People Vs Casacop - PALMOS
People Vs Casacop - PALMOS
Casacop
GR No.
210454
January 13,
2016
Case Digest by M.
Palmos
Facts
:
Acting on a tip from an informant that a. certain Edong was selling shabu in Quezon Street,
Barangay San Antonio, San Pedro, Laguna. SPO4 Dela Pena, Senior Police Officer of then
formed a buy-bust team. Thereafter, the buy- bust team proceeded to the target area. POl
Signap and the informant approached appellant's house. PO1 Signap was introduced to
appellant by the informant as the buyer of shabu. He handed the marked money, consisting of
three (3) P100.00 bills, to appellant, who took a plastic sachet from his left pocket and gave it
to him. PO1 Signap conducted a physical inventory of the seized items and correspondingly
marked them in appellant's house.6chanroblesvirtuallawli
Appellant was brought to the police station. Thereat, SPO4 Dela Pena prepared a certificate of
inventory.7 A request letter8 was sent to the Philippine National Police (PNP) Crime laboratory
for the examination of the seized items. Forensic Chemist Donna Villa P. Huelgas issued
Chemistry Report No. D-808-059 which confirmed the seized items as positive for
methamphetamine hydrochloride or shabu.
RTC finds the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt of crime of violation of RA
9165. CA affirms in toto.
Issu
e:
Rulin
g:
For the successful prosecution of a case for illegal sale of shabu, the following elements
must be proven: (1) the identity of the buyer and the seller, the object and the
consideration; and (2) the delivery of the thing sold
And the payment therefor.13 On the other hand, in prosecuting a case for illegal possession of
dangerous drugs, the following elements must concur: (1) the accused is in possession of an
item or object, which is identified as a prohibited drug; (2) such possession is not authorized by
law; and (3) the accused freely and consciously possessed the drug.14chanroblesvir
All the elements in the prosecution for illegal possession of dangerous drugs and paraphernalia
were likewise established. Found in appellant's pocket after he was caught in flagrante were
two (2) more plastic sachets containing shabu, an improvised glass tooter containing shabu
residue and the rolled aluminum foil with shabu residue. Under Rule 126, Section 13, a person
lawfully arrested may be searched for anything which may have been used or constitute proof
in the commission of an offense without a warrant. There was no showing that appellant had
legal authority to possess the shabu and its paraphernalia. Moreover, the fact that these
contraband were found in his physical possession shows that he freely and consciously
possessed them.
Ruling from RTC and CA is affirmed and penalty is sustained of crime of illegal
possession of shabu