1 Your name

2 Your address
[City, ST ZIP Code]
3

5 [COURT NAME]
6

7
[PLAINTIFF'S NAME], Case No.: [Number]
8
Plaintiff,
9
NOTICE TO MOTION
10 vs.
OBJECTION/CONTESTING
11 SHOWING FACTS THIS COURT
[DEFENDANT'S NAME],
OR TRIBUNAL IS NOT WITHIN
12
Defendant/Father FEDERAL TERRITORY DEFINED
13 UNDER 42 USC SECTION 1301(A)
(1) AND THEREBY LACKED
14
JURISDICTION FOR CHILD
15 SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
16
UNDER TITLE IV-D OF THE
SOCIAL SECURITY ACT USC
17 SECTION 651-669(b) AND MUST
18 DISMISS THE ORDER OF
SUPPORT TO COMPLY WITH
19
THE FACTS
20

21

22 NOTICE TO MOTION
23
OBJECTION/CONTESTING SHOWING FACTS THIS COURT OR
24
TRIBUNAL IS NOT WITHIN FEDERAL TERRITORY DEFINED UNDER
25
NOTICE TO MOTION OBJECTION/CONTESTING SHOWING FACTS THIS COURT OR TRIBUNAL IS NOT
WITHIN FEDERAL TERRITORY DEFINED UNDER 42 USC SECTION 1301(A)(1) AND THEREBY
26
LACKED JURISDICTION FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT UNDER TITLE IV-D OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ACT USC SECTION 651-669(B) AND MUST DISMISS THE ORDER OF SUPPORT TO COMPLY
WITH THE FACTS - 1
 1 42 USC SECTION 1301(A)(1) AND THEREBY LACKED JURISDICTION
2
FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT UNDER TITLE IV-D OF THE
3

4 SOCIAL SECURITY ACT USC SECTION 651-669(b) AND MUST

5 DISMISS THE ORDER OF SUPPORT TO COMPLY WITH THE FACTS

6

10 1. Comes Now, the Defendant/Father [type in your name, not in capital letters
11
and remove brackets] is a living man with blood running through his body
12

13
and a citizen of the state1 presenting a record of facts within the Notice of

14 Motion for Objection and Contesting the state child support enforcement
15
agency is not within federal territory defined under 42 USC Section 1301(a)
16

17 (1) term State2 and thereby must dismiss order of support issued under Title
18
IV-D of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 651 et seq.).
19
1

20
“In the Constitution the term state most frequently expresses the combined idea just noticed, of
21 people, territory, and government. A state, in the ordinary sense of the Constitution, is a political community of free
citizens, occupying a territory of defined boundaries, and organized under a government sanctioned and limited
22 by a written constitution, and established by the consent of the governed.” Texas v. White, 74 US 700 - Supreme
Court 1869
2
23

24 (1) The42
State term
U.S.“State”, except Definitions
Code § 1301. where otherwise provided,
(a) When used includes the District of Columbia and the
in this chapter—
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and when used in subchapters IV, V, VII, XI, XIX, and XXI includes the Virgin
Islands and Guam.
25
NOTICE TO MOTION OBJECTION/CONTESTING SHOWING FACTS THIS COURT OR TRIBUNAL IS NOT
WITHIN FEDERAL TERRITORY DEFINED UNDER 42 USC SECTION 1301(A)(1) AND THEREBY
26
LACKED JURISDICTION FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT UNDER TITLE IV-D OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ACT USC SECTION 651-669(B) AND MUST DISMISS THE ORDER OF SUPPORT TO COMPLY
WITH THE FACTS - 2
 1 2. It is a fact the defendant/Father [Type in your name and address and then
2
delete brackets] is a living Man with blood flowing through his body and is a
3

4 citizen of the state3 and thereby the court must issue a dismissal for the fact
5
the plaintiff did not meet the constitutional minimum of standing by
6

7
showing the Defendant/Father caused an injury in fact.4

9 3. It is an adjudicated fact this state in the ordinary sense of the Constitution, is

10
a political community of free citizens, occupying a territory of defined
11
boundaries, and organized under a government sanctioned and limited by a
12

13 written constitution, and established by the consent of the governed, and

14

15

16 3

17 “In the Constitution the term state most frequently expresses the combined idea just noticed, of
people, territory, and government. A state, in the ordinary sense of the Constitution, is a political community of free
18 citizens, occupying a territory of defined boundaries, and organized under a government sanctioned and limited
by a written constitution, and established by the consent of the governed.” Texas v. White, 74 US 700 - Supreme
19 Court 1869
4

20
“Over the years, our cases have established that the irreducible constitutional minimum of
21 standing contains three elements. First, the plaintiff must have suffered an "injury in fact"—an invasion of a legally
protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized, see id., at 756; Warth v. Seldin, 422 U. S. 490, 508
22 (1975); Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U. S. 727, 740-741, n. 16 (1972);[1] and (b) "actual or imminent, not
`conjectural' or `hypothetical,' " Whitmore, supra, at 155 (quoting Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U. S. 95, 102 (1983)).
23 Second, there must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of—the injury has to be
"fairly. . . trace[able] to the challenged action of the defendant, and not . . . th[e] result [of] the independent action
24 of some third party not before the court." Simon v. Eastern Ky. Welfare Rights Organization, 426 U. S. 26, 41-42
(1976). Third, it must be "likely," as opposed to merely "speculative," that the injury will be "redressed by a
favorable decision." Id., at 38, 43” Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 US 555 - Supreme Court 1992.
25
NOTICE TO MOTION OBJECTION/CONTESTING SHOWING FACTS THIS COURT OR TRIBUNAL IS NOT
WITHIN FEDERAL TERRITORY DEFINED UNDER 42 USC SECTION 1301(A)(1) AND THEREBY
26
LACKED JURISDICTION FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT UNDER TITLE IV-D OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ACT USC SECTION 651-669(B) AND MUST DISMISS THE ORDER OF SUPPORT TO COMPLY
WITH THE FACTS - 3
 1 thereby this state cannot interfere with the Defendant/Father’s liberty for the
2
care, custody, and control of his offspring.5
3

4
4. This state court is sanctioned and limited by the adjudicated fact Troxel v.
5

6 Granville, 530 US 57 - Supreme Court 20006 and thereby this state court is
7
sanctioned from entering an order that causes interference with parents'
8

9 fundamental liberty interest in the care, custody, and management of their

10
children. challenging the court and thereby the state court is prohibited under
11
due process of law to rely upon any presumptions.
12

13

14
5. This motion for objection is a record showing this court must issue a

15 dismissal for lack of jurisdiction for the fact the state child support agency is
16
not a IV-D Agency because it is not located within the territorial boundaries
17

18 of the State7 defined under definitions 42 USC Section 1301(a)(1) and

19
5

20
"[T] he interest of parents in the care, custody, and control of their children—is perhaps the
21 oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by [the Supreme Court.]" Keates v. Koile, 883 F.3d 1228,
1235-36 (9th Cir. 2018) (quoting Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65 (2000) (plurality opinion)).
22 6

23
"[T] he interest of parents in the care, custody, and control of their children—is perhaps the
24 oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by [the Supreme Court.]" Keates v. Koile, 883 F.3d 1228,
1235-36 (9th Cir. 2018) (quoting Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65 (2000) (plurality opinion)).
7
25
NOTICE TO MOTION OBJECTION/CONTESTING SHOWING FACTS THIS COURT OR TRIBUNAL IS NOT
WITHIN FEDERAL TERRITORY DEFINED UNDER 42 USC SECTION 1301(A)(1) AND THEREBY
26
LACKED JURISDICTION FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT UNDER TITLE IV-D OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ACT USC SECTION 651-669(B) AND MUST DISMISS THE ORDER OF SUPPORT TO COMPLY
WITH THE FACTS - 4
 1 therefore without federal jurisdiction to issue support under Title IV-D of the
2
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 651 et seq.).
3

4
6. This motion for objection is a record8 showing this court must issue a
5

6 dismissal for lack of jurisdiction for the fact the state child support agency is
7
not a IV-D agency because it is not located within the federal territorial
8

9 boundaries of the State9 defined under definitions 42 USC Section 1301(a)

10
(1) District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and when
11
used in subchapters IV, V, VII, XI, XIX, and XXI includes the Virgin
12

13 Islands and Guam.

14

15

16

17

18 State 42 U.S. Code § 1301. Definitions (a) When used in this chapter—
(1) The term “State”, except where otherwise provided, includes the District of Columbia and the
19 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and when used in subchapters IV, V, VII, XI, XIX, and XXI includes the Virgin
Islands and Guam.
8
20

21 Record
Record means information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic
22 or other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form.
9

23
State 42 U.S. Code § 1301. Definitions (a) When used in this chapter—
24 (1) The term “State”, except where otherwise provided, includes the District of Columbia and the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and when used in subchapters IV, V, VII, XI, XIX, and XXI includes the Virgin
Islands and Guam.
25
NOTICE TO MOTION OBJECTION/CONTESTING SHOWING FACTS THIS COURT OR TRIBUNAL IS NOT
WITHIN FEDERAL TERRITORY DEFINED UNDER 42 USC SECTION 1301(A)(1) AND THEREBY
26
LACKED JURISDICTION FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT UNDER TITLE IV-D OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ACT USC SECTION 651-669(B) AND MUST DISMISS THE ORDER OF SUPPORT TO COMPLY
WITH THE FACTS - 5
 1 7. This motion for objection is a record10 showing this court must issue a
2
dismissal for lack of jurisdiction for the fact the state child support agency is
3

4 not a IV-D agency because it is not located within the federal territorial
5
boundaries of the State11 defined under definitions 42 USC Section 1301(a)
6

7
(1) District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and when

8 used in subchapters IV, V, VII, XI, XIX, and XXI includes the Virgin
9
Islands and Guam and therefore without federal jurisdiction to issue
10

11 withholding of income12 under title IV-D of the Social Security Act, 42

12
U.S.C. sec 666(b)(8).
13

14
8. This motion for objection is a record showing this court is not located
15

16 within the State defined under 42 USC Section 1301(a)(1) is a fact and proof

17 10

18 Record
Record means information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic
19 or other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form.
11

20
State 42 U.S. Code § 1301. Definitions (a) When used in this chapter—
21 (1) The term “State”, except where otherwise provided, includes the District of Columbia and the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and when used in subchapters IV, V, VII, XI, XIX, and XXI includes the Virgin
22 Islands and Guam.
12

23
Withholding of income 42 USC § 666(b)(8) For purposes of subsection (a) and this subsection,
24 the term “income” means any periodic form of payment due to an individual, regardless of source, including wages,
salaries, commissions, bonuses, worker’s compensation, disability, payments pursuant to a pension or retirement
program, and interest. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/666
25
NOTICE TO MOTION OBJECTION/CONTESTING SHOWING FACTS THIS COURT OR TRIBUNAL IS NOT
WITHIN FEDERAL TERRITORY DEFINED UNDER 42 USC SECTION 1301(A)(1) AND THEREBY
26
LACKED JURISDICTION FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT UNDER TITLE IV-D OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ACT USC SECTION 651-669(B) AND MUST DISMISS THE ORDER OF SUPPORT TO COMPLY
WITH THE FACTS - 6
 1 the state child support agency is not located within the territorial boundaries
2
of District of Columbia, lacks federal jurisdiction to prosecute or subject the
3

4 Defendant/Father to legal process13 under Title IV-D of the Social Security

5
Act (42 U.S.C. § 651 et seq.).
6

7
9. This motion for objection is a record showing this court is located within the
8

9 territory boundaries of this state and is sanctioned and limited by a written

10
state constitution and hereby cannot cause the deprivation of rights of free
11
citizens of this state with unalienable rights.
12

13

14
10. This motion for objection is a record showing this court is located within

15 the territory boundaries of this state and is sanctioned and limited by a

16
written state constitution and hereby take judicial notice of evidence of an
17

18 adjudicated fact Byars v. United States, 273 U.S. 28 (1927), it is the duty of
19
courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against
20

21

22

23 13

24
Legal process 42 USC § 659(i)(5) The term “legal process” means any writ, order, summons, or
other similar process in the nature of garnishment— https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/659
25
NOTICE TO MOTION OBJECTION/CONTESTING SHOWING FACTS THIS COURT OR TRIBUNAL IS NOT
WITHIN FEDERAL TERRITORY DEFINED UNDER 42 USC SECTION 1301(A)(1) AND THEREBY
26
LACKED JURISDICTION FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT UNDER TITLE IV-D OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ACT USC SECTION 651-669(B) AND MUST DISMISS THE ORDER OF SUPPORT TO COMPLY
WITH THE FACTS - 7
 1 any stealthy encroachments thereon 14 and thereby must dismiss the order of
2
support.
3

4
11.This objection is a record showing the Defendant/Father never expressed or
5

6 implied consent to enter into a contractual relationship with the state agency
7
operating under a state plan for child and spousal support deriving a benefit
8

9 and waiving rights secured by a written state constitution the does not have a
10
support obligation.
11

12
12.This objection is a record showing there is no obligation,15 which means an
13

14
established duty, whether or not fixed, arising from an express or implied

15 contractual, grantor-grantee, or licensor-licensee relationship, for a fee-based

16
or similar relationship, from statute or regulation, or from the retention of
17

18 any overpayment.
19
14
20

21 “It is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any
stealthy encroachments thereon” Byars v. United States, 273 U.S. 28 (1927)
15
22

23 Obligation 42 USC § 1320a-7a(s)

For purposes of subsection (o), the term “obligation” means an established duty, whether or not
24 fixed, arising from an express or implied contractual, grantor-grantee, or licensor-licensee relationship, for a fee-
based or similar relationship, from statute or regulation, or from the retention of any overpayment.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/666
25
NOTICE TO MOTION OBJECTION/CONTESTING SHOWING FACTS THIS COURT OR TRIBUNAL IS NOT
WITHIN FEDERAL TERRITORY DEFINED UNDER 42 USC SECTION 1301(A)(1) AND THEREBY
26
LACKED JURISDICTION FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT UNDER TITLE IV-D OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ACT USC SECTION 651-669(B) AND MUST DISMISS THE ORDER OF SUPPORT TO COMPLY
WITH THE FACTS - 8
 1 13. This objection is a record showing proof the Defendant/Father’s physical
2
appearance was coerced by a notice to appear which contained implied
3

4 threats of arrest, license suspension, and default judgment and thereby the
5
Defendant/Father’s appearance was not voluntary, but under duress and
6

7
grounds for fraud.

10 THIS COURT OR TRIBUNAL IS SANCTIONED AND

11
LIMITED BY A WRITTEN STATE CONSTITUTION AND MUST ISSUE A
12
DISMISSAL OF ORDER OF SUPPORT AND DISMISSAL OF
13

14 PROCEEDINGS FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCMENT IN RESPONSE

15
TO THE FACTS PRESENTED PROVING THE COURT LACKS
16

17 PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND LACKS FEDERAL JURISDICTION TO

18
PROSECUTE THE DEFENDANT FOR CHILD SUPPORT
19
ENFORCEMENT UNDER TITLE IV-D OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT
20

21 (42 U.S.C. § 651 et seq.) AND WITHOLDING OF INCOME UNDER 42

22
U.S.C. § 666(b)(8)
23

24
.
25
NOTICE TO MOTION OBJECTION/CONTESTING SHOWING FACTS THIS COURT OR TRIBUNAL IS NOT
WITHIN FEDERAL TERRITORY DEFINED UNDER 42 USC SECTION 1301(A)(1) AND THEREBY
26
LACKED JURISDICTION FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT UNDER TITLE IV-D OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ACT USC SECTION 651-669(B) AND MUST DISMISS THE ORDER OF SUPPORT TO COMPLY
WITH THE FACTS - 9
 1

5
Dated this [day] of [Month], [year].
6

8
Your Name
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
NOTICE TO MOTION OBJECTION/CONTESTING SHOWING FACTS THIS COURT OR TRIBUNAL IS NOT
WITHIN FEDERAL TERRITORY DEFINED UNDER 42 USC SECTION 1301(A)(1) AND THEREBY
26
LACKED JURISDICTION FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT UNDER TITLE IV-D OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ACT USC SECTION 651-669(B) AND MUST DISMISS THE ORDER OF SUPPORT TO COMPLY
WITH THE FACTS - 10