Human Rights and Judicial Endeavour For Its Protection
Human Rights and Judicial Endeavour For Its Protection
Human Rights and judicial endeavours for its protection - Justice delayed is justice denied.
Human right, a basic right, is for all. It is universal and inalienable. These rights are not conferred by
the law, but by virtue of humanity, it is inherited in every human. Human right is not a new concept it
can be audited form the Vedas, Manusmriti, Arthashastra, and some other scriptures which
discourse human rights. In various written documents such as Magna Carta (1215), French
Declaration of Rights of Man and of Citizens (1789), US Bills of Rights (1791) asserted various
individual rights. In the 20th century, the United Nations came into existence in 1945, after the
Second World War. After 3 years in 1948, UDHR (Universal Declaration of Human Rights) was
presented to the world with 30 articles which awarded the rst recognition to the human rights
universally. Now various international conventions, treaties, covenants, and domestic laws also
emphasize on keeping human rights out of jeopardy. In the present article, vehemence is on how
e caciously judicial body acted to the protection of human rights.
www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-624-human-rights-and-judicial-endeavour-for-its-protection.html 1/13
11/11/2019 Human Rights and Judicial Endeavour for its protection
complimentarily protect and promote HR. A national commission can give recommendations to
various authorities [iii]. It has provided recommendations in matters like health, education, police
encounters, custodial deaths, guidelines for arrest etc. NHRC can either take suo moto action or on a
petition led before it.
In 1993 the commission has issued the guidelines regarding custodial death to all the state
government, that in case of such incident commission must be informed within 24 hours and this
will be followed with Post-mortem Reports, Magisterial Inquest Reports/Videography Reports of the
post-mortem etc. [iv] Section 36 (2) put some limitation on the NHRC, but Supreme Court in Paramjit
Kaur v. State of Punjab [v] construed this statutory provision that when the SC by exercising its
power under article 32 refer the matter of infringement of HR to the commission than the section
36(2) can not restrict commission to act in accordance with the order of SC. SC said that commission
will be sui generis body to carry out the functions referred by the SC and this body is not
circumscribed by any sort of conditions. In the instant case, SC observed that no statutory provision
can curtail the SC to exercise its power and there is no reason that why this commission cannot
comply with the order of the SC i.e., to look into the matter of violation of the HR. Along with SC
NHRC make endeavour in the protection of Human rights.
Section 21 of the PHRA, 1993 empowers the State government to establish SHRC. The act also
provides the power and function of the commission. It has to similar function as NHRC, but it can
deal with the matters enlisted in the list II and III of the 7th schedule of Indian constitution. The
deterrent point is that only 19 states have constituted the SHRC. In 2004-2005 report of the NHRC
set forth the list of the states which constituted the SHRC in their respective state. NHRC also
reiterated that the protection of the HR can be ensured if all the states set up the commission and it
must be in compliance of “Paris principlesâ€.
In D.K Basu v. State of West Bengal [vii], the court asked why there is no SHRC in various states even
after 2 decades of the enactment of the PHRA, 1993. SC conspicuously asked how the capital of the
country does not have any HR commission. Court construed the word "may" of section 21 that this
‘may' do not give an option to the state. The word "shall" and "may" does not imply directory or
mandatory in all the cases, but it must be interpreted on the basis of the objective of the section.
Justice T.S Thakur and R Bhanumati directed the State government to constitute SHRC and HRC. SC
elucidated that the state has no option but to comply with the order in 6 months. In the year 2016
Centre deplored SC order by stating that Delhi is not a state but union territory and the law behest
the state to establish the HR commission, not to union territories.
Therefore, Delhi will go along without the HR commission until the law amended. The bench headed
by Justice T.S. Thakur reiterated “Do you fancy that Union Territories are Utopian ideals where
there are no human rights violations... do you expect people from other territories like Daman and
Diu, Puducherry to come all the way to Delhi to ght their case before the National Human Rights
Commission?†[viii] Regarding amendment in the law J. T.S. Thakur said there was no need for an
amendment in the laws to be made by Parliament to set up a human rights commission for Delhi.
“We will give a legal interpretation to the existing laws if necessary†[ix].
The PHRA, 1993 was amended in 2006 which mandate all the states to establish the SHRC. According
to the report of the NHRC HR commission in states will bring forth better governance as the better
www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-624-human-rights-and-judicial-endeavour-for-its-protection.html 2/13
11/11/2019 Human Rights and Judicial Endeavour for its protection
governance and Human right go parallelly. Establishment of the commission in states will ease
access of the people to better protection of the human right.
In the year 2019 again NHRC during the hearing of Punjab state Human Rights Commission vs. Jatt
Ram NHRC again put forth the except few states no state compiled the order to specify or set up the
HRC. The bench said that the setting of these courts does not require any additional appointment of
Judges or infrastructure still judgment of the court is not executed. Supreme Court has issued Chief
Secretaries to show cause that why such directions need not be issued.
Supreme Court of India is endowed with the power of the judicial review and article 32 gives
increment to this power by allowing the court to review all the measures taken by the government
and pronounce it void if it abridges the part III or basic structure of the constitution. This power of
review keeps all the organs of the state within its limit as conferred by the constitution or any other
law. In case of the infringement of the rights of part III person can directly approach to High court
under article 226 and to Supreme Court under article 32 which itself is a fundamental right. Article
32 is the cornerstone of our democracy which makes the SC protector of fundamental rights.
According to the 32(4) this right to approach will be suspended if the emergency is proclaimed.
Following are the SC judgments assert how SC advanced the protection and promotion of the HR:-
Fundamental Right case
(Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala [x]) this case was heard by the ever largest constitutional
bench of 13 judges. In this court has gifted us the doctrine of the basic structure. Court held that this
principle is inviolable and accordingly the court outlined that power to amend is not bottomless but
limited. This case overruled the Golaknath case [xi]and the court said the parliament act will be
counted ultra-vires if it tries to rewrites the whole constitution in the light of its power under article
368 of the constitution. This view of the Supreme Court protects human rights fundamentally.
Personal liberty
(Maneka Gandhi's case [xiii]) in the present Case, the court gave the wider interpretation of the word
‘personal liberty'. The court considered that for depriving a person of ‘personal liberty'
requisites of article 14 and 19 must be ful lled as article 14, 19 and 21 are interconnected.
Maintenance case
(Shah Bano case [xiv]) Supreme Court granted maintenance to the Shah Bano and protected the
rights of Muslim woman beyond the personal law, but Muslim community considered that this
verdict of the court encroaches Muslim Sharia Law, therefore, parliament ordained All India Muslim
Personal Law Board, 1973.
Article 21 interpretations
Apex court has widely construed article 21 the word "life" is explained in a watershed judgment of
U.S. Supreme Court [xv] that life is something more than mere animal existence [xvi]. SC of India said
that the right to life is not mere physical existence but the right to live with dignity [xvii]. Article 21
includes non-payment of the wages to the workers will be the denial of the right to live with human
dignity [xviii]. SC held that sexual harassment at the workplace is a violation of article 14, 15, and 21
[xix]. Right to shelter, [xx] right to know, [xxi] right to livelihood, [xxii] right against solitary
con nement, [xxiii] right to free legal aid [xxiv] and right to health [xxv] right to privacy [xxvi] etc. All
these are appended as an inherent part of article 21 by the apex court while exercising its power of
interpretation.
Triple Talaq
In the year 2017 SC of India majority of judge 3:2 declared Triple Talaq as unconstitutional as this
practice jeopardise and violates the rights of the Muslim woman in all facets. Though the bill is not
yet passed due to some controversies in it.
Sabarimala Temple
Supreme Court allowed the woman entry in Sabarimala temple that is of age 10 to 50 years as the
devotion cannot be subjected to the gender discrimination [xxviii].
Homosexuality
SC in the year 2018 decriminalized section 377 [xxix] of Indian Penal Code, 1860 on the ground that
it goes against article 14, 15, 19 and 21 of the constitution. This verdict of the SC only decriminalize
homosexuality under section 377 rest of the law will remain the same. After 72 years rights of the
homosexual people is o the hook and they can also enjoy their rights as heterosexual people.
Adultery
SC said that husband is no more master of wife, therefore, pronounced the adultery is no more
crime as it violates the dignity of woman hence infringes article 21 of the constitution. Court also
elucidate that adultery is still ground for divorce and it will be considered criminal if it leads to the
abetment of suicide adulterous could be prosecuted under section 306 of IPC, 1860.
Analysis:
Historic verdicts show that judiciary made endeavours for protection and promotion of human
rights, but we can not say that is infallible. However, it can be stated that SC exercised its power of
interpretation so well that it widened the scope of rights which made it more expeditious for
everyone to enjoy their rights. In India, the judiciary is not superior but as we have constitutionalism
www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-624-human-rights-and-judicial-endeavour-for-its-protection.html 4/13
11/11/2019 Human Rights and Judicial Endeavour for its protection
which invokes that judiciary is independent and all the bodies have to comply with the order of the
SC for the welfare state. Our law directs the government to establish certain organs for the
protection of human rights in compliance of this NHRC at union level and few of the states set up the
SHRC. Law provides that the state should establish the District human rights courts but, there is
noncompliance in this regard. Supreme Court has directed the state governments to establish SHRC
and HRC however, most of the states not acted in accordance with the same. This lacuna on the part
of state dilatory in serving justice to part of society as it is not easy for every person to approach
NHRC from anywhere in the country in order to avail their rights. Law since 1993 requires every state
to constitute SHRC and HRC in their respective territory to accomplish the objective of speedy
remedy to all. The controversial point is that law does not set fort the procedure of the HRCs to deal
with such type of complaints and the act does not mark the jurisdiction of such courts regarding the
o ences of violation of HR. This ambiguous factor must be looked into promptly by the lawmakers
so that vigilant protection provided to the human rights and the aftermath of the already existing
law will not dismay.
End-Notes
[i] Kesavananda Bharati V. State Kerala 1973(4)SCC 225
[ii] section 2(d) of Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993
[iii] Section 18(3) of Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993
[iv] http://nhrc.nic.in/press-release/nhrc-issues-fresh-guidelines-regarding-intimation-custodial-
death
[v] A.I.R. 1999 SC
[vi] Section 21 of Protection of Human Rights Act,1993
[vii] (2015) 8 SCC 744
[viii] https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/are-there-no-rights-violations-in-union-territories-
sc-asks-centre/article8491799.ece
[ix] https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/are-there-no-rights-violations-in-union-territories-
sc-asks-centre/article8491799.ece
[x] (1973) 4 SCC 225
[xi] I. C. Golaknath & Ors vs. State of Punjab and others 1967 AIR 1643
[xii] (1976) 2 SCC 521
[xiii]Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) A.I.R 597
[xiv] Mohd. Ahmed Khan vs. Shah Bano Begum and others 1985 SCC (2) 556
[xv] Munn v. Illinois 94 US. 113(1876)
[xvi] Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh 1963 SC 1295
[xvii] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) A.I.R 597
[xviii] Peoples Union for democratic rights v. Union of India 1982 A.I.R 1473
[xix] Vishakha V. state of Rajasthan (1997) 6 SCC 241
[xx] U.P. Avas Vikas Parishad v. Friends Coop. Housing Society Limited AIR 1996 SC 114
[xxi] Reliance Petrochemicals Ltd. vs. Proprietors of Indian Express Newspapers 1988 SCC (4) 592
[xxii] Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay v. Dilipkumar Raghavendranath Nandkarni (1983) 1
SCC 124
[xxiii] Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration AIR 1978 SC 1675
[xxiv] Hussainara Khatoon vs. State of Bihar 1980 SCC (1) 98
[xxv] State of Punjab v. M.S. Chawla AIR (1997) SC 1225
[xxvi] Justice K.S.Puttaswamy and others vs. Union Of India (2017)10 SCC 1
[xxvii] National Legal Services Authority v Union of India 2014 5 SCC 438
[xxviii] Indian Young Lawyers Association vs. The State of Kerala 2018 SC
[xxix] Navtej Singh Johar V. Union of India (2018)SCC online 1350
(article-1241-extradition.html)
Extradition
(article-1241-extradition.html)
www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-624-human-rights-and-judicial-endeavour-for-its-protection.html 6/13
11/11/2019 Human Rights and Judicial Endeavour for its protection
(article-1240-work-contracts-under-gst-law-is-the-46th-constitutional-amendment-in-
consonance.html)
(article-1239-trade-dress-protection-position-in-u-s-and-india-an-analysis.html)
www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-624-human-rights-and-judicial-endeavour-for-its-protection.html 7/13
11/11/2019 Human Rights and Judicial Endeavour for its protection
(article-1238-family-dispute-need-to-consult-a-family-lawyer-in-uae-.html)
(article-1237-the-elusive-ram-mandir-212-pillars-128-ft-high-5-entrances.html)
www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-624-human-rights-and-judicial-endeavour-for-its-protection.html 8/13
11/11/2019 Human Rights and Judicial Endeavour for its protection
(article-1236-all-of-hindu-marriage-and-divorce.html)
www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-624-human-rights-and-judicial-endeavour-for-its-protection.html 9/13
11/11/2019 Human Rights and Judicial Endeavour for its protection
Delhi (/lawyers/delhi.htm)
Chandigarh
Kolkata (/lawyers/calcutta.htm)
(/lawyers/chandigarh.htm)
Siliguri (/lawyers/siliguri.htm)
Allahabad
Durgapur (/lawyers/durgapur.htm)
(/lawyers/allahabad.htm)
Jamshedpur
Lucknow
(/lawyers/jamshedpur.htm)
(/lawyers/lucknow.htm)
Ranchi (/lawyers/ranchi.htm)
Gurgaon
Janjgir (/lawyers/chhattisgarh.htm)
(/lawyers/gurgaon.htm)
Dimapur (/lawyers/dimapur.htm)
Faridabad
Guwahati (/lawyers/guwahati.htm)
(/lawyers/faridabad.htm)
New Delhi
Noida (/lawyers/noida.htm)
(/lawyers/new_delhi.htm)
Ghaziabad
Ludhiana (/lawyers/ludhiana.htm)
(/lawyers/ghaziabad.htm)
Jaipur (/lawyers/jaipur.htm)
Jalandhar
(/lawyers/jalandhar.htm)
Chennai (/lawyers/chennai.htm)
Agra (/lawyers/agra.htm)
Bangalore
Jodhpur (/lawyers/jodhpur.htm)
(/lawyers/bangalore.htm)
Amritsar
Hyderabad
(/lawyers/amritsar.htm)
(/lawyers/hyderabad.htm)
Visakhapatnam
Mumbai (/lawyers/bombay.htm)
(/lawyers/visakhapatnam.htm)
Pune (/lawyers/pune.htm)
Cochin (/lawyers/cochin.htm)
Nagpur (/lawyers/nagpur.htm)
Coimbatore
Belgaum
(/lawyers/coimbatore.htm)
(/lawyers/belgaum.htm)
Pondicherry
Jalgaon (/lawyers/jalgaon.htm)
(/lawyers/Pondicherry.htm)
Nashik (/lawyers/nashik.htm)
Trivandrum
Ahmedabad
(/lawyers/trivandrum.htm)
(/lawyers/ahmedabad.htm)
Eluru (/lawyers/eluru.htm)
Surat (/lawyers/surat.htm)
Vapi (/lawyers/vapi.htm)
Indore (/lawyers/indore.htm)
Bengaluru
Khandwa
(/lawyers/bengaluru.htm)
(/lawyers/khandwa.htm)
Rajkot (/lawyers/rajkot.htm)
LawArticles
www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-624-human-rights-and-judicial-endeavour-for-its-protection.html 10/13
11/11/2019 Human Rights and Judicial Endeavour for its protection
civil-courts-in-india.html)
Jurisdiction means the power and authority conferred by law upon a court, judge or tribunal to ...
www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-624-human-rights-and-judicial-endeavour-for-its-protection.html 11/13
11/11/2019 Human Rights and Judicial Endeavour for its protection
script-writers.html)
So you have worked hard for months and written your script and screenplay. After unending
serie...
www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-624-human-rights-and-judicial-endeavour-for-its-protection.html 12/13
11/11/2019 Human Rights and Judicial Endeavour for its protection
Lawyers in India
www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-624-human-rights-and-judicial-endeavour-for-its-protection.html 13/13