People vs. Bayon PDF
People vs. Bayon PDF
_______________
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000172044838ce41569490003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 1/13
5/11/2020 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 622
* SECOND DIVISION.
703
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000172044838ce41569490003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 2/13
5/11/2020 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 622
PERALTA, J.:
This an appeal from the Decision[1] dated May 31, 2005
of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CR No. 28161. The
Court of Appeals affirmed the Decision of the Regional
Trial Court (RTC) of Quezon City, Branch 104 in Criminal
Case No.Q-03-116291, finding appellant Reynaldo Bayon
guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of qualified
theft.
On March 31, 2003, appellant Reynaldo Bayon was
charged with theft in an Information[2] that reads:
_______________
[1] Penned by Associate Justice Renato C. Dacudao, with Associate
Justices Edgardo F. Sundiam and Rosalinda Asuncion-Vicente,
concurring; Rollo, pp. 2-14.
[2] Records, pp. 2-3.
705
On the same day, appellant was also charged with
qualified theft in another Information[3] that reads:
When arraigned on May 6, 2003, appellant pleaded not
guilty to both charges.[4] The pre-trial was terminated
without stipulations. Thereafter, joint trial of the cases
ensued.
The prosecution presented three witnesses, namely,
private complainants Atty. Arturo Limoso and Eduardo
Cunanan, and Police Officer Paul Greg Esparta. It
dispensed with the testimonies of Police Officers
Marmando Pallasigue and Edmund Rizon, in view of the
stipulation of the parties as follows: (1) the police officer
recovered a Rolex watch from a person in Bulacan; (2) the
complainant was never present in all the stages of the
search for the watch; (3) the police officer
_______________
[3] Id., at pp. 4-5.
[4] Id., at p. 29.
706
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000172044838ce41569490003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 4/13
5/11/2020 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 622
_______________
[5] Id., at p. 64.
[6] Exhibit “D,” Id., at p. 13.
[7] TSN, June 16, 2003, pp. 4-5.
[8] Id., at pp. 6-7; TSN, August 26, 2003, pp. 3-4.
[9] TSN, June 16, 2003, pp. 7-8, 12-13; TSN, July 28, 2003, p. 4.
707
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000172044838ce41569490003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 5/13
5/11/2020 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 622
_______________
[10] TSN, June 16, 2003, p. 10.
[11] Id., at pp. 9, 11.
[12] Id., at pp. 11-12.
[13] TSN, June 16, 2003, pp. 12-13; TSN, September 3, 2003, pp. 9-10;
TSN, September 8, 2003, pp. 5-6.
708
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000172044838ce41569490003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 6/13
5/11/2020 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 622
_______________
[14] TSN, January 6, 2004, pp. 2-4.
[15] CA Rollo, pp. 30-39.
[16] Id., at pp. 38-39.
709
The trial court stated that the prosecution did not offer
any direct evidence that appellant stole the missing items
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000172044838ce41569490003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 7/13
5/11/2020 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 622
_______________
[17] CA Decision, Rollo, p. 10.
[18] Rollo, pp. 2-14.
710
The elements of the crime of theft are: (1) that there be
taking of personal property; (2) that said property belongs
to another; (3) that the taking be done with intent to gain;
(4) that the taking be done without the consent of the
owner; and (5) that the taking be accomplished without the
use of violence against or intimidation of persons or force
upon things.[20]
Under Article 310[21] of the Revised Penal Code, theft
becomes qualified “if committed by a domestic servant, or
with
_______________
[19] Id., at p. 14.
[20] Astudillo v. People, G.R. Nos. 159734 & 159745, November 30,
2006, 509 SCRA 302, 324.
[21] Art. 310. Qualified theft.—The crime of theft shall be punished
by the penalties next higher by two degrees than those respectively
specified in the next preceding article, if committed by a domestic servant,
or with grave abuse of confidence, or if the property stolen is motor
vehicle, mail matter or large cattle or consists of coconuts taken from the
premises of a plantation, fish taken from a fishpond or fishery or if
property is taken on the occasion of fire,
711
(a) There is more than one circumstance;
(b) The facts from which the circumstances are derived are
proven; and
(c) The combination of all the circumstances is such as to
produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt.[22]
_______________
earthquake, typhoon, volcanic eruption, or any other calamity, vehicular accident
or civil disturbance.
[22] People v. Castro, G.R. No. 170415, September 19, 2008, 566 SCRA 92, 100.
[23] Id.
712
the missing items was kept and where the key to the vault was
placed;
(2) Upon discovery by Atty. Limoso of the loss of the missing
items, the police could no longer find in Atty. Limoso’s house
the clothes of the [accused-appellant.][24]
_______________
[24] CA Decision, Rollo, p. 11.
[25] TSN, July 28, 2003, p. 4.
[26] The Philippine Constitution, Art III. Sec. 12. (1) Any person under
investigation for the commission of an offense shall have the right to be
informed of his right to remain silent and to have competent and
independent counsel preferably of his own choice. If the
713
_______________
person cannot afford the services of counsel, he must be provided with one.
These rights cannot be waived, except in writing and in the presence of
counsel.
xxxx
(2) Any confession or admission obtained in violation of this or
Section 17 hereof shall be inadmissible in evidence against him.
(Emphasis supplied.)
[27] Arce v. People, 429 Phil. 328, 334; 379 SCRA 583, 587 (2002).
[28] Id., at p. 335; p. 589.
[29] Id., at p. 336; p. 589.
714
_______________
** Designated as an additional member in lieu of Associate Justice
Antonio Eduardo B. Nachura, per Raffle dated June 1, 2009.
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000172044838ce41569490003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 13/13