Ethics June 2019 Q1
Ethics June 2019 Q1
QUESTION 1
The legal profession is a profession of great honour. To maintain the honour of legal
profession, the Legal Profession Act 1976 (LPA) was enacted thereunder and the following
bodies were established for the purposes prescribed;
a) The Legal Profession Qualifying Board (LPQB) for the purpose of deciding on the
proper qualification of those who intending to enter the legal profession;
b) The Bar Council (BC) for the proper management of the affairs of the Malaysian Bar
(MB) and the proper performance of its function; and
c) The Legal Profession Disciplinary Board (DB) empowered with disciplinary powers
in respect of advocates and solicitors who commit professional misconduct.
Discuss how the three statutory bodies each perform its role in relation to legal ethics and the
aim of legal ethics to ensure that the honour and dignity of the legal profession is maintained.
Your answer should refer to the LPA, Legal Profession (Practice and Etiquette) Rules 1978
(LPPER) and all relevant rules made by the Bar Council under Section 77 of the LPA.
(25 marks)
The three statutory bodies mentioned above must perform its role in relation to legal
ethics and the aim of legal ethics to ensure that the honour and dignity of the legal profession
is maintained. This can be seen in the LPA, Legal Profession (Practice and Etiquette) Rules
1978 (LPPER) where Rule 16 provides that an advocate and solicitor shall while acting with
all due courtesy to the tribunal before which he is appearing, fearlessly uphold the interest of
his client, the interest of justice and dignity of the profession without regard to any unpleasant
consequences either to himself or to any other person whereas Rule 18 provides that the
conduct of an advocate and solicitor before the Court and in relation to other advocates and
solicitors shall be characterised by candour, courtesy and fairness. Besides that, Rule 31
states that every advocate and solicitor shall at all times uphold the dignity and high standing
of his profession.
Based on the LPA, Legal Profession (Practice and Etiquette) Rules 1978 (LPPER),
the Legal Profession Qualifying Board (LPQB) performs its role in relation to legal ethics
and the aim of legal ethics where Rule 60 (1) provides that an advocate and solicitor may
have his name appear as “consultant” on the letterhead of a firm of advocates and solicitors if
a) he has a valid practicing certificate issued under Part III of the Act, b) (i) he has been in
active practice at the Malaysian Bar for a period of not less than twenty years, (ii) has served
as a Judge of the Federal Court or Supreme Court, Judge of the Court of Appeal, Judge of the
High Court in Malaya, Judge of the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak or High Court in
Borneo for a period of not less than 20 years in such capacity or any combination thereof, (iii)
has been in active practice at the Malaysian Bar and in addition has served as a Judge of the
Federal Court or Supreme Court, Judge of the Court of Appeal, Judge of the High Court in
Malaya, Judge of the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak or High Court in Borneo or any
combination thereof or a period which aggregated with the period of his active practice at the
Malaysian Bar, totals not less than twenty years or (iv) has been in active practice at the
Malaysian Bar for a period of not less than ten years and in addition has served as a President
or Chairman of the Industrial Court or a member of the Malaysian Judicial and Legal Service,
or any combination thereof for a period which aggregated with the period of his active
practice at the Malaysian Bar, totals not less than twenty years, and (c) he is not a partner,
associate or legal assistant in any other firm of advocates and solicitors or engaged in any
other capacity in any such other firm in the States of Malaya.
On the other hand, based on the LPA, Legal Profession (Practice and Etiquette) Rules
1978 (LPPER), the Bar Council (BC) performs its role in relation to legal ethics and the aim
of legal ethics where Rule 7 (b) provides that no advocate and solicitor may accept the
position of an executive director or executive secretary of a company without the express
consent of the Bar Council. It also can be seen in Rule 30 (c) where it states that except on
such ceremonial occasions and at such places as the Bar Council or the Court may prescribe,
an advocate and solicitor shall not wear bands or robes in public places other than in Court or
whilst travelling to or from Court. Besides that, Rule 44 (a) stated that an advocate and
solicitor shall not actively carry on any trade which is declared by the Bar Council from time
to time as unsuitable for an advocate and solicitor to engage in or be an active partner or a
salaried officer in connection therewith while Rule 44 (b) stated that an advocate and
solicitor shall not be a full-time salaried employee of any person, firm or corporation so long
as he continues to practice and shall on taking up any such employment, intimate the fact to
the Bar Council and take steps to cease to practice as an advocate and solicitor so long as he
continues in such employment. Next, Rule 59 (3) provides that no advocate and solicitor
shall practice his profession in the States of Malaya in or as a partner of more than one firm at
any time without the consent of the Bar Council and Rule 62 provides that the Bar Council
may in writing with the approval of the Attorney General in writing, waive any of these
Rules. On the other hand, under Section 77 (1) of LPA, the Bar Council may with the
approval of the AG make rules for regulating the professional practice, etiquette, conduct and
discipline of advocates and solicitors.
For the Legal Profession Disciplinary Board (DB), based on the LPA, Legal
Profession (Practice and Etiquette) Rules 1978 (LPPER), DB performs its role in relation to
legal ethics and the aim of legal ethics where Rule 4 provides that no advocate and solicitor
shall accept a brief in a case where he knows or has reason to believe that his own
professional conduct is likely to be impugned. Next, Rule 21 states that it is improper for an
advocate and solicitor (a) knowingly to misquote the contents of a paper, the testimony of a
witness, the argument of opposing counsel or the language of a decision or textbook or (b)
with knowledge of its invalidity, to cite as authority a decision that has been overruled or a
statute that has been repealed or (c) in argument, to assert as a fact that which has not been
proved, or (d) to mislead his opponent by concealing or withholding in his opening speech
positions upon which he intends to rely. Besides that, Rule 49 provides that it is contrary to
etiquette for an advocate and solicitor to solicit the reporting of any matter in which he has
been profesionally engaged but he may consider and revise reports of cases in which he has
been profesionally engaged so as to ensure the correctness of the Report while Rule 51
provides that an advocate and solicitor shall not do or cause or allow to be done anything for
the purpose of touting directly or indirectly or which is calculated to suggest that it is done
for that purpose. Next, Rule 52 (a) states that it is unprofessional and improper conduct for
an advocate and solicitor to divide or agree to divide either costs received or the profits of his
business with any unqualified person whereas Rule 58 provides that it is contrary to etiquette
to object to the admissibility of any document on the ground that it is not or not sufficiently
stamped unless such objection goes to the root of the subject matter or the suit. On the other
hand, under Section 77 (3) of LPA, it provides that any advocate and solicitor who fails to
comply with any rules made under this section may be liable to disciplinary proceedings.
In conclusion, we can see that the three statutory bodies mentioned above has
performed their role in relation to legal ethics and the aim of legal ethics based on the LPA,
Legal Profession (Practice and Etiquette) Rules 1978 (LPPER) and all relevant rules made by
the Bar Council under Section 77 of the LPA to ensure that the honour and dignity of the
legal profession is maintained.