Engel Paul Aca filed a complaint against lawyer Salvado for issuing worthless checks after inducing Aca to invest in his business by promising high returns. Aca initially invested and received returns, but subsequent investments involving post-dated checks totaling over P6 million were dishonored upon presentment. The Court found Salvado violated rules on integrity and honesty by his deceitful actions, noting lawyers are expected to uphold the law and protect the reputation of the legal profession. While suspending Salvado for two years, the Court determined his conduct displayed doubtful fitness as an officer of the court and undermined public confidence in lawyers.
Engel Paul Aca filed a complaint against lawyer Salvado for issuing worthless checks after inducing Aca to invest in his business by promising high returns. Aca initially invested and received returns, but subsequent investments involving post-dated checks totaling over P6 million were dishonored upon presentment. The Court found Salvado violated rules on integrity and honesty by his deceitful actions, noting lawyers are expected to uphold the law and protect the reputation of the legal profession. While suspending Salvado for two years, the Court determined his conduct displayed doubtful fitness as an officer of the court and undermined public confidence in lawyers.
Engel Paul Aca filed a complaint against lawyer Salvado for issuing worthless checks after inducing Aca to invest in his business by promising high returns. Aca initially invested and received returns, but subsequent investments involving post-dated checks totaling over P6 million were dishonored upon presentment. The Court found Salvado violated rules on integrity and honesty by his deceitful actions, noting lawyers are expected to uphold the law and protect the reputation of the legal profession. While suspending Salvado for two years, the Court determined his conduct displayed doubtful fitness as an officer of the court and undermined public confidence in lawyers.
SALVADO credence, not only due to the unambiguous manner by
A.C. No. 10952, January 26, 2016 which the narrative of events was laid down, but also by En banc the coherent reasoning the narrative has employed. The public is, indeed, inclined to rely on representations made by lawyers. As a man of law, a lawyer is necessarily a FACTS: leader of the community, looked up to as a model citizen. A man, learned in the law like Atty. Salvado, is Engel Paul Aca filed an administrative complaint for expected to make truthful representations when dealing disbarment against Atty. Salvado for violation of Canon 1, with persons, clients or otherwise. Rule 1.01 and Canon 7, Rule 7.03 of the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR). Moreover, it must be pointed out that the denials proffered by Atty. Salvado cannot belie the dishonor of the Complainant alleged, among others, that sometime in checks. His strained explanation that the checks were 2010, he met Atty. Salvado through Atty. Samuel Divina (Atty. mere securities cannot be countenanced. Of all people, Divina), his childhood friend; that Atty. Salvado introduced lawyers are expected to fully comprehend the legal himself as a lawyer and a businessman engaged in several import of bouncing checks. Hence, the excuse of businesses including but not limited to the lending business; "gullibility and inadvertence" deserves scant that on the same occasion, Atty. Salvado enticed the consideration. Surely, Atty. Salvado is aware that complainant to invest in his business with a guarantee that he promoting obedience to the Constitution and the laws of would be given a high interest rate of 5% to 6% every month; the land is the primary obligation of lawyers. When he and that he was assured of a profitable investment due by issued the worthless checks, he discredited the legal Atty. Salvado as the latter had various clients and investors. profession and created the public impression that laws were mere tools of convenience that could be Because of these representations coupled by the used, bended and abused to satisfy personal whims assurance of Atty. Salvado that he would not place his and desires. His issuance of the subject checks display his reputation as a lawyer on the line, complainant made an doubtful fitness as an officer of the court. Clearly, he initial investment in his business. This initial investment violated Rule 1.01 and Rule 7.03 of the CPR. yielded an amount corresponding to the principal plus the promised interest. On various dates from 2010 to 2011, complainant claimed that he was again induced by Atty. Salvado to invest with promises of high rates of return. As consideration for these investments, Atty. Salvado issued several post-dated checks in the total amount of P6,107,000.00, representing the principal amount plus interests. Upon presentment, however, complainant was shocked to learn that the aforementioned checks were dishonored as these were drawn from insufficient funds or a closed account.
Despite repeated demands, respondent fails to make
good of his obligations with the complainant. The IBP Investigating Commissioner recommended that Atty. Salvado be meted a penalty of suspension from the practice of law for six ( 6) months for engaging in a conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law and for behaving in a scandalous manner to the discredit of the legal profession. Atty. Salvado's act of issuing checks without sufficient funds to cover the same constituted willful dishonesty and immoral conduct which undermine the public confidence in the legal profession. The IBP-BOG, on the other hand, modified the period of suspension to two years.
ISSUE: WON Atty. Salvado should be held liable for
violating the CPR.
RULING:
YES. The Court sustains the findings of the IBP-
BOG and adopts its recommendation in part. A perusal of the records reveals that complainant's version deserves