Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Written Reply To 7 11 Application

    Uploaded by

    Neelam Shujahuddin
    7K views2 pages
    1) The document is a reply filed on behalf of the plaintiff/respondent in response to an application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC by the defendant/applicant. 2) It raises 6 preliminary objections to the application, arguing that it lacks the basic ingredients required under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and has been filed to harass and pressurize the respondent. 3) On facts, it denies the assertions made in each paragraph of the application. 4) It prays that the application be dismissed with costs.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Written Reply to 7 11 Application

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    ODT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) The document is a reply filed on behalf of the plaintiff/respondent in response to an application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC by the defendant/applicant. 2) It raises 6 preliminary objections to the application, arguing that it lacks the basic ingredients required under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and has been filed to harass and pressurize the respondent. 3) On facts, it denies the assertions made in each paragraph of the application. 4) It prays that the application be dismissed with costs.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as ODT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as odt, pdf, or txt
    7K views2 pages

    Written Reply To 7 11 Application

    Uploaded by

    Neelam Shujahuddin
    1) The document is a reply filed on behalf of the plaintiff/respondent in response to an application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC by the defendant/applicant. 2) It raises 6 preliminary objections to the application, arguing that it lacks the basic ingredients required under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and has been filed to harass and pressurize the respondent. 3) On facts, it denies the assertions made in each paragraph of the application. 4) It prays that the application be dismissed with costs.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as ODT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as odt, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    IN THE COURT OF MR.

    MUBASSHIR HUSSAIN CHISHTI, CIVIL JUDGE, (EAST)


    ISLAMABAD

    In the matter of:

    ABC Versus XYZ

    Suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction

    Application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC

    REPLY OF APPLICATION U/O 7 RULE 11 CPC ON BEHALF OF


    PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT

    Respectfully sheweth:

    PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS

    1. That the application lacks basic ingredients regarding Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, hence is liable to
    be dismissed.
    2. That the applicant has filed the instant application just to harass and pressurize the
    respondent/plaintiff.
    3. That the application is baseless, false and frivolous and has been filed malafidely and is liable to
    be dismissed summarily.
    4. That the above titled application is not fulfilling the requirements of Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C
    hence is liable to be dismissed.
    5. That the above titled application is also against the law and facts and judgment of the superior
    court and needs to be dismissed and the Respondent/Plaintiff is entitled to costs & special costs.
    6. That the petitioners want to linger the matter and as a result are wasting the precious time of this
    Honourable Court.

    ON FACTS:

    1. That Para No.1 of the application needs no reply.


    2. That Para No.2 of the application is incorrect hence denied. The Plaintiffs have no cause of
    action or locus standi to file the instant suit which is also clearly disclosed by the
    Respondent/Plaintiff in the plaint.
    3. That Para No.3 of the application is incorrect hence denied.
    4. That Para No.4 of the application is incorrect hence denied. The suit of the Respondent/Plaintiff
    is not barred by any law and no ingredients of Order 7 Rule 11 of C.P.C can be attracted to the
    instant suit/plaint.
    5. That Para No.5 of the application is incorrect, hence vehemently denied.
    6. That Para No.6 of the application is incorrect, hence vehemently denied.
    PRAY E R :

    It is therefore, respectfully prayed that the instant application may kindly be dismissed with costs.

    RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF

    Through

    NEELAM AGHA SHUJAH-UD-DIN

    Advocate High Court

    LL.M. (London. UK)

    You might also like