Mumbai Trans-Harbour Link Project: Presentation On
Mumbai Trans-Harbour Link Project: Presentation On
Presentation on
PRESENTED BY
OMKAR ACHARYA
RAHUL BHALERAO
MANOJ TARTE
JAYESH WARE
ANKITA APHALE
GIRISH GUPTA
JAYESH KAMBLI
MUMBAI TRANS HARBOUR LINK
(SEWRI NHAVA SEA LINK)
Introduction
• Mumbai Trans Harbour Link (MTHL), is also
known as Mumbai Trans Harbour Link
(MTHL), Sewri-Nhava Sheva Trans Harbour
Link
• It will connect freeway grade road bridge
connecting the Indian city of Mumbai with Navi
Mumbai .
• If completed, it would be the longest sea bridge
in India.
• The sea link is expected to reduce commuting
time between Mumbai and Navi Mumbai, and
provide direct connectivity to Mumbai Port
Trust, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust and the
proposed Navi -Mumbai International Airport
• It will also allow faster travel to Thane, Nashik,
Panvel, Pune and southern India and is also
expected to boost the economic growth of
neighbouring Raigad district and raise real
estate prices in the region.
Highlights of MTHL
• Carries 6 Highway
• Cross Thane Greek
• Owner MMRDA
• Total Length 22 km(14m)
• Design life 100+yr
• Construction Cost 9360 cr (US$1.5 billion)
• Opened in 2019 (planned)
History
• The MTHL was first proposed in the 1970s. The first concrete
attempt to build it was made in 2004, when Infrastructure Leasing &
Financial Services (IL&FS) submitted a proposal to implement the
project on a build, own, operate and transfer (BOOT) basis.
• The State Government called for a fresh bids for the project in 2008.
However, none of the 13 companies that had shown interest,
submitted bids.
• The media criticized the political feud between the ruling Nationalist
Congress Party (NCP) and Congress coalition, as being responsible
for slowing "down the pace of Mumbai's development".
• The project received environmental clearance from the Ministry of
Environment and Forests (MoEF) on 23 October 2012
Cost
• The cost of the MTHL has increased several times. In 2005, the
cost of the project was estimated at 4000 Cr.
• The cost was revised to Rs. 6000 Cr in 2008. It was then
increased to Rs. 8800 Cr in November,
• 2011 and finally to Rs.9360 Cr in August 2012.
• In January 2013, the Central Government sanctioned 1920 Cr
(US$310 million), which is 20% of the project cost, in viability
gap for the MTHL.
• The State Government will also contribute the same amount.
• The remaining 60% will have to be borne by the developer who
wins the bid.
Create better living conditions
Encourage mass transit
Connect cities, ports, airports by road, rail
Disperse traffic, growth, population
Better sharing of resources
Long term projection
EW expansion Traffic handled by MTHL by 2016
Airoli
train 1, 25,000
25, pass./day
road 93,000 PCU/day
Mumbai Navi Mumbai
Thane vehicle operating
cost
1000 cr.
per Saving in cost by 2016
annum
Mumbai Trans Harbour Link travel time
Siwri cost
Nhava Pollution reduction
MPT JNPT Noise reduction
at intersections
10-12 db 30%
Airoli
Link
Sewri
MTHL Mumbai-Pune
Expressway
Kon
0:30 hour
JNPT
NH4B
To Pune and
Zone II central areas
Zone I
Uran-Panvel
Link Zone III
NH17
To Goa and
western coast
Mumbai
NH4
9:10AM
Multilevel
parking lot 14 lane
Nhava Toll Plaza
Kon
9:00AM
9:30AM
CST Rail yard
Uran
Worli
Western rail
MPT
Central rail
GPO
CST
Hutatma Chowk
commuters
Gateway of India
tourists
FUNDING OF THE PROJECT
g
ar
Marg
tM
pa
Ambedkar Marg MTHL
Ba
ti
E.
pa
M
na
Ganpatrao Kadam D’Mello
ose
Se
Marg Road
sR
oad
Western Centeral
Rail Harbour
Rail
Rail
MULTILEVEL MODERN TOLL
PARKING LOT PLAZA
Encourage use of mass transit 16 lane toll plaza
Saving in fuel cost automated dispersal of traffic
Car elevators, ramps provided Traffic monitoring facility
Ticket validation machines
Ballast-less rail track to minimize load on bridge
12 car rake of passenger capacity 3500 to 1200 seats/rake
MUMBAI
NHAVA
6 lane road link
Better living conditions
productivity
trade
prosperity
growth
dispersal of traffic
ambient air quality
uniform use of resources
THOUGHT employment
CONSIDERATION better land use
COEXISTANCE
Traffic congestion RESPECT
commute time
pollution
health hazard
noise pollution
stress
FEASIBILITY
STUDIES
Alignment technically feasible
Project is financially viable
In depth analysis of biotic conditions
Eco-friendly route chosen
No displacement of existing settlement
Better employment opportunities
Better dispersal of traffics
PLANNING
Use of latest technology
Aesthetic designs
Large spans used
Strict compliance with laws
Future expansion accommodated
Better distribution of land use
Modern traffic surveillance and monitoring
CONSTRUCTION