This document summarizes a court case between the Philippine National Bank and Noah's Ark Sugar Refinery regarding ownership of sugar stocks. The Philippine National Bank had loaned money to Luis T. Ramos and Cresencia K. Zoleta, who used warehouse receipts for sugar stocks held by Noah's Ark as collateral. When the loans were not repaid, the Philippine National Bank demanded the sugar from Noah's Ark, who refused, claiming ownership. The court case addresses this dispute over ownership and Noah's Ark's refusal to relinquish the sugar stocks.
This document summarizes a court case between the Philippine National Bank and Noah's Ark Sugar Refinery regarding ownership of sugar stocks. The Philippine National Bank had loaned money to Luis T. Ramos and Cresencia K. Zoleta, who used warehouse receipts for sugar stocks held by Noah's Ark as collateral. When the loans were not repaid, the Philippine National Bank demanded the sugar from Noah's Ark, who refused, claiming ownership. The court case addresses this dispute over ownership and Noah's Ark's refusal to relinquish the sugar stocks.
This document summarizes a court case between the Philippine National Bank and Noah's Ark Sugar Refinery regarding ownership of sugar stocks. The Philippine National Bank had loaned money to Luis T. Ramos and Cresencia K. Zoleta, who used warehouse receipts for sugar stocks held by Noah's Ark as collateral. When the loans were not repaid, the Philippine National Bank demanded the sugar from Noah's Ark, who refused, claiming ownership. The court case addresses this dispute over ownership and Noah's Ark's refusal to relinquish the sugar stocks.
PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, Petitioner, v. HON. MARCELINO L. SAYO, JR., in his capacity as Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court of Manila (Branch 45), NOAH'S ARK SUGAR REFINERY, ALBERTO T. LOOYUKO, JIMMY T. GO and WILSON T. GO, Respondents.
DAVIDE, JR., J.:
In this special civil action for certiorari, actually the third dispute between the same private parties to have reached this Court, 1 petitioner asks us to annul the orders 2 of 15 April 1997 and 14 July 1997 issued in Civil Case No. 90-53023 by the Regional Trial Court, Manila, Branch 45. The first order 3 granted private respondents' motion for execution to satisfy their warehouseman's lien against petitioner, while the second order 4 denied, with finality, petitioner's motion for reconsideration of the first order and urgent motion to lift garnishment, and private respondents' motion for partial reconsideration. The factual antecedents until the commencement of G.R. No. 119231 were summarized in our decision therein, as follows: In accordance with Act No. 2137, the Warehouse Receipts Law, Noah's Ark Sugar Refinery issued on several dates, the following Warehouse Receipts (Quedans): (a) March 1, 1989, Receipt No. 18062, covering sugar deposited by Rosa Sy; (b) March 7, 1989, Receipt No. 18080, covering sugar deposited by RNS Merchandising (Rosa Ng Sy); (c) March 21, 1989, Receipt No. 18081, covering sugar deposited by St. Therese Merchandising; (d) March 31, 1989, Receipt No. 18086, covering sugar deposited by St. Therese Merchandising; and (e) April 1, 1989, Receipt No. 18087, covering sugar deposited by RNS Merchandising. The receipts are substantially in the form, and contains the terms, prescribed for negotiable warehouse receipts by Section 2 of the law. Subsequently, Warehouse Receipts Nos. 18080 and 18081 were negotiated and endorsed to Luis T. Ramos, and Receipts Nos. 18086, 18087 and 18062 were negotiated and endorsed to Cresencia K. Zoleta. Ramos and Zoleta then used the quedans as security for two loan agreements - one for P15.6 million and the other for P23.5 million - obtained by them from the Philippine National Bank. The aforementioned quedans were endorsed by them to the Philippine National Bank. Luis T. Ramos and Cresencia K. Zoleta failed to pay their loans upon maturity on January 9, 1990. Consequently, on March 16, 1990, the Philippine National Bank wrote to Noah's Ark Sugar Refinery demanding delivery of the sugar stocks covered by the quedans endorsed to it by Zoleta and Ramos. Noah's Ark Sugar Refinery refused to comply with the demand alleging ownership thereof, for which reason the Philippine National Bank filed with the Regional Trial Court of Manila a verified complaint for