Dizon vs. Magsaysay
Dizon vs. Magsaysay
*
No. L23399. May 31, 1974.
________________
* FIRST DIVISION.
251
MAKALINTAL, C.J.:
________________
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015825472cf85ee73a7f003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 2/7
11/2/2016 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 057
252
paragraph 9
________________
253
_______________
"Art. 1670. If at the end of the contract the lessee should continue
enjoying the thing leased for fifteen days with the acquiescence of the
lessor, and unless a notice to the contrary by either party has previously
been given, it is understood that there is an implied new lease, not for the
period of the original contract, but for the time established in articles 1682
and 1687. The other terms of
254
Judgment affirmed.
255
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015825472cf85ee73a7f003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 6/7
11/2/2016 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 057
———o0o———
© Copyright 2016 Central Book Supply, Inc. All rights reserved.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015825472cf85ee73a7f003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 7/7