ICRS Cartilage Injury Evaluation Package
ICRS Cartilage Injury Evaluation Package
A: PATIENT PART:
ICRS Injury questionnaire
The IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form-2000
B: SURGEONS PART
ICRS Knee Surgery History Registration
IKDC KneeExamination form-2000
ICRS- Articular cartilage injury mapping system
ICRS-Articular cartilage injury classification
ICRS-Osteochondritis dissecans classification
ICRS-Cartilage Repair Assessment system
The ICRS Clinical Cartilage Injury Evaluation system -2000 was developed during ICRS 2000 Standards
Workshop at Schloss Münchenwiler, Switzerland, January 27-30, 2000 and further discussed during the
3rd ICRS Meeting in Göteborg, Sweden, Friday April 28, 2000.
The participants in the Clinical Münchenwiler Evaluation Group were as follows:
There was a discussion regarding the use of IKDC-1999 vs KOOS (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis
Outcome Score). The decision in Göteborg was to continue with IKDC (IKDC representatives:
A. Anderson, R. Jakob, H.-U. Stäubli) but there will also be comparative studies with the
KOOS (http://www.koos.nu/)
The clinical evaluation system can also be combined with the ICRS Imaging Protocol as well as the
ICRS Biomechanical Protocol
Phone:____________E -mail:______________
Gender:___________
Height:_____cm Weight:_____Kg
Examiner:_________________________________Date of examination:____________
Loca li sa ti on:
(date):_____________ Gradual:______Acute:______
Etiology/Cause of injury:
Functional status
Preinjury: I___II___III___IV___
Just prior to surgery I___II___III___IV___
Present activity level I___II___III___IV___
IKDC C URRENT H EALTH ASSESSMENT F ORM *
Patie nt s P art:
qExcellent
qVery Good
qGood
qFair
qPoor
2. Compared to one year ago, how would you rate your health in general now?
3. The following items are about activities you might do during a typical day. Does your health now limit
you in these activities? If so, how much?
YES NO
a. Cut down on the amount of time you spent on work or other activities q q
b. Accomplished less than you would like q q
c. Were limited in the kind of work or other activities q q
Had difficulty performing the work or other activities (for example, it took
d.
extra effort)
q q
5. During the past 4 weeks, have you had any of the following problems with your work or other regular
daily activities as a result of any emotional problems (such as feeling depressed or anxious)?
YES NO
a. Cut down on the amount of time you spent on work or other activities q q
b. Accomplished less than you would like q q
c. Didn’t do work or other activities as carefully as usual q q
6. During the past 4 weeks, to what extent has your physical health or emotional problems interfered with
your normal social activities with family, friends, neighbors, or groups?
qNot At All
qSlightly
qModerately
qQuite a Bit
qExtremely
7. How much bodily pain have you had during the past 4 weeks?
qNone
qVery Mild
qMild
qModerate
qSevere
qVery Severe
8. During the past 4 weeks, how much did pain interfere with your normal work (including both work
outside the home and housework)?
qNot at All
qA Little Bit
qModerately
qQuite a Bit
qExtremely
9. These questions are about how you feel and how things have been with you during the past 4 weeks.
For each question, please give the one answer that comes closest to the way you have been feeling.
How much of the time during the past 4 weeks…
10. During the past 4 weeks, how much of the time has your physical health or emotional problems
interfered with your social activities (like visiting with friends, relatives, etc.)?
11. How TRUE or FALSE is each of the following statements for you?
*This form includes questions from the SF-36TM Health Survey. Reproduced with the permission of the
Medical Outcomes Trust, Copyright © 1992.
2000 IKDC SUBJECTIVE K NEE EVALUATION F ORM
Patie nt s P art:
Your Full Name_________________________________________________________________
SYMPTOMS*:
*Grade symptoms at the highest activity level at which you think you could function without significant symptoms,
even if you are not actually performing activities at this level.
1. What is the highest level of activity that you can perform without significant knee pain?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Never q q q q q q q q q q q Constant
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No pain q q q q q q q q q q q Worst pain imaginable
4. During the past 4 weeks, or since your injury, how stiff or swollen was your knee?
qNot at all
qMildly
qModerately
qVery
qExtremely
5. What is the highest level of activity you can perform without significant swelling in your knee?
qVery strenuous activities like jumping or pivoting as in basketball or soccer
qStrenuous activities like heavy physical work, skiing or tennis
qModerate activities like moderate physical work, running or jogging
qLight activities like walking, housework, or yard work
qUnable to perform any of the above activities due to knee swelling
6. During the past 4 weeks, or since your injury, did your knee lock or catch?
qYes qNo
7. What is the highest level of activity you can perform without significant giving way in your knee?
qVery strenuous activities like jum ping or pivoting as in basketball or soccer
qStrenuous activities like heavy physical work, skiing or tennis
qModerate activities like moderate physical work, running or jogging
qLight activities like walking, housework or yard work
qUnable to perform any of the above activities due to giving way of the knee
SPORTS ACTIVITIES:
8. What is the highest level of activity you can participate in on a regular basis?
FUNCTION:
10. How would you rate the function of your knee on a scale of 0 to 10 with 10 being normal, excellent
function and 0 being the inability to perform any of your usual daily activities which may include
sports?
Cannot perform
daily activities No limitation
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
q q q q q q q q q q q
Cannot perform
daily activities No limitation
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
q q q q q q q q q q q
SCORING INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE 2000 IKDC SUBJECTIVE KNEE EVALUATION FORM
Several methods of scoring the IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form were investigated. The results indicated
that summing the scores for each item performed as well as more sophisticated scoring methods.
The responses to each item are scored using an ordinal method such that a score of 1 is given to responses that
represent the lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms. For example, item 1, which is related to the
highest level of activity without significant pain is scored by assigning a score of 1 to the response “Unable to
Perform Any of the Above Activities Due to Knee” and a score of 5 to the response “Very strenuous activities like
jumping or pivoting as in basketball or soccer”. For item 2, which is related to the frequency of pain over the past 4
weeks, the response “Constant” is assigned a score of 1 and “Never” is assigned a score of 11.
The IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form is scored by summing the scores for the individual items and then
transforming the score to a scale that ranges from 0 to 100. Note: The response to item 10 “Function Prior to Knee
Injury” is not included in the overall score. The steps to score the IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form are as
follows:
1. Assign a score to the individual’s response for each item, such that lowest score represents the
lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms.
2. Calculate the raw score by summing the responses to all items with the exception of the response
to item 10 “Function Prior to Your Knee Injury”
3. Transform the raw score to a 0 to 100 scale as follows:
Where the lowest possible score is 18 and the range of possible scores is 87. Thus, if the sum of
scores for the 18 items is 60, the IKDC Score would be calculated as follows:
60 - 18
IKDC Score = x100
87
The transformed score is interpreted as a measure of function such that higher scores represent higher levels of
function and lower levels of symptoms. A score of 100 is interpreted to mean no limitation with activities of daily
living or sports activities and the absence of symptoms.
The IKDC Subjective Knee Score can still be calculated if there are missing data, as long as there are responses to
at least 90% of the items (i.e. responses have been provided for at least 16 items). To calculate the raw IKDC
score when there are missing data, substitute the average score of the items that have been answered for the
missing item score(s). Once the raw IKDC score has been calculated, it is transformed to the IKDC Subjective
Knee Score as described above.
ICRS K NEE HISTORY REGISTRATION-PREVIOUS SURGERY
Surgeons part
Type of surgery: Check all that apply
Meniscal surgery:
Ligament Surgery:
ACL repair__Intraarticular __ Extraarticular___
PCL-repair__Intraarticular___Extraarticular___
Medial -___Lateral-Collateral-ligament reconstruction___
Type of graft:
Patella-tendon__ Ipsilateral__Contralateral__
Single hamstrings -graft___
2 bundle hamstrings -graft___
4 bundle hamstrings -graft___
Quadriceps-graft___
Allograft___
Other___
Patellofemoral surgery:
Soft tissue realignement:
Medial imbrication___ Lateral release___
Bone realignement:
Tibial tubercle transfer:
Proximal__Distal__Medial__Lateral__Anterior__
Trochlear plasty__
Patellectomy__
Imaging techniques:
Plain x-rays:________ Varus-angle______Valgus-angle_______
Findings:
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Bone:____________________________________________________________ ______________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Ligaments:__________________________________________________ ____________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Menisci:_____________________________________________________ ___________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
2000 IKDC K NEE Examination Form
Surg eons part
Patient Name :_____________________________________ Date of Birth: ____/______/______
Day Month Year
Gender: ?F ?M Age :____________ Date of Examination:______/______/_____
Day Month Year
Generalized Laxity: ?tight ?normal ?lax
3. Ligament Examination
(manual, instrumented, x-ray)
∆Lachman (25° flex) (134N) ? -1 to 2mm ? 3 to 5mm(1+) ? 6 to 10mm(2+) ? >10mm(3+)
? <-1 to –3 ? <-3 stiff
∆Lachman (25° flex) manual max ? -1 to 2mm ? 3 to 5mm ? 6 to 10mm ? >10mm
Anterior endpoint: ? firm ? soft
? ? ? ?
4. Compartment Findings crepitation with
∆Crepitus Ant. Compartment ? none ? moderate ? mild pain ? >mild pain
∆Crepitus Med. Compartment ? none ? moderate ? mild pain ? >mild pain
∆Crepitus Lat. Compartment ? none ? moderate ? mild pain ? >mild pain
6. X-ray Findings
Med. Joint Space ? none ? mild ? moderate ? severe
Lat. Joint Space ? none ? mild ? moderate ? severe
Patellofemoral ? none ? mild ? moderate ?severe
Ant. Joint Space (sagittal) ? none ? mild ? moderate ? severe
Post. Joint Space (sagittal) ? none ? mild ? moderate ? severe
7. Functional Test
One Leg Hop (% of opposite side) ? ≥90% ? 89 to 76% ? 75 to 50% ? <50%
**Final Evaluation ? ? ? ?
* Group grade: The lowest grade within a group determines the group grade
** Final evaluation: the worst group grade determines the final evaluation for acute and subacute patients. For chronic patients compare preoperative and postoperative
evaluations. In a final evaluation only the first 3 groups are evaluated but all groups mus t be documented. ∆ Difference in involved knee compared to normal or what is
assumed to be normal.
IKDC COMMITTEE AOSSM: Anderson, A., Bergfeld, J., Boland, A. Dye, S., Feagin, J., Harner, C. Mohtadi, N. Richmond, J. Shelbourne, D., Terry, G. ESSKA: St aubli, H.,
Hefti, F., Hoher, J., Jacob, R., Mueller, W., Neyret, P. APOSSM: Chan, K., Kurosaka, M.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE 2000 IKDC KNEE EXAMINATION FORM
The Knee Examination Form contains items that fall into one of seven measurement domains. However, only the
first three of these domains are graded. The seven domains assessed by the Knee Examination Form are:
1. Effusion
An effusion is assessed by ballotting the knee. A fluid wave (less than 25 cc) is graded mild, easily
ballotteable fluid – moderate (25-60 cc), and a tense knee secondary to effusion (greater than 60 cc) is rated
severe.
3. Ligament Examination
The Lachman test, total AP translation at 70 degrees, and medial and lateral joint opening may be assessed
with manual, instrumented or stress x-ray examination. Only one should be graded, preferably a “measured
displacement”. A force of 134 N (30 lbs) and the maximum manual are recorded in instrumented
examination of both knees. Only the measured displacement at the standard force of 134 N is used for
grading. The numerical values for the side to side difference are rounded off, and the appropriate box is
marked.
The end point is assessed in the Lachman test. The end point affects the grading when the index knee has
3-5 mm more anterior laxity than the normal knee. In this case, a soft end point results in an abnormal grade
rather than a nearly normal grade.
The 70-degree posterior sag is estimated by comparing the profile of the injured knee to the normal knee and
palpating the medial femoral tibia step off. It may be confirmed by noting that contraction of the quadriceps
pulls the tibia interiorly.
The external rotation tests are performed with the patient prone and the knee flexed 30° and 70°.
Equal external rotational torque is applied to both feet and the degree of external rotation is recorded.
The pivot shift and reverse pivot shift are performed with the patient supine, with the hip in 10-20 degrees of
abduction and the tibia in neutral rotation using either the Losee, Noyes, or Jakob techniques. The greatest
subluxation, compared to the normal knee, should be recorded.
4. Compartment Findings
Patellofemoral crepitation is elicited by extension against slight resistance. Medial and lateral compartment
crepitation is elicited by extending the knee from a flexed position with a varus stress and then a valgus
stress (i.e., McMurray test). Grading is based on intensity and pain.
6. X-ray Findings
A bilateral, double leg PA weightbearing roentgenogram at 35-45 degrees of flexion (tunnel view) is used to
evaluate narrowing of the medial and lateral joint spaces. The Merchant view at 45 degrees is used to
document patellofemoral narrowing. A mild grade indicates minimal changes (i.e., small osteophytes, slight
sclerosis or flattening of the femoral condyle) and narrowing of the joint space which is just detectable. A
moderate grade may have those changes and joint space narrowing (e.g., a joint space of 2-4 mm side or up
to 50% joint space narrowing). Severe changes include a joint space of less than 2 mm or greater than 50%
joint space narrowing.
7. Functional Test
The patient is asked to perform a one leg hop for distance on the index and normal side. Three trials for
each leg are recorded and averaged. A ratio of the index to normal knee is calculated.
ICRS Grade 0 - Normal
A B
A B C D
Copyright © ICRS
A B
Measurement of the
defect size: ∅ 11mm
Stable, continuity: Softened area covered by intact cartilage. Partial discontinuity, stable on probing
Complete discontinuity, ”dead in situ”, not dislocated. Dislocated fragment, loose within the bed or empty
defect.> 10mm in depth is B-subgroup
Copyright © ICRS
CARTILAGE REPAIR A SSESSMENT
Criteria Points