Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

The leadership characteristics that empowers success are one of the deeply sought-

after topics of interest, in both the business organizations and the academic research

communities. Currently, the subject has been causing contradictions and had led to

being one of heavily debated topics in both theoretically and practically implementing

it in the workplace.

In this essay, the analysis of these leadership aspects will be inspected on the

following three articles (Capelli et al. 2010; Larkin and Weber 2011; Useem 2010)

with two engaging in the business sector and one being in the military sector. Since

each article’s findings have been conducted in different countries, thus, diverse ideas

and values for the aspects have been established. Capelli et. al, for example, takes

place in India, where the ideas of powers practiced traditional business models are

changed from the CEO to their employees who are now succeeding them as

leaders. Whereas, Larkin and Weber’s focuses in China, interviewing top business

leaders for advice in coping challenges in the changing tourism industry and

Useem’s article mainly focusing on the military who created new tactics that adapted

the new environment which the businesses could take inspirations from. The main

objective of this, is to discover the nature of how their aspects are valued as well as

on their similarities or differences on mission-building, communication-skills and

learning-styles.

While all the articles do practice the aspect of having a mission being built, in which

is to be used as means of establishing purpose for the organization/group to

accordingly act upon, the scope (of domain) where its set for are different. The

Indian leaders for example, has been well-known for being internally and externally

aiding the people and the infrastructure, both in and out of their business which they

call their “social mission” (Capelli et. al, pg.56). While this responsibility would

4/16/2020 Portfolio 6 - Draft Cover Sheet Zaw*


precede beyond their workplace area, building and maintaining healthy relationships,

the rest of the articles are internally focused on their groups (for stability and

consistency). According to Larkin & Webber, the ten global leaders claim that

supporting teams with systematic, well-structured plans and strategic leadings is

mainly the most important mission among all else, for bringing in the team to

together to work inside is far crucial that the outside. This includes bringing right

people to talk to the right team and having a department to rightly execute it (pg.29).

Similarly, Useem’s US Military bootcamp does not differ far from this, except from

the fact that they are in a survival mode where conformity is primarily the only way to

establish the mission, in accords to their laws of the Marine Dictum (pg.76). In

explanatory terms, the dictum says only decisions are made when the consensus is

dominant (e.g. 70% consent-act principle) and must act as their sole mission.

Applying comprehensible communication skills towards member are another

commonly connected aspect that all these articles leniently agree on, with very little

distinctions to be made. Being able to instruct a clear set of goals and objectives, is a

trait that Larkin & Weber (pg.30) as well as Useem (pg.77) both tend to use: helping

individuals find reasons to understand why their responsibilities and directions are

being planned and conducted. Although, Capelli et. al has these traits, he

emphasizes more on building relationships, encouraging openness and empowering

them is the essential part in the teams’ communicating process, with instructing not

being used solitarily (pg.58). The reason was made allegedly so that the needs of

the members and their customers are meet in appeal, contributing to the well being

of the individuals.

Although there is a variation in dealing with uncertainty, all the articles have made

proposals to address it by having a learning style. To Capelli et. al, the way of the

4/16/2020 Portfolio 6 - Draft Cover Sheet Zaw*


learning in the Indian workplace is made by enrolling the staffs on workshop trainings

that are heavily invested, for it is taught by the successful experts (pg.59). The

initiative in implementing this is so that staffs to soon model after them, learning to

overcome challenges by their expertise. In Larkin and Weber’s version, their learning

style happens when practicing the qualities of being self-reflective and humble

instead of being entitled in a god-like status, where one is shy of having their

reputation ruined and is in constant denial. The concept of admittance, honesty,

humility and responsibility is taken into their accords, because formulating in this way

could help find a solution to the problem especially in the long-term that affects all

members (pg.29). On Useem’s style, the learning occurs by one’s personal

experience that they undergone in, using self-reflection as a key to understand and

being aware of their situations so they could adapt if necessary (pg.77).

By looking at the three articles so far, it can be noted that their aspects of mission-

building, communication-skills and learning-styles, are indeed are important

characteristics for success, although it is differentiated due to their nature of

business types. For this reason, there are such decentralized (India) and centralized

(USA & China) focuses in the organizations as well as different ways of learning.

Although communication has far less variation, overall, it was served as a functional

means for the group. Personally, I would like to point out that if businesses are

driven into highly competitive environments, following Useem’s militia is my

recommendation whereas for the challenging environments, take Larkin & Weber’s

advice, and Capelli et. al for creating a new environment.

4/16/2020 Portfolio 6 - Draft Cover Sheet Zaw*

You might also like