Family Law in Zambia - Chapter 10 - Adoption
Family Law in Zambia - Chapter 10 - Adoption
CHAPTER 10
ADOPTION
Ordinarily, the rights and duties of parents over their children are inalienable.
Parents have been defined to include legal guardians; and under customary law and
concept of extended family the term parent1 includes any person for the time being
with custody of a child and providing the child parental care.
Adoption in Zambia is governed by the Adoption Act Cap 54 of the Laws of Zambia.
It is therefore a creation of statute. Under customary law on the other hand a child
belongs to everybody in the extended family and does not have to be formally
adopted through the Court system. The physical move of a child from its natural
parents to any member of the extended family is simply by agreement between the
“parents”, and whosoever is in physical custody of the child exercises parental
rights over the child. The concept of inalienability of rights does not exist.
Definitions
By section 3(2) an adoption order may be made on the application of two spouses
authorizing them jointly to adopt the infant.
By section 3 (3) a mother or father may also adopt her /his child alone or jointly
with her /his spouse. This provision covers cases of step – parents (mother or
father)
By section 4 (a) only a person who has attained the age of 25 and is at least 21
years older than the infant may adopt a child
Or by section 4 (b) if the adopter is a relative of the child she /he must have
attained the age of 21 unless, by Section 4 (c) the applicant is the mother or father
of the infant.
Infant is defined in Section 2 as a person who has not attained the age of 21.
A relative is also defined in S.2 as meaning grand – parent, brother, sister, aunt,
uncle, whether of full blood, of half blood or by affinity, and includes, where the
infant is illegitimate, the father of the infant and any person who would be a relative
of the infant if the infant was the legitimate child of his / her natural mother and
father.
A sole applicant who is male may not adopt a female infant unless there are special
circumstances to the satisfaction of a court of competent jurisdiction, that is, the
High Court or Subordinate Court as provided by section 10.
(a) Without the consent of parent or guardian, or body with parental responsibility of the infant e.g.
orphanage, welfare office, adoption society
203
(b) unless both parties, or the other party (would-be step mother or father) consents.
Section 4 (5) requires that the infant must be resident in Zambia and she/he must
have continually been in the care and possession of the applicant for at least three
consecutive months immediately preceding the date of the order; and the applicant
must have notified the Commissioner for Juvenile Welfare of his/her intention to
adopt the infant. Consent will be dispensed with where a parent or guardian has
abandoned, neglected or ill-treated the infant, or persistently neglected to maintain
or contribute to the maintenance of the infant.
Section 5 (1) of the Adoption Act Cap 54 provides that the Court may dispense with
any consent required by section 4 (4)(a) if it is satisfied
(a) in the case of a parent or guardian of the infant, that he has abandoned, neglected, or persistently ill –
treated the infant
(b) in the case of a person liable by virtue of an order or agreement to contribute to the maintenance of the
infant, that he has persistently neglected or refused so to contribute;
(c) in any case, that the person whose consent is required cannot be found or is incapable of giving his
consent or that his consent is unreasonably withheld
By Section 5 (2) the court may dispense with the consent of the spouse of an
applicant for an adoption order if satisfied that the person whose consent is to be
dispensed with cannot be found or is incapable of giving his consent or that the
spouses are separated and are living apart and that the separation is likely to be
permanent
By section 6 (5) (a) and (b) a mother may not give an effective consent to the
adoption of her infant until it is at least, six weeks old, and unless the document
purporting to be her consent is attested on that date in the prescribed manner. The
rationale for this would appear to be to give mothers sufficient time to be certain
about giving away their infant children. The balance of the mind of the mother may
be disturbed as an effect of giving birth, or by lactation consequent on the birth of
child. Some mothers get so disturbed as to commit the offence of infanticide i.e.
killing of the infant.
It also gives them time to be prepared for court proceedings in case their presence is
necessary in order to answer questions from Court about the nature and effect of
having the infant adopted. The Court is required to ensure that both parties
understand the full implications of an adoption order.
Further, if a child is old enough to understand, the Court is expected to ensure that
the child is made fully aware of the effect of the adoption order, and will grant it
204
only if it is in the best interest of the child. This is in compliance with the United
Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) 1989
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) 1989, provides
in Article 21 that:
“States Parties that recognize and / or permit the system of adoption shall ensure that the best interests of
the child shall be the paramount consideration”…
The Court is assisted by the Commissioner of Juveniles who, upon receiving notice
of an application for adoption, instructs a social welfare officer to carry out an
investigation into the suitability of the adoptive parents, having regard to their living
conditions, standard of living (ability to adequately feed, clothe, educate and
medically cover the child). The Court examines the sources of income of the
adoptive parents, including any real property, shares, annuities, bonds, stability of
a job, directorship of a company, and the like.
Section 11(4) provides that the Registrar General shall, in addition to the Adopted
Children’s Register and the index thereof, keep other registers and books, and make
such entries therein, as may be necessary to record and make traceable connection
between any entry in the Register of Births which has been marked “Adopted” and
any corresponding entry in the Adopted Children Register, but such other registers
and books and indeces thereof shall not be open to the public nor may any search
be conducted therein except by order of the High Court.
The provisions of the Adoption Act enable a curious child to trace his or her natural
parents, and to be in contact with them. This is more usual with adult children.
However, a safe-guard is placed by section 11(4) in case of children who may have
been unwanted, or dumped, as it would clearly not be in their best interest to know
that their natural parent or parents did not want them. The secrecy or concealment
of such information may in other cases have devastating effect on the self-identity of
the child and may adversely affect relations with the adoptive parents.
“Upon an adoption order being made, all rights, duties, obligations and liabilities
of the parents or guardians of the infant in relation to the future custody,
maintenance and education of the infant, including all rights to appoint a
guardian and to consent or give notice of dissent to marriage, shall be
extinguished, and all such rights, duties, obligations and liabilities shall vest in
and be exercisable by and enforceable against the adopter as if the infant were a
child born to the adopter in lawful wedlock, and in respect of the matters
205
aforesaid the infant shall stand to the adopter exclusively in the position of a
child born to the adopter in lawful wedlock.”
In the case of an adoptive parent or adopted child dying intestate, property shall
devolve to the parent or the child in all respects as if the adoptive parent or the
adopted person were natural parents and child. The Intestate Succession Act Cap
59 and the Wills and Administration of Testate Estates Act, Cap 60, both define a
child as “a child born in or out of marriage, an adopted child, a child who is conceived
but not yet born”.3
1. the parental responsibility which any person had immediately before the
making of the order, ceases
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1 See Chapter 9 Supra
2 See Chapter 8 Supra
3 see Chapter 13 below
4. the child is treated as if she/he were not the child of any person other than the
adopters
5. the child who was illegitimate at birth becomes a legitimate child of the
adopters from the date of the adoption order
6. That child assumes the name of the adopters and has a right to the nationality
of the adopters. Right to the nationality of the adoptive parents is not
automatic. This depends on the laws governing the adopters. In the United
Kingdom, a child adopted by a British citizen under the British Nationality Act
1981, becomes a British citizen from the date of the order. However adoption
overseas, e.g. in Zambia, by a British citizen does not confer automatic British
citizenship on the child or infant with respect to the names of the adopted
child
7. the child has a right to inherit from the adoptive parents as if they were his or
her natural parents unless a contrary intention appears in terms of S.15 (2)
though this defeats the “paramountcy” principle
8. The child has a right to the name of the adopters. The requirement for the
name by which the child shall be known is to be found in the prescribed “form
5” used to make the adoption Order. The adopters indicate therein, the child’s
206
new names, but this is not categorical as the Act does not specifically provide
that the child shall assume the surname of the adopters
9. Extinction of natural parental rights and vesting them in the adopters parents
means all rights to consent to marriage are of the adopters.
10. maintenance orders and orders as to custody of the child will be made to a
spouse as if the child was the natural child of the adopters
12. any affiliation orders in respect of an illegitimate child for the benefit of the
child (by the natural father) cease, but any sums unpaid on the day of the
order ie arrears, remain payable
13. Article 21 of the UNCRC provides that a system of adoption shall ensure
that the best interests of the child shall be paramount. The Bill of Rights in the
Constitution of Zambia has anti – discriminatory provisions, but these are not
guaranteed as S.23(4) allows discrimination in the area of personal laws with
respect to adoption, marriage, divorce, burial, devolution of property and other
rights.
In Part V, the Act provides for the registration and operation of adoption societies.
People who wish to adopt a child may make arrangements for adoption through an
adoption society which is lawfully established and registered.
Guardianship
Guardianship is a legal term or concept that confers duties and responsibilities over
children during their minority
R v Birmingham Juvenile Court exp G [1990] 2 QB 573 & [1989] 3 AER 336
on the guardian’s general duties to safeguard the interest of the child
Foster parent
Foster parent, on the other hand, need not have legal guardianship if a parent is
dead or is unfit to exercise his / her responsibilities. It is clearly essential that
someone else stands in their place as loco parentis to the child. This gives them
only de facto care of the child but they can eventually apply for guardianship if they
wish. This does not exempt the foster parents from public scrutiny and regulation.
The foster parents are as cares are expected to ensure that the child’s welfare is
satisfactory and a welfare officer may be charged with a duty to oversee the parents
and give them advice.
Foster parents are granted an order as such, to live with the child and can adopt if
they decide to. The act of adoption gives parental responsibility. Mere guardianship
or foster parenthood does not. There is a common law on the, however, to afford
protection, and willful neglect may result in criminal liability
Held:
i) The applicant did not fully understand the effect of the adoption
ii) The adoption order made on the 9th January, 1974 is therefore revoked.
Statutes referred to:-
The Adoption Act. Cap 54
For the applicant: Mr K Musaba of Messrs Mung’omba Associates
as the adoptees) to revoke the adoption Order made some 26 years ago, on 9 th
January, 1974.
The adoption Order was signed by the Assistant registrar, one J L Daka and
not the Judge. This put me on inquiry and I wanted to look at the file relating
to this adoption. I was told it was retrieved from the archives but got misplaced
in the Principal Registry. Fortunately, Mr Willa Mung’omba of Mung’omba
Associates who acted for the applicant’s father had his file relating to this
Adoption still intact and he let me peruse it. From the file I was satisfied that
the Adoption Order was made by the Honourable Chief Justice B A Doyle.
The ground upon which the applicant wants the adoption Order revoked is that
the biological parents of the Adoptees at that time did not understand the effect
of the adoption. According to the applicant, adoption meant to them that the
applicants’ parents were taking the adoptees as tutors only and to assist in the
bringing up of the adoptees without causing disruption in the relationship
between the parents and the Adoptees. The parents of the Adoptees never
intended to give up their parental rights.
The Adoption Order has appeared after the death of the Adoptees’ grand father
and both Adoptees have sworn affidavits that the effect of the adoption Order is
to create abnormal relationship where there own mother is now their sister and
their grandmother is now their mother. The sisters born to their mother after
remarriage are now their nieces. This has caused pain and stress in the family.
Mr Musaba, learned Counsel for the applicant made a submission on the line of
the affidavits.
I agree the Adoption Order has created abnormal relationships. But that
cannot be the reason upon which the Order can be revoked. Mr Musaba
submitted that there was no consent. I looked at the file shown to me by Mr
Mung’omba. The file shows that all the necessary consents were obtained and
that the procedure relating to adoption under the Laws of Zambia was followed.
However, I give the applicant the benefit of doubt and find that perhaps at the
time of the adoption she did not fully understand the effect of adoption, more
209
so that the Adoptees were not being adopted by a stranger to the family but by
their own grandfather and grandmother. Accordingly, I grant the application
and I revoke the Order of adoption of the Adoptees made on 9th January 1974.