Managers can be leaders by influencing others to achieve goals. Leadership involves seven key traits: drive, desire to lead, honesty, self-confidence, intelligence, knowledge, and extraversion. There are three main leadership styles - autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire. Effective leadership depends on consideration of employees and structuring roles. Contingency theories like Fiedler, Hersey-Blanchard, and Path-Goal propose that leadership style should match the situation. Contemporary views emphasize transformational leadership, vision, teams, and sources of power like authority.
Managers can be leaders by influencing others to achieve goals. Leadership involves seven key traits: drive, desire to lead, honesty, self-confidence, intelligence, knowledge, and extraversion. There are three main leadership styles - autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire. Effective leadership depends on consideration of employees and structuring roles. Contingency theories like Fiedler, Hersey-Blanchard, and Path-Goal propose that leadership style should match the situation. Contemporary views emphasize transformational leadership, vision, teams, and sources of power like authority.
Managers can be leaders by influencing others to achieve goals. Leadership involves seven key traits: drive, desire to lead, honesty, self-confidence, intelligence, knowledge, and extraversion. There are three main leadership styles - autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire. Effective leadership depends on consideration of employees and structuring roles. Contingency theories like Fiedler, Hersey-Blanchard, and Path-Goal propose that leadership style should match the situation. Contemporary views emphasize transformational leadership, vision, teams, and sources of power like authority.
Managers can be leaders by influencing others to achieve goals. Leadership involves seven key traits: drive, desire to lead, honesty, self-confidence, intelligence, knowledge, and extraversion. There are three main leadership styles - autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire. Effective leadership depends on consideration of employees and structuring roles. Contingency theories like Fiedler, Hersey-Blanchard, and Path-Goal propose that leadership style should match the situation. Contemporary views emphasize transformational leadership, vision, teams, and sources of power like authority.
leader is someone who can influence others and who has managerial authority. Leadership is a process of leading a group and influencing that group to achieve its goals. SEVEN TRAITS ASSOCIATED WITH LEADERSHIP 1. Drive. Leaders exhibit a high effort level. They have a relatively high desire for achievement, they are ambitious, they have a lot of energy, they are tirelessly persistent in their activities, and they show initiative. 2. Desire to lead. Leaders have a strong desire to influence and lead others. They demonstrate the willingness to take responsibility. 3. Honesty and integrity. Leaders build trusting relationships with followers by being truthful or nondeceitful and by showing high consistency between word and deed. 4. Self-confidence. Followers look to leaders for an absence of self-doubt. Leaders, therefore, need to show self-confidence in order to convince followers of the rightness of their goals and decisions. 5. Intelligence. Leaders need to be intelligent enough to gather, synthesize, and interpret large amounts of information, and they need to be able to create visions, solve problems, and make correct decisions. 6. Job-relevant knowledge. Effective leaders have a high degree of knowledge about the company, industry, and technical matters. In-depth knowledge allows leaders to make well-informed decisions and to understand the implications of those decisions. 7. Extraversion. Leaders are energetic, lively people. They are sociable, assertive, and rarely silent or withdrawn. THREE LEADER- SHIP STYLES 1. The autocratic style described a leader who dictated work methods, made unilateral decisions, and limited employee participation. 2. The democratic style described a leader who involved employees in decision making, delegated authority, and used feedback as an opportunity for coaching employees. 3. The laissez-faire style leader let the group make decisions and complete the work in whatever way it saw fit. TWO IMPORTANT DIMENSIONS OF LEADER BEHAVIOR THE OHIO STATE STUDIES: 1. Initiating Structure, which referred to the extent to which a leader defined his or her role and the roles of group members in attaining goals. It included behaviors that involved attempts to organize work, work relationships, and goals. 2. Consideration, which was defined as the extent to which a leader had work relationships characterized by mutual trust and respect for group members’ ideas and feelings. high–high leader A leader high in both initiating structure and consideration behaviors UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN STUDIES 1. Leaders who were employee oriented were described as emphasizing interpersonal relationships. 2. The production-oriented leaders, in contrast, tended to emphasize the task aspects of the job. Unlike the other studies, the Michigan researchers concluded that leaders who were employee oriented were able to get high group productivity and high group member satisfaction. managerial grid A two-dimensional grid for appraising leadership styles THREE MAJOR CONTINGENCY THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP. 1. The Fiedler contingency model proposed that effective group performance depended upon properly matching the leader’s style and the amount of control and influence in the situation. The model was based on the premise that a certain leadership style would be most effective in different types of situations. The keys were to (1) define those leadership styles and the different types of situations, and then (2) identify the appropriate combinations of style and situation. least-preferred coworker (LPC) questionnaire - A questionnaire that measures whether a leader is task or relationship oriented leader–member relations - One of Fiedler’s situational contingencies that describes the degree of confidence, trust, and respect employees had for their leader task structure - One of Fiedler’s situational contingencies that describes the degree to which job assignments are formalized and structured position power - One of Fiedler’s situational contingencies that describes the degree of influence a leader has over activities such as hiring, firing, discipline, promotions, and salary increases 2. Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory - situational leadership theory (SLT), is a contingency theory that focuses on followers’ readiness. The emphasis on the followers in leadership effectiveness reflects the reality that it is the followers who accept or reject the leader. Regardless of what the leader does, the group’s effectiveness depends on the actions of the followers. readiness, as defined by Hersey and Blanchard, refers to the extent to which people have the ability and willingness to accomplish a specific task. four specific leadership styles described as follows: 1. Telling (high task–low relationship): The leader defines roles and tells people what, how, when, and where to do various tasks. 2. Selling (high task–high relationship): The leader provides both directive and supportive behavior. 3. Participating (low task–high relationship): The leader and followers share in decision making; the main role of the leader is facilitating and communicating. 4. Delegating (low task–low relationship): The leader provides little direction or support. The final component in the model is the four stages of follower readiness: 1: People are both unable and unwilling to take responsibility for doing something. Followers aren’t competent or confident. 2: People are unable but willing to do the necessary job tasks. Followers are moti vated but lack the appropriate skills. 3: People are able but unwilling to do what the leader wants. Followers are competent, but don’t want to do something. 4: People are both able and willing to do what is asked of them. 3. PATH-GOAL MODEL -Another approach to understanding leadership. path-goal theory - states that the leader’s job is to assist followers in attaining their goals and to provide direction or support needed to ensure that their goals are compatible with the goals of the group or organization. Developed by Robert House, path-goal theory takes key elements from the expectancy theory of motivation.19 The term path-goal is derived from the belief that effective leaders remove the roadblocks and pitfalls so that followers have a clearer path to help them get from where they are to the achievement of their work goals. House identified four leadership behaviors: 1. Directive leader: Lets subordinates know what’s expected of them, schedules work to be done, and gives specific guidance on how to accomplish tasks. 2. Supportive leader: Shows concern for the needs of followers and is friendly. 3. Participative leader: Consults with group members and uses their suggestions before making a decision. 4. Achievement oriented leader: Sets challenging goals and expects followers to perform at their highest level. Some predictions from path-goal theory are: Directive leadership leads to greater satisfaction when tasks are ambiguous or stressful than when they are highly structured and well laid out. The followers aren’t sure what to do, so the leader needs to give them some direction. Supportive leadership results in high employee performance and satisfaction when subordinates are performing structured tasks. In this situation, the leader only needs to support followers, not tell them what to do. Directive leadership is likely to be perceived as redundant among subordinates with high perceived ability or with considerable experience. These followers are quite capable so they don’t need a leader to tell them what to do. The clearer and more bureaucratic the formal authority relationships, the more leaders should exhibit supportive behavior and deemphasize directive behavior. The organizational situation has provided the structure as far as what is expected of followers, so the leader’s role is simply to support. Directive leadership will lead to higher employee satisfaction when there is substantive conflict within a work group. In this situation, the followers need a leader who will take charge. Subordinates with an internal locus of control will be more satisfied with a participative style. Because these followers believe that they control what happens to them, they prefer to participate in decisions. Subordinates with an external locus of control will be more satisfied with a directive style. These followers believe that what happens to them is a result of the external environment so they would prefer a leader that tells them what to do. Achievement-oriented leadership will increase subordinates’ expectancies that effort will lead to high performance when tasks are ambiguously structured. By setting challenging goals, followers know what the expectations are. DESCRIBE CONTEMPORARY VIEWS OF LEADERSHIP . Leader–member exchange theory (LMX) says that leaders create in-groups and out- groups and those in the in-group will have higher performance ratings, less turnover, and greater job satisfaction. 1. A transactional leader exchanges rewards for productivity where a transformational leader stimulates and inspires followers to achieve goals. 2. A charismatic leader is an enthusiastic and self-confident leader whose personality and actions influence people to behave in certain ways. People can learn to be charis- matic. 3. A visionary leader is able to create and articulate a realistic, credible, and attractive vision of the future. A team leader has two priorities 1. manage the team’s external boundary and 2. facilitate the team process. Four leader roles are involved 1.: liaison with external constituencies, 2. troubleshooter, 3. conflict manager, and 4. coach. Five sources of leader power 1. Legitimate power and authority are the same. Legitimate power represents the power a leader has as a result of his or her position in the organization. Although people in positions of authority are also likely to have reward and coercive power, legitimate power is broader than the power to coerce and reward. 2. Coercive power is the power a leader has to punish or control. Followers react to this power out of fear of the negative results that might occur if they don’t comply. Managers typically have some coercive power, such as being able to suspend or demote employees or to assign them work they find unpleasant or undesirable. 3. Reward power is the power to give positive rewards. A reward can be anything that a person values such as money, favorable performance appraisals, promotions, interesting work assignments, friendly colleagues, and preferred work shifts or sales territories. 4. Expert power is power that’s based on expertise, special skills, or knowledge. If an employee has skills, knowledge, or expertise that’s critical to a work group, that person’s expert power is enhanced. 5. Finally, referent power is the power that arises because of a person’s desirable resources or personal traits. If I admire you and want to be associated with you, you can exercise power over me because I want to please you. Referent power develops out of admiration of another and a desire to be like that person. Credibility - The degree to which followers perceive someone as honest, competent, and able to inspire Trust is defined as the belief in the integrity, character, and ability of a leader. Followers who trust a leader are willing to be vulnerable to the leader’s actions because they are confident that their rights and interests will not be abused. FIVE DIMENSIONS THAT MAKE UP THE CONCEPT OF TRUST 1. Integrity: honesty and truthfulness 2. Competence: technical and interpersonal knowledge and skills 3. Consistency: reliability, predictability, and good judgment in handling situations 4. Loyalty: willingness to protect a person, physically and emotionally 5. Openness: willingness to share ideas and information freely