Business Planning Taxation 2020 Study Manual-SAMPLE
Business Planning Taxation 2020 Study Manual-SAMPLE
BUSINESS PLANNING:
TAXATION
Study Manual
www.icaew.com
Business Planning: Taxation
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales
ISBN: 978-1-5097-2735-3
Previous ISBN: 978-1-5097-2066-8
© ICAEW 2019
ii ICAEW 2020
Welcome to ICAEW
Michael Izza
Chief Executive
ICAEW
The Business Planning: Taxation module enables you to apply technical knowledge and
professional skills to identify and resolve taxation issues that arise in the context of preparing
tax computations and to advise on tax-efficient strategies for businesses and individuals.
Questions within the Study Manual should be treated as preparation questions, providing you
with a firm foundation before you attempt the exam-standard questions. The exam-standard
questions are found in the Question Bank.
Module aim
To enable students to apply technical knowledge and professional skills to identify and resolve
taxation issues that arise in the context of preparing tax computations and to advise on tax-
efficient strategies for businesses and individuals.
Students will be required to use technical knowledge and professional judgement to identify,
explain and evaluate alternative tax treatments and to determine the appropriate solutions to
taxation issues, giving due consideration to the needs of clients and the interaction between
taxes. The commercial context and impact of recommendations will need to be considered in
making such judgements, as will ethical and legal issues.
Prior knowledge
There are no regulations stipulating the order in which students must attempt this module.
However, students are strongly advised to complete both the Principles of Taxation module and
the Tax Compliance module before attempting this module, as the ability to prepare tax
computations is required to be successful at this module.
Although technical topics by necessity flow through the three tax exams, a technical topic will
not usually be retested in this module in a comprehensive computational question if it has
already been tested in detail in either of the other two tax exams.
Method of assessment
The Business Planning: Taxation module exam is 2.5 hours long. The exam will contain questions
requiring the use of communication, judgement and evaluation skills as well as an ability to
understand the interaction of different taxes.
The exam will consist of three questions. One question will be an integrated scenario of
approximately 40 marks, which will cover a range of taxes as well as including tax planning.
Ethics and law may be tested in any of the three questions.
The exam will be open book and will permit students to take any written or printed material into
the exam, subject to practical space restrictions. To see the recommended text(s) for this exam,
go to icaew.com/permittedtexts
This grid provides guidance on the relative weighting between knowledge and skills:
Weighting (%)
Knowledge 25-35
Skills 65-75
Tax Compliance
Financial Management
PERSONAL TAX
1 Income tax allowances
The following are the new allowances for 2019/20:
£
Personal allowance 12,500
The blind person's allowance for 2019/20 is £2,450.
2 Taxation of income
2.1 Rate bands
The starting rate for savings income remains at 0% for 2019/20, with the starting rate band at
£5,000. This is only available if the individual's non-savings income is below this amount. The
basic rate band is increased to £37,500 for 2019/20.
The savings income nil rate band remains at 0% for the first £1,000 (basic rate taxpayers) or £500
(higher rate taxpayers) of savings income above any savings income taxed at the starting rate.
This income still counts towards the usual basic and higher rate bands. Whether a taxpayer is
basic rate or higher rate for this purpose is determined before taking account of this nil rate
band. An additional rate taxpayer receives no savings income nil rate band.
The first £2,000 of dividend income (for all individual taxpayers – except trusts) is covered by the
dividend nil rate band ie, is taxed at 0%. This income still counts towards the usual basic and
higher rate bands.
4 Employment income
4.1.1 2019/20
From 2019/20 the car benefit percentages for petrol cars are applicable as follows:
0–50g/km 16%
51–75g/km 19%
76–94g/km 22%
95–164g/km 23% + 1% for every 5g/km in excess of 95g/km
165g/km or more 37%
Diesel supplement 4% (ignore if car meets the Real Driving Emission 2
(RDE2) standard)
From 6 April 2019 the car fuel benefit charge is based on an increased figure of £24,100
(£23,400 in 2018/19).
4.1.2 Company vans
The van benefit charge increases from £3,350 to £3,430 for 2019/20.
The van fuel benefit charge also increases from £633 to £655.
The benefit for zero emission vans is increased to 60% of the ordinary van benefit for 2019/20 ie,
£2,058 (unless there is insignificant private use).
If there is insignificant private use the benefit is nil.
The percentage is expected to increase in future years.
5.3 Class 2
For 2019/20, the equivalent weekly contribution increases to £3.00 (2018/19: £2.95).
A small profits threshold applies where profits are below £6,365.
5.5 Class 4
For 2019/20, the annual lower profits limit increases to £8,632 and the annual upper profits limit
rises to £50,000.
The rates of Class 4 NICs remain at 9% between the lower and upper limits and 2% above the
upper limit.
Solution
Class 2 £ £
£3.00 × 52 156
Class 4
£(50,000 – 8,632) @ 9% 3,723
£(75,000 – 50,000) @ 2% 500
4,223
Total NICs 4,379
CAPITAL TAXES
If losses brought forward exceed the net gains after the annual exempt amount the excess is
carried forward.
Solution
2019/20 – December 2019
Tariq can elect for a deemed disposal at market value; ie, a gain of £28,000 (£58,000 – £30,000).
This is eligible for entrepreneurs' relief but Tariq can elect to defer the gain until future disposal.
2020/21 – May 2020
Tariq disposes of the shares and a gain is calculated using the market value at December 2019
as the deemed cost to give a gain of £2,000 (£60,000 – £58,000). In addition the deferred gain
crystallises.
Therefore Tariq's capital gains tax on the share disposal is £3,200 ((£28,000 × 10%) + (£2,000 ×
20%)), provided he makes an entrepreneurs' relief claim.
2 Inheritance tax
BUSINESS TAX
CORPORATION TAX
INTERNATIONAL TAX
1 VAT
The eligibility criteria to be a member of a VAT group is due to change. At the time of
publication the date of the change is unknown. The new situation will mean that additionally a
VAT group can be formed between:
an individual carrying on a business and one or more UK companies, where the individual
controls each company and the individual's business is established or has a fixed
establishment in the UK
a partnership carrying on a business and one or more UK companies, where the partnership
controls each company and the partnership's business is established or has a fixed
establishment in the UK
2 Stamp taxes
2.1.1 Administration
For disposals from 1 March 2019, SDLT is payable by the purchaser together with the land
transaction from within 14 days of the transfer (previously 30 days).
2.2 Stamp duty/stamp duty reserve tax (SDRT) – transfer of listed securities to
connected companies
From 29 October 2018 targeted anti-avoidance legislation applies so that, where listed shares or
securities are transferred to a connected company, the stamp duty/stamp duty reserve tax is
calculated on consideration of the higher of:
the value of actual consideration; and
the market value of the securities transferred.
In this situation connected means:
two companies are connected if the same person(s) control them (including where one
individual controls one company and a connected person of theirs controls the other)
an individual or individuals are connected to a company if they control the company
Control is when a person owns shares or voting rights, and as a result the company must act in
accordance with their wishes.
Ethics
Introduction
Examination context
TOPIC LIST
1 Fundamental principles, threats and safeguards and standards for tax
planning
2 Conflicts of interest
3 Ethical conflict resolution
4 Disclosure of information and confidentiality
5 Irregularities
6 Client acceptance and regulatory requirements
7 Anti-money laundering
8 Tax planning, tax avoidance and tax evasion
9 GAAR, the Ramsay doctrine and BEPS
10 Disclosure of tax avoidance schemes (DOTAS and DASVOIT)
11 Answering ethics exam questions
Summary and Self-test
Technical reference
Answers to Interactive questions
Answers to Self-test
Introduction
Specific syllabus references for this chapter are 1e, 1f, 1q, 2f, 3a, 3b, 3c and 3d.
Syllabus links
In Chapter 1 of your Principles of Taxation and Tax Compliance Study Manuals, which you
should review, you learned about ethical, legal and regulatory issues in relation to tax work. This
specifically included elements of the IESBA Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants and
ICAEW Code of Ethics as well as Professional Conduct in Relation to Taxation (PCRT) and CCAB
anti-money laundering guidance.
In this chapter we extend this knowledge and in particular your skills by giving consideration to
more complex scenarios. These require you to identify issues embedded in the information
given and to exercise professional scepticism.
The requirement for taxpayers (both individuals and corporations) to disclose their use of tax
avoidance schemes is one way to ensure that tax avoidance is highlighted to HMRC. The general
anti-abuse rule, and the approach adopted by the courts in relation to certain kinds of tax
planning, are also relevant to counteracting tax avoidance by all taxpayers.
Examination context
In the exam students may be required to do the following within the context of taxation:
Recognise and explain the relevance, importance and consequences of ethical and legal
issues
Recommend and justify appropriate actions where ethical dilemmas arise in a given
scenario
Design and evaluate appropriate ethical safeguards
Recognise and advise when a tax-avoidance scheme is notifiable to HMRC and distinguish
between planning, avoidance and evasion and their consequences
Section overview
• The IESBA and ICAEW Codes establishes the fundamental principles of professional ethics
for accountants. These are integrity, objectivity, professional competence and due care,
confidentiality and professional behaviour.
• Professional accountants need to identify, evaluate and respond to threats to compliance
with the five fundamental principles. Such threats may be self-interest threats, self-review
threats, advocacy threats, familiarity threats or intimidation threats.
• The professional accountant must then seek to apply safeguards to eliminate the threats or
reduce them to an acceptable level. If this is impossible, the professional accountant must
remove him- or herself from the situation.
• Professional accountants must follow the five PCRT standards for tax planning when
advising their clients.
1.2 Threat
Professional accountants are obliged to evaluate any threats as soon as they know, or should be
expected to know, of their existence.
Both qualitative and quantitative factors should be taken into account in considering the
significance of any threat.
Solution
The fundamental principles that may be at risk due to the previous advisers' advice relating to
employees are professional behaviour and professional competence and due care. However,
the terms of the previous engagement are not clear from the scenario. If they had only been
asked for advice on the single category of employee then there is no breach.
The standards for tax planning require the advice to be 'client specific'. As a minimum the
previous advisers should have highlighted with sufficient prominence that the advice given did
not relate to all categories of employee, and should have considered including in their advice
the potential impact of a change in assumptions or circumstances.
2 Conflicts of interest
Section overview
The Code requires a professional accountant to take reasonable steps to avoid, identify
and resolve conflicts of interest. Both actual and perceived conflicts must be considered.
Examples of situations in which a conflict may arise include conflicts between a client's
interests and those of the firm, financial involvements between the client and the firm,
acting for both a husband and wife in a divorce settlement or a company and for its
directors personally or two competing businesses, and secondment to HMRC.
2.2 Safeguards
Whatever the circumstances giving rise to the conflict, safeguards should ordinarily include the
professional accountant notifying all known relevant parties of the conflict.
Further steps will vary depending on the matter giving rise to the conflict.
1
Section overview
A professional accountant may need to resolve a conflict in applying the fundamental
principles.
When initiating either a formal or informal conflict resolution process, a professional
accountant should consider the relevant parties, ethical issues involved, fundamental
principles related to the matter in question, established internal procedures and
alternative courses of action.
Having considered the six recommended factors, and followed the suggested steps, if the
conflict cannot be resolved the professional accountant should, where possible, refuse to
remain associated with the matter creating the conflict.
We need a report to the board of directors that shows how these new measures will work, as I
previously indicated to the board that they are likely to be favourable for the group. Are there
any particular companies within the group which would benefit? If we focus on these in the
report, that would be helpful.
Requirement
Prepare notes which document any ethical implications for yourself arising from Jo Soames's
email and state the actions you should take.
Solution
I will need to consider the following points: the relevant facts and the ethical issues; the
fundamental principles related to the issue; the internal procedures available; and alternative
courses of action.
The relevant facts and identification of the ethical issue
1 Jo deceived her employer when applying for her post.
Jo has confessed to telling an untruth during her interview. The extent of corporation tax
knowledge needed in her role may be more than she has, however, this is not clear. It is
possible that this was not the deciding factor for her obtaining her post. Therefore in
respect of this comment, other than being careful when considering information that Jo
provides in the future, there is no ethical conflict for me to resolve.
2 Jo is prepared to take credit for work she has not done.
Jo is not a qualified chartered accountant therefore she is not bound by the fundamental
principles in the ICAEW Code of Ethics. However, I must consider my own position if I am
party to the deception and consider the ICAEW ethical principles as follows:
Objectivity – If I allow Jo to influence me in this matter, I may not be capable of acting
objectively in the future.
I am clearly facing a self-interest threat and an intimidation threat since Jo is ultimately my
immediate superior and I am on a temporary secondment. Should I not do as she asks, my
secondment may be terminated.
3 Jo is looking to complete a report which may not show the true picture.
Jo is not a qualified chartered accountant therefore she is not bound by the fundamental
principles in the ICAEW Code of Ethics. However, I must consider my own position if I am
party to the deception and consider the ICAEW ethical principles as follows:
Integrity – If I allow Jo to influence me and produce a report which does not show the true
picture and either omits or conceals facts and conclusions which would result from proper,
unbiased reporting on the whole group of companies, this would be a breach of integrity.
This is again a self-interest threat and a possible intimidation threat.
A sensible safeguard to put in place is that I insist on reporting fairly on all group
companies. If this was not established at the outset of the secondment, it should be now.
The parties involved
The group could incur extra tax costs and penalties if Jo acts beyond her capability in taxation
resulting in badly prepared computations, and/or reports to the board without giving proper and
accurate guidance on the implications of the new measures. My employer and I would also be
exposed to risk of being associated with work that was of insufficient quality or at worst, untruthful.
The internal procedures available, alternative courses of action
Initially I should inform Jo that I am not prepared to be part of her deception and that she should
not put her name to the work I have prepared. I should suggest she seek further training and
discuss the issue of her lack of corporate taxation knowledge with her line manager. If she refuses I
should seek to identify any internal procedures within the group for reporting my concerns.
I may also speak to my line manager at my employer firm. I should consider carefully whether I
wish to continue to work with Jo or whether I ask for the secondment to be cut short.
Section overview
• PCRT Helpsheet C provides guidance on how to deal with errors in relation to a client's tax
affairs.
• Particular procedures should be followed where this results from HMRC error.
Definition
Irregularities: All errors, whether made by the client, the member, HMRC or any other party in a
client's tax affairs ranging from the innocent to those that may amount to fraud.
I am preparing the latest VAT return. I cannot see that there has been any adjustment to reflect a
change in use of the company's computer training building. Mark Charles, the finance director
has told me that it is unlikely that HMRC will pick up the change in use and to ignore it for now
but if notice of an inspection by HMRC is received we will pay the outstanding VAT on the next
return before the VAT inspector arrives. However, I am worried we will be open to penalties.
The amount of VAT is in the region of £80,000 – please could you advise me on how to report
this matter.
Requirement
Discuss the action you should take and the advice you should give to your client.
See Answer at the end of this chapter.
• Professional accountants are subject to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
• Particular responsibilities are placed on anyone undertaking the role of Senior Accounting
Officer in a qualifying company.
Employed members will normally be covered by their employer's insurance policy. The PII
regulations apply to individual members but in practical terms professional indemnity insurance
usually covers their practising entity, for example their partnership or their sole practice.
Solution
Briefing Note for your manager
Re: Paolo Lunedi's concerns
Given the concerns Paolo has raised with us, before taking any action, we need to identify:
if there is a treaty which grants a relevant exemption;
whether information relating to the overseas dividends should appear on the UK return;
whether any voluntary disclosure might be advisable; and
whether any change is needed to current or past returns.
If, on investigation, it appears that the non-taxation and non-disclosure treatment is correct,
documentation should be maintained to support this.
Otherwise, Paolo needs to discuss this matter with the board of directors of Noche and, if they
will not comply with the UK law, he will have to consider his position as FD and SAO. He may
wish to seek advice from the ICAEW confidential ethics helpline and/or take legal advice. If the
issue cannot be resolved he will need to consider resigning from his position with the company.
This will also be an ethical problem for us. Now we are aware of the issue we will have to ensure
that the corporation tax computations are prepared in line with the law and if not, we will have to
advise the client, in writing, of our concerns. If we do not reach a satisfactory conclusion on this
issue with the client we will have to consider resigning from the engagement.
• This guidance has been prepared to assist professional accountants in complying with 1
their obligations in relation to the prevention, recognition and reporting of money
laundering.
• Failure to take account of the guidance could have serious legal, regulatory or
professional disciplinary consequences.
7.2 Defences
There are several possible defences against a charge of failure to report:
The individual does not actually know or suspect money laundering has occurred and has
not been provided by his employer with the training required, although this is then an
offence on the part of the employer.
The privilege reporting exemption ie, where the professional accountant is exempt from
making a report where his knowledge or suspicion came in privileged circumstances. This
may be when asked to give tax advice on the interpretation or application of specific tax
law, or where a confidential communication takes place between the client the accountant
and the client's solicitor predominantly for use with actual or pending litigation.
There is reasonable excuse for not making a report.
It is known, or reasonably believed that the money laundering is occurring outside the UK,
and is not unlawful under the criminal law of the country where it is occurring.
7.4 Reporting
7.4.1 Protected disclosure
The money laundering legislation requires an accountant to disclose confidential information
without client consent in certain circumstances. In order to disclose confidential information, the
accountant must have knowledge or suspicion, or reasonable grounds for knowledge or
suspicion, that a person has committed a money-laundering offence. Disclosure without
reasonable grounds for knowledge or suspicion will increase the risk of a business or an
individual being open to an action for breach of confidentiality.
A professional accountant with knowledge or suspicion of money laundering must make a
report. If the accountant works for a firm with a MLRO, then an internal report must be made
direct to the MLRO.
The MLRO is then responsible for deciding whether the information contained in an internal
report needs to be relayed to NCA in the form of an external report, a SAR, and if so, for
compiling and despatching the SAR. There are specific offences applying to MLROs failing to
make a report where one is needed.
An accountant in sole practice needing to make a report would be required to submit a SAR
direct to NCA.
Solution
By omitting to declare taxable employee income for PAYE, Sribani is paying too little income tax
and national insurance which is illegal. She should be informed of the need to amend previous
payroll information and payments, in writing. She should also be informed of the possible
Section overview
• Tax evasion is illegal and tax avoidance is legal.
• Tax evasion could lead to prosecution for both the client and his accountant.
• Tax avoidance is liable to be countered by specific anti-avoidance rules included in
particular pieces of legislation, by the GAAR, and by the application of the Ramsay
doctrine in the courts.
• The role of data analytics in closing the tax gap.
• Professional accountants may be involved in tax planning arrangements in many ways.
Requirement
Prepare a response to this email.
See Answer at the end of this chapter.
The Criminal Finances Act 2017 makes companies or partnerships (relevant bodies) criminally
liable for failing to prevent facilitation of tax evasion. This therefore applies to accountancy firms
although it does not apply to sole practitioners. An offence is committed under this Act if the
relevant body failed to prevent one of its associated persons (eg, employees) from facilitating
tax evasion by another person (eg, a client), even if the evasion was unsuccessful.
The relevant body should put procedures in place that take into account the size of the
organisation and the nature of the work. A risk assessment should consider the motive and
means of the associated persons involved in the work, to facilitate tax evasion offences.
Associated persons include employees, partners or other agents.
A failure to have adequate procedures in place means that the relevant body may be criminally
liable for failure to prevent associated persons from facilitating tax evasion. For an offence to
have been committed there must be:
an attempt at fraudulent tax evasion by someone, eg, a client of the firm;
criminal facilitation with the attempted tax evasion by the associated person, eg, an
employee of the firm; and
failure by the relevant body (the firm) to prevent the associated person from criminally
facilitating the evasion.
Section overview
• The GAAR applies for income tax, corporation tax, capital gains tax, IHT, SDLT and the
annual tax on enveloped dwellings.
• Applies if it is reasonable to conclude that tax avoidance was one of the main purposes of
a transaction, and it was not a reasonable course of action in response to the relevant tax
provisions.
• Includes cases where the effect of the transaction is inconsistent with the principles on
which the tax provisions are based, cases where there are contrived or abnormal steps,
and transactions intended to exploit shortcomings in the legislation.
• Just and reasonable adjustments are to be made to counteract the benefit of the planning.
• In addition to the GAAR, the courts have developed a purposive approach to interpreting
tax legislation (the Ramsay doctrine) which makes some tax planning schemes ineffective.
• The OECD and G20 countries have devised an action plan to tackle international tax
avoidance, the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) plan.
9.1.1 Overview
The general anti-abuse rule (GAAR) applies to arrangements entered into on or after
17 July 2013.
It is intended to counter the tax advantages sought from the most aggressive tax avoidance
arrangements, and can therefore be relevant to almost all taxpayers. It is intended to act as a
deterrent to discourage taxpayers from using such arrangements.
It applies on a self-assessment basis for income tax, corporation tax, capital gains tax, IHT, SDLT
and the annual tax on enveloped dwellings. National insurance contributions are now also
included under different tax provisions. An accountant should consider whether GAAR applies
when completing a tax return. If this is unclear then specialist help or a second opinion should
be sought.
9.1.2 When the GAAR applies
The GAAR is based on the 'double reasonableness test' such that it applies to arrangements if:
it is reasonable to conclude that obtaining a tax advantage was one of the main purposes of
the arrangements; and
the arrangements are abusive.
Arrangements are abusive if they cannot reasonably be regarded as a reasonable course of
action in relation to the relevant tax provisions. Whether they are reasonable is determined
having regard to whether:
the results of the arrangements are consistent with the principles and objectives on which
the relevant tax provisions are based;
there are contrived or abnormal steps; and
the arrangements are intended to exploit shortcomings in the tax legislation.