Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Midterm Examination (CLJ4 – Evidence)

_____________________________________________________________
Name:_______________________ Date:________________
Admission Slip No.:_____________ Score:_______________

Read each question carefully. Answer the Essay questions legibly,


clearly,  and concisely. A mere "Yes" or "No" answer without any corresponding
explanation or discussion will not be given any credit.

1. State the basic requirements for admissibility of an Object Evidence. (5pts)

_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________

2. Police officers arrested Mr. Adik in a buy-bust operation and confiscated from
him 10 sachets of shabu and several marked money bills of 500 used as buy-bust
money during the operation.

At the trial for violation of Sec. 5, Art. II of Republic Act 9165 (The
Comprehensive Dangerous Drug Act of 2002) , the prosecution failed to present the
actual buy-bust money but instead presented a photograph.

Rule whether the evidence is admissible or not.

_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________

3. For purposes of authentication of an object or for laying the foundation for the
exhibit, object evidence may be classified into.

_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________

4. Sendong the official photographer of the College of Criminal Justice took


photographs of the Search for Mr. & Ms. College. In one of the photographs he had
taken, Julia a criminology student filed a case against the school for exhibiting an
alleged indecent photograph.

During the trial, Julia presented the photograph she is referring to as offensive.
Rule on the admissibility of the photograph and what should be done in order for the
photograph to be competent.

_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
1|Page
5. It is one of the basic requisites for the admissibility of an object or real
evidence to authenticate the object evidence, how is authentication be done?

_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________

6. State the category of the object evidence for purposes of authentication and
explain why is it categorized as such.

1. Kitchen Knife
_______________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________

2. Caliber .45 Pistol


_______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

3. Honda Motorcycle
_______________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________

4. Presence of Spermatozoa in the underwear of the Victim


_______________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________

5. Urine contained in a Coca-Cola Bottle recovered in the Crime Scene


_______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

6. T-Shirt printed “Mga Anak ng Bayan”


_______________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________

7. Bottle printed “Happy 35th Birthday Leah”


_______________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________

8. Blood Stains on a piece of wood


_______________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________

9. Parker pen engraved with a name “”


_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________

10. Chair pasted on it is a sticker “5”


_______________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
7. Atty. Santos of the Public Attorney’s Office (PAO) presented the evidence for
the defense. The short pants of accused was presented in evidence to contradict the
statement of the prosecution witnesses.
2|Page
Prosecutor Juan Dela Cruz suggested that the short pants be worn or fitted to
show that the same is really the short pants of the accused.

Rule on the Admissibility of the evidence and the act of asking the accused to
wear the short pants would violate the right of the accused against self-incrimination.

_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________

8. Recovered in the crime scene is a skull purporting to be of human origin,


police office Dano who investigated the crime submitted the skull for forensic
examination on the real identification of the person. When the result was submitted to
court, accused counsel objected and contended that the forensic examiner must be
presented in court to identify the result and the findings he made.

Is the objection proper, if yes why? If No, why?

_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________

9. Lito was found in possession of a knife while boarding the Lite Shipping ferry
bound for Cebu City. Lito contended that the same was only taken by him in
preparation for a cooking event in Cebu City where he will be using the said knife.

The police charged Lito for possession of deadly weapon. Will the case prosper
and may the knife be considered as object evidence against Lito?

_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________

10. What is an Object Evidence and when will it be submitted to court as


evidence?

_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________

3|Page

You might also like