CPD Special Order - Investigatory Stop System With Forms
CPD Special Order - Investigatory Stop System With Forms
I. PURPOSE
This directive:
1. entering and maintaining Investigatory Stop Reports into the Investigatory Stop Database.
2. completing hard copy Investigatory Stop Reports.
3. accessing information from the Investigatory Stop Database.
I. maintains the requirement for sworn members who complete the hard copy version of the
Investigatory Stop Report to enter the data documented on the hard copy into the Investigatory Stop
Database.
J. continues the requirement for sworn members to document, in the appropriate field, location of
occurrence by using the appropriate Incident Reporting Guide (CPD-63.451) location codes.
K. continues management responsibility for field supervisors approving Investigatory Stop Reports
including review, training, and accountability for proper use and entry of Investigatory Stop Reports by
their subordinates.
L. revises executive officer responsibilities concerning monthly internal audits.
M. satisfies CALEA Law Enforcement Standard Chapter 1.
II. DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this directive, the following definitions apply:
Reasonable Articulable Suspicion should be founded on specific and objective facts or observations
about how a suspect behaves, what the subject is seen or heard doing, and the circumstances or
situation in regard to the suspect that is either witnessed or known by the officer. Accordingly,
Reasonable Articulable Suspicion must be described with reference to facts or observations about a
particular suspect's actions or the particular circumstances that an officer encounters. The physical
characteristics of a suspect are never, by themselves, sufficient. Instead, those characteristics must
be combined with other factors, including a specific, non-general description matching the suspect or
the observed behaviors of the suspect.
1. For Investigatory Stops, a sworn member must possess specific and articulable facts which,
combined with rational inferences from these facts, reasonably warrant a belief that the
suspect is committing, is about to commit, or has committed a criminal offense.
2. For a Protective Pat Down, a sworn member must possess specific and articulable facts,
combined with rational inferences from these facts, that the suspect is armed and dangerous
or reasonably suspects that the person presents a danger of attack to the sworn member or
others in the area.
D. Probable Cause—Probable cause exists where the police have knowledge of facts that would lead a
reasonable person to believe that a crime has occurred and that the subject has committed it. This
differs from Reasonable Articulable Suspicion in that the facts supporting RAS do not need to meet
probable cause requirements, but they must justify more than a mere hunch. The facts should not be
viewed with analytical hindsight but instead should be considered from the perspective of a
reasonable officer at the time that situation confronted him or her.
E. Plain Touch Doctrine—When a sworn member is conducting a lawful Protective Pat Down of a
suspect’s outer clothing for weapons and encounters an object that, based upon their training and
experience, the sworn member believes that the object is contraband, the sworn member may seize
the item without a warrant. The object may not be manipulated in order to determine the identity of
the object.
III. POLICY
A. The Investigatory Stop System is one of the ways the Chicago Police Department, as part of and
empowered by the community, ensures that we protect the public, preserve the rights of all members
of the community, and enforce the law impartially. Adherence to this policy allows the Department to
serve all citizens equally with fairness, dignity, and respect, and to uphold our pledge to not use racial
profiling and other bias-based policing.
B. Department members are responsible for ensuring public safety by deterring and responding to
crime. They are also responsible for upholding the rights guaranteed to the public under the United
States Constitution, the State of Illinois Constitution, and the law. Safeguarding the liberties of the
public and preventing crime are not mutually exclusive; each can be achieved by fostering trust and
confidence between Department members and the public. Members will comport with the policy and
procedures of this order to ensure appropriate conduct when interacting with members of the public.
C. Sworn members who conduct an Investigatory Stop are required to complete an Investigatory Stop
Report.
D. The reasons for completing the Investigatory Stop Report is to ensure:
A. 725 ILCS 5/107-14 delineates the authority for conducting an Investigatory Stop. The statute reads as
follows:
"Temporary questioning without arrest. A peace officer, after having identified himself as a peace
officer, may stop any person in a public place for a reasonable period of time when the officer
reasonably infers from the circumstances that the person is committing, is about to commit or has
committed an offense as defined in Section 102-15 of this Code, and may demand the name and
address of the person and an explanation of their actions. Such detention and temporary questioning
will be conducted in the vicinity of where the person was stopped.”
B. 725 ILCS 5/108-1.01 delineates the authority for conducting a Protective Pat Down during an
Investigatory Stop. The statute reads as follows:
"Search during temporary questioning. When a peace officer has stopped a person for temporary
questioning pursuant to Section 107-14 of this Code and reasonably suspects that he or another is in
danger of attack, he may search the person for weapons. If the officer discovers a weapon, he may
take it until the completion of the questioning, at which time he shall either return the weapon, if
lawfully possessed, or arrest the person so questioned."
NOTE: In this context the word "search" refers to a Protective Pat Down.
A. An officer may conduct an Investigatory Stop if it is based on specific and articulable facts which,
combined with rational inferences from these facts, give rise to Reasonable Articulable Suspicion that
criminal activity is afoot. The sole purpose of the temporary detention is to prove or disprove those
suspicions.
B. During an Investigatory Stop, subjects may be asked to identify themselves and to provide an
explanation for their actions; however, a failure to do so is not, in and of itself, an arrestable offense
or grounds for further detention, and a subject may choose not to answer any of the officer's
questions.
C. Police are not required to give Miranda warnings when conducting on-the-scene questioning during
the fact-gathering process.
1. When an officer has detained a subject based upon Reasonable Articulable Suspicion that
criminal activity is afoot and, during that detention, develops additional Reasonable
Articulable Suspicion that the subject is armed and dangerous or reasonably suspects that
the person presents a danger of attack to the officer or another, the officer may conduct a
Protective Pat Down of the outer clothing of the subject for hard objects that could be used as
weapons. The Protective Pat Down is only for the purpose of officer and citizen safety; it is
not to search for evidence.
2. During a Protective Pat Down of the outer clothing of the subject, the officer may not go into
the pockets of the subject or reach underneath the outer surface of the garments. If during
the Protective Pat Down of the outer clothing, the officer touches an object which the officer
NOTE: Protective Pat Downs will be conducted by a member who is the same gender as
the person that is the subject of the Investigatory Stop. If a member of the same
gender is not immediately available, officer and public safety is compromised, and it
is imperative that an immediate search be conducted, members will not endanger
themselves or the public to comply with this requirement. Members will exercise
caution when patting down outer garments of persons of the opposite sex.
B. Pursuant to Minnesota v. Dickerson and People v. Mitchell, the Plain Touch Doctrine allows officers
to seize contraband during a Protective Pat Down after satisfying the following requirements:
1. When conducting a lawful Investigatory Stop and the officer is performing a Protective Pat
Down, if the officer plainly feels an item that, based upon that officer's training and
experience, the officer believes to be contraband, the officer may seize that item and lawfully
charge the person with it.
2. The Plain Touch Doctrine requires officers to satisfy the following three-part test:
a. Investigatory Stops, Probable Cause stops when no other document captures the
reason for the detention, Protective Pat Downs or other searches; and
b. enforcement of the Gang and Narcotics-Related Loitering Ordinances consistent with
the Department directive entitled "Gang and Narcotics-Related Enforcement."
2. The Investigatory Stop Database contains:
a. information concerning the individual temporarily detained for the Investigatory Stop.
b. narrative sections that include a statement of facts to establish Reasonable
Articulable Suspicion in order to justify an Investigatory Stop of an individual and, if
applicable, to justify a Protective Pat Down.
NOTE: Sworn members are required to complete the narrative field in the
Investigatory Stop Database.
3. Sworn members will complete hard copy Investigatory Stop Reports only when the electronic
Investigatory Stop Database is unavailable and after approval is obtained by their immediate
supervisor.
4. Sworn members are responsible for entering all Investigatory Stop Reports created during
their tours of duty into the electronic system as soon as possible but no later than the end of
their tours of duty consistent with Item VIII-B.
a. Sworn members will complete and submit hard copies of the appropriate
Investigatory Stop Report for approval as soon as possible but no later than the end
of their tours of duty;
b. Supervisors will review all hard copy Investigatory Stop Reports created by
subordinates and either approve or return it for correction or other action before the
end of their tours of duty consistent with Item VIII-C-1 of this directive; and
c. Commanding officers of these units will determine the method of data entry and
ensure the information is entered into the Investigatory Stop Database consistent
with Item VIII-B-2 of this directive within a reasonable period of time.
C. Access
1. All Investigatory Stop Database information will be accessible to any sworn Department
member and select civilian members, e.g., Department statistician, for one year after the
initial Investigatory Stop Report was generated.
2. Pursuant to supervisory approval, personnel assigned to the following bureaus will be
allowed access to Investigatory Stop information for three years based upon reasonable,
articulated investigative need:
a. Bureau of Detectives;
b. Bureau of Organized Crime;
c. Bureau of Internal Affairs.
NOTE: The bureau chiefs will establish appropriate record keeping relevant to
access and approval.
3. Other Department members who require access beyond this policy will submit a To-From-
Subject Report through the chain of command to the Director, Information Services Division,
articulating the investigative need for access. If necessary, the Director, Information Services
Division, will consult with the Office of Legal Affairs regarding the requested access.
4. After three years, personal identification data contained within the Investigatory Stop
Database will be deleted pursuant to Information Services Division practice and record-
retention requirements, statutory or judicial. Therefore, no member will have access to
personally identifying data from those Investigatory Stop Reports.
NOTE: The aggregate data from an Investigatory Stop event, such as the date,
time, and address of occurrence, in addition to the descriptive racial and
demographic data, will be retained by Information Services Division.
VIII. PROCEDURES
A. Investigatory Stop/Probable Cause Stop When No Other Document Captures the Reason for the
Detention
1. Sworn members who conduct an Investigatory Stop, Probable Cause stop when no other
document captures the reason for the detention, and, if applicable, a Protective Pat Down or
other search in a public place, are required to submit an Investigatory Stop Report into the
Investigatory Stop Database. All of the factors that support Reasonable Articulable Suspicion
in order to temporarily detain an individual for investigation, Probable Cause when a stop is
made and no other document captures the reason for detention, and, if applicable, all of the
NOTE: For purposes of this directive, "public place" means any place to which the
public or a substantial group of the public has access and includes, but is
not limited to, streets, highways, parks, and the common areas of schools,
hospitals, apartment buildings, office buildings, transport facilities, and
stores.
2. In addition, Investigatory Stop Reports will be submitted for all Investigatory Stops and
Protective Pat Downs that lead to an arrest, Personal Service Citation, Administrative Notice
of Violation (ANOV), Curfew Violation Report, School Absentee Report, or other enforcement
action.
3. Upon the completion of an Investigatory Stop that involves a Protective Pat Down or any
other search, sworn members are required to provide the subject of the stop a completed
Investigatory Stop Receipt. The Investigatory Stop Receipt will include the event number, the
reason for the stop, and the sworn member's name and star number.
EXCEPTION: An Investigatory Stop Receipt will not be provided if the subject of the stop is
arrested.
4. The following examples illustrate instances when Investigatory Stop Reports, Investigatory
Stop Receipts, and other Department reports are required, and are intended to serve as
guidelines that can be applied in various circumstances.
a. An officer performs a traffic stop on a vehicle after observing the vehicle run a stop
sign. The officer issues the driver a Personal Service Citation for failure to stop at a
stop sign, and completes and affixes a Traffic Stop Statistical Study sticker to the
appropriate copy of the Personal Service Citation consistent with the Department
directive "Illinois Traffic and Pedestrian Stop Statistical Study." An Investigatory
Stop Report will not be completed.
b. An officer performs a traffic stop on a vehicle after observing the vehicle run a stop
sign. During the traffic stop, the officer observes various factors that develop
Reasonable Articulable Suspicion that the driver may be "armed and dangerous" or
"presents a danger of attack." The officer conducts a Protective Pat Down on the
driver and the vehicle for weapons. No weapons are discovered. The officer issues
the driver a Personal Service Citation for failure to stop at a stop sign. Due to the
performance of a Protective Pat Down, the officer completes an Investigatory Stop
Report and provides a completed Investigatory Stop Receipt to the driver. The officer
documents on the Investigatory Stop Report the reason for the stop was a traffic
violation, failure to stop at stop sign, and the Reasonable Articulable Suspicion to
justify the Protective Pat Down of the driver and the vehicle. When completing the
Investigatory Stop Receipt, the officer writes "failure to stop at a stop sign" as the
reason for the stop. Additionally, the officer completes and affixes a Traffic Stop
Statistical Study sticker to the appropriate copy of the Personal Service Citation
consistent with the Department directive "Illinois Traffic and Pedestrian Stop
Statistical Study."
c. An officer performs a traffic stop on a vehicle after observing the vehicle run a stop
sign. During the stop, the officer receives a flash message that provides a description
of a wanted offender and vehicle for a theft that just occurred in the area of the traffic
stop. The driver and the vehicle match the description. The officer conducts an
investigation for the theft by questioning the driver regarding his whereabouts at the
time of the theft. The officer determines that he does not have probable cause to
arrest. The officer issues the driver a Personal Service Citation for failure to stop at a
stop sign and completes an Investigatory Stop Report. The officer documents on the
Investigatory Stop Report the initial reason for the stop was a traffic violation, failure
1. Sworn members will submit an electronic Investigatory Stop Report as soon as possible but
no later than the end of their tours of duty by selecting "Automated Investigatory Reports"
from the CLEAR menu.
2. If electronic access to the CLEAR application is not available, after receiving approval from a
supervisor, sworn members will:
c. select "yes" in the Investigatory Stop Database that a hard copy Investigatory Stop
Report was completed.
d. record the ISR number generated by the Investigatory Stop Database onto the hard
copy Investigatory Stop Report.
e. forward the completed, hard copy Investigatory Stop Report to their supervisor
for approval.
3. If electronic access to the CLEAR application continues to be unavailable and is restored
after the sworn member's tour of duty has ended, unit executive officers will determine the
method of data entry and ensure that the Investigatory Stop Report is entered into the
Investigatory Stop Database consistent with Item VIII-B-2 of this directive within a reasonable
period of time.
NOTE: For units without executive officers, the unit commanding officer will
designate a supervisor to perform these duties.
C. Supervisory Responsibilities
a. approve or reject all submitted Investigatory Stop Reports by the end of their tours of
duty.
b. review and ensure Investigatory Stop Reports are properly completed and conform to
Department policy.
(1) Supervisors are responsible for ensuring that members properly document in
the narrative sections of all (electronic and hard copy) Investigatory Stop
Reports:
(1) personally inform the preparing sworn member of the reason for the
disapproval or rejection;
(4) instruct the preparing sworn member to address the error and resubmit the
Investigatory Stop Report by the conclusion of the member's tour of duty.
(5) verify submission of the corrected Investigatory Stop Report and approve as
appropriate.
e. forward all hard copy Investigatory Stop Reports to the district review officer or
member designated by the unit commanding officer for records retention.
2. District review officers or members designated by unit commanding officers will, on a daily
basis, forward all hard copy Investigatory Stop Reports, via the Police Documents Section, to
the Records Inquiry Section (Unit 163), Records Division, for records retention.
a. ensure supervisors are properly reviewing and approving all submitted Investigatory
Stop Reports.
b. ensure the submission of Investigatory Stop Reports into the CLEAR system is
monitored in order to ensure that the review and approval process is timely.
c. ensure all approved hard copy Investigatory Stop Reports are forwarded, via the
Police Documents Section, to the Records Inquiry Section (Unit 163), Records
Division, for records retention.
d. conduct monthly internal audits of Investigatory Stop Reports to ensure compliance
with this directive and submit a report of their findings to the commanding officer. If
ten or less Investigatory Stop Reports are completed during the audit period, the
executive officer will submit a negative report.
e. take appropriate action if any deficiencies are noted. If supervisory approvals do not
conform to Department policy, the executive officer will take appropriate action
(reviewing the policy with the member, recommending training, initiating progressive
discipline where warranted, etc.). Additionally, the executive officer will forward and
document the action taken in a To-From Subject Report to the Commanding Officer,
Integrity Section, Inspections Division.
NOTE: In units without executive officers, the unit's exempt commanding officer will
designate a supervisor to perform these duties. These duties do not apply to
administrative units.
4. On a daily basis, commanding officers and executive officers will be accountable for the
proper implementation of this directive.
X. RETENTION
A. Pursuant to 705 ILCS 405/1-7, entitled "Confidentiality of Law Enforcement Records," juvenile
Investigatory Stop Reports will be filed and retained separately from adult Investigatory Stop Reports.
B. The Director, Records Division, will dispose of both electronic and hard copy Investigatory Stop
Reports consistent with this and other applicable Department directives, applicable court orders, and
the law.
C. All Investigatory Stop Reports, electronic and hard copy, will be retained for a period of six months
after the completion of the Illinois Traffic Stop Statistical Study (TSSS).
1. all hard copy Investigatory Stop Reports three years and older will be purged.
2. all personal identifying information entered into the electronic database three years and older
will be purged.
E. All hard copy Investigatory Stop Reports and personal identifying information contained within the
database generated after the TSSS retention period and beyond will be retained for a period of three
years from the date the Investigatory Stop Report was generated.
NOTE: Pursuant to a court order entered in Hall, et al. v. City of Chicago, et al., 12 C 6834, the
Chicago Police Department and its members are ordered to preserve all data in the
Investigatory Stop System and to preserve ALL hard copies of Investigatory Stop Reports
until further notice.
Eddie T. Johnson
Superintendent of Police
17-067 DK
GLOSSARY TERMS:
1. Investigatory Stop
A limited search during an Investigatory Stop in which the sworn member conducts a pat down of the
outer clothing of a person for weapons for the protection of the sworn member or others in the area. If,
during a Protective Pat Down of the outer clothing, the sworn member touches an object which the
sworn member reasonably believes is a weapon, the sworn member may reach into that area of the
clothing and retrieve the object. A Protective Pat Down is not a general exploratory search for
evidence of criminal activity.
Reasonable Articulable Suspicion is an objective legal standard that is less than probable cause but
more substantial than a hunch or general suspicion. Reasonable Articulable Suspicion depends on the
totality of the circumstances which the sworn member observes and the reasonable inferences that
are drawn based on the sworn member's training and experience. Reasonable Articulable Suspicion
can result from a combination of particular facts, which may appear innocuous in and of themselves,
but taken together amount to reasonable suspicion.
Reasonable Articulable Suspicion should be founded on specific and objective facts or observations
about how a suspect behaves, what the subject is seen or heard doing, and the circumstances or
situation in regard to the suspect that is either witnessed or known by the officer. Accordingly,
Reasonable Articulable Suspicion must be described with reference to facts or observations about a
particular suspect's actions or the particular circumstances that an officer encounters. The physical
characteristics of a suspect are never, by themselves, sufficient. Instead, those characteristics must
be combined with other factors, including a specific, non-general description matching the suspect or
the observed behaviors of the suspect.
NOTE: An Investigatory Stop and a Protective Pat Down are two distinct actions—
both require independent, Reasonable Articulable Suspicion (i.e., to stop a
person there must be reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, and to stop a
person and perform a Protective Pat Down of the person, there must be
reasonable suspicion of criminal activity and reasonable suspicion that the
person is armed and dangerous or presents a danger of attack).
4. Probable Cause
Probable cause exists where the police have knowledge of facts that would lead a reasonable
person to believe that a crime has occurred and that the subject has committed it. This differs
from Reasonable Articulable Suspicion in that the facts supporting RAS do not need to meet
probable cause requirements, but they must justify more than a mere hunch. The facts should
not be viewed with analytical hindsight but instead should be considered from the perspective
of a reasonable officer at the time that situation confronted him or her.
When a sworn member is conducting a lawful Protective Pat Down of a suspect’s outer clothing for
weapons and encounters an object that, based upon their training and experience, the sworn member
believes that the object is contraband, the sworn member may seize the item without a warrant. The
object may not be manipulated in order to determine the identity of the object.
In making routine or spontaneous law enforcement decisions, such as investigatory stops, traffic stops
and arrests, Chicago Police Department officers may not use race, ethnicity, color, national origin,
ancestry, religion, disability, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status,
military discharge status, financial status, or lawful source of income to any degree, except that
officers may rely on the listed characteristics in a specific suspect description.
By fostering an environment where procedural justice principles become standard practice, the
Department can create an organizational culture that fosters a true partnership with the public and
leads to safer and more prosperous communities.
8. Public Place
Any place to which the public or a substantial group of the public has access and includes, but is not
limited to, streets, highways, parks, and the common areas of schools, hospitals, apartment buildings,
office buildings, transport facilities, and stores.
NAME (Last, First, Middle) NICKNAME(S) DATE OF BIRTH AGE / EST. AGE
ADDRESS OF RESIDENCE (Number/Direction/Street Name/Apt./Floor/City/State/Zipcode) HOME PHONE NO. CELL PHONE NO.
SEX HEIGHT WEIGHT BUILD EYE COLOR HAIR COLOR HAIRSTYLE COMPLEXION
WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING DO YOU BELIEVE IS THE RACE OF THE PERSON STOPPED? RELATED ISR NO. (To Identify Associates)
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN HISPANIC OR LATINO AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
WHITE ASIAN NATIVE HAWAIIAN OR OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
CLOTHING TYPE/COLOR SCARS/MARKS/TATTOOS FACIAL HAIR RECORDED:
IN-CAR VIDEO
BODY WORN CAM.
EMPLOYER'S NAME EMPLOYER'S ADDRESS
MISSION NO. BOC-I NO. HOT SPOT NO. RD NO. (If Related) GANG/NARCOTIC RELATED DISPERSAL TIME NO. DISP.
ENFORCEMENT YES
(AS IN S10-02-03) NO
DISPOSITION OF THE STOP: IF YES, CHECK APPLICABLE BOX BELOW. CITED VIOLATIONS/CHARGES
ENFORCEMENT ACTION ARREST PERSONAL SERVICE CITATION (CIT. #)
TAKEN? OTHER
YES NO ANOV (CIT. #) (Specify)
GANG INFORMATION SECTION (COMPLETE THIS SHADED SECTION ONLY IF INCIDENT/SUBJECT HAS GANG INVOLVEMENT):
GANG/FACTION GANG KNOWN HANG-OUTS
WAS A PROTECTIVE PAT DOWN WHAT WERE THE REASONABLE ARTICULABLE SUSPICION FACTORS THAT LED TO THE PROTECTIVE PAT DOWN
CONDUCTED? YES NO (Check all that apply. All checked items must be described in the Investigatory Stop Narrative on Side 2):
WAS PROTECTIVE PAT DOWN VERBAL THREATS OF VIOLENCE BY SUSPECT VIOLENT CRIME SUSPECTED
BASED ON CONSENT? KNOWLEDGE OF SUSPECT'S PRIOR CRIMINAL VIOLENT
BEHAVIOR/USE OF FORCE/USE OF WEAPON SUSPICIOUS BULGE/OBJECT
YES NO
ACTIONS INDICATIVE OF ENGAGING IN OTHER REASONABLE SUSPICION OF WEAPONS
RECEIPT GIVEN? YES NO VIOLENT BEHAVIOR
WAS A WEAPON OR CONTRABAND DISCOVERED AS A RESULT OF THE PROTECTIVE PAT DOWN? YES NO IF YES, DESCRIBE BELOW.
FIREARM COCAINE Wgt. HEROIN Wgt. OTHER Describe:
OTHER WEAPON Describe: CANNABIS Wgt. OTHER CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE Describe below:
STOLEN PROPERTY ALCOHOL DRUG PARAPHERNALIA Wgt.
WAS A SEARCH BEYOND A PROTECTIVE PAT DOWN CONDUCTED OF THE PERSON? YES NO
WAS A SEARCH BEYOND A PROTECTIVE PAT DOWN CONDUCTED OF HIS/HER EFFECTS? YES NO
WAS THE SEARCH BEYOND CONDUCTED BY CONSENT? YES NO IF NO, EXPLAIN THE BASIS FOR AND ALL THE REASONS THAT LED TO
THE SEARCH BEYOND A PROTECTIVE PAT DOWN IN THE NARRATIVE
WAS CONTRABAND FOUND AS A RESULT OF THE SEARCH? YES NO IF YES, DESCRIBE BELOW.
FIREARM COCAINE Wgt. HEROIN Wgt. OTHER Describe:
OTHER WEAPON Describe: CANNABIS Wgt. OTHER CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE Describe below:
STOLEN PROPERTY ALCOHOL DRUG PARAPHERNALIA Wgt.
INVESTIGATORY STOP NARRATIVE (Must include all factors that support Reasonable Articulable Suspicion or Probable Cause to justify the stop, all factors that
support Reasonable Articulable Suspicion to justify the Protective Pat Down, and the basis and all reasons that led to the search beyond a Protective Pat Down)
ISR NO.
DISTRIBUTION: Forward original report to the Records Division.
FIRST OFFICER'S NAME AND STAR NO. SECOND OFFICER'S NAME AND STAR NO.
REVIEWING SUPERVISOR NAME AND STAR NO. FOR A REJECTED ISR, COMPLETE AN
APPROVED REJECTED INVESTIGATORY STOP REPORT
DEFICIENCY NOTIFICATION (CPD-11.914).
CPD-11.910 (REV. 7/17) SIDE 2
INVESTIGATORY STOP RECEIPT Event
CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT No.
You were the subject of an Investigatory Stop by the Chicago Police Department.
Officer
(Print) Name Star No.
Officer
(Print) Name Star No.
Reason(s) for the Stop (Check all that apply).
ACTIONS INDICATIVE OF ENGAGING IN DRUG TRANSACTION
THE ABOVE-REFERENCED INVESTIGATORY STOP REPORT WAS REJECTED BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING:
SUBMITTED HARD COPY OF THE INVESTIGATORY STOP REPORT DOES NOT MATCH THE ELECTRONIC VERSION SUBMITTED
IN THE INVESTIGATORY STOP DATABASE.
INVESTIGATORY STOP REPORT SUBMITTED IN ERROR. OFFICER'S ACTIONS DID NOT REQUIRE THE SUBMISSION OF AN
INVESTIGATORY STOP REPORT AS SPECIFIED BY DEPARTMENT POLICY.
IF AN INTERVIEW WITH THE PREPARING OFFICER REVEALS THAT THE INVESTIGATORY STOP, PROTECTIVE PAT DOWN, OR OTHER TYPE OF
SEARCH WAS NOT JUSTIFIED, OR THAT AN INVESTIGATORY STOP REPORT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED, INSTRUCT THE OFFICER NOT
TO RESUBMIT THE INVESTIGATORY STOP REPORT. THE INVESTIGATORY STOP REPORT WILL REMAIN IN REJECTED STATUS FOR CLEARANCE
BY THE INTEGRITY SECTION OF THE BUREAU OF ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT.
ACTION(S) TAKEN
CPD-11.914 (Rev. 9/18) Scan and email to [email protected], Attention: Commanding Officer of the Integrity Section,
Bureau of Organizational Development. Retain original in district/unit.
9/5/2019 Incident Reporting Guide - CPD-63.451
5. OFFENSE CODE - This column indicates the I-UCR offense code to be used
when applicable.
C. DEFINITIONS
1. Assault incidents, without exception, involve the use of force and do not
involve any actual contact between the victim and offender. All unsuccessful
attempts at force by an offender that do not involve a deadly weapon (e.g.
attempting to punch someone or throwing a stone at another person but no
one is actually struck) should be classified as an assault. All successful
attempts at force by an offender that do involve a deadly weapon another (e.g.
shooting a firearm at person but no one is actually struck) should be classified
as an aggravated assault.
2. Battery incidents, involve only those cases when actual physical contact is
made between the victim and offender. In selecting the proper battery
classification, members should be aware of three possible aggravating factors:
directives.chicagopolice.org/directives/data/a7a57bf0-12d7196c-11f12-d71a-3c76ad6f2c11950a.html 1/5
9/5/2019 Incident Reporting Guide - CPD-63.451
c. There was contact made with the victim during the attack (including
minor contact or injury) AND the victim was a police officer or other,
protected employee.
D. NOTES
2. INDEX CRIMES - IUCR Codes for the Index Crimes are listed by category as
follows:
directives.chicagopolice.org/directives/data/a7a57bf0-12d7196c-11f12-d71a-3c76ad6f2c11950a.html 2/5
9/5/2019 Incident Reporting Guide - CPD-63.451
d. Hashish - A dark brown resin that is collected from the tops of potent
cannabis sativa. It is at least five times stronger than marijuana.
4. LOCATION CODES - Select the most precise code from the following:
directives.chicagopolice.org/directives/data/a7a57bf0-12d7196c-11f12-d71a-3c76ad6f2c11950a.html 5/5