Insomniac Holdings LLC V Conscious Entertainment Group Wawdce-20-00137 0001.0
Insomniac Holdings LLC V Conscious Entertainment Group Wawdce-20-00137 0001.0
17
Plaintiff Insomniac Holdings, LLC (“Insomniac”) brings this action against Defendants
18
Conscious Entertainment Group, LLC d/b/a USC Events (“USC”) and Chad Anderson
19
(“Anderson”), alleging as follows:
20
21
I. INTRODUCTION
22
1. This is an action to judicially confirm that Insomniac and USC are no longer co-
23
producing Paradiso Festival, an annual two-day electronic dance music event held at the Gorge
24
Amphitheatre in Quincy, Washington, because the parties’ co-promotion agreement was
25
properly terminated due to USC and Anderson’s fraudulent activity of misusing funds taken
26
27
1 from Insomniac and being unable to account for such funds. USC cannot be permitted to
2 promote the Paradiso Festival 2020 or continue to use its name or trademark.
3 2. Plaintiff Insomniac and Defendant USC are music event promoters who jointly
5 “Agreement”). Due to USC’s breach of the Agreement, the Agreement was terminated.
7 3. Insomniac and USC shared equally the net revenue and losses from Paradiso
8 Festival. Under the Agreement, USC was responsible for managing and paying most artists
9 and vendors for Paradiso Festival. However, USC could request funds advanced on unearned
10 revenue from Insomniac to ensure USC had enough cash flow to pay mutually agreed costs,
11 such as event deposits, to USC’s artists and vendors before the event.
12 4. In 2019, Paradiso Festival was held at the Gorge Amphitheatre on June 14 and
13 15, 2019 (the “2019 Event”). In the months leading up to the 2019 Event, USC submitted four
14 detailed funding requests to Insomniac so that USC could pay mutually agreed costs before the
15 event. Insomniac carefully reviewed each request and ultimately advanced over $2 million to
16 USC for the sole purpose of making specific payments to specific artists and vendors before the
18 5. Despite USC’s representations and obligations to Insomniac, USC did not use
19 the advanced funds for their agreed-upon purpose and did not pay its artists and vendors. As a
20 result, USC’s artists and vendors began contacting Insomniac to seek payment for the 2019
21 Event. Even though Insomniac already funded the payments for many of these artists and
22 vendors by advancing funds to USC, and even though it was USC’s responsibility to pay them,
23 Insomniac was forced to pay an additional $1.2 million directly to USC’s artists and vendors in
24 order to protect the Paradiso Festival brand and maintain Insomniac’s business relationships
25 and reputation, as these artists and vendors often perform at and support Insomniac’s other
26 music events.
27
1 6. Under the Agreement, Insomniac and USC were required to settle the 2019
2 Event no later than 30 days after the event. Further, Insomniac and USC were required to
3 provide each other with financial information necessary for settlement within 30 days.
5 the Agreement, USC refused to provide financial documents that would show how USC
6 actually used the advanced funds. As a result, Insomniac was unable to settle the 2019 Event
7 and ensure that all artists and vendors were fully paid.
8 8. Insomniac notified USC in writing that USC was in material breach of the
9 Agreement due to USC’s failure to comply with its accounting obligations. After USC failed to
10 cure the breach, Insomniac notified USC in writing that the Agreement was terminated.
12 for the limited purpose of settling expenses and revenues for the 2019 Event. Insomniac was
13 eventually forced to settle the 2019 Event without all of the financial information that would be
14 necessary, and that was required under the Agreement, for a complete and accurate settlement.
15 As part of the settlement, USC agreed to pay all unpaid vendors in full for the 2019 Event and
17 10. Several vendors have notified Insomniac that they have still not been paid for
18 the 2019 Event. USC has not submitted payment confirmation to Insomniac. On information
19 and belief, USC has still not fully paid all of the USC vendors for the 2019 Event.
20 11. On information and belief, USC has begun promoting and booking talent for
22 12. USC’s harmful acts and omissions have damaged the Paradiso Festival brand
23 and Insomniac’s business and reputation, and Insomniac no longer wishes, and is no longer
24 contractually obligated, to produce Paradiso Festival with USC. Insomniac now seeks, in this
25 lawsuit, assurance that all artists and vendors have been fully paid for the 2019 Event, a
26 declaration that the Agreement has been terminated, and money damages.
27
II. PARTIES
1
13. Plaintiff Insomniac is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal
2
place of business in Beverly Hills, California. Insomniac is a music event promoter that
3
regularly promotes electronic music events around the country. Insomniac is an affiliate of
4
House of Blues Concerts, Inc., a California corporation (“HOB”). For purposes of diversity,
5
Insomniac’s LLC members are citizens of Delaware, Nevada, and/or California.
6
14. On information and belief, Defendant USC is a Washington limited liability
7
company with its principal place of business in Seattle, King County, Washington.
8
15. On information and belief, Defendant Chad Anderson is a citizen of Washington
9
State who resides in Snohomish County, Washington. Mr. Anderson is the Founder and CEO
10
of USC. On information and belief, Mr. Anderson is the only LLC member of USC.
11
III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
12
16. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because this is
13
a civil action between citizens of different states, and the amount in controversy exceeds
14
$75,000, exclusive of interest and costs.
15
17. Venue is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1) because Defendants
16
reside in this District.
17
18. This Court has the authority to determine the parties’ respective rights and other
18
legal obligations pursuant to the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201. The
19
dispute between the parties with respect to the termination status of the Agreement creates a
20
justiciable controversy.
21
IV. FACTS
22
A. Co-Promotion Agreement
23
19. Since 2012, electronic dance music fans have flocked to the Gorge
24
Amphitheatre every summer to attend Paradiso Festival. This weekend-long music event
25
features nationally and internationally known electronic dance music artists, with headliners
26
such as Kaskade, Porter Robinson, Tiesto, Bassnectar, Above & Beyond, Zedd, Krewella,
27
1 Skrillex, and Armin Van Buuren. Paradiso Festival attracts over 25,000 attendees per day
2 every year.
3 20. On March 19, 2013, HOB and USC entered into the Agreement for the purpose
4 of promoting and conducting the 2013 Paradiso Festival. In addition to operating as a co-
5 promotion agreement, the Agreement operated as the venue agreement that allowed Paradiso
7 21. On or around May 1, 2013, HOB assigned the Agreement to Insomniac pursuant
8 to Section 10(b) of the Agreement. A copy of the Agreement is attached as Exhibit A and
10 22. The Agreement was automatically renewed on an annual basis, with Paradiso
11 Festival to be held at the Gorge Amphitheatre for the last full weekend in June or other
12 mutually agreed weekend. The 2019 Event was produced under automatic renewal of the
13 Agreement.
14 23. Either Insomniac or USC could terminate the Agreement based on the other
15 party’s breach. The party had the right to terminate the Agreement if the other party failed to
16 perform any obligation under the Agreement, received written notice of its failure to perform,
17 and did not cure its failure within 10 days following the notice.
18 24. The Agreement set out each promoter’s responsibilities for producing Paradiso
20 concessions; venue operations; and permits. USC’s responsibilities included artist relations and
21 talent management; audio, lighting, and visual production; merchandise vending; attractions;
23 25. The Agreement sets out a cross-license provision that survives termination of
24 the Agreement. Insomniac and USC share ownership of the Paradiso Festival trademark and
25 grant each another a cross-license to use the trademark for the Event. Further, neither party is
26 allowed to use the Paradiso Festival trademark in conjunction with any other event without the
B. Financial Terms
1
26. Under the Agreement, Insomniac and USC split the net revenue and losses from
2
Paradiso Festival on a 50/50 basis. Net revenue was calculated as gross box office receipts less
3
applicable taxes, applicable venue and/or parking costs, and artist compensation and other
4
mutually agreed upon and reasonably necessary expenses.
5
27. Although the Agreement assigned the responsibility to pay expenses for most
6
artists and vendors to USC, Insomniac could pay mutually agreed talent and production costs
7
upon USC’s request.
8
28. Insomniac and USC used the following process for funding requests:
9
a. First, USC was required to submit a request to Insomniac at least two weeks
10
before its payment deadlines. The request listed each artist or vendor to be
11
funded, the total fee for each artist or vendor, the deposit or additional
12
payment amount being requested, and the remaining balance. USC was also
13
required to provide documentation (known as “backup”) supporting the
14
request. For instance, USC was required to provide a fully executed
15
agreement for each artist.
16
b. Second, Insomniac reviewed the request and backup. For instance,
17
Insomniac confirmed the total fee and requested payments for each artist
18
matched the artist’s agreement with USC.
19
c. Third, Insomniac and USC discussed and resolved any concerns about the
20
funding request. USC might provide additional backup. Insomniac and
21
USC might adjust the requested amount.
22
d. Finally, Insomniac approved the funding request and sent the agreed-upon
23
amount to USC by wire.
24
29. Because Insomniac and USC shared net revenue for Paradiso Festival, and
25
because Insomniac and USC each collected ticket sales and paid various expenses prior to the
26
event, including advances from Insomniac to USC, the parties engaged in a careful and detailed
27
1 settlement process to reconcile revenue and expenses. This settlement process depended on
2 complete, accurate, and timely financial information from each party. Accordingly, the
4 30. Under Section 4(b) of the Agreement, Insomniac and USC were required to
5 settle each Paradiso Festival no later than 30 days after the event.
6 31. Under Section 4(c) of the Agreement, Insomniac and USC were each required to
7 provide the other party with the financial information necessary for settlement within 30 days.
8 32. Under Section 4(d) of the Agreement, Insomniac and USC were each required to
9 maintain full and complete books and records with respect to Paradiso Festival. The other
10 party had the right to inspect and examine these books and records for the purpose of settling
11 Paradiso Festival upon five business days’ written notice for up to one year following the event.
14 34. As part of producing the 2019 Event, USC submitted four funding requests to
15 Insomniac so that USC could pay certain talent and production costs before the event. USC
16 provided the names of the specific entities who would be paid (the “Advanced Fund Vendors”)
17 and the specific payments sought in each request. USC also provided Insomniac with backup,
19 35. Insomniac’s accountants carefully reviewed USC’s backup for each request.
20 Between March 1, 2019 and June 7, 2019, Insomniac approved and advanced $2,062,760.46 to
24 informed Charles Liu, Insomniac’s Director of Finance, by e-mail that USC was “working on
25 getting together the first funding request for the first round of artist deposits right now” and
27
1 37. Mr. Liu replied to Ms. Whitney that the request seemed pretty early, as USC had
2 submitted its first request in April for the previous year’s event.
3 38. On February 22, 2019, Ms. Whitney acknowledged the request was early, but
4 “they are just trying to get an early announce by next Wednesday this year.” Ms. Whitney also
5 provided a funding request spreadsheet, USC invoice, and backup by e-mail. Mr. Liu
6 understood Ms. Whitney to mean that USC would soon announce the artist lineup for the 2019
7 Event, and the requested funds covered deposits that would secure the artists’ participation in
8 the event.
10 reviewed the request and raised several concerns to Ms. Whitney, noting that USC had not
11 provided agreements for several artists as part of its backup and that there were discrepancies
12 between the deposits noted in the artist agreements and the deposits listed in the funding
14 funding request spreadsheet, USC invoice, and backup to Insomniac by e-mail on February 27,
15 2019.
16 40. In its first funding request, USC requested payments for artist deposits. USC’s
17 updated first funding request included a spreadsheet that listed specific artists, the total event
18 fee for each artist, the deposit amount being requested for each artist, and the remaining
19 balance. The request included funding to pay specific deposit amounts for specific artists
20 represented by United Talent Agency (“UTA”) and specific artists represented by Paradigm
22 41. USC provided the artist agreements as backup to justify the funding request.
23 These artist agreements listed the amounts USC agreed to pay the artist for the 2019 Event.
24 42. Along with the funding request spreadsheet and backup, USC provided an
25 invoice, which listed the total requested amount under a single line item for “Reimbursable
27
1 43. After careful review of USC’s materials, including checking the amounts in the
2 spreadsheet against the amounts in the artist agreements, Insomniac approved USC’s first
3 funding request. On March 1, 2019, Insomniac sent the first portion of the Advanced Funds to
4 USC by wire.
7 an invoice and backup. USC’s second request included production costs, such as marketing, in
8 addition to artist payments. The second request also included funding for specific payments
9 towards the total fee for specific artists represented by UTA and Paradigm.
10 45. On April 15, 2019, after careful review of USC’s materials, Insomniac approved
11 USC’s second funding request and sent the second portion of the Advanced Funds to USC by
12 wire. Insomniac also reminded USC to send future funding requests at least two weeks in
13 advance.
16 and backup to Insomniac’s accountants. On May 24, Ms. Whitney sent USC’s fourth funding
18 47. USC’s third and fourth requests included requests for marketing, entertainers,
19 sound, lasers, and other production costs, in addition to artist payments. The requested artist
20 payments included funding for specific additional and final payment amounts to UTA artists
22 48. The USC invoices for the third and fourth funding requests listed several line
23 items. The invoices listed an “Activity” and a “Description” for each line item. The “Activity”
24 for each line item was “Advanced on Unearned Revenue.” The “Description” for each line
25 item was one of the expense category for the 2019 Event; for instance, one line item was for
26 “Paradiso 2019 Talent,” another was for “Paradiso 2019 Safety,” and a third was for “Paradiso
27 2019 Communications.”
1 49. On June 7, 2019, Insomniac approved USC’s third and fourth funding requests
5 Insomniac that USC had not used the Advanced Funds to pay the Advanced Fund Vendors.
6 This was the first time Insomniac learned the Advanced Fund Vendors had not been fully paid.
7 51. For instance, USC told Insomniac’s accountants that it would use a specific
8 portion of the Advanced Funds to pay specific artists represented by Paradigm. USC
9 represented to Insomniac that it needed the Advanced Funds in order to make specific
10 payments to these specific artists before the 2019 Event, pursuant to USC’s agreements with
11 the artists. However, USC did not pay these amounts to the Paradigm artists. On the first day
12 of the 2019 Event, Insomniac was forced to pay $215,055 directly to Paradigm to cover
13 outstanding invoices that USC was supposed to pay using the Advanced Funds.
14 52. In order to ensure the success of the 2019 Event, Insomniac paid almost
15 $600,000 directly to artists and vendors to cover USC’s outstanding invoices on the first day of
17 53. In the months following the 2019 Event, other Advanced Fund Vendors
18 contacted Insomniac with outstanding invoices that USC had not paid.
19 54. For instance, USC told Insomniac’s accountants that it would use a specific
20 portion of the Advanced Funds to pay specific artists represented by UTA. However,
21 Insomniac learned that USC did not make these payments to the UTA artists. On July 9, 2019,
22 nearly a month after the event, Mr. Anderson sent multiple e-mails to Insomniac seeking
23 funding to pay outstanding invoices from UTA. On July 11, 2019, Mr. Anderson again
24 requested funds for the outstanding invoices and told Insomniac that the Advanced Funds for
25 UTA artists had been “allocated to other departments.” Mr. Anderson did not explain, and has
27
1 55. Even though USC was responsible for managing artists under the Agreement,
2 Mr. Anderson also told UTA that Insomniac would handle Paradiso payments, leading UTA to
3 contact Insomniac directly about payment. On or around July 15, 2019, Insomniac paid
4 $638,650 directly to UTA to cover outstanding invoices for amounts that USC was supposed to
5 have already paid using the Advanced Funds. USC has not explained, and has never explained,
6 what happened to the original $638,650 that Insomniac advanced USC to pay UTA artists.
7 56. In addition to talent agencies, individual artists have contacted Insomniac about
8 USC’s mismanagement of the 2019 Event, stating they did not know whether they would be
11 “Outstanding Debt: USC Events’ Penchant for Nonpayment Exposed [Exclusive].” The article
12 provided quotes and anecdotes from vendors, contract workers, and employees whom USC had
13 not yet paid for the 2019 Event, even though the article was published more than three months
15 events-nonpayment.
16 58. Shortly after the 2019 Event, Insomniac and HOB were also contacted by
18 59. On or around July 10, 2019, Just Right Productions (“JRP”) sent a copy of a
19 default judgment it obtained against USC for around $29,500, supported by two unpaid
20 invoices for stage rental equipment that JRP provided to USC for other events.
21 60. Additionally, on or around July 17, 2019, LMG, LLC (“LMG”) sent a copy of a
22 default judgment it obtained against USC for around $176,000. Insomniac asked USC about
23 the judgment, and USC said it had nothing to do with Paradiso. But Insomniac contacted LMG
24 directly and learned the judgment included outstanding payments from Paradiso Festival 2017.
25 Insomniac had advanced funds to USC to cover LMG’s payments for Paradiso Festival 2017,
26 and this was the first time Insomniac learned that USC not used those funds to pay LMG.
27
3 information from USC so the parties could settle the event. However, despite Insomniac’s
4 repeated requests and USC’s repeated assurances that it would provide this information, USC
6 62. On June 17, 2019, two days after the 2019 Event, Insomniac asked USC for a
7 reconciliation that would show what Insomniac funded based on USC’s funding requests, and
8 what USC actually paid out from the Advanced Funds. Because Insomniac had been forced to
9 pay unpaid invoices for some Advanced Fund Vendors on the first day of the event, Insomniac
10 was concerned that there may be other Advanced Fund Vendors who were not fully paid, and
11 that Insomniac did not know what USC had actually paid using the Advanced Funds. USC
13 63. Over the next week and a half, Insomniac sent daily follow-up e-mails to USC
14 requesting the reconciliation documents and backup for expenses paid by USC. Despite USC’s
15 assurances that it would, for instance, send the documents “by midday tomorrow,” “shortly,”
16 “by the end of the day,” or “in the next couple hours,” USC did not submit any documents to
18 64. There were numerous issues with the June 26 documents provided by USC. For
19 instance, the documents did not show how USC used the over $600,000 in Advanced Funds
20 that Insomniac had provided for payments to UTA artists, but that USC never paid to UTA and
21 that Insomniac was forced to pay a second time, directly to UTA, after the 2019 Event. USC
22 provided quotes instead of final invoices for some vendors, and did not provide invoices at all
23 for other vendors. Some invoices did not include an invoice number, vendor name, or vendor
25 65. USC also misrepresented the status of its vendor payments in the June 26
26 documents. For instance, USC’s reconciliation showed that the balance for a particular
27
1 communications vendor, who was an Advanced Fund Vendor, was paid. However, this vendor
2 contacted Insomniac and HOB to inform them that it had not been paid for the 2019 Event.
3 66. In July and August 2019, USC sent additional invoices to Insomniac as
4 purported backup for USC’s expenses. In other words, USC represented to Insomniac that it
5 had paid these invoices, in order to justify the expenses that USC claimed in settling the 2019
6 Event. However, some of the vendors for these invoices informed Insomniac that USC had not
9 Insomniac’s need to settle the 2019 Event and ensure all artists and vendors had been fully
10 paid, Insomniac asked USC to provide an Accounts Payable register (“AP register”) showing
11 all paid and outstanding invoices for the 2019 Event. An AP register would show all of the
12 payments that USC had made, which would allow Insomniac’s accountants to determine what
14 68. Insomniac needed USC’s AP register in order to settle the 2019 Event, and
15 Insomniac’s request was reasonable given the mysterious disappearance of the Advanced
16 Funds. Under the Agreement, USC was required to provide the AP register within a reasonable
17 period of time after the 2019 Event, not to exceed 30 days. Based on USC’s obligations under
18 the Agreement, including USC’s obligation to maintain full and complete books and records,
19 and Insomniac’s right to inspect USC’s books and records with five business days’ written
20 notice, USC should have been able to provide the AP register to Insomniac promptly. Further,
21 an AP register is a simple report that can be easily generated by USC’s accounting software.
22 69. USC did not respond to Insomniac’s request for an AP register. Insomniac sent
23 a follow-up e-mail to Mr. Anderson on August 17, 2019, again requesting an AP register
24 showing paid and outstanding invoices. On September 4, 2019, Insomniac sent another follow-
25 up e-mail and warned Mr. Anderson that if Insomniac did not receive payment confirmation,
26 Insomniac would need to bill back the Advanced Funds and work with an audit team to collect
1 70. On September 5, 2019, Mr. Anderson told Insomniac that USC would have an
2 update “by tomorrow afternoon at the latest.” He did not provide the promised update.
3 71. Insomniac continued to learn of other Advanced Fund Vendors whom USC had
4 not paid using the Advanced Funds. USC continued to ignore Insomniac’s request to provide
5 an AP register so Insomniac could ascertain what USC had done with the Advanced Funds and
7 72. On September 11, 2019, almost five weeks after Insomniac’s original request for
8 an AP register, Insomniac sent USC written notice of USC’s breach of its settlement and
10 Letter, Insomniac demanded that USC send an AP register and final invoices showing USC’s
11 payments from the Advanced Funds to cure its breach within ten days, as required by Section 7
14 73. Later that day, Mr. Anderson sent an e-mail to Ian Humphrey, Senior Counsel
16 74. On September 21, 2019, after USC failed to cure its breach, Insomniac sent a
20 from FedEx that the September 21 Termination Notice was delivered to USC.
22 discussions and seek financial documents from USC for the limited purpose of settling
24 76. On September 22, 2019, after the period for cure had expired and Insomniac had
25 terminated the Agreement, Mr. Anderson submitted a QuickBooks report that purported to
26 address Insomniac’s request for an AP register. However, there were numerous issues with the
27 QuickBooks report. For instance, the QuickBooks report showed significantly higher expenses
1 than the backup provided by USC, so Insomniac could not reconcile USC’s expenses.
2 Although the QuickBooks report showed that USC had written certain checks, the QuickBooks
3 report did not show which checks had cleared, and it was unclear whether vendors actually
4 received the funds. Insomniac was particularly concerned about the status of these alleged
5 payments because Insomniac continued to receive e-mails and outstanding invoices from
6 vendors who were listed as “paid” on USC’s spreadsheets. Further, the QuickBooks report
7 contained annotations suggesting the report was edited after it was pulled from USC’s
8 accounting software.
9 77. On October 28, Mr. Anderson spoke with Meelo Solis, Insomniac’s VP of
10 Festivals and Concerts. Mr. Solis told Mr. Anderson the Agreement was terminated, but Mr.
11 Anderson claimed he did not receive the September 21 Termination Notice and threatened to
12 sue Insomniac. Mr. Anderson offered to provide bank statements and wire receipts to settle the
13 2019 Event.
14 78. On October 29, Mr. Humphrey e-mailed Mr. Anderson and asked him to send
16 79. Between October 30 and November 10, 2019, Insomniac sent numerous follow-
17 ups by text message and e-mail to Mr. Anderson, requesting that USC send the bank statements
18 and wire receipts to Insomniac. Despite Mr. Anderson’s offer to provide these documents and
19 his repeated assurances that USC would, for instance, send the documents “by tomorrow at the
20 latest,” “over the weekend,” “by end of day,” “finishing up now,” or “tomorrow,” USC still did
21 not send the bank statements and wire receipts showing USC had paid its vendors.
24 terminated the Agreement, Insomniac never received all of the necessary financial information
25 for a complete and accurate settlement of the 2019 Event. However, in the interests of closing
26 the books for the event and ensuring all of the artists and vendors were paid, Insomniac
27
1 negotiated a settlement with USC that was executed on December 20, 2019 (the “2019 Event
3 81. As part of the 2019 Event Settlement, USC agreed to pay all unpaid vendors
4 from Paradiso 2019 (the “Unpaid Vendors”) in full and submit payment confirmation to
5 Insomniac (the “Vendor Payment Confirmations”) by no later than January 18, 2020. USC
7 82. The parties agreed that a certain amount would be deducted from USC’s share
8 of the revenue to pay the JPR and LMG judgments and to offset an amount USC owed to HOB
9 from the settlement of another event. Insomniac paid HOB, JPR and LMG and provided
11 83. After applying deductions and discounts, Insomniac and USC agreed on the
12 final amount that USC would receive from the 2019 Event proceeds.
13 84. Ms. Salazar-Hanna negotiated the settlement for Insomniac. After the 2019
14 Event Settlement was executed, Ms. Salazar-Hanna asked Mr. Anderson when USC would start
15 sending Vendor Payment Confirmations. On December 20, 2019, Mr. Anderson told Ms.
16 Salazar-Hanna by e-mail, “If you send the wire through immediately, I’ll start on the payments
18 85. Insomniac sent the settlement amount to USC by wire on December 20, which
20 86. Despite Mr. Anderson’s promise to “send you confirmation as we go,” Mr.
21 Anderson and USC did not send any Vendor Payment Confirmations to Insomniac.
22 87. On January 6, 2020, Ms. Salazar-Hanna asked Mr. Anderson for a status update
23 on payments to the Unpaid Vendors, as Insomniac had expected to receive Vendor Payment
24 Confirmations after USC received the settlement. Mr. Anderson replied to Ms. Salazar-Hanna
25 by e-mail that “I have started to make payments and will get more done this week,” but he did
27
2 Production, asked Mr. Anderson to make certain that a particular vendor, one of the Unpaid
3 Vendors, was paid as soon as possible, as Mr. Bear had told the vendor that USC would be
4 paying it at the first of the year. Mr. Anderson replied to Mr. Bear by e-mail that “I am in
6 89. Despite Mr. Anderson’s representation that USC would pay the vendor on
7 January 7, and USC’s requirement under the 2019 Event Settlement to pay all Unpaid Vendors
8 and send Vendor Payment Confirmations to Insomniac by January 18, 2020, this vendor has
10 90. On January 9, 2020, a security vendor told Insomniac that USC still hadn’t paid
11 his team for the 2019 Event, and that Mr. Anderson had been telling him “tomorrow” for the
12 past 5 months. The vendor also said that Mr. Anderson claimed he hadn’t received settlement
13 from Insomniac yet. On January 15, the vendor told Insomniac that Mr. Anderson “stopped
14 responding to calls/emails/texts.” The security vendor and his team have still not been paid.
15 91. Although the January 18, 2020 deadline has passed, USC has not submitted
16 Vendor Payment Confirmations to Insomniac. Unpaid Vendors have informed Insomniac that
17 USC has still not fully paid them, despite USC’s obligation to do so before January 18.
20 https://www.facebook.com/USCSEATTLE/.
21 93. On January 15, 2020, USC posted a “teaser” video for Paradiso Festival on
23 94. On January 17, 2020, USC posted a photo from Paradiso Festival on USC’s
24 Facebook page with the comment, “Who do YOU want to see Paradiso Festival? Tag the
25 artists below!”
26
27
1 95. On January 21, 2020, USC posted another photo from Paradiso Festival on
2 USC’s Facebook page with the message, “Question: Who should play the sunset time slot at
3 Paradiso Festival?”
4 96. Despite Insomniac’s clear termination, USC’s social media posts have generated
5 excitement in the electronic dance music community that Paradiso Festival will be held in
6 2020.
7 97. On information and belief, USC has started promoting and booking talent for
8 Paradiso Festival 2020 even though the Agreement was terminated and there is no longer a
15 99. USC failed to provide necessary financial information to settle 2019 Event, as
16 required by Sections 4(b) and 4(c) of the Agreement. USC’s failure to provide this information
18 100. Insomniac provided written notice to USC of its material breach on September
19 11, 2019. USC failed to cure the breach within 10 days following this notice, as required by
23 102. On October 28, 2019, Mr. Anderson spoke with Mr. Solis. Mr. Anderson
24 disagreed that the Agreement was terminated and threatened to sue Insomniac.
25 103. On January 15, 2020, USC posted a “teaser” video for Paradiso Festival on
26 USC’s Facebook page. Since then, USC has posted at least two photographs from Paradiso
27 Festival on USC’s Facebook page with comments inviting electronic music dance fans to name
1 the artists they wish to see at Paradiso Festival. USC’s actions show that USC believes the
3 104. There is an actual controversy between Insomniac and USC with respect to the
5 105. Under Section 9 of the Agreement, Insomniac may not promote or book any
6 other multi-stage electronic dance music concert event at the Gorge Amphitheatre so long as
7 the Agreement remains in effect. Insomniac wishes to promote an electronic dance music
8 event at the Gorge Amphitheatre this summer without USC’s involvement, and seeks judicial
9 confirmation that Insomniac is no longer bound by the non-compete obligation because the
11 106. Insomniac seeks a declaratory judgment that the Agreement was terminated on
17 108. Section 9 of the Agreement states: “For so long as the Event is profitable to
18 both parties based on the financial terms and distribution of revenues under Section 3 and 4,
19 above, this Agreement shall automatically renew on annual basis with the Event being
20 scheduled at the Venue for the last full weekend in June, or other time in the Gorge Season as
21 both parties mutually agree, unless the parties mutually agree otherwise.”
22 109. Insomniac terminated the parties’ relationship, however, to the extent it is found
23 not to have terminated, a declaratory judgment should be entered that the Agreement is no
27
1 111. Due to the circumstances surrounding the 2019 Event, including but not limited
2 to USC’s material breach of the Agreement; USC’s misrepresentations to Insomniac about how
3 the Advanced Funds would be used; USC’s misrepresentations to Insomniac about how the
4 Advanced Funds were used; USC’s failure to pay its artists and vendors, including the
5 Advanced Fund Vendors; USC’s failure to provide financial documents and backup showing
6 how the Advanced Funds were actually used; USC’s failure to provide financial documents and
7 backup showing that all USC artists and vendors were fully paid for the 2019 Event; USC’s
8 breach of its duty of good faith and fair dealing to Insomniac; USC’s actions damaging the
9 Paradiso Festival brand; USC’s actions damaging Insomniac’s business relationships and
10 reputation, including causing artists to no longer wish to work with Insomniac; and USC’s
11 general poor behavior towards Insomniac, Insomniac’s purpose for entering the Agreement has
13 112. Mr. Anderson has indicated he wishes to renew the Agreement and continue
15 113. There is an actual controversy between Insomniac and USC with respect to
17 114. Insomniac seeks a declaratory judgment that the Agreement has not been
23 116. Insomniac and USC were parties to the Agreement, a fully executed contract.
24 117. The Agreement provides a cross-license provision. Under Section 2(d) of the
25 Agreement, “To the extent necessary for promoting the Event, each party hereby grants to the
26 other a limited, non-assignable license to use the trademarks, service marks, logos and other
27 brand names of the other strictly in conjunction with the Event and in accordance with such use
1 standards and guidelines provided by the owning party. ‘Paradiso Festival’ is a registered
2 trademark jointly owned by [Insomniac] and USC Events. The parties grant one another a
3 cross-license to use the ‘Paradiso Festival’ trademark along with the branding and concept for
4 the Event, including all other trademarks, service marks, copyrights, trade dress and other
5 rights related specifically and exclusively to the production and promotion of the Event
6 (collectively the ‘Event Branding’) and neither party shall, directly or indirectly use the Event
7 Branding in conjunction with any other event without the advance written consent of the other
8 party.”
9 118. Under Section 10(g) of the Agreement, the cross-license provision survives
11 119. Under Sections 1 and 9 of the Agreement, Paradiso Festival was a weekend
13 120. USC has started promoting Paradiso Festival 2020 on its social media accounts.
14 121. The Agreement has been terminated. HOB, Insomniac’s parent company, is the
15 venue operator for the Gorge Amphitheatre, and there is currently no venue agreement to
17 122. Insomniac has not given written consent for USC to use the Paradiso Festival
19 123. On information and belief, USC has or will soon begin other promotion
20 activities for Paradiso Festival 2020, including booking artists for Paradiso Festival 2020 and
22 124. Due to Insomniac’s longtime association with Paradiso Festival, USC’s conduct
23 in promoting Paradiso Festival 2020 will reflect on Insomniac and affect Insomniac’s business
24 relationships with the artists and vendors who support Paradiso Festival, even though the
25 Agreement was terminated and Insomniac is no longer co-producing Paradiso Festival with
26 USC.
27
2 music fans may wrongly blame Insomniac when the event does not take place due to
3 Insomniac’s longtime association with Paradiso Festival. These consumers may also be
4 harmed by USC’s actions, such as by purchasing air tickets or making other travel
6 126. Due to USC’s reputation for failure to pay, USC may wrongly represent to
7 artists and vendors that Insomniac is still co-producing Paradiso Festival with USC in order to
9 127. As a direct and proximate result of USC’s conduct, Insomniac will suffer severe,
10 immediate, and irreparable injury to its business, goodwill, and reputation. Unless such acts are
11 restrained by this Court, they will be continued, and Insomniac will continue to suffer great and
12 irreparable injury.
14 129. Insomniac is entitled to an injunction against USC in order to stop USC from
15 promoting Paradiso Festival 2020, using the Paradiso Festival social media accounts, and
21 131. Under the 2019 Event Settlement, USC was required to pay the Unpaid Vendors
22 before January 18, 2020 and send Vendor Payment Confirmations to Insomniac.
23 132. On information and belief, USC has not fully paid the Unpaid Vendors.
24 133. USC breached its obligations to Insomniac by failing to pay the Unpaid Vendors
26 134. Due to USC’s breach, multiple Unpaid Vendors have contacted Insomniac to
1 135. If USC does not pay the Unpaid Vendors and submit Vendor Payment
2 Confirmations to Insomniac, Insomniac will incur the costs of working with an audit team to
3 systematically contact, reconcile, and pay the Unpaid Vendors for the 2019 Event. These costs
4 are necessary to protect USC’s business relationships and reputation, as many of the Unpaid
6 136. Mr. Anderson is the alter ego of USC, and vice versa, such that USC and Mr.
7 Anderson are to be treated as one and the same. Mr. Anderson is personally liable for USC’s
8 acts and omissions, including his own acts and omissions on behalf of USC, and through which
11 proven at trial.
16 139. On February 19, 2019, USC told Insomniac that it was putting together a
17 funding request “for the first round of artist deposits.” Insomniac was concerned that the
18 request seemed early, as USC had submitted its first funding request in April for the previous
19 year’s Paradiso Festival. On February 22, 2019, USC sent an e-mail to Insomniac
20 acknowledging the request was early, but explained USC was “trying to get an early announce
22 140. Insomniac understood from USC’s statements that USC planned to announce the
23 artist lineup for the 2019 Event earlier than the previous year, and that USC needed an advance
24 from Insomniac so that USC could pay deposits to secure the artists’ participation in the 2019
25 Event.
26 141. On February 27, 2019, USC submitted its first funding request to Insomniac.
27 The request listed specific artists, the total event fee for each artist, the deposit amount being
1 requested for each artist, and the remaining balance. USC also provided backup in the form of
2 fully executed agreements for the artists, as well as an invoice from USC with a line item for
4 142. USC submitted three additional funding requests to Insomniac on April 1, May
5 18, and May 24, 2019. Each funding request listed specific artists and vendors for the 2019
6 Event, the total event fee for each artist and vendor, the deposit or payment amount being
7 requested for each artist and vendor, and the remaining balance. USC provided backup with
8 each funding request, along with invoices from USC showing line items for “Advanced on
10 143. USC represented that it would use the funds received from the four funding
12 specific payments, including first round artist deposits, to specific artists and vendors for the
13 2019 Event.
15 USC represented that it needed the funds in order to make necessary payments to the Advanced
16 Fund Vendors before the 2019 Event. Otherwise, there would be no need for USC to receive
17 Advanced Funds before the 2019 Event. USC could pay its artists and vendors using cash flow
18 from its standard operations or USC’s share of the net revenue after the 2019 Event was settled.
19 145. Insomniac carefully reviewed each funding request before approving and
20 sending the Advanced Funds to USC. In total, Insomniac advanced over $2 million to USC in
21 reliance on the information and materials that USC provided with its four funding requests.
22 146. USC’s representations were false. USC had no intention of using—and did not
23 use—the Advanced Funds to make the payments to the Advanced Fund Vendors that it listed in
24 its four funding requests. USC lied to Insomniac so that Insomniac would send the Advanced
25 Funds to USC.
26
27
1 147. Insomniac did not know USC’s representations were false. Insomniac
2 discovered the representations were false after Insomniac was forced to pay outstanding
3 invoices to Advanced Fund Vendors on the first day of the 2019 Event.
4 148. For instance, USC said it would use a specific portion of the Advanced Funds to
5 pay specific artists represented by Paradigm. This amount was supposed to cover all deposits
6 and event fees for the Paradigm artists, and Insomniac carefully reviewed the fully executed
7 artist contracts to reconcile these numbers with USC’s funding requests before sending the
8 Advanced Funds. However, on the first day of the 2019 Event, Insomniac learned there was an
9 outstanding balance of $215,055 owed to Paradigm artists. Insomniac was forced to pay the
10 balance directly to Paradigm in order to ensure the success of the 2019 Event. USC never
11 reimbursed Insomniac for the $215,055 amount that Insomniac had to pay twice (once to USC
12 through the Advanced Funds; once to Paradigm on the day of the event), and USC never
14 149. USC also told Insomniac it would use a specific portion of the Advanced Funds
15 to pay specific artists represented by UTA. This amount was supposed to cover all deposits
16 and event fees for the UTA artists, and Insomniac carefully reviewed the fully executed artist
17 contracts to reconcile these numbers with USC’s funding requests before sending the Advanced
18 Funds.
19 150. One month after the event, Insomniac learned that USC still had an outstanding
20 balance of $638,650 to UTA artists for the 2019 Event. Insomniac learned this because UTA
21 sought the unpaid balance from USC after the event, and Mr. Anderson asked Insomniac for
22 funds to pay this amount, even though Insomniac had already given USC all the funding it
23 needed to pay the UTA artists through the Advanced Funds. On July 11, 2019, Mr. Anderson
24 admitted that he and USC had lied in its funding requests, as the Advanced Funds that
25 Insomniac gave USC to pay for UTA artists had been “allocated to other departments.”
26 151. On or around July 15, 2019, Insomniac was forced to pay $638,650 directly to
27 UTA to cover USC’s outstanding invoices the 2019 Event. Based on the amounts in USC’s
1 funding requests, this meant USC could not have fully paid even the first round artist deposits
2 for UTA. USC never reimbursed Insomniac for the $638,650 amount that Insomniac had to
3 pay twice (once to USC through the Advanced Funds; once directly to UTA after the 2019
5 152. Under the Agreement, USC was responsible for artist relations and talent
6 management, as well as managing many of the vendors for the 2019 Event. USC was
7 responsible for paying these artists and vendors, whether through USC’s own funds or by using
8 the Advanced Funds that Insomniac provided to USC for the sole purposes of paying the
10 153. Artists and vendors, including the Advanced Fund Vendors, contacted
11 Insomniac about USC’s failure to pay them for the 2019 Event and other events. Because of
12 USC’s actions, artists have told Insomniac they do not know whether they will work with
14 154. Under the 2019 Event Settlement, USC agreed to pay the Unpaid Vendors in full
16 155. Although that date has passed, Unpaid Vendors have informed Insomniac that
17 they have still not been paid in full by USC. USC has not submitted the payment confirmation.
18 On information and belief, USC has not fully paid the Unpaid Vendors despite its requirement
20 156. Under Washington law, a duty of good faith and fair dealing is implied in every
21 contract. This duty requires the parties to a contract to cooperate with each other so that each
23 157. Insomniac and USC are co-owners of the Paradiso Festival trademark.
24 158. By failing to pay its artists and vendors for all of their hard work in supporting
25 the 2019 Event, USC has harmed the Paradiso Festival brand. Further, artists and vendors no
26 longer trust the promoters of Paradiso Festival to meet their payment obligations.
27
1 159. Mr. Anderson is the alter ego of USC, and vice versa, such that USC and Mr.
2 Anderson are to be treated as one and the same. Mr. Anderson is personally liable for USC’s
3 acts and omissions, including his own acts and omissions on behalf of USC, and through which
5 160. Defendants are liable to Insomniac for breach in an amount to be proven at trial.
8 A. A declaration that the Agreement was terminated or, in the alternative, that the
11 using the Paradiso Festival social media accounts, booking artists for Paradiso Festival, and
16 E. The right to conform the pleadings to the proof and evidence presented at trial;
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27