Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 46

Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 1 of 46 PAGEID #: 356

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

BELLWETHER MUSIC FESTIVAL LLC, : Case No. 1:20-CV-463


et al., :
: Judge McFarland
and :
:
BRATWURST FESTIVAL, INC., :
: FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs, : for DECLARATORY
: JUDGMENT, INJUNCTIVE
v. : RELIEF and DAMAGES
:
AMY ACTON, et al., :
:
and :
:
LANCE HIMES, in his official capacity as :
Interim Director of the Ohio Department of Health, :
:
Defendants. :
:

Now come Plaintiffs BELLWETHER MUSIC FESTIVAL LLC; ESK PRESENTS LLC;

PROJECT LIVE, LLC; BRATWURST FESTIVAL, INC., and MARK W. MILLER who, in

support of their First Amended Complaint, allege as follows:

INTRODUCTION

1. This is an action for declaratory judgment, preliminary and permanent injunction, and

damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983, arising from Defendants’ unconstitutional conduct, policies,

practices, regulations, restrictions, threats, intimidation, and/or harassment.

2. While AMY ACTON, as the Director of the Ohio Department of Health, and LANCE

HIMES, as the Interim Director of the Ohio Department of Health, may have or had certain latitude

to regulate so as to ameliorate the effects of a pandemic, that latitude remains subject to


Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 2 of 46 PAGEID #: 357

constitutional limits, including needing to comply with the First Amendment and the Due Process

Clause and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States

Constitution.

3. Nonetheless, AMY ACTON, under color of state law, acted in an arbitrary and

capricious manner so as to infringe the fundamental liberty interests of Plaintiffs, as well as to

infringe the First Amendment rights of Plaintiffs both directly and through discriminatory decrees

by which some First Amendment rights may be exercised.

4. LANCE HIMES, under color of state law, continues to enforce or threatens to enforce

the decrees issued by AMY ACTON and threatens to issue additional decrees which have and will

continue to infringe the fundamental liberty interests of Plaintiffs, as well as to infringe the First

Amendment rights of Plaintiffs both directly and through discriminatory decrees by which some

First Amendment rights may be exercised.

5. As a direct result of the unconstitutional conduct and policies and practices of AMY

ACTON, as well as the policy, practice of custom of the Ohio Department of Health and LANCE

HIMES, Plaintiffs faced an imminent risk of criminal prosecution and extensive daily fines, as

well as continued irreparable harm to their rights under the First Amendment and the Fourteenth

Amendment to the United States Constitution.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

6. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331,

as this action arises under the Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution; under 28

U.S.C. § 1343(a)(3), in that it is brought to redress deprivations, under color of state law, of rights,

privileges, and immunities secured by the United States Constitution; under 28 U.S.C. §

1343(a)(4), in that it seeks to recover damages and secure equitable relief under an Act of

-2-
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 3 of 46 PAGEID #: 358

Congress, specifically, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which provides a cause of action for the protection of

civil and constitutional rights; under 28 U.S.C. § 2201, to secure declaratory relief; under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2202, to secure other relief, including permanent injunctive and damages; and under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1988, to award attorneys’ fees.

7. Venue is proper within this judicial district and division pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)

and Local Rule 3.8, as (i) the Defendant is situated within this judicial district; and (ii) a substantial

part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property

that is the subject of the action is situated

PARTIES

8. Plaintiff BELLWETHER MUSIC FESTIVAL LLC is an Ohio limited liability

company.

9. Plaintiff ESK PRESENTS LLC is an Ohio limited liability company.

10. Plaintiff PROJECT LIVE, LLC, is an Ohio limited liability company.

11. Plaintiff BRATWURST FESTIVAL, INC., is an Ohio corporation.

12. Plaintiff MARK W. MILLER is an Ohio citizen.

13. At all times relevant herein to and including June 11, 2020, Defendant AMY ACTION

was and had been the Director of the Ohio Department of Health.

14. Since June 11, 2020, Defendant LANCE HIMES has been the Interim Director of the

Ohio Department of Health.

15. Defendant WARREN COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT is a county health district

organized under Ohio Rev. Code Chapter 3709, charged with enforcing the Ohio Department of

Health’s Orders and empowered to make its own orders. Only injunctive and declaratory relief is

sought against the WARREN COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT.

-3-
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 4 of 46 PAGEID #: 359

16. Defendant STARK COUNTY COMBINED GENERAL HEALTH DISTRICT is a

combined health district organized under Ohio Rev. Code Chapter 3709, charged with enforcing

the Ohio Department of Health’s Orders and empowered to make its own orders. Only injunctive

and declaratory relief is sought against the STARK COUNTY COMBINED GENERAL HEALTH

DISTRICT.

17. The actions of AMY ACTON described herein were either outside the scope of her

respective office, or, if within the scope, undertaken in an arbitrary manner, grossly abusing the

lawful powers of her office.

18. AMY ACTON has personally undertaken to personally undertook specific actions so as

to violate the constitutional rights of the Plaintiffs and/or threaten to violate the constitutional

rights of the Plaintiffs.

19. All actions by AMY ACTON described herein were undertaken under color of state law

and have caused and continue to cause and threaten the deprivation of Plaintiffs’ rights protected

by the United States Constitution.

20. AMY ACTON is being sued in her individual capacity, though, prior to her resignation

as Director of the Ohio Department of Health, was also being sued in her official capacity.

21. LANCE HIMES threatens to continue to undertake specific actions so as to violate the

constitutional rights of the Plaintiffs and/or threaten to violate the constitutional rights of the

Plaintiffs.

22. At present, LANCE HIMES is being sued in his official capacity, having automatically

been substituted into this action as a defendant pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. To the extent LANCE HIMES may, subsequently, personally undertake specific

actions so as to violate the constitutional rights of the Plaintiffs and/or threaten to violate the

-4-
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 5 of 46 PAGEID #: 360

constitutional rights of the Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs expressly reserve the right to amend to assert an

individual capacity claim against him.

FACTS

The Bellwether Music Festival

23. A multi-day, multi-stage alternative music festival known as the Bellwether Music

Festival is held each summer at Renaissance Park, located just outside Waynesville, Ohio.

24. ESK PRESENTS LLC manages and produces the Bellwether Music Festival on behalf

of BELLWETHER MUSIC FESTIVAL LLC.

25. Renaissance Park is nearly 260 acres spanning the county line between Warren County

and Clinton County.

26. The Bellwether Music Festival was scheduled to be held on August 6 to 8, 2020, with a

national lineup of musical acts.

27. The website for the Bellwether Music Festival is located at

https://www.bellwetherfest.com/.

28. The Bellwether Music Festival has garnered significant regional and national attention

and a significant number of attendees were expected to travel in interstate commerce to attend the

music festival and to camp at a designated site at the Renaissance Park so as to attend all days of

the Festival.

29. It takes nearly a year lead time to plan, organize and book the musical groups, as well

as the various other aspects for a successful Bellwether Music Festival.

30. Prior to the filing of this action, nearly $400,000 has been spent on contracts for the

scheduled artists for the forthcoming Bellwether Music Festival.

-5-
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 6 of 46 PAGEID #: 361

31. The music lineup already engaged at the time this action was filed for this summer’s

Bellwether Music Festival included: Shovels & Rope; John Moreland; Davy Knowles; The

Steepwater Band; The Devil Makes Three; The Growlers; The Lone Bellow; Cloud Nothings; Matt

Holubowski; Hannah Wicklund; Early James; Louis Prince; Maria Carrelli; Frankly Speaking;

Olivia Frances; Frontier Folk Nebraska; Nathaniel Rateliff; Langhorne Slim; Scarypoolparty;

Hayes Carll; Waxahatchee; Nicole Atkins; Saintseneca; S.G. Goodman; Fenne Lily; Paul

McDonald; Sam Williams; and Carriers.

32. In addition to the musical performances, stand-up comedy acts were to be provided each

night.

33. As developed below, due to the actions and decrees of AMY ACTON and the continued

enforcement or threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES, the Bellwether Musical

Festival was precluded from proceeding forward as it falls within the ambit of being within the

category of “parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals” and such activities have been banned

throughout the State of Ohio by AMY ACTON, most recently through the Director’s Updated and

Revised Order issued on May 29, 2020. See paragraphs 102 – 106 below.

34. Events such as the Bellwether Music Festival are not of the nature that one can start-

and-stop the event on immediate notice. Various preparations must occur well in advance.

Additionally, sufficient marketing and advance ticket sales are necessary, equipment must be

reserved and contracted, permits obtained, etc.

35. At this time, due to the unknown, arbitrary and ad hoc nature by which AMY ACTON

has acted and LANCE HIMES continues to operate pursuant thereto, Bellwether Music Festival

and those who planned to attend are precluded from engaging in or enjoying the musical and

related activities that were to occur as part of the Bellwether Music Festival.

-6-
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 7 of 46 PAGEID #: 362

36. After the filing of this action, BELLWETHER MUSIC FESTIVAL LLC and ESK

PRESENTS LLC arrived at a go-no-go deadline of whether to cancel the Bellwether Music

Festival and, because of the unconstitutional actions and decrees of AMY ACTON and the

continued enforcement or threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES, they were

had to cancel the Bellwether Music Festival.

37. At present and under the current decrees of AMY ACTON and the continued

enforcement or threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES, BELLWETHER

MUSIC FESTIVAL LLC and ESK PRESENTS LLC had to cancel the Bellwether Music Festival,

even though that entails the loss of hundreds of thousands of dollars, less they sunk additional

hundreds of thousands of dollars in the wishful hope to experience the noblesse oblige of AMY

ACTON or LANCE HIMES at some time before the scheduled dates for the Bellwether Music

Festival.

38. Because Bellwether Music Festival has been cancelled due to the decrees and actions of

AMY ACTON and LANCE HIMES, the various musicians already booked as part of the lineup

will not be performing and the prospective attendees of the Bellwether Music Festival will not be

able to hear and appreciate said musical performances.

39. MARK W. MILLER desired to attend and camp at the forthcoming Bellwether Musical

Festival so as to enjoy the three days of musical entertainment and activities, as well as engaging

in the interactive communication that occurs with others in attendance.

40. MARK W. MILLER has not been diagnosed with the COVID-19 virus nor, to his

knowledge, has he been exposed to any individual who has been infected with the COVID-19

virus. This notwithstanding, AMY ACTON has issued decrees that infringe and violate the First

-7-
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 8 of 46 PAGEID #: 363

Amendment and liberty interests of MARK W. MILLER, which LANCE HIMES has continued

to enforce or threaten to enforce.

The Country Fest

41. A multi-day country music festival known as The Country Fest is held each summer at

Clay’s Park Resort, located just outside North Lawrence, Ohio.

42. PROJECT LIVE, LLC, manages and produces The Country Fest.

43. Clay’s Park Resort is 500-acre resort in Stark County and is one of Ohio’s top outdoor

camping, water park, and event destinations, operating for 72 years in northeastern Ohio.

44. The Country Fest is currently scheduled to be held on August 6 to 8, 2020, with a

national lineup of musical acts.

45. The website for The Country Fest is located at https://www.thecountryfest.com/.

46. The Country Fest has garnered significant regional and national attention with a

significant number of attendees expected to travel in interstate commerce to attend the music

festival and to camp at a designated site at Clay’s Park Resort so as to attend all days of The

Country Fest.

47. It takes at least a year lead time to plan, organize and book the musical groups, as well

as the various other aspects for a successful musical event.

48. Already to date, nearly $2 million has been spent on contracts for the scheduled artists

for the forthcoming The Country Fest.

49. The music events already engaged for the forthcoming The Country Fest includes: Brett

Eldredge; The Cadillac Three; Niko Moon; Teddy Robb; Eric Church; Jimmie Allen; Raelynn;

Jameson Rodgers; Dierks Bentley; Jon Pardi; Michael Ray; Sean Stemaly; and Ashland Craft.

-8-
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 9 of 46 PAGEID #: 364

50. As developed below, due to the actions and decrees of AMY ACTON and the continued

enforcement or threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES, The Country Fest is

currently precluded from proceeding forward as it falls within the ambit of being with the category

of “parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals” (excepting “county fairs”) and such activities have been

banned throughout the State of Ohio by AMY ACTON and LANCE HIMES, most recently

through the Director’s Updated and Revised Order issued on May 29, 2020. See paragraphs 102

– 106 below.

51. Events such as The Country Fest are not of the nature that one can start-and-stop the

event on immediate notice. Various preparation must occur well in advance. Additionally,

sufficient marketing and advance ticket sales are necessary, equipment must be reserved and

contracted, permits obtained, etc.

52. At this stage, due to the unknown, arbitrary and ad hoc nature by which AMY ACTON

has acted and LANCE HIMES continues to operate pursuant thereto, it is unknown whether The

Country Fest and its attendees can fully and robustly engage in or enjoy the musical and related

activities that occur as part of The Country Fest.

53. Over the past several weeks and months, PROJECT LIVE, LLC, has made repeated

inquiries to the STARK COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH as to whether The Country Fest will be

able to go forward; the latest response, on June 6, 2020, indicated that that STARK COUNTY

BOARD OF HEALTH has taken the position that “concerts remain closed for obvious reasons”

and this includes the forthcoming The Country Fest.

54. PROJECT LIVE, LLC, is quickly approaching a go-no-go deadline of whether to cancel

The Country Fest.

-9-
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 10 of 46 PAGEID #: 365

55. At present and under the current decrees of AMY ACTON and the continued

enforcement or threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES, PROJECT LIVE, LLC

would have no option but to cancel The Country Fest, even though that would entail the loss of

hundreds of thousands of dollars, less they sink additional hundreds of thousands of dollars in the

wishful hope to experience the noblesse oblige of LANCE HIMES at some time before the

scheduled dates for The Country Fest.

56. If The Country Fest is cancelled due to the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON and

the continued enforcement or threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES, then the

various musicians already booked as part of the lineup will not be performing and the prospective

attendees of The Country Fest will not be able to hear and appreciate said musical performances.

The Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival

57. A multi-day festival known as Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival is held each summer in

Bucyrus, Ohio.

58. BRATWURST FESTIVAL, INC., owns, manages and produces the Bucyrus Bratwurst

Festival.

59. Spanning six city blocks, Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival is held along South Sandusky

Avenue and its side streets between City Hall and Mary Streets in the City of Bucyrus.

60. The Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival is currently scheduled to be held on August 13 to 15,

2020.

61. The website for the Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival is located at http://www.

bucyrusbratwurstfestival.com/index.html.

- 10 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 11 of 46 PAGEID #: 366

62. The Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival was first held in the summer of 1968 and has garnered

significant regional attention with a significant number of attendees expected to travel in interstate

commerce to attend the Festival.

63. It takes over a year lead time to plan, organize and book the vendors, musical groups,

parade participants and the various other aspects for a successful Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival.

64. The main features of the Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival include daily parades, music

performances, and food vendors.

65. As developed below, due to the actions and decrees of AMY ACTON and the continued

enforcement or threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES, the Bucyrus Bratwurst

Festival’s parades and music performances, and potentially other events, are currently precluded

from proceeding forward as those activities fall within the ambit of being considered within the

category of “parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals” and such activities have been banned

throughout the State of Ohio by AMY ACTON, most recently through the Director’s Updated and

Revised Order issued on May 29, 2020. See paragraphs 102 – 106 below.

66. Events such as the Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival are not of the nature that one can start-

and-stop the event on immediate notice. Various preparations must occur well in advance.

Additionally, sufficient marketing is necessary, equipment must be reserved and contracted,

permits obtained, etc.

67. At this time, unknown, arbitrary and ad hoc nature by which AMY ACTON has acted

and LANCE HIMES continues to operate pursuant thereto, it is unknown whether the Bucyrus

Bratwurst Festival and its attendees can fully and robustly engage in or enjoy the musical groups,

the parades, and related activities that occur as part of the Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival.

- 11 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 12 of 46 PAGEID #: 367

68. BRATWURST FESTIVAL, INC., is quickly approaching a go-no-go deadline of

whether to cancel the Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival and/or the music performances, parades and

other aspects of the Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival.

69. At present and under the current decrees of AMY ACTON and the continued

enforcement or threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES, BRATWURST

FESTIVAL, INC., would have no option but to cancel the music performances, the parades, and

potentially other events at the Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival.

70. If the Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival is cancelled or if the Festival’s music performances,

parades and other events are cancelled due to the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON and the

continued enforcement or threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES, then the

various musicians already booked as part of the lineup will not be performing, the parade

participants who have already signed up will not be able to participate in a parade at the Festival,

and the prospective attendees of the Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival will not be able to hear and

appreciate said musical performances or said parade.

71. BRATWURST FESTIVAL, INC., has made inquiry to the Crawford County Public

Health as to whether Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival will be able to go forward, and Crawford County

Public Health has taken the position that the music performance and parades are not permitted due

to the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON and the continued enforcement or threat of

enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES.

- 12 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 13 of 46 PAGEID #: 368

THE REIGN OF DECREES OF AMY ACTON


March 9, 2020 – Executive Order 2020-01D

72. On March 9, 2020, Ohio Governor R. Michael DeWine issued Executive Order 2020-

01D wherein he declared, inter alia, a state of emergency “for the entire State to protect the well-

being of the citizens of the [sic] Ohio from the dangerous effects of COVID-19”.

73. A copy of Executive Order 2020-01D is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

74. Within Executive Order 2020-01D, Governor DeWine ordered and directed “[t]he

[Ohio] Department of Health [to] issue guidelines for private businesses regarding appropriate

work and travel restrictions, if necessary.” Executive Order 2020-01D ¶4.

75. Instead of simply issuing “guidelines for private businesses regarding appropriate work

and travel restrictions”, AMY ACTON has proceeded to issue and sought the enforcement of

decrees that restrict the constitutional rights, freedoms and liberties of the people of the State of

Ohio all on pain of criminal liability.

March 17, 2020 –Director’s Order re: Mass Gatherings

76. On March 17, 2020, AMY ACTON issued the Director’s Order re: Mass Gatherings.

77. A copy of the Director’s Order re: Mass Gatherings is attached hereto as Exhibit B.

78. Within the Director’s Order re: Mass Gatherings, AMY ACTON decreed:

Mass gatherings are prohibited in the State of Ohio.


Mass gatherings are defined as any event or convening that brings together fifty
(50) or more persons in a single room or single space at the same time, such as an
auditorium, stadium, arena, large conference room, meeting hall, or any other
confined indoor or outdoor space.
Director’s Order re: Mass Gatherings ¶¶1 & 2.

- 13 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 14 of 46 PAGEID #: 369

79. Within the Director’s Order re: Mass Gatherings, AMY ACTON specifically declared

“parades, fairs and festivals” were included within the ambit of what constitutes a mass gathering.

Director’s Order re: Mass Gatherings ¶2.

80. Within the Director’s Order re: Mass Gatherings, AMY ACTON declared that the

Director’s Order re: Mass Gatherings went into immediate effect and would “remain in full force

and effect until the State of Emergency declared by the Governor no longer exists, or the Director

of the Ohio Department of Health rescinds or modifies [the] Order.” Director’s Order re: Mass

Gatherings ¶7.

March 22, 2020 –Director’s Stay at Home Order

81. On March 22, 2020, AMY ACTON issued the Director’s Stay at Home Order.

82. A copy of the Director’s Stay at Home Order is attached hereto as Exhibit C.

83. Within the Director’s Stay at Home Order, AMY ACTON decreed that that “non-

essential businesses and operations must cease” and “effective at 11:59 pm on March 23, 2020, all

persons are to stay at home or their place of residence unless they are engaged in Essential

Activities, Essential Governmental Functions, or to operate Essential Businesses and Operations

as set forth in this Order.”

84. Within the Director’s Stay at Home Order, AMY ACTON decreed, inter alia, that:

All public and private gatherings of any number of people occurring outside a single
household or living unit are prohibited…. Any gathering of more than ten people
is prohibited unless exempted by this Order….
All places of public amusement, whether indoors or outdoors, including, but not
limited to, locations with amusement rides, carnivals, amusement parks, water
parks, aquariums, zoos, museums, arcades, fairs, children’s play centers,
playgrounds, funplexes, theme parks, bowling alleys, movie and other theaters,
concert and music halls, and country clubs or social clubs shall be closed.

Director’s Stay at Home Order ¶3.

- 14 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 15 of 46 PAGEID #: 370

April 2, 2020 – Amended Director’s Stay at Home Order

85. On April 2, 2020, AMY ACTON renewed and continued the Director’s Stay at Home

Order, with the issuance of the Amended Director’s Stay at Home Order.

86. A copy of the Amended Director’s Stay at Home Order is attached hereto as Exhibit D.

87. Within the Amended Director’s Stay at Home Order, AMY ACTON ordered and

decreed, inter alia, that “all individuals living within the State of Ohio are ordered to stay at home

or at their place of residence except as allowed in this Order.”

88. Within the Amended Director’s Stay at Home Order, AMY ACTON decreed, inter alia,

that:

All public and private gatherings of any number of people occurring outside a single
household or living unit are prohibited…. Any gathering of more than ten people
is prohibited unless exempted by this Order….
All places of public amusement, whether indoors or outdoors, including, but not
limited to, locations with amusement rides, carnivals, amusement parks, water
parks, aquariums, zoos, museums, arcades, fairs, children’s play centers,
playgrounds, funplexes, theme parks, bowling alleys, movie and other theaters,
concert and music halls, and country clubs or social clubs shall be closed….
Swimming pools, whether public or private, shall be closed unless it is a swimming
pool for a single household. Campgrounds shall be closed, except that persons
residing in recreational vehicles (“RVs”) at campgrounds who genuinely have no
other viable place of residence may remain in the campground….

Amended Director’s Stay at Home Order ¶3 (emphasis added).

89. Within the Amended Director’s Stay at Home Order, AMY ACTON ordered and

decreed, inter alia, that:

all individuals currently living within the State of Ohio are ordered to stay at home
or at their place of residence except as allowed in this Order. To the extent
individuals are using shared or outdoor spaces when outside their residence, they
must at all times and as much as reasonably possible, maintain social distancing of
at least six feet from any other person, with the exception of family or household
members…. All persons may leave their homes or place of residence only for
Essential Activities, Essential Governmental Functions, or to participate in
Essential Businesses and Operations….

- 15 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 16 of 46 PAGEID #: 371

Amended Director’s Stay at Home Order ¶1.

April 30, 2020 – Amended Director’s Stay Safe Ohio Order

90. On April 30, 2020 AMY ACTON issued the Director’s Stay Safe Ohio Order.

91. A copy of the Director’s Stay Safe Ohio Order is attached hereto as Exhibit E.

92. Within the Director’s Stay Safe Ohio Order, AMY ACTON decreed that “[a]ll

businesses and operations in the State, except as defined [therein], are permitted to reopen within

the State so long as all workplace safety standards are met.” Director’s Stay Safe Ohio Order ¶2.

93. Within the Director’s Stay Safe Ohio Order, AMY ACTON decreed, inter alia, that:

All public and private gatherings of any number of people occurring outside a single
household and connected property, or living unit and connected property are
prohibited…. Any gathering of more than ten people is prohibited unless exempted
by this Order….

Director’s Stay Safe Ohio Order ¶4.

94. Within the Director’s Stay Safe Ohio Order, AMY ACTON decreed, inter alia, that

certain businesses which she delineated therein could resume activities.

95. But also within the Director’s Stay Safe Ohio Order, AMY ACTON decreed, inter alia,

that:

the following businesses and operations are to remain closed until this Order is
amended or rescinded: …[the Director’s Order re: Mass Gatherings of March 17,
2020] that closed all auditoriums, stadiums, arenas, parades, fairs, festivals,
bowling alleys, health clubs, fitness centers, workout facilities, gyms, yoga studios,
indoor trampoline parks, indoor water parks, movie and other theatres (excluding
drive-in theatres), performance theatres, all public recreation centers, and indoor
sports facilities in the State remains in effect. All places of public amusement,
whether indoors or outdoors, including, but not limited to, locations with
amusement rides, carnivals, amusement parks, water parks, aquariums, zoos,
museums, arcades, fairs, children’s play centers, playgrounds, funplexes, theme
parks, bowling alleys, movie and other theaters, concert and music halls, and
country clubs or social clubs shall be closed…. Swimming pools, whether public
or private, shall be closed unless it is a swimming pool for a single household.
Campgrounds shall be closed, except that persons residing in recreational vehicles

- 16 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 17 of 46 PAGEID #: 372

(“RVs”) at campgrounds who genuinely have no other viable place of residence


may remain in the campground….

Director’s Stay Safe Ohio Order ¶13g (emphasis added).

May 20, 2020 –Director’s Camp Safe Ohio Order

96. On May 20, 2020, AMY ACTON issued the Director’s Camp Safe Order wherein she

modified provisions of the Director’s Stay Safe Ohio Order.

97. A copy of the Director’s Camp Safe Ohio Order is attached hereto as Exhibit F.

98. Within the Director’s Camp Safe Order, AMY ACTON decreed, inter alia, that “[a]ll

campgrounds…are permitted to reopen in the State so long as all safety standards are met”.

Director’s Camp Safe Order ¶2. Within such decree, AMY ACTON mandates that the businesses

and operations at the campgrounds “shall continue to comply with Social Distancing Requirement

as defined in this Order, including by maintaining six-foot social distancing for both employees

and members of the public at all times…” Director’s Camp Safe Order ¶2.

99. Within the Director’s Camp Safe Order, AMY ACTON specifically decreed that the

Director’s Stay Safe Ohio Order was amending the Director’s Stay Safe Ohio Order ¶13g so that

the Director’s Stay Safe Ohio Order ¶13g should now read to include the following:

…[the Director’s Order re: Mass Gatherings of March 17, 2020] that closed all
auditoriums, stadiums, arenas, parades, fairs, festivals, bowling alleys, health clubs,
fitness centers, workout facilities, gyms, yoga studios, indoor trampoline parks, indoor
water parks, movie and other theatres (excluding drive-in theatres), performance
theatres, all public recreation centers, and indoor sports facilities in the State remains
in effect. All places of public amusement, whether indoors or outdoors, including, but
not limited to, locations with amusement rides, carnivals, amusement parks, water
parks, aquariums, zoos, museums, arcades, fairs, children’s play centers, playgrounds,
funplexes, theme parks, bowling alleys, movie and other theaters, concert and music
halls, and country clubs or social clubs shall be closed…. Swimming pools, whether
public or private, shall be closed unless it is a swimming pool for a single household.

Director’s Camp Safe Order ¶5 (emphasis added).

- 17 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 18 of 46 PAGEID #: 373

100. Included within the Director’s Camp Safe Order, AMY ACTON specifically decreed

that the Director’s Camp Safe Order “may be enforced by State and local law enforcement to the

extent set forth in Ohio law.” Director’s Camp Safe Order ¶7.

101. Included within the Director’s Camp Safe Order, AMY ACTON specifically

threatened criminal violations by acknowledging that a violation of any rule that she adopts or any

order she decrees constitutes “a misdemeanor of the second degree, which can include a fine of

not more than $750 or not more than 90 days in jail, or both.” Director’s Camp Safe Order ¶8.

May 29, 2020 –Director’s Updated and Revised Order

102. On May 29, 2020, AMY ACTON issued the Director’s Updated and Revised Order.

103. A copy of the Director’s Updated and Revised Order is attached hereto as Exhibit G.

104. Within the Director’s Updated and Revised Order, AMY ACTON continued and

reiterated the prohibition of the freedom and liberty of citizens of Ohio that she first decreed on

March 22, 2020, in the Director’s Stay at Home Order, AMY ACTON decreed, inter alia, that:

All public and private gatherings of greater than 10 people occurring outside a
single household and connected property, or living unit and connected property are
prohibited, except for the limited purposes permitted by Orders of [AMY ACTON]
….

Director’s Updated and Revised Order ¶3 (emphasis added).

105. While the Director’s Updated and Revised Order declares that the prohibition against

public and private gatherings of greater than 10 people “does not apply to First Amendment

protected speech, including petition or referendum circulators and any activity by the Media”,

Director’s Updated and Revised Order ¶3, the Director’s Updated and Revised Order specifically

delineated

the following businesses and operations are to remain closed until this Order is
amended or rescinded: …[the Director’s Order re: Mass Gatherings of March 17,

- 18 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 19 of 46 PAGEID #: 374

2020] that closed auditoriums, stadiums, arenas, parades, fairs, festivals, bowling
alleys, health clubs, fitness centers, workout facilities, gyms, yoga studios, indoor
trampoline parks, indoor water parks, movie and other theatres (excluding drive-in
theatres), performance theatres, all public recreation centers, and indoor sports
facilities in the State remains in effect, except that … the mass gathering definition
is now any number greater than 10 persons…. All places of public amusement,
whether indoors or outdoors, including, but not limited to, locations with
amusement rides, carnivals, amusement parks, water parks, aquariums, zoos,
museums, arcades, fairs, children’s play centers, playgrounds, funplexes, theme
parks, bowling alleys, movie and other theaters, concert and music halls, and
country clubs or social clubs shall be closed….

Director’s Updated and Revised Order ¶9d (emphasis added).

106. By specifically and explicitly delineating that “parades, fairs, [and] festivals” are still

prohibited activities throughout the State of Ohio, AMY ACTON has demonstrated the purpose

and the intent of the Director’s Updated and Revised Order and the continued prohibition against

mass gatherings applies to such activities.

107. Based upon, inter alia, the Director’s Updated and Revised Order, the Bellwether

Music Festival, The Country Fest, and the Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival are precluded from

proceeding forwarded, less the individuals running or producing such festivals face the real and

imminent prospect of criminal prosecution, together with other vendors supporting the festivals

also facing the real and imminent prospect of criminal prosecution and those people attending the

festivals also facing the real and imminent prospect of criminal prosecution.

108. Ohio Rev. Code § 3701.56 provides that “boards of health of a general or city health

district . . . shall enforce quarantine and isolation orders.”

109. Pursuant to both the various decrees of AMY ACTON and Ohio Rev. Code § 3701.56,

WARREN COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT maintains authority to enforce such decrees,

including precluding or restricting the Bellwether Music Festival, including doing so on pain of

criminal prosecution.

- 19 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 20 of 46 PAGEID #: 375

110. Pursuant to both the various decrees of AMY ACTON and Ohio Rev. Code § 3701.56,

STARK COUNTY COMBINED GENERAL HEALTH DISTRICT maintains authority to enforce

such decrees, including precluding or restricting the Bellwether Music Festival, including doing

so on pain of criminal prosecution.

111. LANCE HIMES has continued to enforce or threaten to enforce the various decrees

issued by AMY ACTON, including, without limitation, the foregoing decrees.

The claimed bases for the dictates of AMY ACTON


have been ad hoc decrees based upon ipse dixit that have proven baseless

112. When the threat of COVID-19 virus first arose in March 2020, it was generally

recognized and acknowledged that a significant number, if not most, people would eventually be

exposed to the COVID-19 virus.

113. At a news conference held on March 12, 2020, AMY ACTON acknowledged that “the

entry [of the virus] will be amongst us. We know forty and upwards percent of our population

will eventually get this [virus].”1

114. Thus, as stated by AMY ACTON on March 12, 2020, the governmental interest was

“slowing [the spread of the virus]” in order to “keep[] the numbers low enough so we don’t

overwhelm over hospital systems.” AMY ACTON specifically tied the effort to mitigate the rate

at which the virus spread to the availability of medical equipment: “there are only so many

ventilators; there are only so many eco machine.”2

1
Audiovisual of the news conference of March 12, 2020, is available on the website of
The Ohio Channel (https://www.ohiochannel.org/video/governor-mike-dewine-3-12-2020-covid-
19-update). These comments start at approximately 31:02 of the recording.
2
Audiovisual of the news conference of March 12, 2020, is available on the website of
The Ohio Channel (https://www.ohiochannel.org/video/governor-mike-dewine-3-12-2020-covid-
19-update). These comments start at approximately 31:08 of the recording.

- 20 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 21 of 46 PAGEID #: 376

115. And the interest of not overwhelming the health care system and capacity was reiterated

by Ohio Governor R. Michael DeWine at that same news conference held on March 12, 2020:3

We have to take this action. We have to do everything we can to have an


interruption. We have to do everything we can to slow down the spread of this
virus. We know that it will continue to spread. But slowing it down will enable
out health care providers, our hospitals, our doctors to be able to stay up with the
medical problems that this virus is causing…. We do not want to be in a situation
where our medical providers are making life and death decisions as to who lives
and who dies. That is something that is simply unacceptable.

116. At a news conference held on March 24, 2020, AMY ACTON identified the basis for

their actions: “And the ICU, folks, is our focus through this. It’s all about the capacity of our

hospitals to treat the sickest.”4

117. Over the ensuing months, AMY ACTON and Governor DeWine moved significantly

away from the initial justification for the decrees of AMY ACTON as necessary to not overwhelm

the health care system and capacity to now some nebulous concept of generally protecting people

from themselves.

118. At no time during the past three months has hospital or medical provider, in the State

of Ohio or elsewhere in the United States, been unable to have a ventilator or other medical

equipment when needed to treat a person infected with COVID-19.

119. And the baseless and ad hoc nature by which the decrees of AMY ACTON and the

restrictions on constitutional rights effectuated therein can be seen further in other pronouncement

and actions of AMY ACTON and/or Governor DeWine.

3
Audiovisual of the news conference of March 12, 2020, is available on the website of
The Ohio Channel (https://www.ohiochannel.org/video/governor-mike-dewine-3-12-2020-covid-
19-update). These comments start at approximately 23:12 of the recording.
4
Audiovisual of the news conference of March 24, 2020, is available on the website of
The Ohio Channel (https://www.ohiochannel.org/video/governor-mike-dewine-3-24-2020-covid-
19-update). These comments start at approximately 21:55 of the recording.

- 21 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 22 of 46 PAGEID #: 377

120. At a news conference held on March 12, 2020, Ohio Governor R. Michael DeWine

declared:5

We are told by medical experts that whatever the number is today, it will double in
six days and then that will just continue on and on and on….

121. At a news conference held on March 12, 2020, AMY ACTON described as a “key

clue” to COVID-19 was what she characterized as the “logarithmic spread of disease” by it

“doubling every six days”.6

122. At no time – on March 12, 2020, or since then – have the COVID-19 infections doubled

in the State of Ohio or elsewhere in the country every six days.

123. At that same news conference held on March 12, 2020, Ohio Governor R. Michael

DeWine then introduced AMY ACTON in order to offer the “science” on COVID-19; AMY

ACTON then proceeded to state, as a factual matter that, as of that date, over 100,000 people in

Ohio were already infected with the COVID-19 virus, specifically declaring:7

We know now, just the fact of community spread, says that 1%, at the very least
1% of our population is carrying this virus in Ohio today. We have over 11.7
million in Ohio, so the math is over 100,000. So that just give gives you an idea of
the virus spreads and is spreading quickly.

5
An audiovisual recording of the news conference of March 12, 2020, is available on the
website of The Ohio Channel (https://www.ohiochannel.org/video/governor-mike-dewine-3-12-
2020-covid-19-update). These comments start at approximately 00:52 of the recording.
6
An audiovisual recording of the news conference of March 12, 2020, is available on the
website of The Ohio Channel (https://www.ohiochannel.org/video/governor-mike-dewine-3-12-
2020-covid-19-update). These comments start at approximately 29:27 of the recording.
7
An audiovisual recording of the news conference of March 12, 2020, is available on the
website of The Ohio Channel (https://www.ohiochannel.org/video/governor-mike-dewine-3-12-
2020-covid-19-update). These comments start at approximately 32:56 of the recording.

- 22 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 23 of 46 PAGEID #: 378

124. And this pronouncement of over 100,000 people in Ohio were already infected with

the COVID-19 virus as of March 12, 2020, was reiterated and propagated by Governor DeWine

when he issued a tweet on the matter that same day, declaring what “we know” as a factual matter:

125. At the time that Governor DeWine and AMY ACTON declared that over 100,000

people in Ohio were already infected with the COVID-19 virus, the total number of confirmed

cases of COVID-19 infection in the State of Ohio was a total 15 persons.

126. There was no basis in fact for the statement of AMY ACTON or the tweet of Governor

DeWine that, as of March 12, 2020, over 100,000 people in Ohio were already infected with the

COVID-19 virus. The assertion of that number of infections was arbitrary and baseless, but

demonstrates the false premise driving the ensuing arbitrary and unconstitutional actions by AMY

ACTON.

127. Furthermore, the so-called “expert” upon which Governor DeWine and AMY ACTON

have based their actions has been that of now- discredited British epidemiologist Neil Ferguson.

128. In fact, at a news conference held on March 17, 2020, AMY ACTON acknowledged

the source of her decisions as being the discredited British epidemiologist Neil Ferguson:8

I’m about to describe to you is what we see is coming, but when we make these
choices we’re making and that the governor’s making…this really is going to get
us through it in a lot sooner, in a sense a lot better way. So it’s very important to

8
An audiovisual recording of the news conference of March 17, 2020, is available on the
website of The Ohio Channel (https://www.ohiochannel.org/video/governor-mike-dewine-3-17-
2020-covid-19-update). These comments start at approximate 11:51 of the recording.

- 23 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 24 of 46 PAGEID #: 379

say that there was an important study that came out in the United Kingdom by Dr.
Ferguson, and it was done by the Imperial College, and they’re really taking a look
at the very best modeling and data we have.… [T]he models [is where] they came
up with some of the new guidance, about 10 people in a room, about social
distancing…
…This was a study that’s been done in the UK and what the study looked like,
because you’re going to see it in the media today. And I don’t want people to
become overly frightened.… But the point of this is that this study was done
looking as if we did nothing. And then it looks very carefully at everything we’re
doing and why collectively it will make a difference. So we’ve always been talking
about the curve. And if we did nothing, again, and I’ll refer you to the UK study by
Ferguson.

129. The study by Neil Ferguson upon which AMY ACTON relied from the outset for her

decrees and actions has been completed repudiated as premised upon a completely faulty model.

130. Then, at a news conference held on March 24, 2020, AMY ACTON declared, without

factual or scientific basis, that the situation in Ohio was on track to follow what was being

experienced in Italy or New York City, lagging by only 7 to 14 days:9

it’s expected in countries around the world that we will be following, more of what
we’ve seen in Italy, that is certainly the case in Ohio…. that what we can really
expect is that we’re on a 7 to 14 day lag behind New York City.

131. And in support of her declaration that the State of Ohio was 7 to 14 days behind Italy

or New York City, AMY ACTON cited to an op-ed, i.e., an opinion piece, in the New York Times

yet AMY ACTON described such opinion piece as “the lastest science”.10

132. At no time – on March 24, 2020, or 7 to 14 days afterwards, or at present – has the

State of Ohio experienced anything close or comparable to the COVID-19 situation that occurred

9
Audiovisual of the news conference of March 24, 2020, is available on the website of
The Ohio Channel (https://www.ohiochannel.org/video/governor-mike-dewine-3-24-2020-covid-
19-update). These comments start at approximately 22:24 of the recording.
10
Audiovisual of the news conference of March 24, 2020, is available on the website of
The Ohio Channel (https://www.ohiochannel.org/video/governor-mike-dewine-3-24-2020-covid-
19-update). These comments start at approximately 22:46 of the recording.

- 24 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 25 of 46 PAGEID #: 380

in Italy or New York City. Yet, AMY ACTON has proceeded to issue her decrees and to violate

the constitutional rights of Plaintiffs and others premises upon such a false perspective.

133. At a news conference held on March 24, 2020, AMY ACTON the purpose behind

ensuing effort was and would be to not overwhelm the health care system and capacity:11

it’s all about the curve. And so, we’re doing our very best to keep everything we’re
doing with our measures and our policy is helping minimize the impact on our
hospital system….

134. Also at that news conference held on March 24, 2020, AMY ACTON claimed the

“science” indicated Ohio would be experiencing 6,000 new cases of COVID-19 infections without

any mitigation effort:12

We know that at some point soon, in a worst-case scenario, had we done nothing in
Ohio, and we’re doing everything the science has said to do in Ohio. But they’re
anticipating that there could be up to 6,000 new cases a day if we aren’t all abiding
by these things we’re doing. And if you had 6,000 new cases a day, clearly that
would quickly outpace our hospital capability.

135. But that which AMY ACTON self-characterized as “science” lacked any of the

objective and critical analysis inherent in scientific methodology and, instead, was based upon

nothing more that her ad hoc declarations and ipse dixit (just like her earlier declaration on March

12, 2020, that over 100,000 people in Ohio were already infected with the COVID-19 virus).

11
Audiovisual of the news conference of March 24, 2020, is available on the website of
The Ohio Channel (https://www.ohiochannel.org/video/governor-mike-dewine-3-24-2020-covid-
19-update). These comments start at approximately 23:12 of the recording.
12
Audiovisual of the news conference of March 24, 2020, is available on the website of
The Ohio Channel (https://www.ohiochannel.org/video/governor-mike-dewine-3-24-2020-covid-
19-update). These comments start at approximately 27:15 of the recording.

- 25 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 26 of 46 PAGEID #: 381

136. At a news conference held on April 20, 2020, Governor DeWine declared success on

the goal of flattening the infection curve so as to not overwhelm the medical: “We have flattened

the curve….”13

137. At a news conference held on April 20, 2020, AMY ACTON declared:14

We know that we are going to have to learn [to live] with this virus. We’ve talked
about the fact that there is no putting the genie back in the bottle. Whether we have
orders or not orders, whatever we do, the virus is spreading amongst us.

138. At a news conference held on April 20, 2020, AMY ACTON addressed that, as of that

date, the total infection amongst people in Ohio: “could be anywhere from five to 15% of our

population that has been affected.”15

139. As with her declaration on March 12, 2020, that over 100,000 people in Ohio were

already infected with the COVID-19 virus, this latest pronounced was also arbitrary and baseless,

and, once again, demonstrates the false premise driving the ensuing arbitrary and unconstitutional

actions by AMY ACTON.

140. Additionally, AMY ACTON utilized “deaths reported in the last 24 hours”, as opposed

to “deaths occurring in the last 24 hours” in a deliberate and conscious effort to inflate the

concentration of deaths tied to COVID-19.

13
Audiovisual of the news conference of April 20 2020, is available on the website of The
Ohio Channel (https://www.ohiochannel.org/video/governor-mike-dewine-4-20-2020-covid-19-
update). These comments start at approximately 4:43 of the recording.
14
Audiovisual of the news conference of April 20 2020, is available on the website of The
Ohio Channel (https://www.ohiochannel.org/video/governor-mike-dewine-4-20-2020-covid-19-
update). These comments start at approximately 38:49 of the recording.
15
Audiovisual of the news conference of April 20 2020, is available on the website of The
Ohio Channel (https://www.ohiochannel.org/video/governor-mike-dewine-4-20-2020-covid-19-
update). These comments start at approximately 39:10 of the recording.

- 26 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 27 of 46 PAGEID #: 382

141. For example, it has been reported that, on May 23, 2020, AMY ACTON and the Ohio

Department of Health indicated there were 84 reported deaths over the past 24 hours; however, the

real number of deaths occurring during that period totaled seven (7), a difference of 77.

142. Yet, the distinction – deaths reported versus deaths actually occurring – was not clearly

reported by the news media when, for example, in reporting on the announcement on deaths on

May 23, 2020, the headline of the article in The Cincinnati Enquirer declared “Coronavirus in

Ohio: Deaths more than double the previous 24-hour period.”16

143. Furthermore, based upon information and belief, regardless of when a death occurred,

deaths are being reported as a COVID-19 death not based upon the virus as causing the death but,

rather, simply based upon whether the decedent either had a confirmed infection or a suspected

infection of the COVID-19 virus. As a result, the COVID-19 death rate reported by AMY ACTON

is higher than a death rate which would be based upon the death being caused by COVID-19.

A state court has already appropriately characterized AMY ACTON’s


decrees and actions as impermissibly arbitrary, unreasonable, and oppressive manner

144. In a challenge in state court to the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON wherein she

unilaterally closed gyms and fitness centers, the state court judge has recognized the arbitrary and

baseless nature of the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON.

145. In a case in Lake County Common Pleas Court, styled Rock House Fitness v. Acton,

and assigned Case No. 20-CV-000631, Judge Eugene Lucci granted a preliminary injunction

allowing gyms and fitness centers throughout the State of Ohio to open and operate,

notwithstanding the decrees of AMY ACTON.

16
https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2020/05/23/coronavirus-cincinnati-columbus-
cleveland-ohio-deaths-more-than-double-previous-24-hour-period/5250810002/
- 27 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 28 of 46 PAGEID #: 383

146. A copy of the Order Granting Preliminary Injunction issued by Judge Lucci is attached

hereto as Exhibit H.

147. With the Order Granting Preliminary Injunction, Judge Lucci:

a. recognized that, while AMY ACTON as Director of the Ohio Department of


Health, was granted ultimate authority in matters of quarantine and isolation, such
matters and authority only extended to either: (i) restricting the movements or
activities of an individual “who has been exposed to a communicable disease”
(quarantine); or (ii) separating from others a person “infect” with a communicable
disease (isolation), and that the length of such quarantine or isolates is for the usual
incubation person for the communicable disease (which in the case of COVID-19)
is 14 days. See Order Granting Preliminary Injunction ¶¶14-17 & 23-25;

b. instead of doing so, AMY ACTON has actually “quarantined the entire people of
the state of Ohio, for much more than 14 days”. See Order Granting Preliminary
Injunction ¶26;

c. AMY ACTON “has no statutory authority to close all bueinsses… for a period of
two months”. See Order Granting Preliminary Injunction ¶26;

d. Declaring that AMY ACTON “has acted in an impermissibly arbitrary,


unreasonable, and oppressive manner and without any procedural safeguards”. See
Order Granting Preliminary Injunction ¶26.

First Amendment rights implicated


148. The First Amendment’s protections encompass entertainment, including live musical

performances. See, e.g., Ward v Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 790 (1989)(music

performances); see also Schacht v United States, 398 U.S. 58 (1970)(theater); Joseph Burstyn, Inc.

v Wilson, 343 U.S. 495 (1952)(film).

149. “[T]he holding of festivals allows for the communication [of ‘views on society, life,

and other more philosophical subjects’] to extend to even more members [of an organization] and

increases the likelihood that this conduct will be noticed by, and thereby communicated to, the

surrounding community.” Adhi Parasakthi Charitable, Medical, Educational, and Cultural

Society of North America v. Township of West Pikeland, 721 F.Supp.2d 361 (E.D. Pa. 2010).

- 28 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 29 of 46 PAGEID #: 384

150. And “[e]ven when offered for entertainment purposes, and not political or ideological

reasons, music is entitled to First Amendment protection.” Hassay v. Mayor & City Council of

Ocean City, 955 F.Supp.2d 505 (D. Md. 2013); see Atlantic Beach Casino, Inc. v. Morenzoni, 749

F.Supp. 38, 41 (D.R.I. 1990)(“[t]he 2 Live Crew performance is protected First Amendment

activity”).

151. Thus, musical festivals enjoy the full protection of the First Amendment.

152. “Parades are…a form of expression, not just motion, and the inherent expressiveness

of marching to make a point.” Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of

Boston, Inc., 515 U.S. 557, 568 (1995).

153. And “[t]he protected expression that inheres in a parade is not limited to its banners

and songs.” Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc., 515 U.S.

557, 569 (1995).

154. Thus, parades enjoy the full protection of the First Amendment.

155. In prohibiting and continuing to prohibit “parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals”

throughout the State of Ohio (with the exception of “county fairs” which are permitted), AMY

ACTON has violated, and LANCE HIMES continues to threaten to violate, the First Amendment

rights of the Plaintiffs, as well as the First Amendment rights of the performers engaged to perform

at “parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals” and the First Amendment rights of the public who would

attend such performances.

156. Specifically, because the Bellwether Musical Festival would fall within the category of

“parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals” throughout the State of Ohio (with the exception of

“county fairs” which are permitted), AMY ACTON has violated, and LANCE HIMES continues

to threaten, to violate the First Amendment rights of the Plaintiffs, as well as the First Amendment

- 29 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 30 of 46 PAGEID #: 385

rights of the performers engaged to perform at “parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals” and the

First Amendment rights of the public who would attend such performances.

157. Specifically, because The Country Fest would fall within the category of “parades,

fairs, festivals, and carnivals” throughout the State of Ohio (with the exception of “county fairs”

which are permitted), AMY ACTON has violated, and LANCE HIMES continues to threaten to

violate, the First Amendment rights of the Plaintiffs, as well as the First Amendment rights of the

performers engaged to perform at “parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals” and the First

Amendment rights of the public who would attend such performances.

158. Specifically, because the Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival would fall within the category of

“parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals” throughout the State of Ohio (with the exception of

“county fairs” which are permitted), AMY ACTON has violated, and LANCE HIMES continues

to threaten to violate, the First Amendment rights of the Plaintiffs, as well as the First Amendment

rights of the performers engaged to perform at “parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals” and the

First Amendment rights of the public who would attend such performances.

159. There is neither a compelling governmental interest or a significant governmental

interest that justifies the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON, or the continued enforcement or

threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES, whereby the Bellwether Musical

Festival is prohibited or otherwise restricted so as to infringe the freedom of speech and freedom

to peaceably assembly afforded to the sponsors, organizers, producer, performers and those in

attendance at or who desire to attend the Bellwether Musical Festival.

160. There is neither a compelling governmental interest or a significant governmental

interest that justifies the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON, or the continued enforcement or

threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES, whereby The Country Fest is

- 30 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 31 of 46 PAGEID #: 386

prohibited or otherwise restricted so as to infringe the freedom of speech and freedom to peaceably

assembly afforded to the sponsors, organizers, producer, performers and those in attendance at or

who desire to attend The Country Fest.

161. There is neither a compelling governmental interest or a significant governmental

interest that justifies the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON, or the continued enforcement or

threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES, whereby the Bucyrus Bratwurst

Festival is prohibited or otherwise restricted so as to infringe the freedom of speech and freedom

to peaceably assembly afforded to the sponsors, organizers, producer, performers and those in

attendance at or who desire to attend the Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival.

162. There is neither a compelling governmental interest or a significant governmental

interest that justifies the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON, or the continued enforcement or

threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES, whereby parades, fairs, festivals, and

carnivals throughout the State of are prohibited or otherwise restricted so as to infringe the freedom

of speech and freedom to peaceably assembly afforded to the sponsors, organizers, producer,

performers and those in attendance at or who desire to attend such parades, fairs, festivals and

carnivals.

163. The absolute ban or restrictions imposed by the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON,

and the continued enforcement or threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES,

whereby the Bellwether Musical Festival is prohibited or otherwise restricted so as to infringe the

freedom of speech and freedom to peaceably assembly afforded to the sponsors, organizers,

producer, performers and those in attendance at or who desire to attend the Bellwether Musical

Festival is not being done in the least restrictive or even a narrowly tailored manor to any putative

governmental interest that may actually exist to justify the absolute ban or restrictions.

- 31 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 32 of 46 PAGEID #: 387

164. The absolute ban or restrictions imposed by the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON,

and the continued enforcement or threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES,

whereby The Country Music Fest is prohibited or otherwise restricted so as to infringe the freedom

of speech and freedom to peaceably assembly afforded to the sponsors, organizers, producer,

performers and those in attendance at or who desire to attend The Country Fest is not being done

in the least restrictive or even a narrowly tailored manor to any putative governmental interest that

may actually exist to justify the absolute ban or restrictions.

165. The absolute ban or restrictions imposed by the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON,

and the continued enforcement or threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES,

whereby the Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival is prohibited or otherwise restricted so as to infringe the

freedom of speech and freedom to peaceably assembly afforded to the sponsors, organizers,

producer, performers and those in attendance at or who desire to attend the Bucyrus Bratwurst

Festival is not being done in the least restrictive or even a narrowly tailored manor to any putative

governmental interest that may actually exist to justify the absolute ban or restrictions.

166. The absolute ban or restrictions imposed by the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON,

and the continued enforcement or threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES,

whereby parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals throughout the State of Ohio are prohibited or

otherwise restricted so as to infringe the freedom of speech and freedom to peaceably assembly

afforded to the sponsors, organizers, producer, performers and those in attendance at or who desire

to attend such parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals throughout the State of Ohio is not being done

in the least restrictive or even a narrowly tailored manor to any putative governmental interest that

may actually exist to justify the absolute ban or restrictions.

- 32 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 33 of 46 PAGEID #: 388

167. The absolute ban or restrictions imposed by the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON,

and the continued enforcement or threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES,

whereby the Bellwether Musical Festival is prohibited or otherwise restricted so as to infringe the

freedom of speech and freedom to peaceably assembly afforded to the sponsors, organizers,

producer, performers and those in attendance at or who desire to attend the Bellwether Musical

Festival does not afford sufficient alternative channels for the speech and peaceable assembly of

the sponsors, organizers, producer, performers and those in attendance .

168. The absolute ban or restrictions imposed by the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON,

and the continued enforcement or threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES,

whereby The Country Fest is prohibited or otherwise restricted so as to infringe the freedom of

speech and freedom to peaceably assembly afforded to the sponsors, organizers, producer,

performers and those in attendance at or who desire to attend The Country Fest does not afford

sufficient alternative channels for the speech and peaceable assembly of the sponsors, organizers,

producer, performers and those in attendance.

169. The absolute ban or restrictions imposed by the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON,

and the continued enforcement or threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES,

whereby the Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival is prohibited or otherwise restricted so as to infringe the

freedom of speech and freedom to peaceably assembly afforded to the sponsors, organizers,

producer, performers and those in attendance at or who desire to attend the Bucyrus Bratwurst

Festival does not afford sufficient alternative channels for the speech and peaceable assembly of

the sponsors, organizers, producer, performers and those in attendance.

170. The absolute ban or restrictions imposed by the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON,

and the continued enforcement or threat of enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES,

- 33 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 34 of 46 PAGEID #: 389

whereby parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals throughout the State of Ohio (with the exception

of county fairs) are prohibited or otherwise restricted so as to infringe the freedom of speech and

freedom to peaceably assembly afforded to the sponsors, organizers, producer, performers and

those in attendance at or who desire to attend such parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals

throughout the State of Ohio does not afford sufficient alternative channels for the speech and

peaceable assembly of the sponsors, organizers, producer, performers and those in attendance.

Other First Amendment activities have been allowed and further


demonstrate the baseless nature of the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON

171. While the First Amendment activities of Plaintiffs are still explicitly prohibited by the

decrees of AMY ACTON and the continued enforcement or threat of enforcement of those decrees

by LANCE HIMES, the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON have allowed and permitted mass

gatherings of people throughout the State of Ohio since March 2020.

172. In particular, for over at least the past month, other First Amendment activities and

associated speech have been allowed and authority to occur with no mandate or effort to engage

in safety protocols, including social distancing.

173. There is no justifiable bases by which certain First Amendment activities are allowed

unabated by AMY ACTON or her decrees while the First Amendment activities of Plaintiffs and

others are verboten by the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON.

174. With respect to the mass gatherings over the course of the past month, The Cincinnati

Enquirer reported that, on June 7, 2020, “[m]ore than 4,000 people gathered at Fountain Square”,

the main square in downtown Cincinnati.17

17
https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2020/06/07/george-floyd-cincinnati-federation-
teachers-join-sunday-protests/3170245001/
- 34 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 35 of 46 PAGEID #: 390

175. Accompanying the story in The Cincinnati Enquirer reporting of over 4,000 people

gather in close proximity was the following photograph of the gathering:

176. As further example, Freshwater Cleveland published the following photographs of

crowds congregating in downtown Cleveland on May 30, 2020:18

18
https://www.freshwatercleveland.com/features/GeorgeFloyd060120.aspx
- 35 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 36 of 46 PAGEID #: 391

177. The Cleveland Plain Dealer published the following photographs of crowds

congregating in downtown Cleveland on May 30, 2020:19

19
https://www.cleveland.com/metro/2020/06/cuyahoga-county-sheriff-says-department-
was-unprepared-for-scale-of-protests-that-turned-into-riots-in-downtown-cleveland.html
- 36 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 37 of 46 PAGEID #: 392

178. The Columbus Dispatch published the following photographs of crowds congregating

in downtown Columbus on June 2, 2020:20

179. The foregoing photographs, together with the activities that have occurred during the

past month, demonstrate there is no justifiable reason or basis for the decrees and actions of AMY

ACTON whereby the First Amendment activities during the past month can occur without being

subject to the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON, including the attendant criminal aspects

thereto, while the First Amendment activities of the Plaintiffs are explicitly prohibited and subject

Plaintiffs and others to the prospect of criminal prosecution.

20
https://www.dispatch.com/news/20200603/downtown-columbus-protests-remain-peaceful
- 37 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 38 of 46 PAGEID #: 393

180. There is no difference between a large crowd gathering in the downtown of a large

Ohio city to hear speech from speakers versus a large crowd gathering at Renaissance Park or

Clay’s Park Resort (or at other venues) to hear speech in the form of music and other entertainment.

Yet, AMY ACTON has, through her decrees and actions, explicitly allowed and condoned the

former while prohibiting outright the latter.

181. Furthermore, AMY ACTON has decreed and permitted amusement parks (including

King’s Island and Cedar Point) to open and operate wherein musical performances also take place

and are allowed to occur. Yet, the decrees of AMY ACTON and the continued enforcement or

threatened enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES, continues to discriminate against the

speech and peaceable assembly of the sponsors, organizers, producer, performers and those in

attendance of those at parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals throughout the State of Ohio (with the

exception of county fairs), including that of the Plaintiffs without sufficient constitutional

justification

AMY ACTON has infringed the liberty interest innate to all Americans
to walk about freely and to engage with family, friends, neighbors and strangers

182. Great constitutional concepts, including “liberty”, are “purposely left to gather meaning

from experience… [T]hey relate to the whole domain of social and economic fact, and the

statesmen who founded this Nation knew too well that only a stagnant society remains unchanged.”

National Ins. Co. v. Tidewater Co., 337 U.S. 582, 646 (Frankfurter, J., dissenting).

183. Thus, while the Supreme Court “has not attempted to define with exactness the liberty

[] guaranteed” by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court has

acknowledged that “some of the included things have been definitely stated. Without doubt, it

denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint, but also the right of the individual to contract,

to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry,

- 38 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 39 of 46 PAGEID #: 394

establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his own

conscience, and generally to enjoy those privileges long recognized at common law as essential to

the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.” Meyer v. State of Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399

(1923).

184. “In a Constitution for a free people, there can be no doubt that the meaning of ‘liberty’

must be broad indeed.” Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 572 (1972).

185. And in a nation of free people, the core of liberty relates to the ability of the people to

interact with one another, be they family, friends, neighbors or even strangers, as opposed to

enjoying such liberties solely at the whim or noblesse oblige of a government official.

186. “The Constitution promises liberty to all within its reach.” Obergefell v. Hodges, __

U.S. __, 135 S.Ct. 2584, 2593 (2015).

187. “The fundamental liberties protected by [the Due Process Clause] include most of the

rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights. In addition[,] these liberties extend to certain personal

choices central to individual dignity and autonomy….” Obergefell v. Hodges, __ U.S. __, 135

S.Ct. 2584, 2597 (2015)(internal citation omitted).

188. “In the American legal tradition, liberty has long been understood as individual

freedom from governmental action.” Obergefell v. Hodges, __ U.S. __, 135 S.Ct. 2584, 2634

(2015)(Thomas, J., dissenting).

189. “[L]iberty in the eighteenth century was thought of much more in relation to ‘negative

liberty’; that is, freedom from, not freedom to, freedom from a number of social and political evils,

including arbitrary government power.” Obergefell v. Hodges, __ U.S. __, 135 S.Ct. 2584, 2635

(2015)(Thomas, J., dissenting)(quoting J. Reid, The Concept of Liberty in the Age of the

American Revolution 56 (1988)).

- 39 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 40 of 46 PAGEID #: 395

190. “When the colonists described laws that would infringe their liberties, they discussed

laws that would prohibit individuals ‘from walking in the streets and highways on certain saints

days, or from being abroad after a certain time in the evening, or...restrain [them] from working

up and manufacturing materials of [their] own growth.’” Obergefell v. Hodges, __ U.S. __, 135

S.Ct. 2584, 2635 (2015)(Thomas, J., dissenting)(quoting Downer, A Discourse at the Dedication

of the Tree of Liberty, in 1 C. Hyneman & D. Lutz, American Political Writing During the

Founding Era 1760-1805, at 101 (1983)).

191. AMY ACTON, acting under color of state law, has imposed and decree restrictions and

prohibitions on the people of the State of Ohio, including MARK W. MILLER, that go

significantly beyond “walking in the streets and highways on certain saints days”; instead, AMY

ACTON, acting under color of state law, has imposed and decreed restrictions and prohibitions on

the people of the State of Ohio of essentially being out in society for nearly three months so as to

prohibit any meaningful human interaction.

192. The extreme scope and length of the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON is of such a

nature so as to infringe the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth

Amendment of the sponsors, organizers, producer, performers and those in attendance at or who

desire to attend the Bellwether Festival or The Country Fest, including MARK W. MILLER.

193. There is neither a compelling governmental interest or a significant governmental

interest that justifies the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON whereby the liberty interest of the

sponsors, organizers, producer, performers and those in attendance at or who desire to attend the

Bellwether Musical Festival can be infringed.

194. There is neither a compelling governmental interest or a significant governmental

interest that justifies the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON whereby the liberty interest of the

- 40 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 41 of 46 PAGEID #: 396

sponsors, organizers, producer, performers and those in attendance at or who desire to attend The

Country Fest can be infringed.

195. There is neither a compelling governmental interest or a significant governmental

interest that justifies the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON whereby the liberty interest of the

sponsors, organizers, producer, performers and those in attendance at or who desire to attend

parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals throughout the State of Ohio (with the exception of county

fairs) can be infringed.

196. The absolute ban or restrictions imposed by the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON

upon the liberty interest of the sponsors, organizers, producer, performers and those in attendance

at or who desire to attend the Bellwether Musical Festival is not being done in the least restrictive

or even a narrowly tailored manor to any putative governmental interest that may actually exist to

justify the absolute ban or restrictions.

197. The absolute ban or restrictions imposed by the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON

upon the liberty interest of the sponsors, organizers, producer, performers and those in attendance

at or who desire to attend The Country Fest is not being done in the least restrictive or even a

narrowly tailored manor to any putative governmental interest that may actually exist to justify the

absolute ban or restrictions.

198. The absolute ban or restrictions imposed by the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON

upon the liberty interest of the sponsors, organizers, producer, performers and those in attendance

at or who desire to attend parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals throughout the State of Ohio (with

the exception of county fairs) is not being done in the least restrictive or even a narrowly tailored

manor to any putative governmental interest that may actually exist to justify the absolute ban or

restrictions.

- 41 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 42 of 46 PAGEID #: 397

COUNT I
VIOLATION OF RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH
(42 U.S.C. § 1983 / First and Fourteenth Amendments)

199. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference the foregoing allegations as if fully restated herein.

200. The decrees of AMY ACTON and the continued enforcement or threatened

enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES have violated and threaten to violate the First

Amendment rights of the Plaintiffs, including freedom of speech and freedom to peaceable

assembly.

201. Such infringement of fundamental constitutional rights by AMY ACTON and

threatened infringement by LANCE HIMES do not satisfy the applicable constitutional standard

or scrutiny, both as-applied to Plaintiffs and facially.

202. As a direct and proximate result of the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON, Plaintiffs

have suffered damages.

203. Plaintiffs face the real and imminent threat of irreparable injury to their First

Amendment rights.

204. The public interest always supports vindicating constitutional rights.

COUNT II
VIOLATION OF FUNDAMENTAL LIBERTY INTERESTS
(42 U.S.C. § 1983 / Fourteenth Amendments – Substantive Due Process)

205. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference the foregoing allegations as if fully restated herein.

206. The decrees of AMY ACTON and the continued enforcement or threatened

enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES have violated and threaten to violate the innate

rights of personal and individual liberty of Plaintiffs, as well as such rights of others who would

otherwise associate and interact with Plaintiffs free from government dictate.

- 42 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 43 of 46 PAGEID #: 398

207. Such infringement of fundamental constitutional rights by AMY ACTON and

threatened infringement by LANCE HIMES does not satisfy the applicable constitutional standard

or scrutiny, both as-applied to Plaintiffs and facially.

208. As a direct and proximate result of the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON, Plaintiffs

have suffered damages.

209. Plaintiffs face the real and imminent threat of irreparable injury to their First

Amendment rights.

COUNT III
VIOLATION OF EQUAL PROTECTION
(42 U.S.C. § 1983 / Fourteenth Amendments– Equal Protection)

210. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference the foregoing allegations as if fully restated herein.

211. The decrees of AMY ACTON and the continued enforcement or threatened

enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES invidiously discriminate against the planned and

desired speech of Plaintiffs solely because said speech will be made by and/or received by a “mass

gathering” (which AMY ACTON has defined as any convening of 10 or more people greater)

while, at the same time, through her decrees and actions, allowing others to engage in speech even

when said speech was made by and/or received by a “mass gathering”.

212. Such discriminatory treatment of fundamental constitutional rights by AMY ACTON

and the continued enforcement or threatened enforcement of those decrees by LANCE HIMES

does not satisfy the applicable constitutional standard or scrutiny, both as-applied to Plaintiffs and

facially.

213. As a direct and proximate result of the decrees and actions of AMY ACTON, Plaintiffs

have suffered damages.

- 43 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 44 of 46 PAGEID #: 399

214. Plaintiffs face the real and imminent threat of irreparable injury to their First

Amendment rights.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for judgment as follows:

A. that this Court render a declaratory judgment declaring that the orders and decrees of AMY

ACTON, including, without limitation, the Director’s Updated and Revised Order issued

on May 29, 2020, are invalid as applied to the Bellwether Music Festival, The Country

Fest, the Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival, as well as to the sponsors, vendors, organizers,

producer, performers and those in attendance at or who desire to attend any of the

Bellwether Music Festival (including, without limitation, MARK W. MILLER), The

Country Fest, and the Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival;

B. that this Court render a declaratory judgment declaring that the orders and decrees of AMY

ACTON, including, without limitation, the Director’s Updated and Revised Order issued

on May 29, 2020, are invalid facially as to “parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals” as such

activities enjoy protection under the First Amendment;

C. that this Court issue a preliminary injunction and permanent injunction precluding LANCE

HIMES, in both his official and individual capacity, the WARREN COUNTY HEALTH

DISTRICT, and the STARK COUNTY COMBINED GENERAL HEALTH DISTRICT,

together with their officers, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and those acting in

concert or participation with them, including, without limitation, any department or agency

of the State of Ohio and any law enforcement officer, from undertaking any actions to

restrict or prohibit, in any manner, the holding of the Bellwether Music Festival, The

Country Fest, and the Bucyrus Bratwurst Festival, including not to impede or threaten any

- 44 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 45 of 46 PAGEID #: 400

vendors who provide support for such festivals and events, as well as precluding any

retaliatory action related thereto;

D. that this Court issue a preliminary injunction and permanent injunction precluding LANCE

HIMES, in both his official and individual capacity, the WARREN COUNTY HEALTH

DISTRICT, and the STARK COUNTY COMBINED GENERAL HEALTH DISTRICT,

together with their officers, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and those acting in

concert or participation with them, including, without limitation, any department or agency

of the State of Ohio and any law enforcement officer, from undertaking any actions to

restrict or prohibit, in any manner, the holding of “parades, fairs, festivals, and carnivals”,

including not to impede or threaten any vendors who provide support for such “parades,

fairs, festivals, and carnivals”, as well as precluding any retaliatory action related thereto;

E. that this Court retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purpose of enforcing any order or

judgment that issues;

F. that this Court award Plaintiffs’ costs and expenses of this action, including a reasonable

attorneys’ fees award in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 1988;

G. that this Court award damages of at least nominal damages;

H. that this Court otherwise adjudge, decree, and declare the rights and other legal relations

of the parties to the subject matter here in controversy, in order that such declarations shall

have the force and effect of final judgment; and

I. that this Court grant any other relief to which Plaintiffs are entitled, in law or in equity.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Curt C. Hartman


Curt C. Hartman (0064242)

- 45 -
Case: 1:20-cv-00463-MWM Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/23/20 Page: 46 of 46 PAGEID #: 401

The Law Firm of Curt C. Hartman


7394 Ridgepoint Drive, Suite 8
Cincinnati, OH 45230
(513) 379-2923
[email protected]

Christopher P. Finney (0038998)


Rebecca Heimlich (0064004)
Finney Law Firm LLC
4270 Ivy Point Blvd., Suite 225
Cincinnati, OH 45245
(513) 943-6655
[email protected]
[email protected]

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing will be served upon all counsel of record through the
Court’s ECF filing system on the date of filing:

/s/ Curt C. Hartman

- 46 -

You might also like