General Seminar Report PDF
General Seminar Report PDF
On
MIVAN TECHNOLOGY
By
SYED MUZAMMIL HYDER RAZVI
(15261A0147)
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
MAHATMA GANDHI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
(Affiliated to Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad)
Approved by AICTE, New Delhi
Sponsored by Chaitanya Bharathi Educational Society
Gandipet,Hyderabad – 500075. A.P. (INDIA)
www.mgit.ac.in
Jan, 2019
Sl. No. CONTENTS PAGE No.
1. ABSTRACT ii
2. INTRODUCTION 01
3. OBJECTIVES 02
4. SAILIENT WORKS PUBLISHED 02
5. SUMMARY 12
6. REFERENCES 13
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
ABSTRACT
The traditional mode of construction for individual houses comprising load beari
ng
walls with an appropriate roof above or reinforced concrete (RC) framed struct
ure
construction with infill masonry walls would be totally inadequate for m
ass
housing construction industry in view of the rapid rate of construction. Furth
er,
such constructions are prone to poor quality control even in case of contract
ors
with substantial resources and experience. For undertaking mass housing works,
it
is necessary to have innovative technologies which are capable of fast r
ate
construction and are able to deliver good quality and durable structure in c
ost
effective manner. Several systems are adopted at different places in the wor
ld;
eventually the systems which are reasonably economical and easy for operati
on
with skilled labour are useful in India. These are essentially based on the basis
of
mode of construction, namely, pre-cast construction or in-situ construction.
This report lays emphasis on:
Components and Features of Mivan technology
Working of Mivan technology
Comparison of Mivan formwork system with Conventional Construction
Cost Analysis and Comparison
Time Comparison
Feedback
ii
INTRODUCTION
Pre-cast and cast-in-situ are techniques that are used for quick construction. P
re-
cast includes the wall-panel units and slab units directly added to buildi
ng
structure. The use of aluminium also evolved as one of the techniques for qui
ck
construction by use of aluminium and steel formwork. As a matter of fact the c
ost
of the formwork may be up to 25% of cost of the structure in building work, a
nd
even higher in bridges, it is thus essential that the forms are properly designed
to
effect economy without sacrificing strength and efficiency. Certain patent
ed
systems based on imported technologies such as “Mascon System” (Canad
a),
“Mivan System” (Malaysia) etc. have come on the Indian scene in recent years.
In Mivan systems traditional column and beam construction is eliminated a
nd
instead walls and slabs are cast in one operation at site by use of specia
lly
designed, easy to handle light weight pre-engineered aluminum forms w
ith
minimum labour and without use of any equipment. Rapid construction of multi
ple
units of a repetitive type can be achieved with a sort of assembly line producti
on
by deployment of a few semi-skilled labours. The entire operation essentia
lly
comprises fitting and erecting the portion of shuttering as already determined a
nd
then carrying out concreting of the walls and slabs. Props are so designed that th
ey
stay in position while de-shuttering of slabs takes place. The dimensional
accuracy
of the formwork is of high order. Therefore any possibility of errors does not ri
se.
Thus, the method of construction by MIVAN technology can increase productivit
y,
quality and performance of work through the use of better construction equipme
nt,
materials, and time saving compared to conventional. This study is essent
ial
because it can provide the necessary information on the building cost and durati
on
comparison between the conventional system and MIVAN building system
in
India’s construction industry.
Pa
ge | 1
OBJECTIVES
To carry out a detailed study on MIVAN technology
Comparison and Analysis with the conventional method of construction
SAILIENT WORKS PUBLISHED
1.1 Conventional Formwork
1.2 Mivan technology
Pa
ge | 2
Aluminium is used to make all the components of formwork which makes it li
ght
in weight and also more number of times repetitions can be possible. As they are
of
light in weight dismantling can be done with ease and is simple, in other words it
is
short and simple cycle. This system as the complete methodology well planned
to
its finest details. The one of the main characteristics is that it makes the use
of
concrete as principal building material for the prime reason in cost a
nd
accessibility of cement and sand which are available easily. The use of appropria
te
grade of cement can be beneficial to build quality and strength, resistance
to
earthquake and fire, low noise transmission with the better thermal capacity, givi
ng
a longer life with minimum maintenance services [1].
1.2.1 Components of Mivan technology
1. Beam components
1. Beam side panel: According to the size of the beam the cutting is done to for
m a
rectangular structure.
2. Prop head for soffit beam: For easy dislodging of the formwork V-shaped
head
is used.
3. Beam soffit panel: It supports the soffit beam and is a plain rectangular structu
re
of aluminium.
4. Beam soffit bulk head: It is used to carry the bulk loads.
2. Wall components
2. Rocker: It is of L-shape and also a supporting component of wall.
Pa
ge | 3
3. Kicker: It acts as a ledge to support and at the top of the panel it forms the w
all
face.
4. Stub pin: It helps in joining of two wall panel together.
3. Deck components
1. Deck panel: It forms a horizontal surface for safety of workers and for casting
of
slab.
3. Prop length: It is a length of the prop and it depends on the slab length.
4. Deck mid: It helps in supporting and to hold the concrete in the middle porti
on
of the beam.
5. Soffit length: It supports the edges of the deck panel.
1.2.2 Working of Mivan technology
Step 1:- Shuttering detailed drawings is provided and before manufacturing
or
fabrication all the building architecture and structural drawings are freeze. If a
ny
revision in drawing during the execution of work, it will be cumbersome.
Step 2:- When marking of columns is done by the surveyor, the fixing of Miv
an
shuttering is done after the reinforcement column work is completed
Step 4:- Pouring of concrete take place after the slab and beam shuttering w
ith
conduit work is done [1].
Pa
ge | 4
1.2.3 Features of Mivan technology
1. Sheet thickness and size of panel
The concrete wall panel is 4mm thick.
2000*600, 2000*300, 1200*300, 850*300 are the standard sizes of panels.
Any other required size as per the requirement can be manufactured a
nd
delivered to the site.
2. Load carrying capacity
It has 7-8 tonnes per square meter capacity.
Due to use of aluminium as a material, it is light in weight.
It weighs around 18-20 kg per square meter.
3. Striking time
Vertical formwork – 12 hours after concreting or when concrete attai
ns
2
strength of 2 N/mm .
Horizontal formwork – 36 hours after concreting or when concrete atte
nds
2
strength of 10 N/mm [1].
Pa
ge |
5
Factors Conventional System Mivan Formwork System
The speed of development is much In this framework the divider and the
slower because of well-ordered
floors are threw all the while in one
Speed of fruition of various phases of the
nonstop operation and furthermore the
exercises, for example, erection of
development completing work can be begun instantly,
formwork, cementing and de-
so the speed of the development is
covering and from there on putting
considerably speedier.
and other completing exercises.
Because of traditional strategy for Superior quality is acquired due to in-situ
Quality throwing of entire structure and
development ordinary quality is
transverse dividers done in constant
obtained.
operation.
If there should arise an occurrence of
On account of ordinary Mivan framework the wall and the roof
1
development the partition walls
Table -1 components are casted together because
are comprised of blocks because of which the insides have flawless and
Aesthetics
of which the column and the beam clean lines without unattractive
indicate unattractive projections in projections in different corners. The wall
room interiors. and the roofs likewise have a smooth
even surface.
All the outer walls are comprised All the outside walls are comprised of
concrete and don't require manual cement
of blocks, so it requires manual
External finishes putting and furthermore have smooth
bond putting which should be
completing, so this will require no regular
repainted as often as possible.
repainting.
The maintenance cost is too high
as it requires visit repairs of The maintenance cost is negligible as the
Maintenance mortars of wall and roofs, painting walls and roof is comprised of excellent
of external and internal walls concrete which don't require visit repairs.
because of leakages.
Less talented works are required on the
Skilled workers are required on site as all the completing things are pre-
assembled. The formwork boards are
the site as the structure isn't solid
light and can be lifted physically, so there
Proficiency and and it ought to be in appropriate
is no need of burning through cash for
measurement.
cost saving substantial cranes for lifting.
The formwork boards are not light
There is no prerequisite of works for
in weight.
building block dividers and putting as
real piece of the structure is thrown in
concrete by little gathering of specialists.
2.1 Comparison of Mivan formwork system with Conventional Constructio
n
1
[3] Vasav, 2017, Table – 1, page no. 1145.
P
a
g
e
|
6
Sl. Characteristics MIVAN System Conventional Formwork
No. System
1 Speed of development 7 days cycle per floor. Min. process duration is of
21 days.
2 Quality of surface finish Excellent. Putting is not Bad.
required Putting is required
3 Pre-planning of formwork Required Not required
system
4 Type of construction Cast-in-situ Cellular Simple RCC encircled
construction development
5 Wastage of formwork Very less In incredible sum.
material
6 Accuracy in construction Accurate construction Accuracy is Less than
Modern Systems
7 Coordination between various Essential Not essentially required
offices
8 Resistance to earthquake Good resistance Less than Modern Systems
Removing of floor piece
9 frames without expelling Possible Not possible
props
10 Need of any timber or Not required These are the main
plywood components
11 Re-use estimation of 150 – 200 Maximum 50
formwork
12 Stacking of materials Hard Easy
13 Initial investment in the High Less
system
14 Economy in development Economical for mass Economical on small scale
housing
2.2 Comparison of Characteristics
2
Table -2
3.1 Case Study – 1
Project: Residential building Location:
Mumbai
Design Consultant: J+W Consultant Built up area: 675.779 sq.
m
Number of storeys: G+21 floors
2
[3] Vasav, 2017, Table – 2, page no. 1146.
Pa
ge | 7
Sl. No. Description Unit Mivan Conventional
technology formwork
1 Material cost Sq. m 9000 500
2 Labour cost Sq. m 260 380
3 Number of 200-300 times 15-20 times
repetitions
4 Minimum duration 10 days 21 days
of slab cycle
3.1.1 Cost Analysis
3
Table-3 Cost analysis and comparison
4
Graph -1 Cost comparison of formwork
3
[1] Naveen, 2017, Table – 1, page no. 2720.
4
[1] Naveen, 2017, Graph – 6.1, page no. 2721.
Pa
ge
| 8
Sl. Shuttering Shuttering Total Cost of Total cost of
Mivan
No items quantity Conventional formwork
Technology
1 Column 40.38 363420 20190
2 Beam 24.2292 218062 12114.6
3 Slab 256.11 2304990 128055
2886472 160359.6
3.1.2 Cost analysis of a residential building
5
Table-4 Shuttering quantity and cost comparison
3.1.3 Planning and Scheduling
6
Graph -2 Time comparison of formwork
5
[1] Naveen, 2017, Table – 2, page no. 2721.
6
[1] Naveen, 2017, Graph – 6.2, page no. 2721.
Pa
ge
| 9
Sl. Parameter Cost By Conventional Cost by Mivan Cost Saving
No. Technology Technology
Wooden Materials =
1. Shuttering after Rs. 88.50 /sq. m Rs. 83.8 /sq. m Rs. 104.63/sq. m
repetitions M. S. Material =
Rs. 100.00 /sq. m
2. Concreting Rs. 1400 /sq. m Rs. 1505 /sq. m Rs. -105 /sq. m
3. Reinforcement Rs. 1,480.00 Rs. 2,115.20 Rs. -635.2 /sq. m
4 Brickwork Rs. 484.00 0.00 Rs. 480 /sq. m
5 Plaster Rs. 700.00 0.00 Rs. 700 /sq. m
6 Total cost saving Rs. 548.43 /sq. m
3.2 Case Study – 2
Details about the structure: It is a part of Paranjpe schemes’s “Blue Ridge” a 1
38
acre integrated township Hinjewadi, Pune. We have acquired the data of To
wer
HA-1 (25 Floors) [4].
Table 5: Cost comparison between construction by conventional and
3.3 Feedback
In this project we have taken a survey of people who are occupied in houses b
uilt
by mivan technology.
7
Mivan technology
We have prepared questionnaire and took the feedback from occupant. The res
ult
analysis of selective question out of questionnaire of this survey is as follows [4]:
7
[4] Kushal, 2015, Table – 1, page no. 31.
Pag
e | 1
0
Is house more Spacious?
18% YES
12% NO
70%
CAN'T SAY
8
Which technology of house
construction is more comfortable?
20% CONVENTIONAL
50% MIVAN
30% OTHERS
How much you would rate to Mivan
technology of house construction?
0%
30% 0 TO 3
4 TO 6
70% 7 TO 10
10
8,9,10
[4] Kushal, 2015, Table – 1, page no. 31.
Pag
e | 1
1
SUMMARY
With the rise of the population of the country, the task of construction process
as
monumentally increased. As we all know the construction of high rise building
is
becoming a trend and the process of construction of these high rise building tak
es
more time and hence to reduce the duration and cost of the project advanc
ed
technologies are adopted.
1. Mivan technology is suitable for large scale building projects but not for sm
all
scale projects and they can be reused for about 200-300 times.
2. Even though the initial investment of Mivan technology is high, it provides c
ost
efficient project and eliminated the need of plastering work as it gives a go
od
surface finish compared to conventional type of formwork.
3. The duration of project can be minimized by adopting Mivan technology.
4. Mivan formwork system not only helps in improving the quality and efficien
cy
of the work but also has helped in maintaining the site safety.
5. Mivan formwork systems, which are mostly modular, designed for speed a
nd
efficiency, are engineered to provide increased accuracy and minimize waste
in
construction and most have enhanced health and safety features built-in.
Hence, Mivan technology is the need of time to solve the problems of me
ga
housing projects in India.
Pag
e | 12
REFERENCES
[1] Naveen V. Chikkaveerayanavar, Naresh Patil, “Planning and Scheduling
Of
Shuttering System for Multi-Storeyed Building”, International Resear
ch
Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Volume: 04 Issue: 0
7 |
July -2017, pp. 2718-2722.
[2] Patil R.S., Pawale D.B., Tambe H.D. and Pawar P.D., Wakchuare A.
V.,
“Mivan Technology Using Aluminium Formwork”, International Journal
of
Engineering Sciences & Management (IJESM) | February 2016, pp. 25-28.
[3] Vasav R. Rakholia, Srinil H. Soni, “Comparative Studies of Constructi
on
Techniques (Conventional vs. Mivan)”, International Research Journal
of
Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Volume: 04 Issue: 11 | Nov -
2017,
pp. 1144-1147.
[4] Kushal Patil, Ajitkumar Jadhav, Nikhil Shingate, “Mivan Technolog
y”,
International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJET
R),
Volume-3, Issue-6 | June 2015, pp. 30-32.
[5] Akshay Gulghane, Nikhil Pitale, Sanket Sanghai, “Time and C
ost
Optimization of Construction Project Using Mivan
Technology”,
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJER
A),
Vol. 8, Issue 8 (Part -II) | Aug 2018, pp. 70-74.
Pag
e | 1
3