Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Macalintal v. COMELEC, G.R.

157013

Doctrine: Congress has no general supervision over the COMELEC which is an independent body,
functioning on its own and promulgating rules and regulations of its own kind. Congress may however
review its orders, decisions, and rulings as specifically provided by the Constitution.

Date: July 10, 2003 | Ponente: Austria-Martinez, J.

Facts:
Macalintal assails that certain provisions in RA 9189 (The Overseas Absentee Voting Act of 2003) are
unconstitutional, in which the petitioner (filing as a taxpayer) has provided a position of having legal
standing with the said issue considering that there has been a misapplication of public funds.

Petitioner raises 3 points or questions for contention:


1. That Section 5(d) of R.A. No. 9189 allowing the registration of voters, who are immigrants or
permanent residents in other countries, by their mere act of executing an affidavit expressing their
intention to return to the Philippines, violates the residency requirement in Art. V, Sec. 1 of the
Constitution.
2. That Section 18.5 of the same law empowering the COMELEC to proclaim the winning
candidates for national offices and party list representatives, including the President and the Vice-
President, violates the constitutional mandate under Art. VII, Sec. 4 of the Constitution that the
winning candidates for President and Vice-President shall be proclaimed as winners only by
Congress.
3. That Section 25 of RA 9189, allowing Congress through the Joint Congressional Oversight
Committee, (JCOC) to exercise the power to review, revise, amend, and approve the
Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) that the COMELEC shall promulgate, violates the
independence of the COMELEC under Art. IX-A, Sec. 1 of the Constitution.

Issues:
1. WON Section 5(d) of R.A. No. 9189 violates Art. V, Sec. 1 of the Constitution
2. WON Section 18.5 of R.A. No. 9189 violates Art. VII, Sec. 4 of the Constitution
3. WON Section 25 of R.A. No. 9189 violates Art. IX-A, Sec. 1 of the Constitution

Held:
1. No, it does not violate the latter provision by the constitution. Even if the petitioner has posited the idea
that Section 5(d) of RA 9189 violates the residency requirement of Sec. 1 Art. 5 of the Constitution, we
turn to Section 2 of Article 5 of Constitution wherein the Congress provides a system for absentee voting
by qualified Filipinos abroad.
● Section 2 of Art. 5 Constitution serves as an exception to the residency requirement by
reason of the doctrine of necessary implication of statutory construction which may be
applied in construing constitutional provisions.
● *Note: One of the goals of Constitutional Commission is to enfranchise as much Filipino
citizens as possible especially those citizens living abroad who have not abandoned their
domicile in the Philippines.
2. YES, Sec.18.5 violates the constitutional provisions of Art. 7, Sec. 4 as the former provision is far too
sweeping to include the winners of President and Vice President. The power to proclaim such winners
vests on the capacity or the obligation of the Congress to do so, not COMELEC.

3. YES, Sec. 25 of RA 9189 violates Sec. 1, Art. 9-A of Constitution because:


● Section 25: (Joint Congressional Oversight Committee) - having the power to revise, review, or
amend the implementing rules and regulations promulgated by the COMELEC. Also, the JCOC
is composed of:
1. Chairman of the Senate Committee on Constitutional Amendments, Revision of Codes
and Laws.
2. 7 Senators designated by the Senate President
3. Chairman of the House Committee on Suffrage and Electoral Reforms
4. 7 Members of HOR designated by the Speaker of the House of Representatives: 4
should come from the majority, and 3 from the minority.
● Section 19 of RA 9189 must also be noted: The implementing rules and regulations of the
COMELEC must be submitted to the “JCOC” for approval.

○ Both provisions violate the autonomy or independence of COMELEC as provided by


Sec. 1, Art. 9-A of Constitution.
○ By vesting itself the powers to revise, review, or amend the Implementing Rules and
Regulations promulgated by the COMELEC, is by far an action that goes way beyond the
scope of its constitutional authority.
■ The Court has held that “whatever may be the nature of the functions of the
Commission on Elections, the fact is that the framers of the Constitution wanted
it to be independent from the other departments of the Government.”

Decision: Petition is partly GRANTED. Portions of RA 9189 is declared VOID for being
UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

You might also like