Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quality of Life in Older Ages
Quality of Life in Older Ages
net/publication/5571528
CITATIONS READS
210 991
2 authors, including:
Gopal Netuveli
University of East London
126 PUBLICATIONS 2,951 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
UK/Japan comparison of health behaviours and their impacts on social determinants of healthy ageing View project
Life course influences on health and quality of life at older ages View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Gopal Netuveli on 29 January 2016.
Background: The quality of life of elderly people has become relevant with the
demographic shift that has resulted in greying of population. There are
indications that concepts and concerns related to quality of life in older ages are
different from the general population.
Results: Quality of life is described often with both objective and subjective
dimensions. The majority of the elderly people evaluate their quality of life
positively on the basis of social contacts, dependency, health, material
circumstances and social comparisons. Adaptation and resilience might play a
part in maintaining good quality of life. Although there are no cultural
differences in the subjective dimension of quality of life, in the objective
dimension such differences exist. Two major factors to be considered with regard
to quality of life in old age are dementia and depression.
Discussion: With all other influences controlled, ageing does not influence
quality of life negatively; rather a long period of good quality of life is possible.
Therefore, the maintenance and improvement quality of life should be included
among the goals of clinical management.
Introduction
Every one has an opinion about their quality of life, but no one knows
precisely what it means in general. John Stewart Mill noted that indi-
vidual opinion about well-being was ‘the best means of knowledge
immeasurably surpassing those that can be possessed by any one else’.1
Accepted: January 2008 Thus, quality of life is highly individualistic and might even be an
*Correspondence to: Dr ‘idiosyncratic mystery’ due to the high levels of variability between
Gopalakrishnan Netuveli,
Department of Primary
individuals, making it unsuitable for decision making.2 However, cross-
Care and Social Medicine, national audits of welfare or comparisons of different groups of indi-
3rd Floor, The Reynolds viduals often include a metric of quality of life, underlying which is the
Building, St Dunstan’s
assumptions that there are group-specific characteristics in quality of
Road, London W6 8RP,
UK E-mail: g.netuveli@ life. This review, for example, assumes that older age groups are suffi-
imperial.ac.uk ciently peculiar in this respect to merit such a review, perhaps due to
British Medical Bulletin 2008; 85: 113–126 & The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press.
DOI:10.1093/bmb/ldn003 All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected]
G. Netuveli and D. Blane
the perception that the elderly are peculiarly vulnerable due to (1)
declining physical and mental capabilities; (2) exit from labour market
with greater dependence on pensions; (3) break down of extended
families; and (4) isolation due to death of contemporaries, especially
that of spouse or partner.3 The interest in the topic originates from the
demographic shift that has resulted in unprecedented proportions of
elderly especially among the populations of the developed world.
A common experience of the reviewers of quality of life literature is
how it has exponentially increased from 1970s and the multiplicity of
instruments developed for measuring quality of life. Searching Pubmed
with ‘quality of life’ in the title of articles in English, published in the
last 5 years and about humans aged 65þ years yielded 3151 papers
and 79 of them were reviews. The aim of this review is to provide a
Ageing well
Related to quality of life in old age are the concepts of ageing well rep-
resented by the qualifiers such as active, positive, successful or healthy
used with ageing, but ‘successful ageing’ is the most frequently used
term. The widely accepted definition of successful ageing by Rowe and
Kahn contains three components: low risk of disease and disability;
high mental and physical function; and active engagement with life.27
The proportion of successful agers varies with the operational defi-
nition used. One review found 29 different definitions among 28
studies with an average prevalence around 36% and as the definitions
become more stringent in excluding functional limitations, the preva-
lence declined.28
The distinction between successful ageing and quality of life lies in
the emphasis on physical health for defining successful ageing.
However, well-being is often incorporated into the concept of success-
ful ageing and ageing well adds to the quality of life. It might also be
possible that there are definitions of health which are akin to that of
quality of life, for example, health as going and doing something
meaningful.29
Psycho-social factors
Social comparison plays a role in preservation of quality of life in older
ages as health and other circumstances deteriorate.43 It is a strategy
that is often used by older people and may be upward/downward con-
trast or identification and combinations there of.44 The predominant
strategy is downward contrast and those who employ it feel grateful or
happy that they are doing well relative to others who are less fortunate.
High-quality social relations add to the quality of life in older ages.
identified in the qualitative study was the sense of purpose and the
feeling of usefulness generated by having a role.47 The role usually
emerges from inter-generational relationship and also from caring for
their spouses or partners. Other significant influences were from the
support networks from family, friends and religion. For all ethnic
groups spouses and partners were sources of love and companionship,
often the link to wider family and social networks. Bereavement
brought in loss of companionship and sometimes practical support.
Family support for white ethnic groups came from siblings, whereas
for the minority ethnic groups, children were the main source. Across
the ethnic groups respondents received support from friends and reli-
gion although there was some difference between White and minority
ethnic groups. There were greater diversity in terms of income and
The phrase ‘the value assigned to the duration of life’ reflects the
narrow scope of health-related quality of life as a valued end point in
health care, which has as its objective the provision of ‘incremental sur-
vival time and/or incremental quality to that time’.51 An example of
incorporation of time into health-related quality of life measurement
implied by this definition is the Quality Adjusted Life Years.14 Hickey
Acknowledgements
We are indebted to an anonymous reviewer whose comments on a pre-
vious version of this review have helped us to improve it.
References
1 Mill JS (1885) On Liberty. New York, NY: JB Alden, 128.
2 Leplége A, Hunt S (1997) The problem of quality of life in medicine. JAMA, 278, 47 –50.
3 Williams A (1977) Measuring the quality of life of the elderly. In Evans A, Wingo L (eds)
Public Economics and the Quality of Life. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press,
282–297.
4 Brown J, Bowling A, Flynn TN (2004) Models of quality of life. A taxonomy and systematic
review of the literature. European Forum on Population Ageing Research, http://www.shef.ac.
uk/ageingresearch/pdf/qol_review_no_tables.pdf. Accessed on 1 January 2008.
5 Galloway S, Bell D, Hamilton C, Scullion A (2006) Well-being and quality of life: measuring
the benefits of culture and sport – a literature review and thinkpiece. Edinburgh: Scottish
Executive, http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2006/01/13110743/0. Accessed on 1
January 2008.
6 Dolan P, Peasgood T, White M (2005) Review of research on the influences on personal well-
being and application to policy making. http://www.defra.gov.uk/science/project_data/
DocumentLibrary/SD12005/SD12005_4017_FRP.pdf. Accessed on 1 January 2008.
7 Taillefer MC, Dupuis G, Roberg MA, LeMay S (2003) Health-related quality of life models:
systematic review of the literature. Soc Indic Res, 64, 293–323.
8 O’Boyle CA (1997) Measuring the quality of later life. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci,
352, 1871– 1879.
9 Walker A (2004) The ESRC growing older research programme, 1999– 2004. Ageing Soc, 24,
657–674.
10 Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Schmidt LJ, Mackintosh AE, Fitzpatrick R (2004) Health status
and quality of life in older people: a structured review of patient-reported health instruments.
Report from the Patient-reported Health Instruments Group ( formerly the Patient-assessed
Health Outcomes Programme) to the Department of Health, April 2004. Available at http://
phi.uhce.ox.ac.uk/. Accessed on 1 January 2008.
11 Sirgy MJ, Rahtz D, Coskun SA (eds) (2003) Advances in Quality-of-Life Theory and
Research. New York, NY: Springer.
12 Huppert F, Baylis N, Keverne B (2005) The Science of Well-Being. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
13 Brock D (1993) Quality of life in health care and medical ethics. In Nussbaum M, Sen A
(eds) The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 95– 132.
14 Wingo L (1977) Objective, subjective and collective dimensions of the quality of life. In
Evans A, Wingo L (eds) Public Economics and the Quality of Life. Baltimore: The Johns
Hopkins University Press, 13 –27.
15 Lawton MP (1991) A multidimensional view of quality of life in frail elders. In Birren J,
Lubben J, Rowe J, Detchman D (eds) The Concept and Measurement of Quality of Life in
the Frail Elderly. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 3–27.
16 Lawton M, Winter L, Kleban MH, Ruckdeschel K (1999) Affect and quality of life.
Objective and subjective. J Aging Health, 11, 169– 198.
17 Erikson R (1993) Descriptions of inequality: the Swedish approach to welfare research. In
Nussbaum M, Sen A (eds) The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 67–83.
18 WHOQOL Group (1993) Measuring Quality of Life: The Development of the World Health
Organisation Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL). Geneva: World Health Organisation.
19 Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Epstein RS, Ferrie PJ, Jaeschke R, Hiller TK (1992) Evaluation of
impairment of health-related quality of life in asthma: development of a questionnaire for use
in clinical trials. Thorax, 47, 76 –83.
20 Testa MA, Simonson DC (1996) Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes. N Engl J Med, 334,