Case Study 2.1&2.2
Case Study 2.1&2.2
Case Study 2.1&2.2
Tables 2.1 and 2.2, if you were Sandra, who would you Select?
candidates and looking at the traits approaches that is listed in Table 2.1
and 2.2, If I was Sandra I would select candidate Thomas Santiago because
2.1, Mr. Santiago case study described that he poses qualities as being
Thomas is also described as a man who has been consulted by the “upper
has been with the company for 10 years, so I believe his line up matches
what Ralph ideas for leadership traits that are outlined in Table 2.1. Thomas
upper management trusts his judgment to consult with him on matters such
Thomas aligns with Table 2.2 because it states that he is honest and had a
sense of integrity. Thomas has a sociable trait that is listed on the chart that
proves his case because the employees trusted him and felt that they could
work with him. Thomas must have great interpersonal skills and creates
The trait approach was helpful because it narrowed down what candidates
have the best characteristics traits from the list. The trait helped establish
and discern who the three individuals were as a person. All three candidates
intelligent which are three important qualities to have as a leader. Table 2.2
pointed out that the major leadership traits that were posted by all three
determination. Those traits are vital in recognizing leadership skills and the
potential in individuals.
The trait was extremely helpful in the selection process. Having the
guidelines within the trait listing was a tool to use when you must go back
and forth on which candidate meets more of the qualifications. Based on the
traits they were true finding leadership abilities which allowed the key
this case?
The trait approached limited the utility because it offered an endless list of
traits and failed to adequately prioritize the traits. In the case, imagine all
three of the candidates posing several traits listed in Table 2.1 and 2.2. It
was difficult to determine which of the traits was more important in the
given scenario because all the candidates had strong and inclusive traits
from the listing. There was no winner by the traits alone, so, therefore,
choosing the highest success rate from the product research and
However, the role is rather isolated and may be called for a leader who has
integrity and persistence over the one who has high-level source of
sociability. You must be able to see that sociability may be more important
Case 2.2
Carol’s leadership traits were put to the test in a way she has never
husband’s death that made her move into the vacancy. That tragedy pushed
her straight into action which was “solid, strong, fair and considerate, cared
Kemp, and Bader. Also, Carol problem-solving skills and abilities were
president.
2. How big of a part did Carol’s traits plain in the expansion of the
company?
Carol’s trait played a huge role in the expansion of the company. Her ability
and emotional stability during the rough times showed great leadership in
her employees along with the lack of people quitting during her tenure as
the president.
Carol persistence and strength showed in all her employees which were
presented to the community which helped leapfrog the small company over
the chain retailers. Carol had the strength to push forward all her ideas of
advertising, sales, and service which the correct route for the company was
to take. Carol also had personal ownership to continue to guide the factor
degree and her good leadership skills. She has exemplified the leadership
traits which are valuable across the board along with her ability to step into
a business situation and still come out successful. Carol has acquired many
other qualities trait that may have worked in other business contexts.
After time Carol created more and more leadership traits that could have
crossed over too many more business ventures. Her survival mode kicked
which was helpful to her success as a leader. Carol was able to utilize her
sons in the progression of her leadership so that helped her because she