Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Conditional Obligations; Promise (1997)

In two separate documents signed by him, Juan


Valentino “obligated” himself each to Maria and to Perla, thus – ‘To Maria, my true love, I
obligate myself to give you my one and only horse when I feel like It.” – and
– ‘To Perla, my true sweetheart, I obligate myself to pay you the P500.00 I owe you when I feel
like it.” Months passed but Juan never bothered to make good his promises. Maria and Perla
came to consult you on whether or not they could recover on the basis of the foregoing settings.
What would your legal advice be?

SUGGESTED ANSWER:

I would advise Maria not to bother running after Juan for the latter to make good his promise.
[This is because a promise is not an actionable wrong that allows a party to recover especially
when she has not suffered damages resulting from such promise. A promise does not create an
obligation on the part of Juan because it is not something which arises from a contract, law,
quasi-contracts or quasi- delicts  (Art,  1157)].  Under  Art.  1182,  Juan’s  promise  to Maria is
void because a conditional obligation depends upon the sole will of the obligor.

As regards Perla, the document is an express acknowledgment of a debt, and the promise to pay
what he owes her when he feels like it is equivalent to a promise to pay when his means permits
him to do so, and is deemed to be one with an indefinite period under Art. 1180. Hence the
amount is recoverable after Perla asks the court to set the period as provided by Art. 1197, par. 2.

You might also like