Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Macondray & Co. vs. Sellner Digest
Macondray & Co. vs. Sellner Digest
Macondray & Co. vs. Sellner Macondray & Co. vs. Sellner
Macondray & Co. vs. Sellner Macondray & Co. vs. Sellner
III. Issue/s It would be the height of injustice to permit the principal then to withdraw
the authority and terminate the agency as against an express provision of the
1. W/N Sellner is entitled to the commission even though the
Company cancelled the Sale contract, and perchance reap the benefit of the agent's labors, without being
liable to him for his commissions.
IV. Ratio/Legal Basis
Lastly, the Court noted that the sudden cancellation of the sale by the
The Court ruled that it is very clear that the Company agreed to sell the land
to Baretto for P18,892.50 and that Barretto agreed to buy the land at Company is to be considered as arbitrary since there was no reason given
that price with the condition that he will first examine the title and the by the Company to justify the cancellation. The Court also noted that based
certificate of the land. The Court further noted that the Company did
on jurisprudence Barretto is entitled to examine the title and certificate of
not give enough reason nor has any reason for setting up a deadline for
the payment of the land. the land for a reasonable time. Thus, it is very clear that the Company
cannot cancel the sale since it will arbitrarily deprive Barretto the
Even though the Court does not question the general doctrine as to the
opportunity to make such examination of the documents.
power of a principal to revoke the authority of his agent at will, in the
absence of a contract fixing the duration of the agency the Court believed And since it is clear that Sellner is entitled to his commission, offsetting this
that whatever may be the view which should taken as to the right of the commission against the unpaid balance of the market value of the land, will
Company to terminate the negotiations for the sale of the property to not make the Company entitled to any money judgment against Sellner.
Barretto, there can be no question as to the liability of the Company to
Sellner for the amount of the commission which it agreed to pay him should Thus, because of this, the Court ruled that Sellner is entitled to the
he find a purchaser for the land at the price agreed upon in his agency commissions as stipulated and that the Company has no cause of action for
contract. monetary damages against Sellner.