Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Giannis May 6 Lawsuit
Giannis May 6 Lawsuit
Anastasi Pardalis
Pardalis & Nohavicka, LLP
950 Third Avenue, 25th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Telephone: (718) 777-0400
Facsimile: (718) 777-0599
Attorneys for the Plaintiff
Defendants. ___
individual, by and through his undersigned attorneys, PARDALIS & NOHAVICKA, LLP, hereby
alleges as follows against Defendants FAN CLOSET LLC, STEFEN HILL, and PHIL WILLETT
(collectively “Defendants”):
NATURE OF ACTION
1. Antetokounmpo brings this action for the infringement of his GREEK FREAK
trademark by Defendants through the unauthorized use of the GREEK FREAK mark, including,
without limitation, by advertising, marketing, promoting, distributing, displaying, offering for sale
and selling unlicensed infringing products bearing the GREEK FREAK brand label.
1
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 2 of 21
seq.;
1125(a);
9) Unjust Enrichment;
50-51).
has been using the nickname, Greek Freak, as a trademark in U.S. commerce (the “GREEK
FREAK mark”); Antetokounmpo’s products are distributed under the GREEK FREAK mark at
2
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 3 of 21
use of his GREEK FREAK mark, Antetokounmpo’s GREEK FREAK mark has become famous,
manufacturing, importing, selling and distributing apparel, such as phone cases, hoodies, baby
onesies and bodysuits, and other items of apparel under the GREEK FREAK mark.
7. Upon learning of Defendants’ unauthorized use of the GREEK FREAK mark and
brand, Antetokounmpo took immediate action and asked Defendants to provide him with a full
accounting of all merchandise sold by Defendants that is infringing upon Plaintiff’s trademark
record of their alleged sales and profits of GREEK FREAK branded products.
surrender of the infringing inventory and other reasonable requests which were meant to ensure
that the infringement has ceased and that the Antetokounmpo’s has been adequately compensated
3
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 4 of 21
12. This action arises under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq. and the statutory
and common laws of the State of New York. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this
action over Plaintiff’s federal claims under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
13. This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claims under 28
U.S.C. §§ 1367(a), because they are so related to the claims within the original jurisdiction of the
Court that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States
Constitution.
14. Personal jurisdiction exists over Defendants in this judicial district pursuant to
N.Y.C.P.L.R. § 302(a)(1) and N.Y.C.P.L.R. § 302(a)(3), or in the alternative, Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 4(k), because, upon information and belief, Defendants regularly conduct, transacts
and/or solicits business in New York and in this judicial district, and/or derives substantial revenue
from this business transactions in New York and in this judicial district and/or otherwise avails
himself of the privileges and protections of the laws of the State of New York such that this Court’s
assertion of jurisdiction over Defendants does not offend traditional notions of fair play and due
process, and/or Defendants’ infringing actions caused injury to Plaintiff in New York and in this
judicial district such that Defendants should reasonably expect such actions to have consequences
a) Upon information and belief, Defendants have been systematically directing and/or
targeting their business activities at consumers all over the country, including New York,
b) Defendants’ website provides information about and describes the goods sold; it
further allows online sales with the use of a credit card and other means of payment, and it
4
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 5 of 21
c) Upon information and belief, Defendants are aware of the products that Plaintiff
offers, namely the GREEK FREAK products and the GREEK FREAK mark. Defendants
are aware that their infringing actions, alleged herein, are likely to cause injury to Plaintiff
15. Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c), because acts
THE PARTIES
17. In 2007, Plaintiff started playing basketball, and by 2009, he was playing
competitively for the youth squad of Filathlitikos. From 2013 to the present, he is playing for the
18. Giannis Antetokounmpo is widely known under his nickname the “GREEK
FREAK.” His popularity has been rising over the last years and he has participated or licensed his
19. Upon information and belief, Defendant Stefen Hill resides at 7660 Beverly Blvd,
20. Upon information and belief, Defendant Phil Willett resides at 3162 Jenkins
5
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 6 of 21
21. Upon information and belief, Defendant Fan Closet LLC is a California Limited
Liability Company, with an address at c/o STEPHEN HILL 7660 Beverly Blvd, Unit 343, Los
Angeles CA 90036.
22. Antetokounmpo has built a strong reputation for his professional skills which is
23. Antetokounmpo has continually used his GREEK FREAK mark in connection with
his products in U.S. commerce at least as early as 2017. He has been identified as the “GREEK
FREAK” even earlier than that, due to his impressive professional abilities and achievements.
24. During this time, Plaintiff has engaged in substantial advertising and promotion,
and has expended substantial time, money and resources successfully developing and promoting
25. Plaintiff has also entered into licensing and other similar agreements with thirds
parties, for the authorized use of the GREEK FREAK mark in commerce in connection with a
variety of goods.
26. The GREEK FREAK products are directly associated with Antetokounmpo as he
is recognized as the “Greek Freak,” and they distinguish themselves among competitive products
based on their association with Antetokounmpo and their superior design and quality.
applied for, and obtained a federal registration for his GREEK FREAK mark (EXHIBIT A).
Antetokounmpo has also applied for a variation of his GREEK FREAK mark, namely for the mark
“GREEK FR34K” which includes the numbers appearing on his NBA jersey. This mark has been
6
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 7 of 21
approved for registration and no third party oppositions have been filed against it; therefore it will
be registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office soon (EXHIBIT B). This mark
28. Antetokounmpo’s U.S. trademark registration for the GREEK FREAK mark covers
“Backpacks” in International Class 18 and “Shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, hooded sweatshirts, jackets,
hooded jackets, sports jerseys, socks, warm up suits, caps, hats” in International Class 25
29. Antetokounmpo has expended substantial time, money and resources successfully
30. Antetokounmpo has sold tens of thousands of dollars of products under the GREEK
FREAK mark.
31. Antetokounmpo has used the GREEK FREAK brand continuously and exclusively,
and any products offered under that mark are directly associated with him.
32. As a result, Plaintiff’s mark has become famous, and an extremely valuable asset
for Plaintiff.
upon information and belief, Defendants have advertised and sold various products under the
“GREEK FREAK” name through various media, platforms, and websites, including their website
34. Defendants have engaged in this infringing activity despite having constructive
notice of Antetokounmpo’s federal trademark rights under 15 U.S.C. § 1072 and despite having
7
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 8 of 21
actual knowledge of Antetokounmpo’s use of the GREEK FREAK mark, since Defendants offer
35. Defendants’ use of the GREEK FREAK mark postdates the date of first use of the
37. On March 27, 2020, Plaintiff, through his attorneys, sent a Cease and Desist letter
to Defendants (EXHIBIT D), alerting them of Plaintiff’s exclusive rights in the mark and
38. Defendants after receiving Antetokounmpo’s cease and desist letter, provided a
record of their alleged sales and profits of GREEK FREAK branded products.
39. However, Defendants failed to cooperate with Plaintiff in good faith to reach an
agreement that would ensure that infringement has ceased and Plaintiff is reasonably compensated
40. Upon information and belief, before removing the “GREEK FREAK” from their
website, Defendants had made substantial sales of products under it, capitalizing upon Plaintiff’s
famous mark.
41. Upon information and belief, the products offered by Defendants under the GREEK
FREAK mark were of a particular aesthetic not aligned with Plaintiff and of a substantially lower
quality than the products offered by Plaintiff. Therefore, Defendants’ actions constitute trademark
dilution by garnishment.
8
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 9 of 21
42. Defendants’ use of the GREEK FREAK mark is directly competitive with
Plaintiff’s use of the mark on his products and has caused confusion, mistake, and deception as to
43. Defendants’ failure to cooperate with Plaintiff in the face of a demand to cease
and desist its infringing activities and to provide proof of sales and profits derived therefrom,
demonstrates Defendants’ bad faith intent to profit from Plaintiff’s success, by misleading,
44. There is no question that the products sold by Defendant under the GREEK
FREAK mark were sold by Defendant with the purpose of confusing and misleading consumers
into believing that they are purchasing products associated with or endorsed by Giannis
Antetokounmpo, one of the most successful and popular NBA players. Defendant therefore
traded off the goodwill and reputation of Antetokounmpo by engaging in the unauthorized use of
45. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation in the foregoing
46. Since the early days of his career, Antetokounmpo has been identified as the
“GREEK FREAK,” and since at least as early as 2017, he has continuously and extensively used
the GREEK FREAK mark in commerce, and has built its reputation under the same mark.
47. Antetokounmpo owns Federal Registration No. 5401870 for the GREEK FREAK
mark. This registration is valid, substituting, and prima facie evidence of the validity of the
9
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 10 of 21
GREEK FREAK mark, Plaintiff’s ownership of the mark, and Plaintiff’s exclusive right to use the
mark in commerce.
48. Defendants made unauthorized use of the GREEK FREAK mark for apparel that
are confusingly similar to, related to, and directly competitive with Antetokounmpo’s goods sold
49. Defendants’ unauthorized use of the GREEK FREAK mark is likely to cause
products and/or result in the mistaken belief that Defendants are somehow legitimately affiliated,
the GREEK FREAK mark, constitute willful trademark infringement of a federally registered
51. By reason of Defendants’ aforesaid acts, Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to
suffer damage and injury to its business reputation and goodwill and will sustain loss of revenue
and profits.
52. Unless enjoined by this Court, Defendants will potentially continue to perform the
acts complained of herein and cause said damages and injury, all to the immediate and irreparable
harm of Plaintiff. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law for Defendants’ wrongful acts.
53. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation in the foregoing
54. Plaintiff is the exclusive owner of all right and title to the GREEK FREAK mark.
10
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 11 of 21
55. Plaintiff has continuously used the GREEK FREAK mark in interstate commerce
since on or before the date of the first use as reflected in its registration attached hereto as Exhibit
A.
the GREEK FREAK mark and with knowledge that Defendants’ products bear counterfeit marks,
Defendants intentionally reproduced, copied and/or colorable imitated the GREEK FREAK mark
on products which are indistinguishable from the actual/original products offered under the
57. Defendants’ infringing products are likely to cause confusion, mistake and
deception among the general purchasing public as to the origin of these infringing products, and
are likely to deceive consumers, the public and the trade into believing that Defendants’ infringing
products originate from, are associated with or are otherwise authorized or endorsed by Plaintiff.
58. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ illegal actions alleged herein,
Defendants have caused substantial monetary loss and irreparable injury and damage to Plaintiff,
his business, reputation and valuable rights in the GREEK FREAK mark and the goodwill
60. Unless immediately enjoined, Defendants will continue to cause such substantial
61. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief, damages for the irreparable harm caused by
Defendants’ infringing activities, and all gains, profits and advantages obtained by Defendants as
a result therefrom, enhanced discretionary damages, treble damages and/or statutory damages of
11
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 12 of 21
up to $2,000,000.00 per counterfeit mark per type of goods sold, offered for sale or distributed and
62. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation in the foregoing
63. As a result of Plaintiff’s widespread and continuous use of his GREEK FREAK
mark in commerce in the United States and as a result of Plaintiff’s fame and direct association
with such mark, the GREEK FREAK mark is famous within the meaning of relevant statutes.
64. Defendants’ unauthorized commercial use of the GREK FREAK mark was
65. Defendants’ unauthorized commercial use of the GREEK FREAK mark has
caused and continues to cause irreparable injury to Plaintiff and his business reputation and has
diluted the distinctive quality of Plaintiff’s famous GREEK FREAK mark within the meaning of
15 U.S.C. § 1125(c).
66. Upon information and belief, Defendants have profited or will profit through their
and/or willful.
12
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 13 of 21
69. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation in the foregoing
70. Plaintiff as the owner of all right, title and interest in and to the GREEK FREAK
mark, has standing to maintain an action for false designation of origin and unfair competition
under Federal Trademark Statute, Lanham Act § 43(a) (16 U.S.C. § 1125).
71. Since 2017, Plaintiff has continuously and extensively advertised and marketed
his products under his GREEK FREAK mark throughout the United States.
connection with his products and Plaintiff’s reputation and fame, the GREEK FREAK mark has
74. Defendants’ unauthorized use of the GREEK FREAK mark in connection with
apparel and phone case products causes confusion, mistake, and deception as to the source,
sponsorship, or approval of Defendants’ products by Plaintiff and results in the mistaken belief
that Defendants and their products are somehow legitimately affiliated, connected or associated
with Plaintiff.
otherwise dealing with the infringing products, Defendants have traded off the goodwill of Plaintiff
and his products, thereby directly and unfairly competing with Plaintiff.
76. Defendants knew, or by the exercise of reasonable care should have known, that
the infringing products would cause confusion, mistake and deception among consumers and the
public.
13
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 14 of 21
77. Defendants’ aforesaid acts constitute willful unfair competition with Plaintiff, in
78. Upon information and belief, Defendants’ aforementioned wrongful actions have
been knowing, deliberate, willful, intended to cause confusion, to cause mistake and to deceive
consumers and were performed with the intent to trade on the goodwill and reputation of Plaintiff.
79. By reason of Defendants’ aforesaid acts, Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to
suffer damage and injury to its business, reputation and goodwill, and will sustain loss of revenue
and profits.
80. Unless enjoined by this Court, Defendants will continue to perform the acts
complained of herein and cause said damages and injury, all to the immediate and irreparable
harm of Plaintiff. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law for Defendant’s wrongful acts.
81. Plaintiff incorporated by reference each and every allegation in the foregoing
82. Plaintiff has established and enjoys common law trade name and trademark rights
in the GREEK FREAK mark in connection with clothing and related products, through continuous,
extensive and uninterrupted use of the mark in commerce throughout the United States.
83. By their wrongful acts, Defendants have caused, and unless restrained by this Court
will continue to cause, serious and irreparable injury and damage to Plaintiff and to the goodwill,
reputation and proven business success associated with the GREEK FREAK mark.
84. Upon information and belief, Defendants have profited by their conduct and
activities.
14
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 15 of 21
87. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation in the foregoing
88. Defendants’ activities consist of deceptive acts and practices in the conduct of
their business.
89. Defendants’ aforementioned deceptive acts are aimed at consumers, and are
materially misleading with respect to the source, sponsorship, and affiliation or approval of
Defendants’ activities, and/or falsely suggest that Defendants are somehow legitimately
90. Plaintiff has been, and will continue to be, damaged by Defendants’ deceptive
91. Defendants have caused, and will continue to cause, irreparable injury to Plaintiff
and to the public unless restrained by this Court, pursuant to N.Y. Gen. Bus. L. § 349.
92. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation in the foregoing
93. Defendants’ aforesaid acts have created a likelihood of injury to the business
reputation of Plaintiff and likelihood of dilution of the distinctive quality of the GREEK FREAK
mark.
15
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 16 of 21
94. Defendants’ acts have caused, and will continue to cause irreparable injury to
Plaintiff unless restrained by this Court, pursuant to N.Y. Gen. Bus. L. § 360-1.
95. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation in the foregoing
competition, misappropriation, unjust enrichment, unfair and fraudulent business practices, and
misuse of Plaintiff’s GREEK FREAK mark under the common law of the State of New York.
98. By reason of Defendants’ aforesaid acts, Plaintiff has suffered and will continue
to suffer damage and injury to its business, reputation and good will, and will sustain loss of
99. Unless and until enjoined by this Court, Defendants will continue to perform the
acts complained herein and cause said damages and injury, all to the immediate and irreparable
harm of Plaintiff. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law for Defendants’ wrongful acts.
100. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation in the foregoing
101. By virtue of the egregious and illegal acts of Defendants as described herein,
16
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 17 of 21
practices, infringement, acts of deceit, and otherwise would serve to unjustly enrich Defendants
103. Plaintiff incorporated by reference each and every allegation in the foregoing
104. Plaintiff has enjoyed long and successful business relationships with its
105. Defendants’ conduct has interfered with these relationships and constitutes
tortious interference with prospective business relationships with these distributors and
customers.
reputation, Plaintiff’s relationship with his customers and his distribution network, for which
Defendants and any other identified person or entity who has acted in concert or in participation
with him, are liable to Plaintiff for actual and punitive damages in an amount to be proven at
trial.
107. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation in the foregoing
108. Defendants have used the GREEK FREAK mark in order to promote, distribute,
offer for sale and sell their products, inter alia, by labeling such products with the GREEK
FREAK mark.
17
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 18 of 21
111. Defendants’ false labeling has caused confusion, mistake, and deception among
buyers of the counterfeited products and all purchasers of the GREEK FREAK products as to
distributors.
112. The false trade statements have also caused confusion, mistake, and deception
among buyers of the counterfeited products and all purchasers of the GREEK FREAK brand
counterfeit goods.
113. By setting forth the false labeling on the counterfeit goods, and as pled above in
this Complaint, Defendants have proximately contributed to the harm that Plaintiff has suffered.
1125(a)(1)(A) and is liable to Plaintiff for such remedies as are afforded it under 15 U.S.C. §§
115. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation in the foregoing
116. Upon information and belief, Plaintiff has conspired with unknown manufacturers
and/or suppliers in the U.S. and/or overseas and other persons to illegally manufacture and/or
import in the United States, products under the GREEK FREAK mark.
18
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 19 of 21
117. Defendants’ conduct combined with the conduct of unknown third parties
constituted conspiracy and concert of action to tortuously interfere with Plaintiff’s business, for
118. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation in the foregoing
119. Defendants knowingly used the Plaintiff’s name and nickname, which is part of
Plaintiff’s identity; such use resulted in Defendants’ commercial advantage; such use was made
without Plaintiff’s consent; and the Plaintiff has been injured financially because of such use.
120. Defendants used Plaintiff’s name and nickname through Defendants’ website,
which is accessible by and targets consumers throughout the U.S., including New York.
121. Defendants have therefore committed an actionable wrong under NY Civ. Rights
Law § 50 and is liable to Plaintiff for such remedies as are afforded it under NY Civ. Rights Law
§ 51.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests that this Court enter judgment in its favor and against
agents, attorneys, employees, and all others in active concern or participation with them from:
(a) any further acts of infringement of Plaintiff’s intellectual property rights in the
GREEK FREAK mark, and in any similar mark Plaintiff owns, uses and/or may use.
19
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 20 of 21
(b) using Plaintiff’s name, portrait, likeness and/or the GREEK FREAK mark and any
variation that is confusingly similar to the Plaintiff’s mark unless expressly and specifically
authorized by Plaintiff.
(c) doing any act or thing that is likely to dilute the distinctiveness of Plaintiff’s
GREEK FREAK mark or that is likely to tarnish the goodwill associated with it.
Court and serve on counsel for Plaintiff within thirty (30) days after the entry of injunction
issued by this Court, a sworn statement setting forth in detail the manner and form in which
(a) All monetary actual and/or statutory damages sustained and to be sustained by
pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117 N.Y. Gen. Bus. L. § 349, N.Y. Gen. Bus. L. § 360-m,
(b) All exemplary and/or punitive damages to which Plaintiff is entitled under
(d) Plaintiff’s reasonable attorney’s fees, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117, N.Y. Gen.
Bus. L. § 349, N.Y. Gen. Bus. L. § 360-m, and/or any other applicable statute, together
4. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
20
Case 1:20-cv-03530-NRB Document 2 Filed 05/06/20 Page 21 of 21
Respectfully submitted,
21