Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SARS-like Cluster of Circulating Bat Coronavirus Pose Threat For Human Emergence
SARS-like Cluster of Circulating Bat Coronavirus Pose Threat For Human Emergence
SARS-like Cluster of Circulating Bat Coronavirus Pose Threat For Human Emergence
Vineet D. Menacherya, Boyd L. Yount Jr.a, Amy C. Simsa, Kari Debbinka,b, Sudhakar S. Agnihothramc, Lisa E. Gralinskia,
Rachel L. Grahama, Trevor Scobeya, Jessica A. Plantea, Scott R. Royala, Jesica Swanstroma, Timothy P. Sheahana,
Raymond J. Picklesc,d, Davide Cortie,f,g, Scott H. Randelld, Antonio Lanzavecchiae,f, Wayne A. Marascoh,
and Ralph S. Barica,c,1
a
Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; bDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; cDivision of Microbiology, National Center for Toxicological Research, Food and Drug
Administration, Jefferson, AR 72079; dDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology and Marsico Lung Institute/Cystic Fibrosis Center, University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; eInstitute for Research in Biomedicine, Bellinzona, Switzerland; fInstitute of Microbiology, Eidgenössische
Technische Hochschule Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; gHumabs BioMed SA, Bellinzona, Switzerland; and hDepartment of Cancer Immunology and AIDS,
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute–Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA 02215
Edited by Peter Palese, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, and approved January 6, 2016 (received for review September 4, 2015)
Outbreaks from zoonotic sources represent a threat to both strategies against SARS were effective against WIV1-CoV spike
human disease as well as the global economy. Despite a wealth of unlike available vaccine approaches. Together, the results highlight
metagenomics studies, methods to leverage these datasets to identify the utility of developing platforms to evaluate circulating zoonotic
future threats are underdeveloped. In this study, we describe an viruses as threats for future emergence and epidemic potential.
approach that combines existing metagenomics data with reverse
genetics to engineer reagents to evaluate emergence and pathogenic Results
potential of circulating zoonotic viruses. Focusing on the severe acute The discovery of SARS-like virus clusters that bridge the gap
respiratory syndrome (SARS)-like viruses, the results indicate that the between the epidemic strains and related precursor CoV strain
WIV1-coronavirus (CoV) cluster has the ability to directly infect and HKU3 virus provided the best evidence for emergence of SARS-
may undergo limited transmission in human populations. However, CoV from Chinese horseshoe bats (5). Comparing the receptor
in vivo attenuation suggests additional adaptation is required for binding domain (RBD), SARS-CoV Urbani and WIV1 share
epidemic disease. Importantly, available SARS monoclonal antibodies homology at 11 of the 14 contact residues with human ACE2
offered success in limiting viral infection absent from available (Fig. 1A); importantly, the three amino acid changes represent
vaccine approaches. Together, the data highlight the utility of a relatively conservative substitution not predicted to ablate
platform to identify and prioritize prepandemic strains harbored in binding (Fig. 1B). Therefore, exploring WIV1 strains allows ex-
animal reservoirs and document the threat posed by WIV1-CoV for
amination of emergence, pathogenesis potential, and adap-
emergence in human populations.
tation requirements. Using the SARS-CoV infectious clone as a
template (7), we designed and synthesized a full-length infectious
SARS | CoV | emergence | Spike | WIV1 clone of WIV1-CoV consisting of six plasmids that could be
enzymatically cut, ligated together, and electroporated into cells
A lthough previously associated with upper respiratory infec-
tions, the emergence of severe acute respiratory coronavirus
(SARS-CoV) in 2002–2003, and more recently, Middle East
to rescue replication competent progeny virions (Fig. S1A). In
addition to the full-length clone, we also produced WIV1-CoV
respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV underscores the threat of
Significance
cross-species transmission leading to virulent pandemic viral in-
fections (1, 2). Whereas prevailing research suggests that SARS-
CoV emerged from viruses in the Chinese horseshoe bat, identi- The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus
fying a progenitor strain that used human angiotensin converting (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV
enzyme 2 (ACE2) had proven elusive (3, 4). However, recent highlights the continued risk of cross-species transmission leading
metagenomics studies isolated several SARS-like virus sequences to epidemic disease. This manuscript describes efforts to extend
that share ≥90% genome-wide homology and represented the surveillance beyond sequence analysis, constructing chimeric and
full-length zoonotic coronaviruses to evaluate emergence poten-
closest sequences to the epidemic strains (5, 6). Importantly, re-
tial. Focusing on SARS-like virus sequences isolated from Chinese
searchers also isolated replication competent virus; WIV1-CoV,
horseshoe bats, the results indicate a significant threat posed by
part of the Rs3306 cluster, could use ACE2 orthologs and medi-
WIV1-CoV. Both full-length and chimeric WIV1-CoV readily repli-
ated low-level replication in human cells (5). Overall, the evidence
cated efficiently in human airway cultures and in vivo, suggesting
indicates that SARS-CoV likely emerged from Chinese horseshoe
capability of direct transmission to humans. In addition, while
bats and that similar viruses are still harbored in these populations.
monoclonal antibody treatments prove effective, the SARS-based
The identification of WIV1-CoV and its capacity to use ACE2
vaccine approach failed to confer protection. Together, the study
orthologs offers a warning for possible reemergence and pro-
indicates an ongoing threat posed by WIV1-related viruses and
vides an opportunity to prepare for a future CoV outbreak. To
the need for continued study and surveillance.
achieve this goal, a new platform is required to translate meta-
genomics findings; the approach must generate critical di- Author contributions: V.D.M., B.L.Y., and R.S.B. designed research; V.D.M., B.L.Y., A.C.S.,
agnostic reagents, define emergence potential of novel strains, S.S.A., L.E.G., T.S., J.A.P., S.R.R., J.S., and T.P.S. performed research; V.D.M., B.L.Y., R.J.P.,
and determine efficacy of current therapeutics. Building on this D.C., S.H.R., A.L., and W.A.M. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; V.D.M., A.C.S.,
K.D., R.L.G., and R.S.B. analyzed data; and V.D.M. and R.S.B. wrote the paper.
premise, we developed a framework to examine circulating CoVs
using reverse genetic systems to construct full-length and chi- The authors declare no conflict of interest.
meric viruses. The results indicate that viruses using WIV1-CoV This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
spike are poised to emerge in human populations due to efficient Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.
replication in primary human airway epithelial cell cultures. See Commentary on page 2812.
However, additional adaptation, potentially independent of the 1
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected].
Downloaded by guest on March 27, 2020
spike protein receptor-binding domain, is required for patho- This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.
genesis and epidemic disease. Importantly, monoclonal antibody 1073/pnas.1517719113/-/DCSupplemental.
MICROBIOLOGY
WIV1 spike proteins; human ACE2 contact residues are also highlighted we examined the full-length WIV1-CoV versus the epidemic
(orange). (C ) Viral replication of WIV1-CoV (blue), WIV1-MA15 (blue SARS-CoV Urbani strain in vivo. Ten-week-old BALB/c mice
hatched), and SARS-CoV Urbani (black) following infection of Vero cells at a
multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01. (D) Well-differentiated air–liquid in-
terface primary human airway epithelial cell cultures were infected with
SARS-CoV Urbani (black), SARS-CoV MA15 (black hatched), WIV1-MA15
(blue-white hatched), and WIV-CoV (blue) at (E) MOI of 0.01 in cells from the
same donor at an MOI of 0.01. Samples were collected at individual time
points with biological replicates (n = 3) for all experiments for both C and D.
chimeric virus that replaced the SARS spike with the WIV1
spike within the mouse-adapted backbone (WIV1-MA15,
Fig. S1B). WIV1-MA15 incorporates the original binding and
entry capabilities of WIV1-CoV, but maintains the backbone
changes to mouse-adapted SARS-CoV. Importantly, WIV1-
MA15 does not incorporate the Y436H mutation in spike that is
required for SARS-MA15 pathogenesis (8). Following electro-
poration into Vero cells, robust stock titers were recovered from
both chimeric WIV1-MA15 and WIV1-CoV. To confirm growth
kinetics and replication, Vero cells were infected with SARS-
CoV Urbani, WIV1-MA15, and WIV1-CoV (Fig. 1C); the
results indicate similar replication kinetics and overall titers
between the CoVs. However, Western blot analysis suggests
potential differences in spike cleavage/processing of WIV1 and
SARS-CoV spike proteins (Fig. S1C); the ratio of full-length to Fig. 2. Viruses using WIV1 spike attenuated relative to SARS spike in vivo.
cleaved spike varied between SARS spikes (Urbani, 1.21; MA15, (A and B) Ten-week-old BALB/c mice were infected with 104 pfu of either
1.44) and WIV1 (full length, 0.61; WIV1-MA15, 0.25) signaling SARS-CoV MA15 (black) or WIV1-MA15 (blue hatched) via the i.n. route and
possible variation in host proteolytic processing (Fig. S1D). examined over a 7-d time course. (A) Weight loss (n = 17 for WIV1-MA15, n =
Overall, the results indicate comparable viral replication, but 9 for SARS-CoV MA15) and (B) lung titer (n = 3 for MA15, n = 4 for WIV1-
possible biochemical differences in processing. MA15. (C and D) Ten-week-old BALB/c mice were infected with 1 × 105 pfu of
either SARS-CoV Urbani (black), WIV1-CoV (blue), or SARS-CoV MA15 (gray)
and examined over a 4-d time course. (C) Weight loss (n = 6 for WIV1-CoV,
Replication in Primary Human Epithelial Cells. Next, we wanted to
n = 6 for SARS-CoV Urbani) and (D) lung titer (n = 3 for WIV1-CoV, n = 3 for
determine WIV-CoV replication potential in models of the hu- SARS-CoV Urbani) were examined. For each bar graph, center value is rep-
man lung. Previous examination of WIV1-CoV recovered from resentative of group mean and error bars are defined by SEM. P values based
Downloaded by guest on March 27, 2020
bat samples demonstrated poor replication in A549 cells (5); on two-tailed Student’s t test of individual time points are marked as in-
however, replication of epidemic SARS-CoV is also poor in dicated: ***P < 0.001.
Menachery et al. PNAS | March 15, 2016 | vol. 113 | no. 11 | 3049
were infected with 105 pfu of WIV1-CoV or SARS-CoV Urbani
and followed over a 4-d time course. As expected, neither in-
fection condition resulted in significant weight loss compared
with MA15 (Fig. 2C). However, viral replication was significantly
attenuated for WIV1-CoV compared with SARS-CoV Urbani
(Fig. 2D); at both days 2 and 4 postinfection, WIV1-CoV titer was
reduced nearly 10,000- and 1,000-fold, respectively. Similarly, only
minor antigen staining was observed following WIV1-CoV in-
fection, contrasting antigen staining throughout the parenchyma
2-d post–SARS-CoV Urbani infection (Fig. S2 E and F). To-
gether, the data indicate significant attenuation of WIV1-CoV
relative to the epidemic SARS-CoV in wild-type mice.
tential threat based on replication in primary human cells and and protection following homologous SARS-CoV challenge in
preference for the human ACE2 receptor in vivo, we next sought young mice (18). However, both aged animal and heterologous
MICROBIOLOGY
Fig. 4. SARS-CoV monoclonal antibodies have robust neutralization against
WIV1 spike-mediated infection. Neutralization efficacy was evaluated using
percent neutralization assays against SARS-CoV Urbani (black) or WIV1-MA15
(blue) with a panel of monoclonal antibodies: (A) fm6, (B) 230.15, (C) 227.15,
and (D) 109.8, all originally generated against epidemic SARS-CoV. Each data
point is representative of two or more independent neutralization wells. (E and
F) Twenty- to twenty-four-week-old HFH4 ACE2-expressing mice were injected
with 200 μg of anti-SARS human antibody 227.15 (hatched line) or mock (solid
line) 1 d before infection with 1 × 10^5 pfu of SARS-CoV Urbani (black) or WIV1-
CoV (blue) and examined over a 7-d time course for (E) survival (n = 3 for both
antibody-treated groups and mock PBS control WIV1-CoV, n = 2 for mock-
treated SARS-CoV Urbani), (F) day-2 lung titer (n = 3 for all groups). ND signifies
no titers detected. For each bar graph, center value is representative of group
mean and error bars are defined by SEM.
vide significant protection and may cause adverse effects in the indicate individual eosinophil locations. P values based on two-tailed Stu-
context of WIV1-CoV spike-mediated outbreak. dent’s t test of individual time points are marked as indicated: **P < 0.01.
Menachery et al. PNAS | March 15, 2016 | vol. 113 | no. 11 | 3051
closest model to the human lung. Therefore, the ability of both based on robust neutralization and protection in young mice
WIV1-CoV and WIV1-MA15 to grow equivalently to the epi- (18). However, studies with DIV in aged animals revealed in-
demic SARS-CoV in these cultures is a major concern for complete protection, significant immune pathology, and eo-
emergence. However, pathogenesis studies in mice suggest that sinophilia (19). Despite these prior results, the efficacy of
further adaptation may be required for epidemic disease. Com- monoclonal antibody treatments made further testing of DIV
pared with SARS equivalents, both full-length and chimeric seemingly worthwhile against WIV1-CoV spike-mediated in-
WIV1 viruses had significant attenuation even with the presence fection. However, the results remained the same, as vaccination
of human ACE2 in the mouse model. Together, the data suggest of aged mice resulted in no protection from WIV1-MA15
that despite using ACE2 and robust replication in primary replication in vivo (Fig. 5). Importantly, increased immune
human airway epithelial cultures, WIV1-CoV likely maintains pathology and observed eosinophilia indicate that broad-based
deficits that impact pathogenesis in mice; therefore, WIV1- vaccination efforts against SARS-CoV–like viruses must con-
mediated infection may have diminished epidemic potential in sider heterologous viruses as well as failure due to senescence in
humans relative to SARS-CoV. the aged host. A number of novel platforms including Venezuelan
A number of factors may contribute to reduced mouse path- Equine Encephalitis Virus Replicon Particle (VRP) and live-
ogenesis observed following WIV1-CoV spike-mediated in- attenuated vaccine approaches show great promise in these
fection. In the context of both the SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV areas, but require further testing and development before de-
outbreaks, focus had been primarily directed to spike binding ployment in an outbreak setting (22, 23).
as the key component of emergence and pandemic potential. Overall, the results from these studies highlight the utility of a
Supported by adaption at Y436H in mouse-adapted SARS spike platform that leverages metagenomics findings and reverse
(10), improved binding to host receptor cannot be discounted as genetics to identify prepandemic threats. For SARS-like WIV1-
a crucial component in emergence. This fact is supported by CoV, the data can inform surveillance programs, improve di-
improved replication of WIV1-CoV in mice expressing human agnostic reagents, and facilitate effective treatments to mitigate
ACE2 compared with control (Fig. 2D versus Fig. 3B). However, future emergence events. However, building new and chimeric
in vivo attenuation of WIV1-CoV relative to SARS-CoV Urbani reagents must be carefully weighed against potential gain-of-
despite efficient infection in primary human airway cultures function (GOF) concerns. Whereas not generally expected to
suggests that additional factors contribute to epidemic emer- increase pathogenicity, studies that build reagents based on
gence. One possibility is that adaptation outside of spike protein viruses from animal sources cannot exclude the possibility of
may lead to emergence via altered host–virus interactions. increased virulence or altered immunogenicity that promote
Whereas WIV1-MA15 was attenuated relative to SARS-MA15 escape from current countermeasures. As such, the potential of a
in vivo, overall titers in the lung were similar to the epidemic threat, real or perceived, may cause similar exploratory studies to
SARS-CoV Urbani in BALB/c mice (Figs. 3 and 4). These data be limited out of an “abundance of caution.” Importantly, the
suggest that CoV backbone changes may account for or com- government pause on GOF studies may have already impacted
pensate for deficits in WIV1-CoV replication compared with the scope and direction of these studies. Whereas previous
SARS-CoV Urbani in vivo. Another possible factor accounting for adaption of the epidemic SARS-CoV strain provided insights
attenuation is changes to spike that are independent of receptor into species-specific changes, bat-derived WIV1 adaptation
binding. Whereas the receptor binding domain had garnered the may identify elements critical for pathogenesis and transition
most interest, changes in the remaining portion of S1 as well as the from reservoir to human host; targets include viral proteins that
S2 portion of spike may also play a critical role in facilitating CoV interact with host machinery or host immunity like NSP1, en-
infection, transmission, and/or pathogenesis (20). Differences in velope, or ORF6 (22, 24, 25). Similarly, WIV1-CoV could be
these regions of spike may yield increased protease targeting, used to drive improved therapeutics, including escape mutants
enhanced spike cleavage, and/or expanded tropism leading to for improved monoclonal antibodies or more broadly neutral-
more robust infection for the epidemic SARS strains. Globally, izing vaccine approaches. However, it remains unclear from the
the in vivo results suggest that any of these areas may have con- current policies and GOF environment if these types of studies
tributed to SARS-CoV emergence. However, even these inter- will be permissible. Although limits and standards for these
pretations must be tempered due to the robust differences types of experiments must be established, erring on the side of
between mouse and human models; further studies in nonhuman caution is not without its own risks and balancing the benefits
primates are required to confirm these results and derive further of these types of studies must also be weighed against the
insight into CoV emergence from zoonotic sources.
potential hazards.
Despite the differences in the backbone genome sequences, Using a novel platform to translate metagenomics findings, the
therapeutics developed against SARS-CoV provide some mea-
WIV1-CoV cluster has been identified as a threat for future
sure of protection in the context of a future outbreak. Testing the
emergence in human populations due to robust replication in
four most broadly neutralizing SARS-CoV antibodies revealed
primary human airway epithelial cell cultures. However, based
effective control of WIV1-MA15 at relatively low concentrations
on in vivo mouse data, additional adaptations will likely be re-
of antibody (14, 15, 21). For two of the four antibodies tested
quired to produce epidemic disease. Notably, whereas current
(Fm6 and 230.15), WIV1-CoV spike-expressing virus was neu-
antibody-based therapies hold great promise in treating WIV1-
tralized equivalently or better than SARS-CoV Urbani. Simi-
CoV spike-mediated infection, failure of SARS-CoV vaccination
larly, only minimal differences at the low end of the neutrali-
approaches presents a major challenge for any efforts to protect
zation curve were noted for antibody 227.14. Whereas antibody
against future emergent viruses. Together, the data illustrate the
109.8 produced only marginal neutralization of WIV1-MA15,
utility of the platform and highlight the need to build and
the overall antibody neutralization data argue that multivalent
monoclonal antibody approaches could limit a WIV1-CoV maintain preparations for future emergence events.
spike-mediated outbreak. As such, a “ZMapp”-based approach Materials and Methods
could have great potential in stemming or preventing a future
Viruses, Cells, and Infection. Wild-type and chimeric CoVs were cultured on
SARS-CoV–like outbreak. Vero E6 cells, grown in DMEM (Gibco) and 5% fetal clone serum (HyClone)
In contrast to the success of monoclonal antibodies, vaccine along with anti/anti (Gibco). Growth curves in Vero and primary human
failure indicated further development and refinement are nec- airway epithelial cells were performed as previously described (26, 27). Hu-
Downloaded by guest on March 27, 2020
essary. The development of a DIV SARS-CoV vaccine was man lungs were procured under University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
buoyed as a possible means to control SARS-CoV outbreaks (UNC) Institutional Review Board-approved protocols.
MICROBIOLOGY
sections were prepared by the UNC histopathology core facility as previous gestive and Kidney Disease under Award NIH DK065988 (to S.H.R.). Support
described (23). Images were captured using an Olympus BX41 microscope for the generation of the mice expressing human ACE2 was provided by NIH
with an Olympus DP71 camera. Grants AI076159 and AI079521 (to A.C.S.).
1. Peiris JS, Guan Y, Yuen KY (2004) Severe acute respiratory syndrome. Nat Med 15. Rockx B, et al. (2010) Escape from human monoclonal antibody neutralization affects
10(12, Suppl):S88–S97. in vitro and in vivo fitness of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Infect
2. Al-Tawfiq JA, et al. (2014) Surveillance for emerging respiratory viruses. Lancet Infect Dis 201(6):946–955.
Dis 14(10):992–1000. 16. Traggiai E, et al. (2004) An efficient method to make human monoclonal antibodies from
3. Graham RL, Baric RS (2010) Recombination, reservoirs, and the modular spike: memory B cells: Potent neutralization of SARS coronavirus. Nat Med 10(8):871–875.
Mechanisms of coronavirus cross-species transmission. J Virol 84(7):3134–3146. 17. Zhu Z, et al. (2007) Potent cross-reactive neutralization of SARS coronavirus isolates by
4. Graham RL, Donaldson EF, Baric RS (2013) A decade after SARS: Strategies for con- human monoclonal antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(29):12123–12128.
trolling emerging coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 11(12):836–848. 18. Spruth M, et al. (2006) A double-inactivated whole virus candidate SARS coronavirus
5. Ge XY, et al. (2013) Isolation and characterization of a bat SARS-like coronavirus that vaccine stimulates neutralising and protective antibody responses. Vaccine 24(5):
uses the ACE2 receptor. Nature 503(7477):535–538. 652–661.
6. He B, et al. (2014) Identification of diverse alphacoronaviruses and genomic charac- 19. Bolles M, et al. (2011) A double-inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome corona-
terization of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome-like coronavirus from bats in virus vaccine provides incomplete protection in mice and induces increased eosinophilic
China. J Virol 88(12):7070–7082. proinflammatory pulmonary response upon challenge. J Virol 85(23):12201–12215.
7. Yount B, et al. (2003) Reverse genetics with a full-length infectious cDNA of severe 20. McRoy WC, Baric RS (2008) Amino acid substitutions in the S2 subunit of mouse
hepatitis virus variant V51 encode determinants of host range expansion. J Virol
acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(22):12995–13000.
82(3):1414–1424.
8. Frieman M, et al. (2012) Molecular determinants of severe acute respiratory syndrome
21. Sui J, et al. (2014) Effects of human anti-spike protein receptor binding domain an-
coronavirus pathogenesis and virulence in young and aged mouse models of human
tibodies on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus neutralization escape and
disease. J Virol 86(2):884–897.
fitness. J Virol 88(23):13769–13780.
9. Gillim-Ross L, et al. (2004) Discovery of novel human and animal cells infected by the
22. DeDiego ML, et al. (2014) Coronavirus virulence genes with main focus on SARS-CoV
severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus by replication-specific multiplex re-
envelope gene. Virus Res 194:124–137.
verse transcription-PCR. J Clin Microbiol 42(7):3196–3206. 23. Agnihothram S, et al. (2014) A mouse model for Betacoronavirus subgroup 2c using a
10. Roberts A, et al. (2007) A mouse-adapted SARS-coronavirus causes disease and mor- bat coronavirus strain HKU5 variant. MBio 5(2):e00047–e14.
tality in BALB/c mice. PLoS Pathog 3(1):e5. 24. Narayanan K, Ramirez SI, Lokugamage KG, Makino S (2015) Coronavirus non-
11. Ostrowski LE, Hutchins JR, Zakel K, O’Neal WK (2003) Targeting expression of a structural protein 1: Common and distinct functions in the regulation of host and viral
transgene to the airway surface epithelium using a ciliated cell-specific promoter. Mol gene expression. Virus Res 202:89–100.
Ther 8(4):637–645. 25. Bolles M, Donaldson E, Baric R (2011) SARS-CoV and emergent coronaviruses: Viral
12. Netland J, Meyerholz DK, Moore S, Cassell M, Perlman S (2008) Severe acute respiratory determinants of interspecies transmission. Curr Opin Virol 1(6):624–634.
syndrome coronavirus infection causes neuronal death in the absence of encephalitis in 26. Sheahan T, Rockx B, Donaldson E, Corti D, Baric R (2008) Pathways of cross-species
mice transgenic for human ACE2. J Virol 82(15):7264–7275. transmission of synthetically reconstructed zoonotic severe acute respiratory syn-
13. Qiu X, et al. (2014) Reversion of advanced Ebola virus disease in nonhuman primates drome coronavirus. J Virol 82(17):8721–8732.
with ZMapp. Nature 514(7520):47–53. 27. Sims AC, et al. (2013) Release of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nu-
14. Sui J, et al. (2008) Broadening of neutralization activity to directly block a dominant clear import block enhances host transcription in human lung cells. J Virol 87(7):
antibody-driven SARS-coronavirus evolution pathway. PLoS Pathog 4(11):e1000197. 3885–3902.
Downloaded by guest on March 27, 2020
Menachery et al. PNAS | March 15, 2016 | vol. 113 | no. 11 | 3053