Basheshar Nath Vs CIT
Basheshar Nath Vs CIT
The constitution of India Guarantees certain Fundamental Rights to the citizens of India and
the question of Waiver of Fundamental Rights is that whether a person can waive his
fundamental rights. This question been extensively discussed in the Case of Basheshar Nath
vs CIT
The Facts of the Case of Basheshar Nath vs CIT are that The Income Tax commissioner under
Section 6 of the Taxation of Income Act examined the accounts of Basheshar Nath and found
that he has not paid an amount of Rs4,50,000 Tax under section 5(1) of the act. Later
Basheshar Nath and Commissioner of Income Tax entered into settlement under the section
8A of the act to pay a sum of Rs3,00,000 in monthly installments. Meanwhile in another case
of Suraj Mall Mehta Vs AS Vishwanath Shastri the court held that section 5(1) of the act is void
as it is violative of Article 14. The appellant Basheshar Nath later wrote a letter to the
commissioner challenging the settlement under Section 8A on the grounds that Section 5(1)
of the act on which it was found being declared void and he requested him to release his
attached properties and also refund him the amount be paid but the commissioner replied
him that the settlement was valid and no refunds will be paid. The appellant aggrieved by his
reply filed a special leave petition in the Supreme Court asking them to direct the
commissioner to refund him money as the Section 5(1) was declared to be void. The
commissioner in the court contended that there were two different procedures for
investigation under section 5(1) and settlement under section 8A and said that the Appellant
by voluntarily accepting for the settlement has waived his fundamental right founded on
Article 14.
The court in this case upheld the contention of the petitioner and held that fundamental
rights cannot be waived