other sources about recent
disaster in the area and real life photographs indicating suffering due to disaster shall be
used as IEC material for facilitating these meetings.
i. Hazard, Vulnerability and Capacity Map: Hazard, Vulnerability and Capacity map
is a significant tool in identifying the risks. This involves drawing the main features and
landmarks of the community as a map. The community drawn map includes houses,
community facilities, roads, bridges and natural resources. Community members also
mark the area which is affected by hazards, vulnerable households and services which
are at risk during disaster. Mapping also provides opportunity for the community
members to discuss about problems and issues. One of the VDMC/LADMC members
can document the deliberations held.
i. Seasonal calendar: Seasonal calendar shows when hazards occur and when
livelihood activities and other significant events take place. It shows months which put
community at risk and the seasons which are relatively safer. Seasonal calendar
provides significant information for preparedness planning.
ii. Focused group discussion: To ensure views and experiences of all stakeholders
(class, caste and strata of the community)- are involved in focused group discussion
collectively and individually which shall be organized by the facilitator with the help of
VDMC/LADMC.
iv. Risk analysis and prioritization:
Analyzing information gathered from mapping and seasonal calendar shall be taken up
to state the risks faced by the community and identify the gaps. After discussion about
the information gathered; the villagers/local area dwellers shall draw risk statements.
The risk analysis process shall involve analyzing intensity, frequency and seasonality of
hazards and its possible impact on most vulnerable groups. At the end of the analysis,
21
communities shall arrive at consensus on prioritising risk statements, which become
basis for risk reduction planning. Documentation of lessons learnt by local communities
should be undertaken by VDMCs and should also be shared with local authorities
/district authorities for further learning/developmental training.
2.5 Disaster Risk Reduction planning
Planning shall focus on reducing the existing risks and preparing for potential risks.
Disaster risk reduction planning shall focus on safety of the self, the family and the
community. This participatory process shall involve all community members, along with
Mukhiya, Gram Sewak & frontline workers and shall propose concrete risk reduction
measures that shall have links to the development programmes. The funds required to
implement each activity shall also be estimated/projected.
The risk reduction plans formulated by the communities include activities which need
resource support from Government (District/Local Area Administration). Panchayati Raj
22
Institutions/ULBs shall play a significant role in planning and implementing various
development schemes and programmes. The mitigation and prevention activities from
risk reduction plans shall be integrated in Gram Panchayat (GP)/ULB plans.
VDMC members, ward member and Mukhia shall have a vital role to play in making GP
plans risk informed and in building the capacity of the community.
Ward Sabha: VDMC members shall mobilize community for organizing Ward Sabhas.
Respective ward member is the Chairperson for Ward Sabha. The agenda for the
meeting shall recommend DRR action plan indicating ward wise activities of risk
reduction, which can be incorporated in the GP Plan for leveraging funds. VDMC
members will make comprehensive presentation of risk reduction plan in Ward Sabha
and a resolution will be passed by Ward Sabha for proposed work to be done by GP for
risk reduction.
Gram Sabha (GS): The Sarpanch and Gram Panchayat Secretary shall be responsible
to manage the administrative functions before, during and after Gram Sabha. The ward
member with the help of VDMC shall prepare the checklist of activities on DRR
measures that are needed. The Gram Sabha shall prioritize the resolutions provided by
each Ward Sabha keeping in mind the vulnerability of the area and modify accordingly
to be approved by the Gram Sabha. In cases where the gap between the demand and
the actual availability of funds for undertaking development projects the Gram Sabha
shall prioritize the felt needs of the people. The Gram Sabha based on that address
highest priority risk issue.
After Gram Sabha, Mukhia, Ward Members and VDMCs have joint responsibility to
follow up the Gram Panchayat plan at Panchayat Samiti level so that timely
implementation of risk mitigation activties is ensured. Follow up of planned work is one
of the significant tasks of VDMCs where VDMCs in coordination with Ward Member and
Mukhiya constantly correspond with Panchayat Samiti, respective line departments and
Zilla Parishad. In some cases, VDMCs also act as pressure groups. However all VDMCs
need to know the planning systems of PRIs from GP to District planning committee.
***Similar process to be followed at the urban local area level.
CBDRR approach believes that community is the first responder to the disasters and
thus preparedness becomes significant milestone for effective implementation of
CBDRR activities. Community level disaster preparedness is a process of acquiring
knowledge about existing risk, identifying coping mechanisms and skills to respond
during disasters. Community level preparedness is responsibility of all the community
members at individual, family and at community levels.
2.9.1 Awareness
One of the key steps of preparedness for the VDMC/LADMC is awareness generation
to mobilize and motivate community members to acquire knowledge about existing risk,
identify coping mechanisms and prepare the disaster management plans. Meetings with
key persons of a village/local area such as the village head, health worker, school
teachers, elected representatives and members of the youth clubs and women also
motivates the villagers to carry forward these plans for a safer living.
The community has to :
Introduction
Learning experiences
a. Apda Mitra scheme of NDMA provided opportunities for learning and skill building
and enabled young people to take a more active and constructive role in society.
b. After undergoing training a sense of responsibility and self-respect has enhanced
in volunteers in view of Disaster Risk Reduction at community level. These volunteers
are also very supportive in providing psychosocial support to community and
enhance the confidence level of the disaster prone community.
c. It enhances the ability of Apda Mitra to think creatively for generating locally
appropriate solutions from existing resources.
d. Trained Apda Mitra are now able to know the types of hazards that are most likely
to affect their region and steps to be taken to prepare themselves.
e. They are working as liaison between the disaster management committees at
community level and District Disaster Management Authority to disseminate the early
warning of disaster regularly.
f. Creation of portal with volunteers database where in the place of residence of the
volunteers is geo-tagged and the contact details are duly updated. The portal will be
immense advantage during any emergency situation.
g. Women's participation in 'search and rescue' is possible and beneficial. When
efforts are made to ensure a culturally sensitive environment for women to learn new
skills, women are willing to shed their inhibitions and come forward to learn.
There are times when impact of the disaster may exceed the preparedness capacities
25
of communities. While it is important to remain prepared in advance, it is equally
important to remain active and prepared for ―response‖ or even for quick and better
recovery. There are few processes which are crucial during response such as:
a. Early warning
b. Evacuation and Rescue
c. First Aid
d. Relief: Food, Water and Sanitation
e. Damage Assessment
f. Carcass disposal
g. Emergency shelter and camp management.
Response of Adpa Mitra during Dussehra Idol immersion (2019), District Supaul
200 volunteers were trained in flood risk mitigation techniques in District Supaul under Apda
Mitra Scheme. These trained volunteers performed efficiently in crowd management during
Idol immersion process during Dussehra. They also rescued people from drowning.
200 volunteers including 55 women volunteers got trained in District Sitamadhi one of the
severely flood prone district of Bihar for flood risk mitigation within Apda Mitra scheme. Under
overall supervision of District Magistrate Sitamadhi Apda Mitra were actively involved in search
& Rescue and relief operations at Dumrikala Panchayat, Majorganj block, District Sitamadhi
during flooding in 2019.
The only way to know if a response or contingency plan will work is to put it into action,
evaluate it, and revise it as appropriate.
These simulation exercises shall be taken up in schools, sub- centers, anganwadi,
panchayat or other community institutions. This could also be implemented in residential
communities/ neighbourhoods Mock drill calendar shall also be developed at village
level looking at various local hazards.
CBDRR-Capacity building is a process that shall help the stakeholder to acquire and
enhance necessary knowledge, skills and attitudes to perform their tasks and duties for
risk- resilience. The CBDRR process takes community through various experiences of
interaction, assessment, planning, coordination and implementation. This shall thus
require continuous capacity building of various stakeholders. Capacity building needs to
be made a more regular exercise and awareness has to be built amongst the
Community Building Organizations, Resident Welfare Associations and Panchayats/
Gram Sabhas, so as to sensitize all the stakeholders to take measures required for
disaster preparedness.
27
2.10.1 Case studies Community based Disaster Risk Reduction
From 14th of July 2018 as per the prediction of IMD it rains heavily in all the 12
blocks of the Kolhapur district. Excess water was received in free catchment areas
of all 13 rivers of district. Immediately water levels increased in all river basins and
alerts was declared by District Administration. Emergency Management planning
was done under the guidance of District Magistrate (Incident Commander) with all
the line department including Aapda Mitra. With the support of trained Aapda Mitra
06 lives got saved due to effective communication and efficient response by the
Aapda Mitra.
Cyclone Fani crossed Odisha coast near Satapada and Puri on 3 rd may leaving
behind devastation.14 district were affected however, Puri, Cuttak and Khorda
District was severely affected. Odisha is having 400 trained Apda Mitra in the
District Puri and Jagatsinghpur. Apda Mitra volunteers immediately came into
action and did early warning and supported in evacuation. As soon cyclone Fani
started losing grip Apda Mitra volunteers supported district administration in
clearing road, providing first aid and managing the distribution of food and medical
aid and other relief material at various relief shelters to the cyclone victim.
28
2.11 Towards sustainability
Community participation and ownership has a direct impact upon both the success and
sustainability of a CBDRR programme. All the process steps of CBDRR explained in this
chapter clearly indicate the areas, tools and activities that are required for community
participation. Engaging community leaders shall have direct influence over community-
based organizations and PRIs/ULBs to ensure sustainability.
Management of community action teams like VDMC/LADMC, thematic and preparedness
task forces are significant achievements of any standard CBDRR intervention. Their
leadership role shall be valued by communities. They are the most effective when they
are linked with other community based organizations to allow sharing of information and
experiences and coordination of activities. The selection of appropriate members for the
committees or action teams shall be critical for sustainability of the intervention.
CBDRR catalysts shall be an important cadre of trained individuals who shall steer the
CBDRR process voluntarily and take significant role in coordination at community and
government levels. They have good level of acceptance from community, Panchayat
members and government officials. Strengthening capacities of identified catalysts shall
ensure sustainability of CBDRR process at community level.
The Disaster Management Act 2005 has provisions for creation of response and
mitigation funds. In States where these funds have got established, DDMAs can set aside a
part of the fund for the VDMCs/LADMCs/ULBDMCs.The SDRF is the primary Fund
available with States for disaster response. States do have the flexibility to meet capacity
development expenses from SDRF subject to a limit of 10 percent of the said Fund. The
XIV Finance Commission (FC) has recommended that decision of constituting District
Disaster Response Funds (DDRFs) is best left to the wisdom of the State Governments,
and hence, separate grants for the financing of DDRFs are not recommended. The FC –
XIV did not make any specific recommendation for mitigation fund.
29
As mandated by Government of India 30% funds from all central schemes will be
invested for disaster innovation, mitigation and adaptation. The funds available with the
DDMAs may be used for the capacity building of the VDMCs, preparation of the VDMPs.
Capacity Building Grant under FC-XIV provided to various States may be used for
CBDM related trainings. The Local Area Development Scheme of Member of
Parliaments can be used to finance the activities of VDMC. Funds of Panchayats and
Urban Local Bodies gained from taxes, duties, tolls, fees and grants-in-aid, donations,
investments, interest returns, and other sources can also be used for disaster
management purposes. The Ministry of Programme Implementation has revised the
MPLADS scheme to include flood shelters, cyclone shelters, etc.
In addition to government funds, donations and grants from the private sector, such as
research institutions, individuals and companies can be used to fund disaster
management measures.
*****
30
Chapter 3
Institutional Framework
31
Chapter 3
Institutional Framework
3.1 Disaster Management Institutions in India
The Act covers community based disaster risk reduction, wherein Section 22(2)(i)
of the Act promotes general education, awareness and community training with regard to
different forms of disasters and on taking suitable measures by community to prevent the
disaster, mitigate and respond to any disaster. Similarly, Section 30(2)(xiii) facilitates
community training and awareness programmes for prevention of disaster or mitigation
with support of local authorities, governmental and non-governmental organizations. This
encourages participation of non- governmental organizations and voluntary social-welfare
institutions working at the grassroots level in the district for disaster management.
Further the Act explains that DDMA headed by Collector or District Magistrate or
Deputy Commissioner and co-chaired by an elected representative as the Co-
Chairperson will act as the planning, coordinating and implementing authorities for
disaster management at the District level and take all necessary measures.
For the purpose of CBDRR, local authorities including Panchayati Raj Institutions
(PRI), Municipalities, Cantonment Boards and Town Planning Authorities which control
and manage civic services, have also been identified by the DM Act. These bodies will
ensure capacity building of their officers and employees for managing disasters, carry out
relief, rehabilitation and reconstruction activities in the affected areas and will prepare DM
Plans in consonance with guidelines of the NDMA, SDMAs and DDMAs. Besides, the
local authorities are encouraged to involve non- governmental organizations, voluntary
organizations, social welfare organizations, etc. working at the grassroots level in the
district for disaster management.
32 | P a g e
The Act mandates strong association of the community and civil society with the
CBDRR process through strategies of awareness generation, capacity building and
training.
Similarly, the National Policy on Disaster Management 2009 (NPDM) lays emphasis on
community based disaster preparedness (Para 5.3.1 and 5.3.2 of Chapter 5 on Disaster
Prevention, Mitigation and Preparedness) to ensure local ownership, addressing local
needs, and promoting volunteerism and mutual help to prevent and minimize damage.
The policy recognizes community as the bedrock of the process of disaster response for
which it has given emphasis on training towards various aspects of response such as
first-aid, search and rescue, management of community shelters, psycho-social
counselling, distribution of relief and accessing support from government/agencies etc. It
also promotes stakeholder participation including encouragement to Non-Governmental
Organizations for community empowerment.
The National Disaster Management Plan (NDMP) 2016 reinforces to develop the
capacities of Panchayats and ULBs in the sphere of disaster management, for which, it
has given emphasis to increase the competence of local bodies in all aspects of disaster
management, mainstreaming DRR, and in promoting a culture of disaster prevention and
DRR. Considering community is the first responder to disasters, capacity building of
community through awareness, sensitization, orientation and developing skills to
enhance the capacity of community (Section 7.4-7.5, page 134) has also been
highlighted in National Plan.
Under the 73rdand 74thConstitutional Amendments, the local government institutions have
started assuming the centre stage in bringing effective, efficient, people-centric and
responsive system in a decentralized mode of governance. This recognizes Panchayati
Raj Institutions (PRI) and Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) as ‗institutions of self –
government‘ at local level with the power, authority and resources. They are put in place
to decentralize and devolve financial and administrative powers through a tiered structure
from the district downwards right up to the Gram Sabha level. In the case of urban self-
government, the devolution is to be up to the ward level.
33 | P a g e
While implementing various development schemes/ programmes, DRR aspects can be
integrated keeping in view of the constitutional recognition of the importance of
decentralization and devolution of powers.
Besides the local government, some other organizations/ schemes likeNehru Yuva
Kendra Sangathan (NYKS), National Social Services (NSS), Civil Defence, etc. play a
crucial role in disaster risk reduction.
Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan (NYKS): the largest grassroots level youth
organization under the umbrella Scheme called ‗Rashtriya Yuva Sashaktikaran
Karyakram‘(RYSK)has taken up an initiative on preparing Disaster Response Teams
(DRTs) of NYKS Youth Volunteers for DRR in collaboration with National Disaster
Response Force (NDRF)on the principles of voluntarism, self-help and community
participation. The volunteers of NYKS act as an interface between affected community
and concerned stakeholders to provide initial rescue and relief services. In addition, the
volunteers are also engaged in other activities like undertaking mock drills at local levels;
generating awareness amongst village communities, peer education and participating
Gram Sabha meetings on DRR during normal time.
Youth networks like NYKS have a fair gender balance because they comprise of a pool
of young and dynamic women as well as men, who strive to bring gender equity in
community activities. In Delhi NCR region NYKS volunteers are playing pivotal role in
motivating and training community members to take up a more proactive role in disaster
preparedness. They are using the visual medium to communicate awareness
messages to those community members who have limited reading skills. Women
volunteers from NYKS are striving to enhance the participation of community in
Disaster Risk Reduction process by supporting the district administration. Their efforts
have succeeded in generating interest among women members of community also and
persuaded them to come forward and contribute to building the disaster preparedness
of their community.
34 | P a g e
(Source: Delhi Disaster Management Authority)
National Service Scheme (NSS): the Scheme was initiated with an aim to take
part in various government led community service activities and programmes. While
studying, these student volunteers undertake community development activities and
facilitate relief and rescue operations during emergency disaster situations. They also
sanitize the affected area, prepare food packets for disaster victims, run common kitchen
and distributes medicines.
Civil Defence: the organization was established under the then Emergency Relief
Organization (ERO) Scheme has been suitably amended by the Civil Defence
(Amendment) Act, 2009 to include disaster management as an additional role for the Civil
Defence Corps, while retaining its primary role.
In addition, there are some other organizations and schemes works at community
level for upliftment of the people in society. As these organizations work at community
level, they also actively involved in disaster related activities and particularly during
disaster situations. In this context, the role and functions of Home Guards & Fire
Services, National Cadet Corps (NCC)/ Scouts & Guides, Auxiliary Nurse
Midwives(ANM), Anganwadi Workers(AWW), Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA)
etc. can‘t be ignored.
35 | P a g e
Role of Civil Defence Volunteers in DRR
Source: DDMA
36 | P a g e
3.3 Community Based Organizations
37 | P a g e
Chapter IV
38 | P a g e
Chapter 4
Action stakeholders Plan for Implementation:
Roles and Responsibilities of various stakeholders
Sl. Major Theme Activities and Responsibilities (at Centre / State / Local levels)
No. Activity (Centre) Responsibility Activity (State) Responsibility (State/ Others)
(Centre)
1. Hazard, Risk & Provide Guidelines for NDMA Provide Guidelines for Hazard, SDMAs & DDMAs
Vulnerability Hazard, Risk & Risk & Vulnerability Analysis
Analysis Vulnerability Analysis
Ensuring Hazard, Risk & Village Disaster Management
Vulnerability Identification Committee, RWAs under
supervision of DDMAs
Resource Inventory Village Disaster Management
Committee, RWAs
Preparation of Hazard and Village Disaster Management
Resource Map through Committee, RWAs
Participatory Rural Appraisal
and Participatory Appraisal at
RWAs level
39 | P a g e
Sl. Major Theme Activities and Responsibilities (at Centre / State / Local levels)
No. Activity (Centre) Responsibility Activity (State) Responsibility (State/ Others)
(Centre)
Identify hazard specific DDMAs in consultation with Village
vulnerabilities faced by the Disaster Management Committee
community and RWAs, VOs, CBOs, NGOs
40 | P a g e
Sl. Major Central/ State/ other Agencies and their Responsibilities
No. Theme Activity (Centre) Responsibility Activity (State/ Others) Responsibility – (State/ Others)
– (Centre)
VDMCs and RWAs in DRR Management , SDMAs, DDMAs
committees
2. Main- Inclusion of CBDRR into All concerned Inclusion of CBDRR into all All Concerned Departments
streaming all Schemes Ministries and Schemes
CBDRR Departments
(MoRD,
MoHUA)
Evaluation of mainstreaming Department of Rural
activities through Social Audit Development, Department of
Urban Development
Third Party Evaluation of impact All concerned Departments/
of various activities SDMAs/ DDMAs, CBOs, NGOs
3. Funds Earmark specific All Ministries/ Earmark specific budgetary All Departments
budgetary allocations Departments allocations towards CBDRR
towards CBDRR
Guidelines for utilization Ministry of Mobilize and utilizeCSR Fund SDMAs/ DDMAs/ District
of CSR Funds in CBDRR Corporate towards implementation of the Administration
Affairs inclusive actions
Strengthening of SHGs State Govt., NABARD, etc.
Issue guidelines on the NITI
earmarking of funds in Aayog,
the State Disaster Ministry of
41 | P a g e
Sl. Major Central/ State/ other Agencies and their Responsibilities
No. Theme Activity (Centre) Responsibility Activity (State/ Others) Responsibility – (State/ Others)
– (Centre)
Response Fund/ Finance &
District Disaster NDMA
Response Fund for
CBDRR initiatives
4. Disaster Preparation of DMPs of VDMCs VDMCs, RWAS, NGOs, CBOs
Managemen and RWAs
t Plans Approval of DMPs of VDMCs and DDMAs
RWAs
Inter-Agency Coordination
Sl. Major Theme Central/ State/ other Agencies and their Responsibilities
No. Activity (Centre) Responsibility – Activity (State/ Others) Responsibility – (State/ Others)
(Centre)
1. Community Organize consultations with SDMAs/ DDMAs, NGOs/ Charitable
Based DRR resource organizations to Organizations
develop community based
DRM system on the local need
basis
Ensure that the community CoR/ Departments dealing with
emergency planning and Disaster Management/ DDMAs,
preparedness in place NGOs/ Charitable Organizations
42 | P a g e
Sl. Major Theme Central/ State/ other Agencies and their Responsibilities
No. Activity (Centre) Responsibility – Activity (State/ Others) Responsibility – (State/ Others)
(Centre)
2. Participation of Participation of Community CoR/ SDMAs/ DDMAs/ NGOs
Community in
DRR
3. Community Undertake capacity MoRD, MoHUA Undertake capacity building of SDMAs, DDMAs, NGOs
Based building of CBOs to CBOs to involve community in
Organizations involve community all stages of Disaster
(CBOs) in all stages of Management
Disaster
Management
Sl. Major Theme Central/ State/ other Agencies and their Responsibilities
No. Activity (Centre) Responsibility – Activity (State/ Others) Responsibility – (State/ Others)
(Centre)
1. Resource Conduct resource mapping SDMAs/ DDMAs/IDRN
Mapping and
Planning
2. Information & Make emergency MHA/ MoES (IMD)/ Make emergency information CoR/ SDMAs/ Information
Communication, information and Ministry of and early warning messages Department/ District
Early Warning early warning Information accessible to community Administration
Systems messages &Broadcasting,
43 | P a g e
Sl. Major Theme Central/ State/ other Agencies and their Responsibilities
No. Activity (Centre) Responsibility – Activity (State/ Others) Responsibility – (State/ Others)
(Centre)
accessible to (I&B) (DAVP)
community and Department of
ensure last mile Telecommunication
connectivity
including adapting
community based,
technology friendly
system for early
warning
dissemination and
awareness
generation
Develop effective IMD, NDMA Develop effective CoR/ Department dealing with
communication communication easily Disaster Management/ SDMAs/
easily understandable to DDMAs
understandable to community
community
3. Insurance – Encourage IRDAI, Ministry of Encourage Insurance Finance Department
Health/ Life Insurance Finance/ companies to provide
/Crop/ House/ companies to Department of insurance for assets
Assets/ provide insurance Banking/
for assets
44 | P a g e
Investing in DRR – Structural Measures
Sl. Major Theme Central/ State/ other Agencies and their Responsibilities
No. Activity (Centre) Responsibility Activity (State/ Others) Responsibility (State/ Others)
(Centre)
1. Multipurpose Design the Ministry of Urban Design the emergency/ PWD, Commissioner of Relief,
Shelters emergency/temp Affairs, Ministry of temporary shelters in SDMAs
orary Shelters in Rural Development consultation with community
consultation with
community
Committee for Maintenance Department dealing with Disaster
of the Emergency Shelters/ Management , COR, SDMAs,
Temporary Shelters with DDMAs, DDRCs
involvement of Community
2. Structural Audit/ Guidelines for NDMA Conducting Rapid Visual State Governments/ SDMAs/
Retrofitting Structural Safety Screening and Structural DDMAs/ Public Works Department
Audit and Rapid Safety Audit of Buildings and and Concerned Departments/
Visual Screening retrofitting taking into owners of the institutions
of buildings of consideration the Multi-
Institutions Hazard Approach
3. Housing/ Ensure construction of all Department of Urban
Reasonable social housing and Development, Department of Rural
Accommodation/ reconstruction schemes in Development, SDMAs, DDMAs/
Infrastructure consultation with community
45 | P a g e
Capacity Development
Sl. Major Theme Central/ State/ other Agencies and their Responsibilities
No. Activity (Centre) Responsibility Activity (State/ Others) Responsibility (State/ Others)
(Centre)
1. Capacity Development of NIDM Training of community in DRR SIDM/ ATIs/ SDMAs/ DDMAs/
Development Training Module
on DRR for
community
Ensure creation of a NGOs/ VOs/ CBOs/ RWAs/ DDMAs/
voluntary group within the VDMCs etc.
Community
2. Curriculum Curriculum NIDM Adaptation of curriculum for Department of Education/ Text
Development development for CBDRR and integration in all Book societies in States
Community levels of education in
Based Disaster vernacular language
Risk Reduction
3. Training Trainings on CBDRR for all ATIs, Disaster Management
State Departments Institutes
Training of volunteers NDRF and SDRF
4. Awareness Sensitize the community on State Social Welfare Departments ,
Generation/ the special needs and rights Departments dealing with Disaster
Sensitization of the Persons with Management, Media, NGOs, VOs,
Disabilities for DRR Department of Information and
Public Relation, DDMAs, SDMAs,
Women and Child Development,
46 | P a g e
Sl. Major Theme Central/ State/ other Agencies and their Responsibilities
No. Activity (Centre) Responsibility Activity (State/ Others) Responsibility (State/ Others)
(Centre)
District Disability Committees
Incorporate Ministry of Youth Orient Youth Programmes NSS, NYKS, NCC, Scouts & Guides,
CBDRR in Affairs, MHA, towards CBDRR NGOs
awareness of Ministry of Defence
youth programs
such as National
Social Service,
National Cadet
Corps
Sensitize the Ministry of Sensitize the elected Department of Panchayati Raj,
elected Parliamentary representatives at state level Department of Urban
representatives Affairs, Ministry of and below on issues of Development
at national level Panchayati Raj CBDRR
on issues of
CBDRR
Sl. Major Theme Central/ State/ other Agencies and their Responsibilities
No. Activity (Centre) Responsibility Activity (State/ Others) Responsibility (State/ Others)
(Centre)
48 | P a g e
Sl. Major Theme Central/ State/ other Agencies and their Responsibilities
No. Activity (Centre) Responsibility Activity (State/ Others) Responsibility (State/ Others)
(Centre)
1. Disaster Prepare a comprehensive State Government./ All
Management CBDRR Plan Departments concerned/ SDMAs/
Plan DDMAs/ VDMCs/ RWAs
2. Education Assistance to MoHRD/ Ensure post disaster Department of Education, DDMAs,
ensure post Department of continuation of the education
disaster School Education of Children in a safe school
continuation of atmosphere
the education of
children in a safe
school
atmosphere
3. Relief and Relief Put up the relief distribution Commissioner of Relief, DDMAs,
Centres centres in consultation with NDRF, SDRF
community
4. Medical Care/ Ensure critical Ministry of Health Ensure critical hospital care Health Department
First Aid hospital care to & Family Welfare to those who may have
those who may acquired disability due to
have acquired disasters
disability due to
disasters
5. Mental Health Provision of Ministry of Health Provision of counselling for Health Department,
Care counselling for & Family Welfare, post-traumatic stress
49 | P a g e
Sl. Major Theme Central/ State/ other Agencies and their Responsibilities
No. Activity (Centre) Responsibility Activity (State/ Others) Responsibility (State/ Others)
(Centre)
post-traumatic disorders
stress disorders
6. Health Focus on community health, Health Department, SDMAs,
especially in the aftermath of DDMAs, ANMs, Aanganwadi, ASHA
a disaster Worker, VDMCs, RWAs, CBOs,
NGOs
Training for community Health Department, SDMAs,
health in the aftermath of DDMAs, NGOs, CBOs
disaster
7. Drinking Water/ Make water Ministry of Jal Make water distribution Department of Water Supply or
Sanitation/ Public distribution Shakti, centres in consultation with concerned Department in the State
Health centres in community in affected areas Government, (WASH empanelled
consultation with and emergency/ temporary NGOs)
community in shelters
affected areas
and emergency/
temporary
shelters
Make sanitation Ministry of Jal Make sanitation facilities in Public Health and Engineering
facilities in Shakti/ affected areas and Department CoR, DDMAs, VDMCs,
affected areas emergency/ temporary RWAs, Aanganwadi, ASHA workers
and emergency/ shelters
temporary
50 | P a g e
Sl. Major Theme Central/ State/ other Agencies and their Responsibilities
No. Activity (Centre) Responsibility Activity (State/ Others) Responsibility (State/ Others)
(Centre)
shelters
Make Public Ministry of Drinking Make Public Health facilities Public Health and Engineering
Health facilities Water &Sanitation inclusive and accessible in Department, CoR, DDMAs,
inclusive and affected areas and
accessible in emergency/ temporary
affected areas shelters
and emergency/
temporary
shelters
8. Food Security & Make the food Ministry of Make the food distribution CoR, DDMAs, ULBs/ PRIs, NGOs,
Essential Supplies distribution Consumer Affairs, centres in consultation with
centres in Food & Public community
consultation with Distribution
community
9. Livelihood Impart Ministry of Skill Impart appropriate choice Skill Development Departments,
appropriate Development based skill training to ITIs, SIRDs
available choice community
based skill
training to
community
Integrate various MoRD, MoHUA Integrate various initiatives SDMAs/ Finance Department/
initiatives and and schemes, soft loans and Urban Department/ Rural
schemes, soft entrepreneurship Department
51 | P a g e
Sl. Major Theme Central/ State/ other Agencies and their Responsibilities
No. Activity (Centre) Responsibility Activity (State/ Others) Responsibility (State/ Others)
(Centre)
loans and opportunities
entrepreneurship
opportunities
10. Legal Aid/ Provision for Ministry of Law & Provide free legal aid on a Law Department/ SLSA,
Grievance establishment of Justice, NLSA, priority basis
Redressal Free Legal Aid
Mechanism Cells
Provision for Concerned Grievance Redressal CoR, DDMAs, / SLSA
establishment of Ministries/
inclusive Departments NLSA
grievance redress
mechanism and
grievance redress
11. Reconstruction Prepare plans for relocation/ CoR/ Department dealing with
reconstruction sites involving Disaster Management and SDMAs/
the community DDMAs
52 | P a g e
Chapter V
53 | P a g e
Chapter 5
Capacities of the nation in disaster preparedness were tested when cyclone Phailin
hit the east coast on the evening of October 12, 2013 with wind speeds of nearly
330kms /hour. The response to Cyclone Phailin in India underscores how enhanced
community preparedness can result in significant reduction in loss of lives.
Preparedness training, Disaster Management planning exercises, awareness-
raising, and several structural and non-structural measures (including construction of
multi-purpose cyclone shelters) by multiple stakeholders including State and National
Governments, UN agencies, NGOs, etc. spanning over a decade have contributed to
this. However, the extensive damage caused to livelihoods, shelter and other assets
as well as challenges to long-term recovery of those affected highlight the need for a
systematic approach to building resilience of communities against disasters and
climate change.
Context: India is one of six major cyclone-prone countries in the world. Cyclonic
storms and storm surge have been responsible for some of the severe fatalities
along the coasts, the worst of which was caused during the Orissa Super-cyclone
(1999). Lack of community preparedness to disasters resulted in extensive loss of
lives and damage to assets. Vulnerability reduction and disaster management saw
significant intensification since the Super Cyclone in Orissa and the focus shifted on
integration of community-based disaster preparedness and mitigation plans into the
development plans prepared by local government, and strengthening of local
capacities and institutions.
Cyclone Phailin hit the east coast of Orissa on the evening of October 12, 2013 with
wind speeds of nearly 260kms /hour. The State Government of Odisha managed
largest-ever evacuation exercise in the state and planned large-scale relief
preparations. The evacuees were put up in nearly 20,000 cyclone shelters, schools,
colleges and other safe places. This was responsible for minimal deaths as
compared to the 1999 Super Cyclone where more than 10,000 people died.
Economic losses indeed have been high—in rural agriculture, fisheries, sericulture,
etc. An estimated 5,000 sq km of mostly paddy crops have been destroyed by the
cyclone causing an estimated loss of some $320m. The recovery challenge of loss of
livelihoods of the poor in coastal areas is huge.
Community participation with support of State Government: Disaster
management plans have been prepared from village to district; village volunteers
trained in first-aid, search and rescue, evacuation and relief and shelter
management; disaster management teams constituted at the district and sub-district
54 | P a g e
levels and mock drills conducted at all levels. The Orissa State Government (with
funding support from other State/National Governments, IFIs such as the World
Bank), NGOs (both local and international), multi-laterals including UNDP have
invested in: development of physical infrastructure for effective response,
Emergency Operation Centres, technology transfer – low cost housing technology,
mason‘s training, community-based livelihood diversification initiatives, mass
awareness creation, social mobilization, strengthening response mechanisms
(search and rescue operations, first aid, water & sanitation, shelter management),
establishment of contingency funds and pre-positioning of food grains at Gram
Panchayat level, creation Orissa Disaster Rapid Action Force (ODRAF), deployment
of staff to expedite effective relief and rehabilitation, use of the rural housing scheme
of Indira Awas Yojana for constructing cyclone-resistant houses, etc.
Main challenges: High levels of poverty and other priorities resulting in reduced
interest in mitigation activities; short memory span regarding large disasters; poor
understanding of DM including that of local elected representatives; etc. posed
challenges to long-term resilience building. In order to address some of these, large
scale social mobilization and mass awareness campaigns,
appreciation/acknowledgement of community actors; development of trainings
modules on DM for elected representatives as well as conduct of trainings through
State Institute of Rural Development (SIRD) were undertaken.
Lessons learnt: Floods following Phailin overwhelmed capacities to respond as well
as undertake recovery initiatives. The occurrence of two disasters in succession has
emphasized the need to strengthen ODRAF, increase the number of cyclone
shelters, and strengthening of community volunteer groups. The new Odisha State
Youth Policy mandates active involvement of the youth in community based disaster
management processes and practices2. Extensive damages to housing emphasized
the need for greater efforts to construct cyclone resistant houses through an owner-
driven approach, improvement of building techniques as well as effective
dissemination of information of safe construction practices.
Due to the concerted efforts of stakeholders in enhancing disaster preparedness in
Orissa significant reduction in loss of lives was observed as a result of accurate
warnings as well as effective and timely evacuation. Timely warnings also resulted in
saving of crops in certain areas which were ready for harvesting. One of the key
elements of successful response was the cyclone shelters that have been
constructed in the state (by the governments, UN agencies, NGOs, etc.) since the
1999 Super Cyclone for more than a decade. Several of these were designed with
special provision for access to the differentially abled. The effective management of
cyclone shelters by community members as revealed by Cyclone Phailin is a
testimony to the sense of community ownership and their level of awareness as well
aspreparedness.
2
http://dsysodisha.gov.in/pdf/Framework-of-Odisha-Youth-Policy-1.pdf
55 | P a g e
Case Study -II
Situation-I
In case of any disaster or emergency, before any government machinery & support
reaches or outside help gets galvanized, it is the Community which has to respond
immediately. As the Community plays the role of First Responder, it is critical that there is
adequate awareness and preparedness at the Community level especially amongst
people residing in the most vulnerable areas of the country. Keeping that in view National
Disaster Management Authority initiated Aapda Mitra Scheme to train volunteers selected
from Civil Defence, Home Guards, Youths and community in disaster response in the
selected most flood prone districts of India. The scheme has been successfully
implemented in 25 States/UTs in India and 5014 volunteers got trained across India till
now.
In Sepahijala district, Tripura and about 90 volunteers got trained in field of flood
risk reduction. On 22nd May, 2018 due to heavy precipitation there was a flood like
situation in low lying areas of Sonamura sub division under Sepahijala District. Without
making delay the SDM Sonamura contacted the Quick Response Team and Aapda Mitra
volunteers for immediate response. Reaching at flood affected area four Aapda Mitra
volunteers instantly plunged into rescue operation at around 9.00 pm with 12 men
carrying capacity boat (without OBM) and rescued the total 12 marooned families from
their houses. The rescue operation completed at 11.00 pm. The rescued persons were
shifted to the relief campsand ensured the relief arrangements. The sub-division
administration and the communities were appreciated the prompt response of the Aapda
Mitra volunteers for saving the precious lives.
Situation-II
A devastative flood occurred in the State from 11 to 18 July, 2018 breaking all
previous records of past. Unakoti District was severely affected and hhousands of people
were got stranded in their houses. As the flood was catastrophic, NDRF, Assam Rifle,
BSF and TSR were deployed in the rescue operations. Boats and rescue teams from
other districts were also mobilized to Unakoti for the rescue operations. As a matter of
coordinated effort, the District Magistrate & Collector, Sepahijala sent a team of
AapdaMitra volunteers(6 AapdaMitra and 2 Red Cross volunteers with two rubber
boats)to Kailasahar Sub Division under Unakoti District for supporting the rescue and
relief operations. The team worked during 14 and 15 June 2018. The team rescued 400
persons from Paitur Bazar, Chirakuti, Durgapur, Sonamara, Kalipur areas. They also
helped the administration in maintaining law & order situation by transporting police
personnel, TSR jawans by boats in different flood affected areas.The District
Administration Unakoti district appreciated the timely support of AapdaMitra volunteers at
the time of need.
56 | P a g e
Role of Aapda Mitra in Community based Disaster Risk Reduction at Kolhapur
Situation III
From 14th of July 2018 as per the prediction of IMD it rains heavily in all the 12 blocks of
the district. Kolhapur received excess water in free catchment areas of all 13 rivers of
district. Immediately water levels increased in all river basins and alerts was declared by
District Administration. Rivers were flowing above danger level, maximum KT WEIR were
submerged, roads were blocked partially, situation became worsening and all were on
high alert. Emergency Management planning was done under the guidance of District
Magistrate Avinash Subhedar, Incident Commander with all the line department including
Aapda Mitra. With the support of Aapda Mitra 06 lives got saved due to effective
communication and efficient response by the Aapda Mitra.
Lesson Learnt
57 | P a g e
Case Study-III
Kachchh located in the western state Gujarat of India, is one of the backward districts of
the state. On January 26th, 2001 an earthquake recorded as 7.9 on the Richter scale
struck Kachchh and other districts of Gujarat and its surrounding states. According to the
estimation of the Government of Gujarat, around 20,083 people died, and approximately
167, 000 suffered injury. According to the official records, a total number of houses
damaged are around 1.2 million out which 370,000 are totally destroyed and 650,000 are
partially destroyed3.
1. re engaged in the reconstruction for the villagers without the involvement of the people
who got affected by the natural disaster, called Product Centric Approach
2. The NGO are engaged in the reconstruction, involving the people into the process, called
People Centric Approach.
3. The People are opting to undertake their own reconstruction and rehabilitation work taking
the compensation from the Government, called Owner Driven Approach.
Bitta Gram Panchyat opted for Owner Driven Constriction approach where Owner
designed their own house. The owners were free to decide every aspects of
3
http://www.gsdma.org/pdf/Earthquake%20Rehabilitation%20Policy.pdf
4
http://www.gsdma.org/pdf/Earthquake%20Rehabilitation%20Policy.pdf
58 | P a g e
reconstruction of their own house. 5 All the households have been covered under the
programme.
Lesson Learnt
With community participation a sense of ownership was created among the community
members for post reconstruction activities so as to ensure a more disaster resilient
community. The evidence of best practices all over the world in the field of disaster
mitigation and management reestablished this reality. Transfer of technology and
knowhow to the community level certainly would contribute to sustainable solution for
Disaster Risk Reduction.
Both districts of Bahraich and Barabanki in Uttar Pradesh experiences extensive flooding
because of its presence around the Ghaghra River. The river originates in the southern
slopes of the Himalayas in Tibet, in the glaciers of Mapchachungo and flows as the
Karnali River in western Nepal. It enters India through Bardiya District, where it crosses
the border into Bahraich District and is called Ghaghra River. Bahraich faces devastating
inundation every year. To
control the flooding,
government of India has built
embankments in both sides of
the river. However, many
villages continue to inhabitants
between the river and the
embankment exposing
themselves to the regular
flooding. In most of the cases,
the local villagers move to the
embankment and take shelter
till the water recedes. Despite
the acute flood risks, the
villagers continue to live in the
most vulnerable condition as the agriculture land is very fertile and provides good yield
even in the summer months. It also needs to be mentioned here that, every flooding
incidence cause colossal damage to the housing, loss of human beings and cattle. As
there is no early warning, it was very difficult for timely evacuate and rescue operations.
Before the project, the villagers even did not have any manual boat to ferry the people
5
http://www.india-movement.org/national/gujarat/index.htm
59 | P a g e
and cattle at the time of the flooding. As the flood water comes from high altitude
mountainous region in Nepal, the current of the water is so high that any untrained person
cannot navigate the boat.
In 2007-08, a Lucknow based CSO, Sahbhagi Sikshan Kendra (SSK) intervened in relief
provisioning. At the time, four consecutive floods took place, leading to immense damage
and losses to lives, agricultural produce, property, resulting in the alienation of people
from their own land. Following the floods, in 2009-11, SSK mainly worked on developing
early warning system through voice broadcasting from the office of the district Collector
and linking it to the last mile by preparing a group of volunteers to transmit the message
and taking action for evacuation. Gram Panchayat representatives are trained and
provided with both motorized and manual boats for evacuation and rescue. This early
warning system was mainstreamed by involving the district administration to send
messages on early warning to a pre-selected group of mobile numbers. For the last mile
connectivity and response action, the Gram Panchayats are involved in dissemination of
early warning and made the owner of the boats. This is a significant contribution in
strengthening disaster governance to respond to the risks in most effective and manner
that is community centric. The Gram Panchayats feel empowered when the district
administration send request to make the boats available for search and rescue operations
in other areas. The Gram Panchayats also have a group of trained people to operate the
boats when the flooding is in high current.
The community is very well equipped to deal with the flood risks. One poor widow woman
sharing her experience stated that earlier when the flood used to come, we climb on the
roof of the house waiting for someone will come and rescue. In the nights, at times, the
snakes used to crawl over the body and we remain still, till the creature moves away.
Today, there is early warning and there is enough infrastructure and trained personnel for
timely evacuation.
60 | P a g e
Because of the support provided by the District Collector of Bahraich to SKK in the DRR
initiative, a prestigious Times Impact award was conferred to the district.
The other major focus was on WASH at the time of flooding. SSK build awareness on
water sanitation management at the time of flooding. It minimized the fecal contamination
of the water including ground water. The cases of diarrhea have also significantly
controlled.
All these interventions became so popular that it became part of the Community Based
Disaster Management/ Disaster Risk Reduction. The experience and model of
intervention was presented at the National Disaster Management Authority, the apex
institution on DRR in India. The Bahraich and Barabanki example of SSK is now a model
of intervention to build community resilience.
Lessons learnt
1. When the community understands the value of resilience building, they realise that
support for relief has very little significance. They try to strengthen the resilience building
process by acquiring skills, new equipment and infrastructure. In the initial phase,
inclusion of Gram Panchayat (Panchayati Raj Institutions) and the district administration,
not only provided legitimacy to the intervention but helped in mainstreaming the initiative.
Now the community members take many new actions besides early warning and
evacuation. The members of the community conduct Post Disaster Needs Assessment
like physical verification of damage and loss of property supervise the relief distribution so
that there is no discrimination and duplication. The government has full faith on the
capacity and intentions of the community members and the Gram Panchayat.
2. The equipment and kit for effective response was never owned and in possession of SSK.
From the very beginning, it was made clear that all the equipment and kit are the property
of the Gram Panchayat and they will manage and maintain it. The GP representatives
and the community leaders were involved in the procurement process. Initially, the local
people did not belief this action, however, at the end, this transfer of ownership and
responsibility to the community was the foundation for building sustainability and
strengthening disaster governance at the community level. The boats proved as life saver
from the flood because it is the only available safe transportation in the time of flood. The
boats were used to transport not only people but also to transport small animals, luggage
and fodder to safe places which contributes to the revenue for maintenance.
3. Sanitation is a prevalent problem which intensifies during disasters like floods and hence
it is important to empower the community through awareness programmes and sensitize
them in order to develop and adopt better hygienic practices. Efforts were made in this
project for this, through the WASH intervention where awareness efforts such as
individual consultation, training of social mobilizers, nukkadnatak, posters and banners
among other activities were used to create awareness and to build the capacity of the
people affected by flood. The WASH campaign proved to be quite useful as it community
is now aware about the dangers of unhygienic practices and near about 60% of them
have started following improved hygienic practices.
61 | P a g e
4. Installation of hand pumps with raised platform and proper drainage was a good flood
resilient strategy to avoid water contamination during floods. Along with that, social
equality was tried to be achieved by the selection of the location of hand pumps in such
an area so that it is accessible to themost vulnerable as well. The initiative by including
the community, especially with women representatives, in the process of decision making
of the ‗Hand Pump Nigrani Samiti‘, was a catalyst towards work and the promotion of
women empowerment simultaneously. The same is the case with model toilets which
were made on a raised plinth so that it doesn‘t get inundated with flood water.
5. The intervention on livelihood focused skills is a long-term intervention to build back
better. The youth who had attained a certain level of education were given skill building
training on themes like basic computer skills and mobile repairing to assist them in
generating a source of income. Women were given training on gardening, agroforestry,
and kitchen and finally vocational training was given to the unskilled people migrating to
urban areas in basic plumbing and carpentry work, masonry work etc. This had a positive
effect on the youth as there are many who have opened their mobile repairing shop either
in the village or in a nearby town and they are earning good amount on a daily basis. In
DRR often such interventions are neglected.
6. There has been work intensively for linking DRR and governance together which is
reflected in the following points:
Formation of Hamlet Development Committees (HDC) in order to decentralise the
process of disaster preparedness and village development along with the Gram
Panchayat framework is a strong example of strengthening local disaster governance.
Each of the HDC committee had 12-15 members which were democratically elected by
the residents of these hamlets for positions such as cashier, chairperson, secretary
among others.
Capacity building of the HDC and GP members micro level planning and DRR action built
the local capacity and reduced external dependence. The HDC and the GP was also
given the responsibility to monitor and maintain the boats as well as the WASH
infrastructure that were provided. Monitoring and evaluation through the village level
committees was a good way to ensure accountability and sustainability to a great extent.
As a part of sustainability effort a Panchayat Level, a Disaster Risk Reduction Community
has been formed for oversight of all the activities. All the above processes made the DRR
interventions community managed and community owned.
7. Incorporating cash-for-work activities helped to demonstrate how the PRIs can make use
of government schemes like MGNREGA to improve people‘s disaster resilience next to
providing income opportunities. Linking DRR activities with government schemes, such
as, MGNREGA helped in implementing the activities more efficiently with less resources
as well as creating a model for the government to replicate. As a result of this intervention
for shelter and handpumps, 6010 labour days were generated with an income of Rs.
634,915 raised.
8. Involvement of the community in stakeholder analysis was very useful. The people knew
where the barriers in claiming their rights were. Rapport with the identified stakeholders
was established and their engagement in implementation and planning process was
62 | P a g e
ensured. This helped in terms of effective implementation of activities and ensuring long
term sustenance through linkages.
9. Simple technology and association of community members as the integral part of the
whole system strengthened the early warning system and helped the community to be
prepared in a better and more systematic manner.
63 | P a g e
Annexure 1
1) Consistent history of disasters like floods/ fire/ high winds/ earthquake etc. or human
induced hazards
2) Geographical vulnerability:
3) District/ block fall in the earthquake seismic zone V/ IV; proximity to
river/embankments; low lying area etc
4) Social vulnerability:
5) Poor housing condition
6) Low literacy
7) Economically weaker group
8) Limited/ no access to infrastructure –proper roads, hospital, schools, PDS etc
9) Hazard history of the village and the last disaster
10) Any changes in the pattern, type or occurrence of the disaster has been observed
11) What happened before the disaster?
12) What preparation was done?
13) What families like to protect?
14) Was any warning communicated?
15) What did people (families & community) do after receiving warning?
16) What precautions were taken?
17) What happened during the disaster?
18) What was the experience?
19) Who was most affected? Why?
20) What was the severity & duration of disaster like flood/ fire/ high winds/ earthquake?
21) What was the nature of destruction & extent of losses?
22) What was the nature & extent of mutual/self-help?
23) What happened after the disaster?
24) What did everyone do after the disaster /flood subsided?
25) How many deaths? How much damage to property and livelihood?
26) Who faced maximum losses and why?
27) What kind of help was needed? Did help arrive on time?
28) What kind of relief, efforts for rehabilitation & restoration of livelihoods from the
government/ non-government?
29) What kind of difficulties was faced? Who had most difficulties? How were the problems
solved?
Is it possible to change this situation? Who shall change it? How?
The community is then requested to decide on the ways through which the village can be better
prepared to respond to the future disaster threat and they can bring a change in the situation.
64 | P a g e
Annexure 2
VDMC nominates community members as flood preparedness task force members for
the training on early warning, search and rescue, managing temporary shelters, first
aid etc. Preparedness task forces manage the preparedness process with reference to
13 point checklist. Similar lists to be prepared by the facilitator for other hazards.
66 | P a g e
Annexure-3
Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities in Community-based Disaster Risk
Reduction
State Disaster Management Issue office order / amend State Acts to make
Authority provision for proposed Institutional mechanisms
Develop action plan and templates for
community-based disaster risk management
Ensure that disaster management plans prepared
by state departments provide for community
involvement.
Recommend funds to be provided for disaster
mitigation and preparedness measures by
VDMC/LADMC/ULBDMC
Advocate for community-based disaster risk
management
Government
Departments
67 | P a g e
Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities
Training Institutions
State DM training institute, Announce and conduct training programmes
State Institute of Rural for VDMC and DM members at the community
Development, Red Cross level.
and departmental training Develop SATCOM based training programmes
programs to reach out to large number of community
members
Develop popular training material to be used by
local resource persons
Private Sector
People‟s representatives /
Community-level
Institutions
68 | P a g e
Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities
69 | P a g e
Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities
Mason and Artisan group Promote awareness in the community about safe
constructions
Conduct safety assessment and audits of houses
and buildings
Train construction workers in the community in
safe housing techniques
Provide technical inputs into emergency
construction
Monitor construction work in the villages
71 | P a g e
Process followed for preparation of guidelines:
72 | P a g e