Motion To Admit

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

REGIONAL TRIAL COURT


Davao City, Branch 55

LAKI ASSET COMPANY


Plaintiff,

- versus -
Civil Case No. 11111
DAMI UTANG CORPORATION For: Sum of Money

Defendants.

x-----------------------
x
MOTION TO ADMIT

The accused, through counsel and unto this Honorable


Court, most respectfully states that:

1. The Honorable Court promulgated its decision on the above-


captioned case on August 9, 2017, finding the accused guilty
beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of Reckless Imprudence
Resulting in Homicide and Less Serious Physical Injuries and
sentencing him to suffer the indeterminate penalty of 1 year, 8
months and 1 day of arresto mayor as minimum to 4 years, 9
months and 11 days of prisioncorreccional as maximum.

2. On the same date, the accused, through the undersigned


counsel, manifested in open court his intention to apply for
probation and avail the benefits of Probation Law of 1976.

3. The accused had fifteen (15) days from the promulgation of the
decision or until August 24, 2017 to file an Application for
Probation.

4. The undersigned counsel, on August 24, 2017, prepared the


Application for Probation on behalf of the accused. A copy
thereof was likewise served and duly received by the Office of
the Provincial Prosecutor, _________________. However, due
to the unusually high number clients that day, the
aforementioned Application for Probation was not immediately
mailed.
5. It was only later that afternoon, after attending to all clients,
that our staff had the opportunity to go to the Post Office.
Unfortunately, the Post Office was already closed when he
arrived, hence, the Application for Probation was not mailed
that day.

6. The delay of one (1) day in the filing of the Application for
Probation is not intended to undermine the speedy and proper
administration of justice. The reason for the delay was beyond
the control of the accused and the undersigned counsel.

7. In several cases decided by the Supreme Court, the High Court


relaxed the stringent application of technical rules in the
exercise of its equity jurisdiction. In Ligon v. Court of Appeals,
it was held “that courts should not be so strict about procedural
lapses that do not really impair the proper administration of
justice. After all, the higher objective of procedural rule is to
insure that the substantive rights of the parties are protected.
Litigations should, as much as possible, be decided on the
merits and not on technicalities. Every party-litigant must be
afforded ample opportunity for the proper and just
determination of his case, free from the unacceptable plea of
technicalities.”

8. The accused is asking for compassion and is hoping that a


mere one (1) day delay would merit the consideration of the
Honorable Court.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed of this Honorable


Court, that this Motion to Admit and the accused’s Application for
Probation be granted.

Accused prays for such other reliefs that are just and equitable
under the premises.

Davao City, Philippines; 24 FEB 2020.

BAI SURHAYAH A. PENDATUN


Counsel for Defendant
Davao City, Philippines
REQUEST FOR & NOTICE OFHEARING

THE BRANCH CLERK OF COURT


Metropolitan Trial Court
Branch 39, Davao City

Please submit the foregoing Motion to the Court for its


consideration and approval immediately upon receipt hereof and
kindly include the same in the court's calendar for hearing on Friday,
27 April 2007 at 8:30 in the morning.

ATTICUS FINCH

1 MockingBirdStreet

Timog Avenue, Quezon City

Please take notice that counsel has requested to be heard on


Friday, 27 April 2007 at 8:30 in the morning.

HALILA SUDAGAR
Counsel for Defendant
SUDAGAR LAW FIRM
Laguna Street, Davao City

PLUS: [5] Proof of Service

You might also like