Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A.F. Sanchez Brokerage, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals PDF
A.F. Sanchez Brokerage, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals PDF
_______________
* THIRD DIVISION.
428
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001424834c0415ef673ae000a0082004500cc/t/?o=False 1/15
11/12/13 CentralBooks:Reader
in reversing and setting aside the decision of the trial court based on
its finding that petitioner is liable for the damage to the cargo as a
common carrier. What petitioner is ascribing is an error of
judgment, not of jurisdiction, which is properly the subject of an
ordinary appeal.
Same; Same; Where the issue or question involves or affects the
wisdom or legal soundness of the decision—not the jurisdiction of
the court to render said decision—the same is beyond the province of
a petition for certiorari.—Where the issue or question involves or
affects the wisdom or legal soundness of the decision—not the
jurisdiction of the court to render said decision—the same is beyond
the province of a petition for certiorari. The supervisory jurisdiction
of this Court to issue a cert writ cannot be exercised in order to
review the judgment of lower courts as to its intrinsic correctness,
either upon the law or the facts of the case.
Civil Law; Common Carriers; Appellate court did not err in
finding petitioner, a customs broker, to be also a common carrier, as
defined under Article 1732 of the Civil Code.—The appellate court
did not err in finding petitioner, a customs broker, to be also a
common carrier, as defined under Article 1732 of the Civil Code, to
wit: Art. 1732. Common carriers are persons, corporations, firms or
associations engaged in the business of carrying or transporting
passengers or goods or both, by land, water, or air, for
compensation, offering their services to the public.
Same; Same; Article 1732 does not distinguish between one
whose principal business activity is the carrying of goods and one
who does such carrying only as an ancillary activity.—Article 1732
does not distinguish between one whose principal business activity
is the carrying of goods and one who does such carrying only as an
429
CARPIO-MORALES, J.:
_______________
431
_______________
432
_______________
17 Id.,at p. 17.
18 Records at p. 32.
19 TSN, March 24, 1994 at pp. 26-27.
20 Records at p. 33.
21 Ibid.
22 Ibid.
23 Id.,at pp. 34-36.
24 Id.,at p. 36.
25 Id.,at pp. 35-36.
433
On August 4, 1992, 26
the Hizon Laboratories Inc. issued a
Destruction Report confirming that 38 x 700 blister packs
of Femenal tablets, 3 x 700 blister packs of Femenal tablets
and 3 x 700 blister packs of Nordiol tablets were heavily
damaged with water and emitted foul smell.
On August 5, 1992,27
Wyeth-Suaco issued a Notice of
Materials Rejection of 38 cartons of Femenal and 3 cartons
of Nordiol on the ground that they were “delivered to Hizon
Laboratories with heavy water damaged (sic) causing the
cartons to sagged28
(sic) emitting a foul order and easily
attracted flies.” 29
Wyeth-Suaco later demanded, by letter of August 25,
1992, from Sanchez Brokerage the payment of P191,384.25
representing the value of its loss arising from the damaged
tablets.
As the Sanchez Brokerage refused to heed the demand,
Wyeth-Suaco filed an insurance claim against FGU
Insurance which paid Wyeth-Suaco the amount of
P181,431.49 in settlement of its claim under Marine Risk
Note Number 4995. 30
Wyeth-Suaco thus issued Subrogation Receipt in favor
of FGU Insurance.
On demand by FGU Insurance for payment of the
amount of P181,431.49 31
it paid Wyeth-Suaco, Sanchez
Brokerage, by letter of January 7, 1993, disclaimed
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001424834c0415ef673ae000a0082004500cc/t/?o=False 6/15
11/12/13 CentralBooks:Reader
_______________
26 Id.,at p. 37.
27 Id.,at pp. 38-39.
28 Ibid.
29 Id.,at p. 40.
30 Id.,at p. 109.
31 Id.,at pp. 134-135.
32 Id.,at p. 134.
434
_______________
435
_______________
38 Id.,at p. 42.
39 Id.,at p. 51.
436
_______________
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001424834c0415ef673ae000a0082004500cc/t/?o=False 9/15
11/12/13 CentralBooks:Reader
(1997).
41 Land Bank of the Philippines v. Court of Appeals, 409 SCRA 455,
482 (2003).
437
ATTY. FLORES:
Q: What are the functions of these license brokers, license
customs broker?
WITNESS:
As customs broker, we calculate the taxes that has to be
paid in cargos, and those upon approval of the importer,
we prepare the entry together for processing and claims
from customs and finally deliver
43
the goods to the
warehouse of the importer.
_______________
42 Id.,atpp.482-483.
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001424834c0415ef673ae000a0082004500cc/t/?o=False 10/15
11/12/13 CentralBooks:Reader
438
_______________
45 Art. 1733. Common carriers, from the nature of their business and
for reasons of public policy, are bound to observe extraordinary
diligence in the vigilance over the goods and for the safety of the
passengers transported by them, according to all the circumstances of
each case.
xxx
46 Art. 1735. In all cases other than those mentioned in Nos. 1, 2, 3,
4, and 5 of the preceding article, if the goods are lost, destroyed or
deteriorated, common carriers are presumed to have been at fault or to
have acted negligently, unless they prove that they observed
extraordinary diligence as required on Article 1733.
47 164 SCRA 685 (1988).
48 Id., at p. 692.
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001424834c0415ef673ae000a0082004500cc/t/?o=False 11/15
11/12/13 CentralBooks:Reader
439
_______________
49 Records at p. 132.
50 Id.,at p. 32.
51 Id.,at pp. 102-104.
52 Id.,at pp. 105-107.
53 Rolloat p. 10.
54 Id.,at p. 9.
55 Art. 1734. Common carriers are responsible for the loss,
destruction, or deterioration of the goods, unless the same is due to any
of the following causes only:
xxx
(4) The character of the goods or defects in the packing or in the containers;
56 Calvo v. UCPB General Insurance Co., Inc., 379 SCRA 510, 520
(2002).
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001424834c0415ef673ae000a0082004500cc/t/?o=False 12/15
11/12/13 CentralBooks:Reader
440
_______________
57 Rollo at p. 34.
58 Id.,at p. 36.
59 Ibid.
60 TSN, December 2, 1994 at p. 25.
441
ATTY. FLORES:
Q: Was there any instance that a shipment of this nature,
oral contraceptives, that arrived at the NAIA were
damaged and claimed by the Wyeth-Suaco without any
question?
WITNESS:
A: Yes sir, there was an instance that one cartoon (sic)
were wetted (sic) but Wyeth-Suaco did not claim
anything against us.
ATTY. FLORES:
Q: HOW IS IT?
WITNESS:
A: We experienced, there was a time that we experienced
that there was a cartoon (sic) wetted (sic) up to62 the
bottom are wet specially during rainy season.
_______________
442
vs. Tolentino-Genilo
Judgment affirmed.
——o0o——
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001424834c0415ef673ae000a0082004500cc/t/?o=False 15/15