Overview of MNCS in India
Overview of MNCS in India
Submitted by
VAIBHAV YADAV
In
April, 2019
1
LAW RELATING TO MNCS IN INDIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 3
a. Macroeconomic trends;............................................................................................................... 5
1. Exporting...................................................................................................................................... 9
2. Overseas Production.................................................................................................................. 10
3. Licensing..................................................................................................................................... 11
CONCLUSION.................................................................................................................................. 12
2
LAW RELATING TO MNCS IN INDIA
INTRODUCTION
Globalization is the single most significant development changing business dynamics in this
century. The reality of global markets and global competition is pervasive. The forces that are
driving the world toward greater globalization are greater than the forces that restrain this
move. With the improvements in transportation and communication technologies there is a
sea change in the way the companies are run. International trade leads to international
marketing, which in turn leads to growth in international business. The phenomenal growth
3
LAW RELATING TO MNCS IN INDIA
a. Raw-Material Seekers: Raw-material seekers were the earliest multinationals and their
aim was to exploit the raw materials that could be found overseas. The modern-day
counterparts of these firms, the multinational oil and mining companies such as
British Petroleum, Exxon Mobil, International Nickel, etc.,
b. Market Seekers: The market seeker is the archetype of the modern multinational firm
that goes overseas to produce and sell in foreign markets. Examples include IBM,
Toyota, Unilever, Coca-cola.
c. Cost Minimizers: Cost minimizers are a fairly recent category of firms doing business
internationally. These firms seek out and invest in lower-cost production sites
overseas (for example, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Taiwan, and India) to remain cost
competitive both at home and abroad.
MNCs have to follow the changes in macroeconomic factors, environmental and social issues, and
business and industry developments. These factors will all profoundly shape the corporate landscape
in the coming years. The following section deals with these trends.
1 Available at http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/company/multinational-corporations-of-india-
characteristics-growth-and-criticisms/23462 (last visited on 09/04/2019)
4
LAW RELATING TO MNCS IN INDIA
Those who say that business success is all about execution are wrong. The right product markets,
technology, and geography are critical components of long- term economic performance. Bad
industries usually trump good management, however: in sectors such as banking,
telecommunications, and technology, almost two-thirds of the organic growth of listed Western
companies can be attributed to being in the right markets and geographies. Companies that ride the
currents succeed; those that swim against them usually struggle. Identifying these currents and
developing strategies to navigate them are vital to corporate success. Predicting short-term changes
or shocks is often a fool's errand. But forecasting long-term directional change is possible by
2
identifying trends through an analysis of deep history rather than of the shallow past. Even the
Internet took more than 30 years to become an overnight phenomenon. Let us take note of the ten
trends that will change the business landscape. It can be divided under three broad categories:
a. Macroeconomic trends;
A. Macroeconomic trends: First, we have identified three macroeconomic trends that will
deeply transform the underlying global economy.
1. New Centers of Economic Activity: Centers of economic activity will shift profoundly,
not just globally, but also regionally. As a consequence of economic liberalization,
technological advances, capital market developments, and demographic shifts, the
3
world has embarked on a massive realignment of economic activity. Although there
will undoubtedly be shocks and setbacks, this realignment will persist. Today, Asia
(excluding Japan) accounts for 13 percent of world GDP, while Western Europe
accounts for more than 30 percent. Within the next 20 years the two will nearly
converge. Some industries and functions— manufacturing and IT services, for
2 Available at http://www.economicsdiscussion.net/multinational-corporations/multinational-
corporations-mncs-meaning-origin-and-growth/20921 (last visited on 09/04/2019)
3 Memorandum of Economic Policies dated August 27, 1991 to the IMF, the Finance Minister submitted in the
concluding paragraph: “The Government of India believes that the policies set forth in the Memorandum are adequate to
achieve the
objectives of the program, but will take any additional measures appropriate for this purpose. In addition, the
Government will consult with the Fund on the adoption of any measures that may be appropriate in accordance with the
policies of the Fund on such consultations.” Era of 1991
5
LAW RELATING TO MNCS IN INDIA
example—will shift even more dramatically. The story is not simply the march to
Asia. Shifts within regions are as significant as those occurring across regions. The
United States will still account for the largest share of absolute economic growth in
the next two decades.
2. Role of Public sector: Public-sector activities will balloon, making productivity gains
essential. The unprecedented aging of populations across the developed world will
call for new levels of efficiency and creativity from the public sector. Without clear
productivity gains, the pension and health care burden will drive taxes to stifling
proportions. Nor is the problem confined to the developed economies. Many
emerging-market governments will have to decide what level of social services to
provide to citizens who increasingly demand state-provided protections such as health
care and retirement security. The adoption of proven private-sector approaches will
likely become pervasive in the provision of social services in both the developed and
the developing worlds.
3. Changing global marketplace: The consumer landscape will change and expand
significantly. Almost a billion new consumers will enter the global marketplace in the
next decade as economic growth in emerging markets pushes them beyond the
threshold level of $5,000 in annual household income—a point when people generally
begin to spend on discretionary goods. From now to 2015, the consumer's spending
power in emerging economies will increase from $4 trillion to more than $9 trillion—
nearly the current spending power of Western Europe. Shifts within consumer
segments in developed economies will also be profound. Populations are not only
aging, of course, but changing in other ways too: for example, by 2015 the Hispanic
population in the United States will have spending power equivalent to that of 60
percent of all Chinese consumers. And consumers, wherever they live, will
increasingly have information about and access to the same products and brands.
B. Social and environmental trends:
Next, we have identified four social and environmental trends. Although they are less
predictable and their impact on the business world is less certain, they will fundamentally
change how we live and work.
1. Communication Technology: Technological connectivity will transform the way people
live and interact. The technology revolution has been just that. Yet we are at the early, not
mature, stage of this revolution. Individuals, public sectors, and businesses
6
LAW RELATING TO MNCS IN INDIA
are learning how to make the best use of IT in designing processes and in developing
and accessing knowledge. New developments in fields such as biotechnology, laser
technology, and nanotechnology are moving well beyond the realm of products and
services. More transformational than technology itself is the shift in behavior that it
enables. We work not just globally but also instantaneously. We are forming
communities and relationships in new ways (indeed, 12 percent of US newlyweds in
2005 met online). More than two billion people now use cell phones. We send nine
trillion e-mails a year. We do a billion Google searches a day, more than half in
languages other than English. For perhaps the first time in history, geography is not
the primary constraint on the limits of social and economic organization. The
battlefield for talent will shift. Ongoing shifts in labor and talent will be far more
profound than the widely observed migration of jobs to low-wage countries. The shift
to knowledge-intensive industries highlights the importance and scarcity of well-
trained talent. The increasing integration of global labor markets, however, is opening
up vast new talent sources. The 33 million university-educated young professionals in
developing countries is more than double the number in developed ones. For many
companies and governments, global labor and talent strategies will become as
important as global sourcing and manufacturing strategies.
2. Corporate Accountability: The role and behavior of big business will come under
increasingly sharp scrutiny. As businesses expand their global reach, and as the
economic demands on the environment intensify, the level of societal suspicion about
big business is likely to increase. The tenets of current global business ideology—for
example, shareholder value, free trade, intellectual- property rights, and profit
repatriation—are not understood, let alone accepted, in many parts of the world.
Scandals and environmental mishaps seem as inevitable as the likelihood that these
incidents will be subsequently blown out of proportion, thereby fueling resentment
and creating a political and regulatory backlash. This trend is not just of the past 5
years but of the past 250 years. The increasing pace and extent of global business, and
the emergence of truly giant global corporations, will exacerbate the pressures over
the next 10 years. Business, particularly big business, will never be loved. It can,
however, be more appreciated. Business leaders need to argue and demonstrate more
forcefully the intellectual, social, and economic case for business in society and the
massive contributions business makes to social welfare
3. Natural Resources: Demand for natural resources will grow, as will the strain on the
7
LAW RELATING TO MNCS IN INDIA
Finally, we have identified a third set of trends: business and industry trends, which are driving
change at the company level.
1. New global industry structures are emerging. In response to changing market regulation and
the advent of new technologies, nontraditional business models are flourishing, often
coexisting in the same market and sector space. In many industries, a barbell-like structure is
appearing, with a few giants on top, a narrow middle, and then a flourish of smaller, fast-
moving players on the bottom. Similarly, corporate borders are becoming blurrier as
interlinked "ecosystems" of bottom. Similarly, corporate borders are becoming blurrier as
interlinked "ecosystems" of suppliers, producers, and customers emerge. Even basic structural
assumptions are being upended: for example, the emergence of robust private equity
financing is changing corporate ownership, life cycles, and performance expectations.
Winning companies, using efficiencies gained by new structural possibilities, will capitalize
4
on these transformations.
2. Management will go from art to science. Bigger, more complex companies demand new tools to
run and manage them. Indeed, improved technology and statistical-control tools have given rise to
new management approaches that make even mega-institutions viable. Long gone is the day of
the "gut instinct" management style. Today's business leaders are adopting algorithmic decision-
making techniques and using highly sophisticated software to run their organizations.
4 Basant, Rakesh (2000): ‘Corporate Response to Economic Reforms in India’, Economic and Political Weekly,
March 4, pp 813-22.
8
LAW RELATING TO MNCS IN INDIA
Scientific management is moving from a skill that creates competitive advantage to an ante
that gives companies the right to play the game.
3. Ubiquitous access to information is changing the economics of knowledge. Knowledge is
increasingly available and, at the same time, increasingly specialized. The most obvious
manifestation of this trend is the rise of search engines (such as Google), which make an
almost infinite amount of information available instantaneously. Access to knowledge has
become almost universal. Yet the transformation is much more profound than simply broad
access. New models of knowledge production, access, distribution, and ownership are
emerging. We are seeing the rise of open-source approaches to knowledge development as
communities, not individuals, become responsible for innovations. Knowledge production
itself is growing: worldwide patent applications, for example, rose from 1990 to 2004 at a rate
of 20 percent annually. Companies will need to learn how to leverage this new knowledge
universe—or risk drowning in a flood of too much information.
9
LAW RELATING TO MNCS IN INDIA
Firms facing highly uncertain demand abroad will typically begin by exporting to a foreign market.
The advantages of exporting are significant: Capital requirements and start-up costs are minimal, risk
is low, and profits are immediate. Furthermore, this initial step provides the opportunity to learn
about present and future supply and demand conditions, competition, channels of distribution,
payment conventions, financial institutions, and financial techniques. Building on prior successes,
companies then expand their marketing organizations abroad, switching from using export agents and
other intermediaries to dealing directly with foreign agents and distributors. As increased
communication with customers reduces uncertainty, the firm might set up its own sales subsidiary
and new service facilities, such as a warehouse, with these marketing activities culminating in the
control of its own distribution system
2. Overseas Production
There is a major drawback to exporting an inability to realize the full sales potential of a product. By
manufacturing abroad, a company can more easily keep abreast of market developments, adapt its
products and production schedules to changing local tastes and conditions, fill orders faster, and
provide more comprehensive after-sales service. Many companies also set up R & D facilities with
their foreign operations; they aim to pick the best brains, wherever they are. The results help
companies to keep track of competition and to design new products. For example, the Japanese
subsidiary of Loctite, a U.S. maker of engineering adhesives, came up with several new applications
for sealants in the electronics industry.
Setting up local production facilities also shows a greater commitment to the local market, which
typically brings added sales, and provides increased assurance of supply stability. Certainty of supply
is particularly important for firms that produce intermediate goods for sale to other companies. A
case in point is SKF, the Swedish ball bearing manufacturer. SKF was forced to manufacture in the
United States to guarantee that its product, a crucial component in military equipment, would be
available when needed. The Pentagon would not permit its suppliers of military hardware to be
dependent on imported ball bearings, because imports could be halted in wartime and are always
subject to the vagaries of ocean shipping.
Thus, most firms selling in foreign markets eventually find themselves forced to manufacture abroad.
Foreign production covers a wide spectrum of activities from repairing, packaging, and finishing to
processing, assembly, and full manufacture. Firms typically begin with the simpler stages – for
example, packaging and assembly – and progressively integrate their manufacturing activities
backward – for example, production of components and subassemblies.
Because the optimal entry strategy can change over time, a firm must continually monitor and evaluate
10
LAW RELATING TO MNCS IN INDIA
the factors that bear on the effectiveness of its current entry strategy. New information and market
perceptions change the risk- return trade-off for a given entry strategy, leading to a sequence of
preferred entry modes, each adapted on the basis of prior experience to sustain and strengthen the
firm’s market position over time.
Associated with a firm’s decision to produce abroad is the question of whether to create its own
affiliates or acquire going concerns. A major advantage of an acquisition is the capacity to effect a
speedy transfer overseas of highly developed but underutilized parent skills, such as a novel
production technology. Often the local firm also provides a ready-made marketing network. This is
especially important if the parent is a late entrant to the market. Many firms have used the acquisition
approach to gain knowledge about the local market or a particular technology. The disadvantage, of
course, is the cost of buying an ongoing company. In general, the larger and more experienced a firm
becomes the less frequently it uses acquisitions to expand overseas. Smaller and relatively less
experienced firms often turn to acquisitions.
Regardless of its preferences, a firm interested in expanding overseas may not have the option of
acquiring a local operation. Michelin, the French manufacturer of radical tires, set up its own
facilities in the United States because its tires are built on specially designed equipment; taking over
an existing operation would have been out of the question. Similarly, companies moving into
developing countries often find they are forced to begin from the ground up because their line of
business has no local counterpart.
3. Licensing
An alternative, and at times a precursor, to setting up production facilities abroad is to license a local
firm to manufacture the company‘s products in return for royalties and other forms of payment. The
principal advantages of licensing are the minimal investment required, faster market-entry time, and
fewer financial and legal risks involved. But the corresponding cash flow is also relatively low, and
there may be problems in maintaining product quality standards. The licensor may also face
difficulty controlling exports by the foreign licensee, particularly when, as in Japan, the host
government refuses to sanction restrictive clauses on sales to foreign markets. Thus, a licensing
agreement may lead to the establishment of a competitor in third-country markets, with a consequent
loss of future revenues to the licensing firm. The foreign licensee may also become such a strong
competitor that the licensing firm will have difficulty entering the market when the agreement
expires, leading to a further loss of potential profits. For some firms, licensing alone is the preferred
method of penetrating foreign markets. Other firms with diversified innovative product lines follow a
strategy of trading technology for both equity in foreign joint ventures and royalty payment
11
LAW RELATING TO MNCS IN INDIA
CONCLUSION
MNCs are beneficial to less developed countries. They improve the foundations of a "backwards"
economic environment through the diffusion of capital, technology, skills, and exports. MNCs have a
direct effect on the development of a more citizen welfare conscious government. Accordingly, the
number of jobs increases, consumer spending increases, the tax base grows and health care is more
widely accessible. They also have an apparent lasting effect on the values and institutions of the host
country. The values of the country change to reflect a country committed to staying in pace with a
rapidly changing global environment; extending to political norms and nationalistic tendencies. Once
there is openness to capitalism, or a more developed capitalist society emerges then there will be a
more stable global society. However, in the end there really is no other more reliable way to improve
the social, economic, and political environment of a state than by allowing a MNC to invest. The
MNCs is fascinating and important for understanding economic globalization. There has been
substantial progress in the literature in the past couple of decades.
As a consequence, the government policy was progressively tightened in the following
a. Some industries were not allowed to import technology at all, the underlying
principles of the policy being that
i. No ‘inessential’ article should be produced with fresh imports of technology
(this gave the exiting domestic and foreign producers automatic protection
against fresh imports of technol-ogy).
ii. Where domestic capacity was ‘adequate’ no technology should be imported;
b. Among industries where technology imports were allowed, the maximum rate of
royalty was laid down;
c. In some designed industries, foreign investment was allowed in principle, but sanction
in individual cases was a matter of administrative decision;
d. The normal permissible period of agreements was reduced from ten years to five, and
renewals were generally frowned upon;
e. Exports and other marketing restriction were generally not allowed, and often an
obligation to export a certain proportion of the output was insisted upon;
f. A clause was often inserted in the agreements granting permission to the importer to
sub-license the technology;
g. The CSIR was allowed to look at applications for approval of technology imports, and
if it expressed willingness to supply the technology, approval was withheld or at least
delayed.
12