Quality Assurance Plan: Global Infra Solutions
Quality Assurance Plan: Global Infra Solutions
Consultants:
Global Infra Solutions National Highways & Infrastructure
Development Corporation Ltd.
in JV with Dhruv Consultancy Services Limited and (Ministry of Road Transport & Highways)
association with Infycons Creative Software Pvt. Ltd.
Government of India
PTI Building, 3rd Floor, 4, Parliament Street,
F-2, E-8/11A, Sukhsagar Apartment, Trilanga, Bhopal -462039 New Delhi-110001
e: [email protected] web: globalinfrasolutions.org
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY, PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR MAWNGAP (ON OLD NH 44E) - MAWPHLANG -
LAITMUSIANG - MAWKYRWAT - RANGTHONG - NONGNAH - DIRANG - KHADPHRA (RANIKOR) (NEAR BANGLADESH BORDER) IN STATE OF MEGHALAYA
DISCLAIMER
This report is confidential and is provided solely for the purposes of presenting the Quality
Assurance Plan for executing design works for the concerned project. This report is
provided pursuant to a Consultancy Agreement between M/s Global Infra Solutions
JV Dhruv Consultancy Services Ltd. and National Highways & Infrastructure Development
Corporation Limited (“NHIDCL”) under which M/s Global Infra Solutions JV Dhruv Consultancy
Services Ltd. undertook to conduct Feasibility study and prepare detailed project report for
Mawngap (on old NH 44E) - Mawphlang - Laitmusiang - Mawkyrwat - Rangthong - Nongnah - Dirang -
Khadphra (Ranikor) (near Bangladesh Border) in the state of Meghalaya. This report is strictly
limited to the matters stated in it and subject to the various assumptions, qualifications and limitations in
it and does not apply by implication to other matters. M/s Global Infra Solutions JV Dhruv
Consultancy Services Ltd. makes no representation that the scope, assumptions, qualifications and
exclusions set out in this report will be suitable or sufficient for other purposes nor that the content
of the report covers all matters which you may regard as material for your purposes. This report must
be read as a whole. Any subsequent report must be read in conjunction with this report.
The report supersedes all previous draft or interim reports, whether written or presented orally, before
the date of this report. This report has not and will not be updated for events or transactions occurring
after the date of the report or any other matters which might have a material effect on its contents, or
which come to light after the date of the report. M/s Global Infra Solutions JV Dhruv Consultancy
Services Ltd. is not obliged to inform you of any such event, transaction or matter nor to update the
report for anything that occurs, or of which M/s Global Infra Solutions JV Dhruv Consultancy Services
Ltd. becomes aware, after the date of this report.
Unless expressly agreed otherwise in writing, M/s Global Infra Solutions JV Dhruv Consultancy Services
Ltd. does not accept a duty of care or any other legal responsibility whatsoever in relation to this
report, or any related inquiries, advice or other work, nor does M/s Global Infra Solutions JV Dhruv
Consultancy Services Ltd. make any representation in connection with this report, to any person other
than NHIDCL. Any other person who receives a draft or a copy of this report (or any part of it) or
discusses it (or any part of it) or any related matter with M/s Global Infra Solutions JV Dhruv
Consultancy Services Ltd., does so on the basis that he or she acknowledges and accepts that he or she
may not rely on this report nor on any related information or advice given by M/s Global Infra
Solutions JV Dhruv Consultancy Services Ltd. for any purpose whatsoever.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................. 6
2 QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICIES, SYSTEMS AND PROCEDURES ................................................... 6
2.1 General ............................................................................................................................................................................. 6
2.2 Quality Policy ................................................................................................................................................................... 6
2.3 Management Responsibility ........................................................................................................................................... 6
2.4 Quality Systems ............................................................................................................................................................... 6
2.5 Contract Review ............................................................................................................................................................... 6
2.6 Design Control .................................................................................................................................................................. 6
2.7 Document and Data Control .......................................................................................................................................... 6
2.8 Process Control of Project Activities ............................................................................................................................. 6
3 TRAFFIC SURVEYS ......................................................................................................................... 6
3.1 Number and Location of Survey Stations .................................................................................................................... 6
3.2 Manpower and Responsibility ....................................................................................................................................... 6
3.3 Applicable Codes / Standards ..................................................................................................................................... 6
3.4 Regulatory Requirements ............................................................................................................................................... 6
3.5 Safety / Environmental Considerations ....................................................................................................................... 6
3.6 Training.............................................................................................................................................................................. 6
3.7 Data Verification ............................................................................................................................................................. 6
3.8 Documentation .................................................................................................................................................................. 6
3.9 Work Procedure .............................................................................................................................................................. 6
3.10 Proposed Number and Locations of Traffic Survey Stations ................................................................................. 6
3.10.1 General................................................................................................................................................................... 6
3.10.2 Proforma for Recording Data ............................................................................................................................. 6
4 INVENTORY & CONDITION SURVEYS FOR HIGHWAYS & STRUCTURES ....................................... 6
4.1 Manpower and Responsibility ....................................................................................................................................... 6
4.2 Equipment.......................................................................................................................................................................... 6
4.3 Applicable Standards / Codes ..................................................................................................................................... 6
4.4 Regulatory Requirements ............................................................................................................................................... 6
4.5 Safety / Environmental Considerations ....................................................................................................................... 6
4.6 Training.............................................................................................................................................................................. 6
4.7 Data Verification ............................................................................................................................................................. 6
4.8 Documentation .................................................................................................................................................................. 6
4.9 Work Procedure .............................................................................................................................................................. 6
4.10 Proforma for recording data ...................................................................................................................................... 6
5 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS .............................................................................................................. 6
5.1 Global Position Survey (Gps) Stations ......................................................................................................................... 7
5.2 Intermediate Reference Pillars ...................................................................................................................................... 7
5.3 Setting Up Instrument on Station ................................................................................................................................... 7
TABLE INDEX
Table 5.1: Survey Booking Sheet --------------------- 20
Table 5.2: Tentative Survey Code List --------------------- 21
Table 5.3: Daily Traverse / Topo Checklist --------------------- 24
Table 10.1: Design Verification Report --------------------- 42
Table 10.2: Review Report --------------------- 43
Table 10.3: Revision Details --------------------- 44
Table 11.1: Overall Development Plan --------------------- 45
Table 11.2: Technical Interface of Major Activities --------------------- 46
Table 11.3: Standard Drawing Size --------------------- 48
Table 11.4: Roads and Highways Discipline --------------------- 50
Table 11.5: Roads & Highways Discipline Checklist for Survey Data --------------------- 51
Table 11.6: Minutes of Meeting --------------------- 52
Table 11.7: Checklist for Plan and Profile Drawing --------------------- 53
Table 13.1: Checklist for Resettlement Survey --------------------- 65
Table 15.1: Pre-Qualification Matrix --------------------- 68
Table 15.2: Qualification Criteria - Part A: Organizational Soundness --------------------- 69
Table 15.3: Qualification Criteria - Part B: Quality --------------------- 70
Table 15.4: Qualification Criteria - Part C: Service Capability --------------------- 70
1 INTRODUCTION
The Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) for “Feasibility study and prepare detailed project
report for Mawngap (on old NH 44E) - Mawphlang - Laitmusiang - Mawkyrwat - Rangthong - Nongnah -
Dirang - Khadphra (Ranikor) (near Bangladesh Border)LQWKHVWDWHRIMeghalaya” is essentially
intended to assist the project team to carry out the various project-related activities in conformity
with the contractual and technical requirements as per Technical schedules, IRC Standards,
MORT&H Specifications and Terms of Reference (TOR) as given in the Contract Agreement.
The overall aim of the QAP is to eliminate errors rather than detect errors so that deliverables are
of required quality and can be submitted within the agreed time frame. QAP is in conformation
with quality standards and in consonance with the declared quality policy of $QDQGMLZDOD
,QIUD $GYLVRU\. All the activities of the project to be undertaken by
$QDQGMLZDOD,QIUD$GYLVRU\ shall be based on the quality assurance system / procedures set outbased
on the Technical Schedules, IRC Standards, BIS Specifications, MORT&H Specifications and
Circulars, sound engineering practices and as approved by the NHIDCL. The QAP is based on the
existing Quality Policy and System Procedures prevalent in the organization and has been suitably
modified to meet the specific project requirements. The QAP shall ensure that all investigations are
controlled from inception and controlled at appropriate levels and the data collected is authorized
and approved before use. Similarly, all designs and reporting documentation shall be subjected to
the rigors of the QAP and ultimately approved by the Team Leader. Quality Assurance
Procedures have been framed for the following activities covering the different stages of the
project:
Traffic Surveys.
Inventory and Condition Survey of Road, Bridges and Culverts.
Topographic Surveys.
Axle Load Survey.
Benkelman Beam Deflection Test.
Soil and Material Investigations.
Geo-technical and sub-soil Investigations.
Checking, approval and Filing of Calculations.
Design, Drawing and Documentation.
Identification and Traceability of Project Documents.
2.1 GENERAL
In this chapter, the quality policy, the management responsibility, the quality systems and
procedures etc. under which all the projects undertaken by the Company are executed, are briefly
brought out in the following paragraphs to provide the overall idea about the general systems and
controls which are going to be adopted for quality assurance of this project.
The responsibility undertaken by $QDQGMLZDOD ,QIUD $GYLVRU\ for implementation of the quality
assurancesystem includes: -
¾ Definition of responsibility and authority of the various team members such as job title /
objective, principal responsibilities / duties, the lines of communication, etc.
¾ Provision and maintenance of adequate and appropriate resources for performance,
verification and management.
¾ Designation of Project Coordinator at Head Office vested with the authority and responsibility
for ensuring that the Quality Systems for various activities as given in the QAP and approved
by Client are implemented and maintained properly.
¾ Arranging design reviews by suitable personnel not directly involved in the particular activity.
¾ Conduct of Quality System Audits by suitable independent personnel not responsible in any
way for quality of item to be audited.
¾ Management reviews to assess the suitability and effectiveness of the system and to determine
whether any changes in the procedures or philosophy are warranted to meet current and
future needs.
The quality system adopted by $QDQGMLZDOD,QIUD$GYLVRU\ has been designed to encourage and
reinforcethroughout the organization a Client-oriented quality culture that conforms to the Client’s
agreed requirements and on time.
Level 2 - Training before commencement of activities, on-the-job training and post activities briefing
with interpretation of results to make the sub-professionals and support staff understand the
importance of each data collected from the site and each activity carried out by them.
Level 3 - Independently, random checking of all the field activities, design and drawing activities by
the experts not directly involved with the project and communication with the personnel of Client at
regular interval to take their views, advice and guidelines, timely.
The three-level quality system is depicted in Figure 2.2.
After award of the work, contract review is done by the team leader as to ensure that quality and
scope of services offered to the Client by $QDQGMLZDOD ,QIUD $GYLVRU\ have been adequately
addressed. $QDQGMLZDOD ,QIUD $GYLVRU\ has the capability to meet the contractual requirements
and to resolve thedifferences, if any between the tender and contract requirements.
The design control is essentially intended for controlling all activities of design planning, design
preparation, verification, review and validation so that the final products meet specified requirements.
The various project functionaries engaged in the design work, drawing and preparation of reports
carry this out. The procedure
Includes the following activities:
The quality system of $QDQGMLZDOD ,QIUD $GYLVRU\ provides for a clear and precise procedure for
control ofdocuments for approval, issue, distribution, review and removal of obsolete ones.
$QDQGMLZDOD ,QIUD $GYLVRU\ has established Quality Assurance procedures for planning and
execution of thevarious activities involved in a project.
The quality assurance procedures for the various survey and investigation, as also in the preparation of
designs and drawings are provided in this QAP.
Technical Excellence
Creativity
Client Satisfaction
Innovation
Timely Delivery
Continuous Monitoring
By the immediate supervisor
Level – III and Random checking by the
experts not directly involved
with the Project to ensure
quality, time & economy
The type of traffic surveys and the minimum number of survey stations shall comply with the
minimum requirements specified in the TOR. The exact location for each type of survey shall be finalized
in consultation with the Client.
The surveys will be planned and programmed by the Traffic Expert under overall guidance of the Team
Leader. He will be assisted by a Traffic Engineer who will be directly responsible for controlling the field
operations and quality / collection of field data.
Trained enumerators will be given an orientation of the project requirements prior to start of the survey.
A one-hour dummy counting shall be carried out at the start of the survey to enable the enumerators to
appreciate and understand our requirements.
All the survey teams will carry with them a letter of authority from the Client.
Help of local police will be taken for stopping vehicles while carrying out the O-D Surveys and
Axle Load Surveys.
The Volume Count / OD survey / Axle Load Survey stations will be located where the road is straight
and fairly level and where adequate shoulder space is available for positioning the enumerators, and
for stopping vehicles in the case of O-D survey.
3.6 TRAINING
All the enumerators will be given an orientation about the objective of the project, the purpose of the
survey and the methodology for filling the Performa. The Supervising Engineers will work with the
enumerators on the first day and have periodic checks on the following days till completion.
For each hour of counting, the Supervising Engineer will visit each count station to check whether the
enumerators are entering the data correctly. He will also carry out an independent check himself by
counting at a location away from the survey station for 15 minutes.
At the end of each shift of 8 hours, the Supervising Engineer will make a summary of hourly counts. This
data will be used to check consistency of traffic volumes from day to day of counting with respect to
hourly and daily volumes.
In case of major variations exceeding 20% without any specific reason, the survey will be repeated. All
the field survey data sheets will be filled with identification information like date, day, shift, direction,
weather condition etc. these will be checked and signed by the supervisor.
3.8 DOCUMENTATION
All the filled-up data sheets will be suitably numbered, got stitched and submitted to Traffic Engineer
for data punching and analysis.
The work will be carried out in accordance with the requirement of the relevant standards, or as per the
approved procedure by the Client for items not covered by IRC standards.
Particular attention will be paid for locating the survey stations. These will be located away from urban
influence with due consideration that each survey location represents a section of homogenous traffic.
For the O-D survey, vehicles will be stopped with the help of local police on a random sampling basis. A
sample size of at least 20% will be targeted.
To capture the quantum local traffic in the vicinity of urban areas, additional counts for a day are
planned. The extent of urban influence will also be delineated during this survey so that suitable measures
like providing additional lanes or service roads or bypass could be considered.
3.10.1 GENERAL
The specific details regarding locations of the various traffic surveys as mentioned above shall be
submitted in traffic survey plan after detailed reconnaissance survey of the alignment to be carried out
by the Key Personnel of our Team.
The following key personnel of the consultants will be responsible for the various tasks:
a) Road Inventory
The Team Leader cum Highway Engineer will be responsible, Highway Engineer will assist him.
b) Pavement Condition Survey
The Pavement Specialist assisted by an Assistant Highway Engineer will be responsible for the
task.
c) Inventory / Condition Survey for Bridge / Culverts and other Structures
The Bridge / Structural Engineer assisted by an Assistant Bridge Engineer will be directly
responsible for the job.
d) Hydrology
During this survey the Consultant will try to find out the hydraulic such as HFL, LWL, construction
age of the structure, etc. by the help of enquiry done from the residents. The Bridge Engineer
assisted by Assistant Bridge Engineer will do this job.
e) Load carrying capacity of bridges
This will be done by Bridge Engineer. The assessment of the load carrying capacity or rating of
existing bridges shall be carried out under one or more of the following scenarios:
i) When the design live load is less than that of the statutory commercial vehicle plying or
likely to ply on bridges;
ii) If during the condition assessment survey and supplementary testing the bridge is found
to indicate distress of serious leading about structural functional adequacy and
iii) Design live load is not known nor is the records and drawings available.
The evaluation of the load carrying capacity of the bridge is to be carried out as per IRC-SP:
37 (“Guidelines for Evaluation of Load Carrying Capacity of Bridges”). The analytical and
correlation method shall be used for the evaluation of the load carrying capacity as far as
possible. When it is not possible to determine the load carrying capacity of the bridge using
analytical and correlation method, the same shall be carried out using load testing. The consultant
shall exhaust all other methods of evaluation of strength of bridges before recommending taking
up load testing of bridges. The respective engineers who had carried out the survey will sign all
proforma on which data is collected.
4.2 EQUIPMENT
The Survey / investigation teams will carry with them the following documents:
A flagman with red flag will be used to make vehicles to slow down or stop when any measurement
across the carriageway is made.
4.6 TRAINING
The concerned senior personnel will give an induction course to the Assistant Engineers before start of the
inventory surveys. The concerned senior personnel themselves will carry out the condition survey of the
pavement and structures.
The individual who has collected the data will sign all the data sheets. The concerned senior personnel
will have a check on all the data sheets and countersign these as a measure of authentication.
4.8 DOCUMENTATION
All the data sheets duly signed by the concerned will be suitably stitched in files, labelled and sent to
office for further analysis.
capture and supplemented with ground measurements where necessary. Network survey for
Visual assessment shall be carried out with speed not exceeding 20 km/hr and stopping at
various locations at suitable intervals and wherever necessary, by variations in pavement
conditions. At the points of stoppage, simple measurements using measuring tape, straight edge
shall be carried out to quantify pavement deficiency on a representative basis. Aspects of
pavement conditions assessed include surface defects, rut depth, cracking, potholes, patched
areas, shoulder condition etc. An overall assessment of performance cum serviceability of the
road shall also be done to qualitatively rate the existing pavement and shoulder condition.
The pavement condition shall be measured under the following sub-heads:
Pavement composition (Type, Thickness)
Shoulder condition (Fair/Poor/Failed)
Riding Quality (Speed, quality: G/F/P/VP)
Pavement distress (cracking %, raveling %, Potholes/ Patching (Nos. & %100 m, Rut
depth (None/Moderate/ Severe)
Pavement Edge Drop (mm)
Embankment Condition (Good/Fair/Poor)
Road Side Drain (Non-existing/Partially Functional/Functional)
The distressed condition shall be estimated by carrying out visual condition survey and taking
measurements wherever necessary after dividing each distress mode of the Pavement in nine
categories i.e. Light / Medium / Heavy and each category further sub-divided in three more
categories, e.g. Light distress condition as Light (-) / Light / Light (+). By studying, the pavement
condition of the project road, each category of distress mode shall be given a definite
quantitative value and data sheet prepared in the field in the coded form shall be converted
into the quantitative values.
C. Condition survey of Bridges and Culverts
Bridge Structural Engineer assisted by an Assistant Bridge Engineer will carry this out. The
condition assessment will be carried out in accordance with guidelines given in IRC: SP35. In IRC:
SP35, Inspection proforma for bridges / structures have been provided. The same is applicable
to any kind of distressed structures. Thus, based on the actual condition of the bridges and
structures only the relevant information contained in the proforma will be collected.
D. HFL and LWL bed level of the Drainage Structures
The observed HFL and LWL bed level for all the drainage structures will be ascertained from
the available data records if any or from the local enquiry and from the marks visible on the
structures. Overtopping and submergence for the structures, if any, will also be ascertained
from the available records and from the local enquiry.
E. Site Selection
To evolve an efficient realignment or new bridge/ structure the several possible options will be
studied for arriving at the most viable alignment/site. Following general factors are to be
considered for the evolution of the most viable option:
Objective for realignment/ proposed bridge/ structure.
Safeguarding the environment.
Least disturbance to land use in the area or navigation/ hydrology of the stream.
Cost effectiveness.
Factors controlling the above Criteria are as follows:
Objectives
¾ Accessibility;
¾ Service to Highway users;
¾ Directness of route;
¾ Network connectivity; and
¾ Traffic Demand.
Environment
Proforma for recording data in respect of the following are enclosed as Annexure 4.1 to 4.5
9 Road Inventory.
9 Pavement Condition Survey.
9 Roughness Survey.
9 Inventory and Condition Survey of Culverts.
9 Inventory and Condition Survey of Bridges.
5 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS
The primary traverse shall be established using GPS instruments. GPS control pillars shall be
established generally at about 5km intervals along the preferred alignment. The GPS Pillars shall be
used for horizontal control of the alignment. The level values obtained from GPS instrument shall be
ignored, as the same does not give the desired accuracy. The levels shall be transferred from some
known GTS/reference Bench Mark available near the project site. The levelling shall be done within the
permissible closing error. Each GPS pillar shall be established at locations where they are not likely to
be disturbed and shall be painted.
Intermediate Reference Pillars (Bench Mark Pillars) shall be located generally at an interval of 250m,
alternatively at RHS / LHS edge of the proposed Right of Way (ROW) and connected to the GPS
Control Pillars to establish the Intermediate traverse grid. They shall be properly painted with yellow
paint. Reduced Level (RL), Reference Pillar Number etc. shall be marked on it with red paint. A complete
list of Reference Pillars shall be prepared including x, y and z coordinates of each BM. All detailed
topographic survey shall be carried out with respect to these Intermediate Reference Pillars.
The Intermediate Reference Pillars shall be of size 15cm x 15cm x 45 cm cast in RCC (M15) with a
nail fixed in the centre of the top surface and embedded in concrete up to a depth of 30 cm with
CC M10 Grade (15 cm wide all around). The balance 15 cm above ground shall be painted yellow.
Benchmarks at site shall be established connecting to GTS Bench Marks at an interval of 250 m on
Bench Mark Pillar made of RCC as mentioned above with RL and BM Number marked on it with red
paint.
The Senior Survey Engineer shall inspect all instruments to verify that no damage has occurred in transit.
The instrument shall be then set up as follows:
¾ Set up total station over the station and measure height of instrument.
¾ Fill in top of Detail Survey Booking Sheet.
¾ Filename e.g. 2912PC.FC5
¾ Station number.
¾ Height of instrument.
¾ Date.
¾ Observer (Surveyor).
¾ Page number (start each day on page 1).
¾ Start string number (add 1 to previous station or start at 01 for each new day).
The vertical Collimation shall be checked on the First station for each day in the following manner:
¾ In Face Left sight to a distant well-defined object and record the Vertical circle reading on the
booking sheet.
¾ In fact, right re-sight the same object and again record the Vertical circle.
¾ Add the two readings and subtract 360o.
¾ This difference is Twice the Vertical Collimation Error. This error should be less than 20” to maintain
the required vertical accuracy.
¾ Check that the prism constant is correct for the prisms being used for the Traverse Detail Survey.
¾ Place a mark about 120 m from the station and measure the distance with the 30-metre tape.
¾ Take a reading to the Prism at this point and ensure the horizontal distance is within 5 mm of the
taped distance.
In face left, set 0o00’00” to Back sight station. If using a Prism pole, the chainman shall make sure that
he uses an extra pole to brace the prism pole whilst taking the readings. The extra pole should be held
almost on line with the Total station to allow the Surveyor to be able to see the bottom of the Prism pole
to set his bearing. Two sets of horizontal angles will be measured in face left and face right. All the
horizontal angles of offset points are to be measured in face left only.
The Carrying out of topographical surveys shall be one of the most important and crucial field tasks
under the project. The detailed field surveys shall be carried out using Total Station, Mobile LiDAR system
and Unmanned Aerial System (wherever necessary).
Chalk marks shall be marked on the Road edge every 25 m on straights or very gentle curves or 5
to 10 m on sharp curves to align the string readings. The survey should extend to within 20 m of the
previous survey or half way to the next station
The entire topographical survey from a station proceeds in one direction from left to right or right
to left.
The various aspects of survey are detailed below:
A. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
The data from the topographical surveys shall be available in x, y and z format for use in Mx software
to develop digital terrain model (DTM). Senior Survey Engineer shall be fully responsible for accuracy
and sufficiency of the topographical survey as per TOR. Following shall be adhered to:
(1) Traverse accuracy is 1:20000, (2) Closing loop distance 5cm per km (3) Permissible Levelling error
12Ök.
It shall be assured that the surveys extend a minimum of 30m beyond either side of the centreline of the
proposed divided carriageway or land boundary whichever is more. Wherever larger widening is
proposed, more width shall be surveyed. Junctions survey shall be done up to a length of at least 120m
on the intersecting roads to design junction improvements.
Longitudinal and cross sections for major and minor streams shall be taken as per recommendations
contained in IRC Special Publication No. 13 and IRC: 5 – 1985 with cross sections at 10m interval.
¾ SURVEY
Topographic survey shall be carried out with reference to Intermediate Reference Pillars. The x, y, z co-
ordinates for each station surveyed shall be recorded with respect to the values of traverse stations. All
features shall be accurately picked up and properly coded as explained below. A sketch for surveyed
points with respect to traverse station shall be proposed. The sketch shall include:
x Station positions (including Set up, Back sight, Foresight and Temporary Stations)
x All features with string numbers.
x Any additional information as felt necessary and as directed by the Team Leader/ Highway Design
Engineer.
x A record of the string numbers on the right of the sketch shall be properly kept.
x Any error found in the field shall be recorded on the booking sheet for correction. The following shall
be recorded:
x Point number of error
x The actual error
x The corrected error
¾ CODING
Coding for feature shall comprise of four characters. First two characters shall describe the feature and
last two characters shall mention the string number. The string number i.e. last two characters shall be
alphanumeric starting from 01 to 09, A1 – A9, B0 – B9……. Z0 – Z9, AA-AZ, BA-BZ,…….., ZA-ZZ.
Whenever there is a break in a string, its number shall be changed.
Break shall be introduced in the left & right edges of shoulder due to culverts, bridges etc. While
recording information for a string number, it should be loaded in the sequence of joining them i.e. for
BG01, BG02. Recording of data shall be done either clockwise / anticlockwise as shown in the sketch
below:
BG01 BG01 BG02 BG02
All the surveyed points having the string no. BG01 shall be joined together in the sequence of recording
to draw the first building and all points having code BG02 shall be joined together to draw the second
building i.e. numeric part will indicate the points to be joined to form the detail and descriptive part
indicates the feature. The survey data shall be thoroughly checked before it is processed through Mx
Software.
All the features that are not to be joined (e.g. telephone poles, trees, electricity poles, spot levels etc.),
shall be having their codes in the form p… i.e. the point strings code shall always start with P. No feature
shall have its survey code starting with M, L or G.
Before proceeding to site, surveyor shall consult with Highway Design Engineer and Software Expert,
regarding fixing of string code and do the needful as required for the Mx Highway Design Software.
Normally all heights observed are contour-able. If for some unavoidable reasons any height cannot be
observed correctly then this is to be coded differently so that design engineer can understand that these
points are not to be considered for contouring.
- TOPOGRAPHY
Banks or Side Slopes (Code EB and ET)
x Banks shall be located opposite the chalk marks and any change of direction or grade where
they run parallel to the road.
x When the Banks are not parallel to the alignment, readings every 20 m or change of direction
or grade, whichever is earlier.
x While following a bank that changes direction often, keep the top and bottom readings next
to each other to avoid the lines overlapping.
x Canal (Code CA)
x Canal strings run along the top of the Canal bank
x The location of the string shall be the same as for Top of Banks
Natural Surface points (Code PNSL)
x These points shall be located every 10 m to show high or low points. Natural surface points
x Readings to be taken to the edge of ditch and one reading to the bottom of the ditch.
x Outline of Rocks (Code RO)
x Readings to be taken at edge of rocks to show outline and on reading on the top of the rock.
Electricity, Telephone and Underground utilities
- STRUCTURES
Edge of Buildings (Code BG)
Trees with girth less than 0.3m need not be picked up.
As trees are not be joined i.e. Point string so its code shall be prefixed with P.
The trees can be classified as follows:
0.3m to 0.6m A
0.6m to 0.9m B
0.9m to 1.8m C
> 1.8m D
B. LONGITUDAL SECTIONS
Long section shall be carried out along the centreline of alignment at 25 m intervals sections and at closer
intervals if there is any horizontal curve, sharp vertical curve also at the location of small streams and
intersections etc.
C. CROSS-SECTIONS
• Cross – Sections to be taken @ 50m interval up to full extent on both sides from the centreline
of the alignment.
• The cross-section’s levels shall be taken as necessary to define ground profile, but not exceeding
1 m interval on existing road surface and elsewhere 5m.
• At cross road locations where intersection improvement is anticipated, cross-sections of crossroad
shall be taken at 10m intervals up to 30m each side from centre line of the cross roads or up to
ROW of crossroad, whichever is more. The cross-sections of the cross roads shall be taken up to
a minimum length of 120m.
• At all other crossroad locations of lesser significance, an extra cross-section covering full-
proposed ROW as per the standard practice shall be undertaken.
The distance between the two-offset/ transverse points shall not be more than 5m.
D. CROSS-SECTIONS AT PROPOSED BRIDGE LOCATIONS (LENGTH >6M)
The scope is explained as under:
The string number for CC can be same but for CR, CL, SL, SR & EB it is to be increased as shown
in sketch.
Minimum three cross sections are to be taken at the start of proposed bridge, middle of
proposed bridge and end of proposed bridge. The locations are as marked ‘X’ in the sketch.
The survey of the banks shall be extended 500 meters upstream and downstream from the
bridge for design purpose. A typical bridge survey sketch is shown below. The sketch shall
contain all physical features like high or low lands, vegetation, trees, temporary or permanent
structures etc. on either side of approach road.
Natural surface readings shall be recorded about 50 m beyond the Top of River Banks or HFL
whichever is higher.
High Flood Level (HFL) with date and Lowest Water Level (LWL) shall be recorded from the
marking on any structure nearby or from the local enquiry.
Structure number of the bridge shall be noted down on the field sheet including direction of flow.
To define channel,
cross section shall
be taken at
proposed bridge
location, 250m and
500m up as well as
down streamside
also at change in
direction of the
stream in between,
if required as in the
sketch shown.
For minor waterway less than 30 m length or for undefined waterway, only one such cross-
section will be taken each, over upstream and downstream side.
E. TEMPORARY (TEMP) STATIONS (CODE PSTN)
PLACING STATIONS
x Temporary Stations shall be placed in between two Traverse Stations wherever from one
traverse station adjacent traverse station is not directly visible.
x Before reading on the Temporary Station angle to the reference object shall be checked. This
angle shall be corrected before placing any new stations.
x A final check reading shall be taken to the Back-Sight station after reading to the Temporary
Station.
USING TEMPORARY STATION
x If only a few additional readings are to be taken from the Temporary Station, the previous
booking sheet shall be used; otherwise a new sheet shall be used.
Readings shall be taken to fill additional details.
F. SURVEY MUST CLOSE ONTO A KNOWN STATION ON THE MAIN TRAVERSE
Survey shall be closed on to a known station on the main traverse everyday so that error, if any shall be
verified and rectified on the same day. Next day’s survey shall proceed only after the readings of the
actual x, y and z of the Bench Mark/ Traverse Station and recorded x, y and z values are checked and
verified by the Senior Survey Engineer. If variation is beyond the permissible limits the survey of that
day shall be repeated.
G. SAFETY
It shall be ensured that the field staffs are made aware of their safety while carrying out field surveys
along and across the highway. As and when required, the survey staff shall be supplied with the following
items for use:
Sketch
LINE POINT /
CODE DESCRIPTION LAYER SYMBOL COLOUR
TYPE LINE
CENTRE OF EXISTING
CC EX-CENTERLINE NONE 13 21 L
CARRIAGEWAY
LINE POINT /
CODE DESCRIPTION LAYER SYMBOL COLOUR
TYPE LINE
BM BENCH MARK BM BM 14 0 P
EMBANKMENT-
BE EMBANKMENT BOTTOM NONE 6 21 L
BOTTOM
LINE POINT /
CODE DESCRIPTION LAYER SYMBOL COLOUR
TYPE LINE
PTF TRANSFORMER TF TF 15 0 P
EARTHEN-SHOU-
SHER RIGHT EDGE OF SHOULDER NONE 15 23 L
RIGHT
Structure Item
a) Culverts Inverts
b) Bridges Abutments
Piers
Deck Slab
4 Edit File 12 Additional Survey Required Yes/No
a) Insert Back Sight Codes
b) Insert Station Numbers
c) Type in Back Sight Bearing
d) Correct any errors in file
e) Record Back sight and Foresight
readings on Traverse Booking Sheet
5 Create Neutral File 13 Locality Sketch Plan for the BMs attached
Base station status: At least one base station should run continuously during the entire
operation. Ideally multiple base stations should be running continuously to cover the entire
corridor stretch for which MLS survey is being planned.
Location of base station: While
using multiple base stations, if a
network-based trajectory
correction needs to be achieved,
a minimum of four base stations
should be established in such a
fashion which ideally covers the
entire area where the MLS will
be conducted.
When base stations are established along the corridor linearly, it must be ensured that at
least two base stations are
running at all times, to avoid
redundancy. Preferably the base
stations should be established in a
manner that the start and end
position is covered within base location.
Maximum distance from Base: MLS survey should not be conducted more than 10 Km away from the
nearest base station to ensure the overall kinematic accuracy is limited to centimeter level. The graph
shows the inaccuracies as the distance increases from base
WEATHER CONDITION
Survey should be conducted in a clear sky condition. It should be avoided in overcast condition since the
satellite visibility tends to be poorer during these conditions. In case it is unavoidable to conduct survey
in such condition, a minimum of 3 base stations should log the data at all times during the survey. MLS
Survey should be totally avoided during rains, even drizzles, or when the surface is wet or has water
deposit along the corridor. Laser used in MLS do not work in water and gives void result for these regions.
Also, lot of noise is captured from the sensor when drizzle occurs as the laser returns from short paths.
ESTABLISHING OF GROUND CONTROL POINTS (GCP)
Ground control points should be established along the entire corridor stretch which can be used for MLS
data control and, also act as check point. Few of the guidelines to follow while establishing GCP are
documented below
¾ GCP should be established at such location which will be clearly visible during MLS survey. Some
of the example of suitable location would be – Center of Carriageway, Side of Carriageway,
Existing CD structure parapet, vertical building façade etc.
Though MLS survey has minimum human intervention while capturing the data, still some failsafe measures
should be adhered to ensure the best data possible from the survey mission. The guidelines for the same
are provided below
¾ MLS surveyor should ensure that all the sensors connected to the MLS is reporting correct status
during the data acquisition.
¾ Real time coverage from imagery and LiDAR sensor should be checked. In case, there are road
intersections to be covered where sufficient data is not appearing, additional run should be
done.
¾ Data should be recorded ideally where fix position status is reported from INS sensor in real
time during survey. Shorter stretches not exceeding 250 m where floating position status is
reported can be ignored, if fixed position is available immediately before and after the section.
¾ In places of dense canopy such as forest cover or with heavy urban settlement along both
corridor where multipath errors and non-visibility of sky position is quite natural, following
procedure should be followed
o Vehicle should be parked at open sky position before the start of the section. Recording
for INS should be only carried out during this time with no recording for LiDAR sensor
and cameras.
o All the sensor recording should be turned on, and the vehicle should be run at higher
speeds for the entire section.
o On completion of the section, the vehicle should be stopped at location which has open
sky visibility and the recording for the LiDAR sensor and camera should be turned off.
INS recording should be continued, and user should wait for the position status to report
a fixed solution, before continuing with the survey.
The reason for driving at higher speed at locations having floating or no solution is to ensure
that the drift from the INS is nominal since it is directly proportionate to time. Stoppage at
beginning and end of the section, ensures that the INS drift can be calibrated and corrected
later when the data is combined with base station positions.
Maximum AGL (Above Ground Level) should be adhered as per the guidelines of DGCA
(Directorate General of Civil Aviation). Ideally up to 60m AGL does not require any special
permission from DGCA and ATC (Air Traffic Controller) and fight height should be restricted to
that level.
Flight trajectory should be planned in such a manner that it covers the entire AOI with short base
length to avoid redundant flying. It should be also ensured that the direct line of sight is available
from the launch location to the aircraft during the entire period when the UAS is airborne.
Survey should be planned during such hours when the lighting condition is suitable so that the
exposure from the sensor results in ideal captures where the features are easily identifiable.
Usually the ideal time for survey is in the morning hours.
Before launching the mission, wind speed should be checked. Depending on the endurance
capability of UAS as far as wind resistance capabilities are concerned, the launch should be
scheduled or reschedule.
GPS base station establishment would be guided by the same principle as defined in MLS survey.
In case of fixed wing system, minimum area of landing should be ensured at open space to avoid
accidental landing and damage. In case of VTOL and Hybrid, similar principle should be
followed but the space requirement would be lesser in comparison.
Establishing of ground control points should follow the similar principle as is defined in MLS
except that only surface based GCP should be established. Also, the size of the GCP will be
primarily governed by the sensor resolution and the height at which the flight is being conducted.
Ex. In case AGL of 60m is used and sensor being used has 24 MP resolution, the GCP should be
ideally sized at 15cm x 15cm to be easily identifiable.
Before conducting the actual acquisition, a trial flight should be conducted every time to ensure
that the acquisition is happening as planned and results are appropriate.
There should be an option for return to base option, and the operator should control this feature
and trigger in any outward occasion such as other obstruction in vicinity being noticed (like birds
or other airborne system) to avoid collision and damage to either.
It should be ensured that the UAS is following the planned trajectory as per the schedule. In case
there is a deviation UAS surveyor should immediately take operation, control the UAS and ensure
that the UAS is returned to base using manual control methods.
Point cloud data should be correlated with the survey carried out using Total Station to ensure
that same accuracy is maintained for all modes of survey
Linear features should be marked at location which are clearly visible in the data. Any
ambiguous area should be avoided and later re-confirmed with other means of survey for the
data void.
Existing Center line from the data should be extracted in such a manner that the existing
horizontal curve is clearly identifiable.
Bare-earth extraction should be carried out only after the GCP has been correlated with the
raw point cloud and any transformation which is necessary has been performed on the basis of
GCP data.
In case of bare-earth extraction from the data, if automated or semi-automated software driven
process is used, the data should be verified using section views to confirm whether only ground
points are part of the bare-earth. For this purpose, section view should be created for entire
stretch and each section should be checked visually for anomalies. In case, some problem is
found, information should be corrected manually
Digital Terrain Model (DTM) from the entire bare earth data should be generated and checked
for any abnormal pits or undulation. The same should be verified with the point cloud in full
resolution to identify any wrong identification of feature
All point features such as electric pole, telephone pole, tree etc. should be digitized by selecting
the center location of the feature. If additional attribute needs to be recorded (such as Girth of
tree, type etc.), the same should be simultaneously done.
All the cross-drainage structure features should be digitized in 3D using 3D polyline only and
snap mode to 3D point should be used while digitizing
All the existing ROB, RUB should be digitized in 3D using 3D polyline only and snap mode to 3D
point should be used while digitizing. Clearance information from existing road surface should
be clearly marked and recorded separately as point object with attribute for the clearance
height.
In case, HT wire, telephone wire or electric wire are crossing the existing alignment, the clearance
height from the lowest point (usually sag point) of the line should be measured and recorded as
point object with clearance height as an attribute
While tracing build-up structures, edge to edge should be marked using 2D/3D polyline and
recorded in classified layers as defined in previous section. Sloping roof structure should be
recorded edge to edge only. Additional information such as height of building should be
measured from general ground elevation and recorded as attribute
Structure such as rotary, well, traffic island should be traced with best fitting circle or arc if the
shape is uniform in nature. In case of non-uniform shape, 2D/3D polyline case be used in
combination with arc to pass all points and provide correct depiction
In case of signboards/ Arch gates appearing across alignment, it should be marked with 2D/3D
line. The lowest point of feature should be marked separately as point object with height
attribute.
Axle load surveys shall be conducted at locations as approved by the Client, on random sample
basis to cover traffic in both the directions. The axle load survey shall be carried out for 2 normal days
(24 hours). Trucks of different types/ axle configuration shall be covered and a few representative buses
shall also be weighed. It shall also be ascertained from local enquiries about the exceptional live loads
that have used the highway in the past in order to assess the suitability of the existing bridges to carry
such loads.
The surveys will be under the direct supervision of Traffic Expert. Traffic Engineer will assist him. Help of
local police will be taken to stop and divert the vehicles on to the weigh pads.
6.3 EQUIPMENT
The equipment to be used will be the Free Weight portable vehicle weighing System. The system
comprises 3 elements; a left weighs pad, a right weigh-pad and a remote indicator unit. Only pre-
calibrated equipment having relevant certificate from manufacturer shall be used.
The work shall be carried out in accordance with the provision contained in IRC: 37.2012
The survey team will carry with them the following documents:
The axle load survey station shall be located at the same place as those for O-D survey where the road
is straight and fairly level and where adequate shoulder space is available. The location shall be
sufficiently away from the narrow / weak bridges or congested / urban stretches. Preferably, the
location shall be in an illuminated place like check post etc. Otherwise, temporary lights shall be arranged
for conducting the survey during night.
6.7 TRAINING
Traffic Expert (TE), to conduct the axle load survey. Traffic Expert shall be one having experience of
similar nature for at least 3 projects.
The weight data will be recorded by the TE on the suitable Proforma. At the end of the survey, the data
sheets will be signed on each page by the TE and countersigned by the supervisor as a measure of
authentication of the collected data.
6.9 DOCUMENTATION
All the data sheets shall be submitted to office for data processing and analysis.
The work consists of several activities. The process control checks exercised on these include:
It is proposed to conduct the axle load survey at the same locations as for the O-D survey as police help
is required for both types of surveys. The specific locations for these surveys shall be finalized in
consultation with the Client only after detailed reconnaissance survey is completed.
The structural strength surveys of the existing pavement shall be carried out under the direct
supervision and direction of the Highway cum Pavement Specialist and senior Material Engineer. One
Assistant Engineer will assist them. The Team Leader cum Senior Highway Engineer will provide logistic,
equipment and other support to them to carry out this task in totality and satisfactorily.
The Team will consist of the following persons:
Assistant Engineer - In charge of the BBD Survey Group and for taking temperature readings
Four Labourers - To mark the test point ahead and lift the beam
Two Flagman - For control of Traffic
Truck Driver - Hired for load application and driving of test truck
Car / Jeep - For movement of the Pavement Specialist, Material Engineer, and any other
personnel willing to see the test in progress.
7.2 EQUIPMENT
IRC: 81 – 1997
The Survey team will carry with them the following documents:
Letter of Authority from client and or project proponent to carry out the survey
A list of equipment
A letter of octroi exemption
Six safety cones (red and white striped), three on each side will be put out when the deflection
measurements are being taken. Besides, banners stating “Road Testing in Progress- Keep Distance” will
be posted on the front and rear of the test truck. Further, flagmen with red flags will be positioned on
either side for warning public vehicles for keeping away from the test truck.
7.6 TRAINING
The Assistant Engineers with similar type of experience of conducting Benkelman Beam Deflection Surveys
on at least three projects shall be deputed and the pavement specialist shall give a brief training to
them.
7.8 DOCUMENTATION
All the data sheets will be countersigned by the Highway cum Pavement Engineer and sent to office for
data analysis. Sample proforma attached as Annexure 7.1.
During each hour of testing, a small hole will be made in the un-cracked area of the pavement filled with
glycerol, and the temperature measured and recorded. The Benkelman Beam Deflection readings will
be taken along the outer wheel path as defined in IRC: 81. Alternate test points will be staggered left
and right.
Tyre pressure will be checked and adjusted to 5.6 Kg/cm2 before start of the tests each day.
In the initial period the Pavement Specialist will be present with the group conducting BBD Survey and
afterwards he will be having periodic checks particularly regarding the following aspects:
8.1 REQUIRMENTS
x Identification of quarry sites and borrows areas / source for procuring the various natural
materials including fly ash / slag for use in the project.
x Sampling the materials from the sources and subjecting these to relevant laboratory tests.
x Estimating quantities of materials available for extraction at the various sources
x Evaluation of test results for suitability for incorporation in the various works and making
recommendations on the use of the materials from different sources based on techno-economic
considerations.
x Preparation of quarry and material location charts and Soil/Materials Report for inclusion in
the Bid Documents.
x Preparation of mass haul diagram indicating location of selected borrow areas / sources.
x Make suitable recommendations regarding making good the borrow areas and quarry areas
after exploitation.
The Material cum Geotechnical Engineer shall visit all the potential quarries; borrow areas and other
material sources. Based on his visual inspection, he shall select the sites from where samples will be
collected for laboratory testing. An Assistant Material Engineer and a few labourers will assist him.
The Material cum Geotechnical Engineer assisted by Material Engineer and laboratory technicians who
shall be responsible for all the laboratory tests.
8.3 EQUIPMENT
The equipment shall include hand tools like crowbars, Spades, wedges etc. for collecting representative
samples. The samples will be packed in suitable bags, labelled and sent to laboratory for various tests
on aggregates, soils etc.
Sampling and testing of borrow areas soils; granular materials for sub-base, stone aggregates etc. shall
be as per relevant IS and BIS-standards.
The samples shall be collected after obtaining necessary authorization from the Client or the owner of
the land / quarry.
As the work involves only collection of samples from off-road locations, the safety / environmental
aspects shall not be significant. However, any holes made for sampling shall be levelled and made good
8.7 TRAINING
At the site, experienced personnel shall carry out sampling and for that no formal training is envisaged
but Senior Material Engineer shall strictly undertake the entire laboratory testing under his direct
supervision.
The Material cum Geotechnical Engineer shall verify that samples have been collected in sufficient
quantities from all the potential sources and he will check all the test results received from the laboratory
for compatibility and make an evaluation for suitability / adoption.
8.9 DOCUMENTATION
All the samples shall be suitably labelled in a systematic manner for easy identification. Besides a list
shall also be prepared for checking at various stages.
All the Proforma for recording test results will be suitably numbered for identification and retrieval.
The Proforma for recording results of various tests will be as per the relevant IS standard. A copy of the
Proforma to be used for recording details of quarries / material sources is attached as Annexure 8.1 to
8.6.
The Geo-technical investigations and sub-surface explorations shall be carried out for the
proposed Bridges / Road over Bridges / tunnels / viaducts / interchanges etc., along high embankments
and any other locations as necessary for proper design of the works and all the relevant laboratory and
field tests on soil and rock samples shall also be conducted.
The sub-soil investigations shall start only after getting approval of detailed scheme, for the sub-soil
investigations, from the Client. Besides, the investigations shall also be carried out along high
embankment (height > 6m).
The sub-soil exploration and testing jobs are to be carried out through a sub-soil consultant empanelled
with the MORT&H. 2XU quality system has prescribed procedure for evaluation and procurement
of services of sub-consultants in accordance with the following procedure:
Short-listing of Sub-Consultants.
Issuance of Work order / letter of Appointment to Sub-Consultants.
Verification data / report / results supplied by Sub-Consultants.
Documentation.
9.3 EQUIPMENT
The boring, sampling and testing equipment shall be in accordance with the requirements of the relevant
IS Standards.
Geotechnical Engineer will ensure that all the field instruments are pre-calibrated as per standard
procedures. The measurement and analysis are to be carried out as per the standard operating
procedures. Any deviations from the set procedures are to be recorded in the logbooks.
¾ IRC: 78 – 2000.
The work will start on approval of geotechnical scheme by the Client. The boring team shall carry with
them a list of equipment including identification numbers and approximate cost and a letter for octroi
exemption.
The boring area including the space where the boring equipment is positioned shall be suitably
barricaded with fixed barriers. Suitable banners notifying the working shall be displayed on either side.
The Material cum Geo-Technical Engineer shall pay periodic visits to the boring sites. An Assistant Bridge
Engineer experienced in geo-technical investigations shall be positioned at site for entire duration of the
boring work to have constant check on the work.
The Geotechnical Engineer will examine the results of the sub-surface investigation, for consistency and
compatibility before acceptance.
9.9 DOCUMENTATION
All the data / documents received from the sub-consultants shall be suitably numbered for usage, storage
and retrieval in future.
CALIBRATION
The Geotechnical Engineer will ensure that all the laboratory instruments are pre-calibrated as per
laboratory’s Quality Procedures. The calibration logs are to be properly maintained and be made
available for inspection by the client.
OPERATING PROCEDURES
Before accepting the samples for analysis, the concerned analyst will check for the integrity of the
sample. The measurement and analysis are to be carried out as per the standard operating procedures.
Any deviations from the set procedures are to be recorded in the logbooks.
DATA CHECKS
The concerned laboratory in-charge will check and validate the raw data generated by the laboratory
assistants. To include the analysis of a sample, he is to do the quality check of minimum one sample of
each test result.
The proforma for recording the results of the geotechnical investigations will be as per the relevant IS
standard. A copy of the proforma is attached as annexure 9.1 to 9.3.
10.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this document is to provide guidance to all concerned in verification and
amendment to design calculations.
10.2 ABBREVIATIONS
TL : Team Leader
DE : Discipline Expert
DRC : Discipline Reviewer / Checker
SP : Specialist
10.3 PROCEDURE
10.3.1 GENERAL
The cover sheet of design calculation files shall have all the information relating to the project and the
subject of design calculations.
Each set of design calculations shall have a REVISION DETAILS sheet, which shall be used for control of
revisions. A copy of the related Form is enclosed. In case calculations are prepared in pencil, photocopy
of the same shall be maintained in the calculation / computation file for presentation whenever required
with the verifying authority's signatures in ink of any colour other than black on all Design Calculation
sheets.
All design calculations (except for results of computer outputs shall be prepared by the Specialist(s) of
the respective discipline(s) on Calculations sheet based on the input requirements of the project. The
design calculation file(s) shall be numbered and these shall comply with the compilation requirements
given in DESIGN VERIFICATION AND REVIEW REPORT Form.
The DE shall get the design calculations verified through a DRC. The DRC shall note all the findings of
verification done on DESIGN VERIFICATION REPORT. The non-conforming design calculations along with
the DESIGN VERIFICATION REPORT shall be sent back by the DRC to the originator SP for taking
appropriate action(s).
The designated DRC shall mark all corrections in the design calculations after cutting the incorrect
computations to establish that the same have undergone checking. The record of such calculations with
the corrections shall be maintained. The originating SP shall make the necessary corrections and take
appropriate actions to close all non-conformities by producing the acceptable design calculations. These
corrected calculations shall then be sent again to DRC for review / approval.
The DRC shall re-inspect the corrected calculations and verify the conformances with his / her previous
comments in the manner explained in the forgoing paragraphs.
The verified design calculations shall be reviewed by the DE reconsidering the various aspects mentioned
under checking / verification requirements in REVIEW REPORT.
The conforming calculations shall be marked as APPROVED on the report by the DE. The DE in the
appropriate space shall initial the cover sheets of conforming calculations. Copies or approved
calculations and the compliance report shall be passed onto the TL for maintenance of project records.
If it is required to be submitted to the Client, a concise design calculation shall be written out from the
detailed design calculations, verified and approved by the appropriate functionaries prior to the
submission to the Client.
Any request for acceptance of deviations due to imposition of impracticable requirements by the Client
which cannot be complied with, shall be referred to the TL.
TL shall then coordinate with the Client and obtain necessary concessions. On acceptance of the deviation
by the Client, the TL shall maintain a record of the same.
On receiving the calculations from DE, the TL shall carry out the final inspection and release the
calculations as per laid down procedure. The TL shall retain the record of compliance report of the
drawing laid down as quality records.
In case design calculations are also required to be approved / reviewed by the Client, the cover sheet
of the file shall be clearly marked as FOR APPROVAL OF (CLIENT'S NAME) by the DE. On getting clients
approval, the Status of the same shall be identified as APPROVED BY CLIENT on the cover sheet.
On each amendment in the design calculations, the DE shall update the revision status of calculations in
the Master List(s) and send the copy of the same to the TL for information.
To be filled
To be filled by DRC
by SP
Check List
Yes / No. / Verified Comments (if
NA (please tick) any)
General Legibility
Input
Inputs listed and referenced
Assumptions (if any) documented adequacy
Inputs and assumptions are reviewed for
adequacy and selection
Codes listed with title, number and year of
publication
Critical elements identified for alternative
calculations as appropriate
Output
Correctness of calculations
Conformance to Design basis / criteria /
philosophy
Field test input data used
Validated computer programme used
11.1 GENERAL
$QDQGMLZDOD has laid down consistent and time-tested procedures for control of designs,
drawings and documents and other activities as per International Standards. The objective is to ensure
that the related activities are planned and controlled, the output in the form of designs, drawings and
documents are verified and the final products satisfy the specified project requirements.
The quality assurance system involves several step-by-step procedures, and these are brought out in the
following paragraphs.
For guiding activities on a project, a detailed work plan is prepared. This defines the responsibility for
implementation of the various activities, the time and duration for performing the activities. The codes /
Standards to be followed, the review / verification system, the input resource required the output to
satisfy project requirements etc. The work teams from the various disciplines assigned to the project
prepare their own work plans for their activities consistent with overall development plan.
Table 11.1: Overall Development Plan
Team Leader Cum TL The Client Clients, Heads of various disciplines, project
Senior Highway functionaries, suppliers and external technical
Engineer services.
Environmental ES TL
Specialist
11.3.1 ORGANISATION
As $QDQGMLZDOD ,QIUD $GYLVRU\ is a multi-disciplinary consultant and for operational purposes, it is
divided into number of disciplines, each headed by a Discipline Head (DH). For executing a project,
key personnel (Discipline Expert, i.e. DE and Specialists i.e. SP) are drawn from various disciplines as
appropriate.
11.3.2 TECHNICAL INTERFACES
The technical interfaces of the major activities have been identified as under:
Table 11.2: Technical Interface of Major
Topographic survey, design location and deck level of bridges, social and
Geometric Design
environmental impact assessment, and traffic forecast.
Quantity / Cost
Detailed design and drawings, environmental / social impact mitigation costs.
Estimation
Economic /
Project costs
Financial
On receipt of survey data, the same shall be plotted in AutoCAD. The checking of data shall include the
following:
11.5 DRAWINGS
The TL shall decide and coordinate with the different key personnel whenever required for deciding the
size(s) of drawings to be adopted in the project considering scale requirements as per TOR and IRC
Standards. The drawings shall be of standard size(s) as mentioned in the following table:
Table 11.3: Standard Drawing Size
1 A0 (840mm x 1188mm)
Sincere efforts shall be made by TL to ensure that concerned functionaries all through the project use a
uniform size of drawings. In unavoidable circumstance, when consistency of size cannot be maintained
for any genuine reason(s) the TL shall accept variation in Length of drawings only without any deviations
in the width.
A standard title block as per IRC-SP: 19 shall be prepared for use in all drawings. The designated
spaces for signatures shall be filled out as the drawing progresses through issue cycle. The wording of
title of drawing shall be finalised in consultation with the concerned key personnel.
All drawings shall be numbered thus:
KPWD/0503/ XX / YY-ZZ
Where,
KPWD/0503 indicates the project code
XX indicates the discipline code
YY indicates the type drawing
ZZ indicates the drawing number
The drawings shall contain and / or refer to the appropriate inputs documents / assumptions made in
the space allocated for NOTES. The input documents may be in any of the following forms:
The completed drawings shall be checked by the HE and approved by the TL from within the project
organisation as per the guidelines given hereinafter:
For systematic comprehensive checking, a check print shall be taken and checking functionary
shall use a checklist. Marking thus ‘J’ in the appropriate columns identifying OK or Not Applicable
(NA) on the report shall indicate the conformance and non-conformance to the quality aspects.
A typical drawing compliance report for plan and profile drawing is enclosed at Table-11-7.
Similar checklist / compliance report shall be prepared for different categories of drawings.
The conforming dimensions, levels and other requirements shall be marked with yellow colour on
the drawing while non-conformance shall he marked with necessary correction on the drawing in
red colour.
The reworked drawing after corrections shall be verified again and the corrections marked in
red shall be encircled with green colour to indicate the same have been incorporated. The
checked print of the drawing duly signed and dated by the checking functionary shall then be
passed on to the approving authority (TL) for record.
11.5.1 APPROVAL
If TL is satisfied with the contents and quality, he shall approve the same.
The drawing issued from a discipline shall contain approval signature of concerned key personnel to
indicate technical adequacy of design.
When the drawing is to be issued the same shall also contain signature or initial of TL in the title block to
indicate that the same meets the project requirement.
The same procedure as mentioned in the paragraphs 11.4 and 11.5 above shall be followed in
controlling the production of design and drawings for culverts, bridges and other structures.
Table 11.5: Roads & Highways Discipline Checklist for Survey Data
Name of Project: Job No.
From km to km Floppy No.
A. General
1 Data Complete
2 Alignment O.K.
PROJECT SPECIFIC
Action by HE
Name:
Signature:
Date:
Note: If client has a different format and wants it to be adopted, it shall supersede.
Checked by:
Comments of TL / HE Compliance
Verified
Approved (TL / HE)
by
Signature:
12.1 GENERAL
For Environmental Impact Assessment, the project influence area will be subjected to rigorous
assessments in terms of environmental impacts to determine any direct and indirect effects due to this
project. It goes without saying that some impact on the environment as well as social structure in the
project area is bound to happen when any development venture is taken up. The Consultants will
endeavour to mitigate the adverse effects by integration of environmental considerations in their
recommendations for new alignment. Cost effective mitigation measures will also be evolved. The
recommendations will be based on an assessment of the likely impact before start of the project. This
exercise will be undertaken in three steps viz. of initial screening, impact assessment and remedial
measures.
It is necessary to carry out a base line survey of the existing level of environmental issues in the project
area. This will be carried out by collection of data from the primary as well as secondary sources as per
the central and state government guidelines and directives of the international funding agencies (if any).
Information will also be collected from any additional sources in addition to the target communities in the
project area. This data will be useful in environmental mapping and identification of sensitive ecological
areas (if any).
After reviewing the data, the ES (Environmental Specialist) will categorise the project or project section
(as per MoEF EIA Notification dated September 14, 2006) as per the following:
Category A project
Category B project
Category B project within 10 km of an environmentally sensitive area (as defined by MoEF EIA
notification, 2006) and thus to be treated as Category A project
Requires additional information for classification and therefore the TL along with the ES shall
gather additional information during the Fact-finding Mission.
In case the project is funded through International funding agencies then the project shall also
be categorised as per the funding agencies guidelines
The Impact Assessment study shall be based on the inferences drawn from the initial screening stage. A
complete identification of adverse as well as beneficial effects due to the project will be carried out to
obtain exact assessment of the impact on surrounding environment and communities in the influence area
based on the scope of work defined in the Contract Document. The major issues that shall be focused
during the stage of Impact Assessment are:
Clearance for working / diversion of sanctuary land from the Chief Wild Life Warden of the
state
Forest land diversion clearance from the State Department of Forest
Tree felling permission from the State Forest department
Permission for Activities near archaeological protected area from Archaeological survey of India
/ state department of Archaeology
NOC and Consents to establish from the State Pollution Control Board
NOC and Consents to operate from the State Pollution Control Board
NOC for water extraction for construction and allied works from Ground Water Authority
Coastal Regulatory Zone Clearance for projects located in the coastal areas from State Coastal
Regulatory Zone Authority and the MoEF
Based on the examination of the project, a decision shall be taken by the Environmental Specialist and
the Team Leader on the applicability of the clearance / NOC and relevant application forms shall be
filled up based on the guidelines of the authorities on behalf of the Project Proponent.
The ES and / TL shall make necessary presentations to the authorities as per the scope of work and the
TOR outlined in the contract document to facilitate / obtain the clearance / NOC. If required by the
contract document the ES and / TL and other team members shall visit the offices of the authorities or
appoint / delegate manpower to visit and liase with the authorities to facilitate / obtain the relevant
NOC / Clearances. The decision of appointing / delegating requisite manpower for the work shall be
taken by the Functional Head – Environment after consulting the TL and / ES on necessity.
Specialist shall ensure that the outsourced firm (if employed) follows the entire process and the checks
are carried out by the outsourced firm/s.
STUDY TEAM
The Environmental Specialist will ensure that the selected members of the study team meet all the selection
criteria to be identified by the client.
Environmental Specialist will ensure that the selected procedures are documented, and the study team
members are familiar with the procedures.
The following codes are to be used for labelling the various air & water samples collected during the
field study.
Ambient Air Quality LABEL : AAQ-N-D
Samples Suffix (N): 1 through n corresponding to the serial number of the
sampling location.
Date of sampling (D): Day/Month/Year
Water quality LABEL: S-G-WQ-N-D
Samples Prefix (S): Surface Water
Prefix (G): Ground Water
Suffix (N): 1 through n corresponding to the serial number of the
sampling location
Date of sampling (D): Day/Month/Year
SAMPLING EQUIPMENT
The Environmental Specialist will ensure that the sampling equipment meets all the requirements and are
in good working condition.
CHECKLISTS
The Environmental Specialist will prepare the following checklists for all the activities associated with
sampling and analysis.
Form 1: Checklist for conclusion of sampling
Form 2: Checklist for sample integrity
The respective team members will ensure that the samples are collected and preserved according to the
specified procedures. Any deviations from the procedures for whatever reasons are to be documented
and passed on to the Environmental Specialist. The Environmental Specialist will do quality check as per
Form 1 to conclude the sampling at any given point.
SAMPLE FORWARDING
The Environment Specialist will ensure that the samples are transported and forwarded to the laboratory
according to the required procedures. The concerned analyst will certify the integrity of the samples as
per Form 2 before accepting the samples for analysis.
FIELD ANALYSIS
CALIBRATION OF INSTRUMENTS
The Environment Specialist will ensure that all the field instruments are pre-calibrated (if required) as
per standard procedures. The measurement and analysis are to be carried out as per the standard
operating procedures. Any deviations from the set procedures are to be recorded in the logbooks.
DATA CHECK
The concerned expert at the site will do quality check as per Form 3 and validate any measurements or
readings taken by field assistants, before moving on to the next sample analysis.
DOCUMENTATION
All the raw data are to be recorded in the logbooks along with the details relating to the sample
identification, location of the sampling point, date and time of sampling, and the real time observations
at the sampling point, Further, any deviations from the set procedures during the field analysis are to be
documented.
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
CALIBRATION
The ES will ensure that all the laboratory instruments are pre-calibrated as per laboratory’s Quality
Procedures. The calibration certificates (obtained from the outsourced laboratory) shall be properly
maintained and be made available for inspection by the client (if required).
OPERATING PROCEDURES
Before accepting the samples for analysis, the concerned analyst will check for the integrity of the sample
as per Form 2. The measurement and analysis are to be carried out as per the standard operating
procedures. Any deviations from the set procedures are to be recorded in the logbooks.
DATA CHECKS
The concerned laboratory in-charge will check and validate the raw data generated by the laboratory
assistants. To include the analysis of a sample, he is to do the quality check as per Form 4.
DOCUMENTATION
All the raw data are to record in the logbooks along with the details relating to the sample identification,
location of the sampling point, date and time of sampling, and the real time observations at the sampling
point. Further, any deviations from the set procedures during the lab analysis shall also have to be
documented.
The data reduction and validation are to be done by the concerned laboratory in-charge. The process
of data reduction and validation will involve the following steps:
Ascertain and certify that the correct Method is used for the conversion.
Ascertain and certify that quality controls requirement like replicate analysis, comparison with
control charts, blank analysis etc. are carried out according to the laboratory quality system
procedures.
Validate and certify that IS units are used unless requested otherwise by the client.
Validate and certify the analysis for the determination of detection limits for the instrument /
technique used and the accuracy and precision of the final results.
Validate and certify the results through comparisons with data in the literature and through inter
parametric correlations.
Validate and certify that proper documentation and maintenance of records has been done
according to the laboratory quality system procedures.
DESIGN STAGE
Appropriate design methods shall be formulated to reduce the earthwork, improve drainage and
stability of slopes, etc. Realignments for short lengths shall also be considered to reduce the impact on
environment.
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
During construction, measures had been identified taken to minimising air, water and noise pollution
stabilise the slopes; improving the drainage; ensuring safety; proper disposal of debris; locating labour
camps and construction plants adequately; etc.
OPERATIONAL STAGE
During the operation stage of the project, tree plantation and its maintenance, is mainly considered to
mitigate the adverse impact on environment.
For each of these mitigation and enhancement measures designs shall be completed with working
drawings, technical specifications and bill of quantities. The avoidance and mitigation of negative
impacts involve reduction in magnitude of the adverse impacts during various stages of the project
through:
Alterations during design, site clearance, construction and operation stages of the road project
to avoid adverse impacts, and
Additional mitigation measures for unavoidable negative impacts on the environmental
components.
These measures shall be incorporated into the various stages of the project. Based on their applicability,
both general and case specific measures to be incorporated as follows:
Standard: The 'standard designs' of typical road sections, shall be arrived at after detailed
deliberations between the Highway Design and the Environment teams and also after taking the
client into confidence.
Generic measures: To avoid or mitigate impacts on environmental components, general
mitigation measures shall be identified based on the characteristic features.
Site Specific: At representative sensitive locations, site-specific designs and environmental
enhancement measures for cultural and community properties, water bodies etc. shall be
formulated as mitigation / compensatory measures for addressing the negative impacts.
PROJECT:
SAMPLING POINT:
PROJECT:
SAMPLING POINT:
Note: It is not necessary that this form be filled in for each sample/sampling point. It is sufficient if the
deviations if any are recorded in the logbooks.
13 SOCIAL ASSESSMENT
Public Consultation
Advance notice to concerned parties
Disclosure of RAP along with complete road
improvement plan
Recording and maintaining of documents about issues
raised during the meeting
Special attention to issues pertaining to women,
indigenous and socio-economically challenged people
Assessment of Loss & RAP
Due merit to each individual asset to be dismantled in
assessment of its value.
Compensation package in line with Government of
India policy on involuntary settlement
Implementation and monitoring mechanism clearly
defined
Minimisation of loss to agriculture and fertile land
Special compensation package for socially backward
group
14.1 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this Quality Plan is to provide guidance to all concerned project staff for numbering of
project and quality system documents for ease of identification.
14.2 PROCEDURE
The document(s) / service for the project shall be identified by the respective functionaries through all
of the following methods:
All documents related to this project would have the number starting with TTS/0166, which would
indicate, the identification number or job number of the project.
The DE shall assess whether the particular activity can be conducted with resources available in-house or
the same needs to be outsourced.
There is a defined process of identification, selection, evaluation and control of outsourced work in the
above-mentioned activities or areas.
15.4.1 IDENTIFICATION
Applications are invited for vendor empanelment through the concerned discipline experts for vendor
identification. The discipline expert sends out the invitations to a pool of vendors and the decision on who
to invite is based on solicitation, networking, references, previous work experience etc.
There is a pre-set application format that has been defined. The vendor is expected to send in the
following information:
Filled application form in the given format and application letter on company letter head
Registration number / certificate of the company
Organization chart of the company (include write up on experience details of key individuals)
Financial statements for the last 3 years
Company profile and catalogues
List of major clients, names and address along with the details of work done
Sample reports for previous work done
Quality and other accreditation certificates
Infrastructure details with the list of service/support centres
Capability statement in terms of manpower, instruments, technology etc
STAGE 1: PRE-QUALIFICATION
The initial stage is called the pre-qualifying stage and is designed to check if the vendor meets the basic
requirements. In all there are 5 mandatory basic requirements that have been defined namely:
Whether the company is in the business of topographical, geotechnical or environmental survey works?
Whether the company is blacklisted by state / central government departments or government
undertaking?
Whether the company has quality certifications & accreditations and the records are available?
Whether the documents available prove that the relevant infrastructures in terms of human resources,
tools & equipments, laboratories etc are in place?
Whether the supporting documents available shows a proven track record of providing required
services?
Failure to meet any of the above mandatory requirements, other than point number 3 above, would lead
to disqualification. If the criteria related to quality certifications & accreditations are not met, the decision
is kept pending, subject to stage 2 evaluations on other quality parameters. The table below shows the
details.
Table 15.1 Pre-Qualification Matrix
The company is in the business of This should be the core business of the Core
Qualified
environmental survey work company. This is a disqualifier Business
1 to 5 years
less than 1 year
Points
Parameter Evaluation Criteria Remarks
Awarded
Previous
A rating would be provided in the remarks column basis
experience with
the previous experience with FISPL.
FISPL
Points
Parameter Evaluation Criteria Remarks
Awarded
Points
Parameter Evaluation Criteria Remarks
Awarded
If a vendor meets all the above criteria’s they are place in List A, if a vendor meets the prequalifying
criterion but fails in meeting any of the qualifying sections, they are placed in List B. At any stage if any
vendor from List B is chosen for any reason the SBU Head shall be informed.
Additionally, a new vendor can be introduced in the system by following the above defined process. If
for some reason the vendors in list A or B cannot be used for a project or it is decided they should not
be used, the work can be awarded to a new vendor, but with an approval of the SBU Head. For clarity
and to reduce time, the PM / DE shall take approval from SBU Head at the time of seeking quote from
a non-empaneled vendor.
Since the overall process to empanel the new vendor may take time and may delay project delivery,
the SBU head may provide an exception for a vendor to be used however, it will be the responsibility
of the project manager and the discipline expert to get all the vendor information and empanel the
vendor in List A or B as soon as possible. The ISO coordinator will monitor this overall process and ensure
compliance.
Note:
The criterion mentioned above can be relaxed / modified / added dependent upon the Clients
requirement. If the agency / sub consultant is a government run organization / institute the
criterion may be relaxed / waived off as these institutes work in a process as defined by
Government policies / acts and other relevant instrument.
Quotes shall be invited from the vendors.
Dependent on the nature of job, the vendor shall be selected based on a combination or the
most importance of factors namely lowest quote, quality, logistics and location as decided by
the PM. The DE shall advise the PC in framing the decision. All decisions by the PC shall be
approved by the HOD.
Based on the selection, an agreement on the prescribed format of the HOD shall be signed
between the HOD and the vendor / sub consultant / subject specialist.
Accuracy of Output.
Quality of Output.
Competitiveness of Price.
Actual implementation of Technical Proposal.
Rating Scale
Parameter
1 2 3 4 5
Timelines of Delivery
Accuracy of Output
Reviewers Comments:
Date:
Prepared By: Reviewed By:
(Discipline Expert) (Project Manager)
15.4.4 CONTROL
The control shall be defined in the various clauses of the contract agreement. The contract agreement
shall be as per the standard format of the Company and shall enlist all technical, financial, commercial
and legal aspects for the activities / processes outsourced and shall have penalty, liquidated and
ascertained damages (LAD) and termination clauses. The project manager shall apply the control in
consultation with the HOD head and the discipline expert.
16.1 GENERAL
In broad terms, for quality assurance in respect of collection of revenue data, roadside utilities, forest
and tress details and obtaining clearance for the project implementation, it is necessary to evolve a
system applicable to all concerns in collection, preparation, review, verification, amendment and
finalisation of respective project clearance.
16.2 PROCEDURE
A comprehensive event-schedule will be made commencing from data collection stage to preparation of
schedule of land acquisition/ utility shifting/ forest clearance to complete the task well within available
time. The related information will be collected and put into one place by respective Key Personnel in a
computer file in sequential manner. One hard copy will be prepared and bound in file with the cover
sheet containing all the information relating to the subject, its sources, name(s) of concerned project staff,
date of inception / revision along with revision number.
Concerned Key Personnel will compile all the information viz. revenue maps, land ownership records,
tree types, utility lines and suggestions by client into the report format based on skeleton proforma
prepared by TL.
in following manner:
i. Land sale statistics for past 10 years from Tehsildar’s office.
ii. Prevailing market rates as reported by local people.
On each amendment in the master list, the KP will update the revision status in the Master List and send
the copy to the TL for information. After each amendment in the master list, the same will be audited by
one of the competent person from the monitoring group before finalization.
17.1 GENERAL
Quality of the economic and financial analysis of a project depends upon the accuracy of its inputs and
the adopted economic and financial model. Therefore, it is imperative to assure the quality of the traffic
analysis, project cost calculations and other inputs viz. financial indices, project planning, other
operational costs etc.
Traffic Forecast : Base year traffic flows and its associate characteristics.
: Systematic traffic forecasts - Vehicle type-wise.
: Estimate of normal, generated, diverted traffic, etc.
Vehicle Operating Cost: Estimates of key inputs like fuel costs, staff
costs, interest and depreciation in financial terms.
Model applicability: Correct congestion factor, speed flow and VOC relationship.
Quality assurance aspects of capital costs and traffic forecast have already been discussed in previous
sections. Implementation schedule will be prepared based on the site condition, intended resource
mobilisation by the contractor, availability of fund and contract packaging as approved by NHAI. It will
be ensured that it should be as realistic as possible. To determine the likely annual progress during the
implementation stage, a detailed work programme will be developed keeping all the possible constraints
in consideration.
Data pertaining to assessment of vehicle operating cost will be collected from at least three different
sources of which preferably two should be located at the extreme ends of the project. These will be
collected at time of preparation of economic analysis to obviate the time factor and eventually the
inflation.
Applicability of the model to Indian conditions will be ensured by calculating capital cost and
maintenance costs using HDM-IV, whereas the VOC savings and time savings will be calculated using the
speed flow and VOC’s relationship developed and standardized by the Indian studies (Road User Cost
Study and IRC: SP-30) to represent the Indian climatic, traffic and topographical conditions.
Traffic Forecast : Base year traffic flows and its associate characteristics.
: Systematic traffic forecasts - Vehicle type-wise.
: Estimate of normal, generated, diverted traffic, etc.
Co-financing arrangements.
Availability of funds.
Market capitalisation of internal funds.
Self-financing ratio.
Equity contribution.
Terms of loan.
Raising funds through cess on land development.
Financial risks will be analysed under the following categories:
$QQH[XUHV
Annexure 3.1
CLASSIFIED TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT SURVEY
Location: Date:
Direction: Shift:
Time Interval (mins)
Vehicle type Total
00 to 15 15 to 30 30 to 45 45 to 00
Taxi
2 Wheelers
3 Wheelers
Minibus
School Bus
Public
Bus
Private
4 Tyres
LCV
6 Tyres
Car
Toll
Exempted
Vehicle
Bus
Toll Exempted Vehicles : Government Vehicles (Police, VIP, Fire Brigade, Postal Vehicles etc.), Army Vehicles, Ambulence,
Mortury Van
Annexure 3.2
CLASSIFIED TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT SURVEY (HEAVY VEHICLE)
Location: Date:
Direction: Shift:
Time Interval (mins)
Vehicle type Total
00 to 15 15 to 30 30 to 45 45 to 00
2 Axle truck
3 Axis truck
4-6 Truck
7++ Axle
Tractor
Tractor Trailer
Cycle
Cycle Rickshaw
Animal/Hand cart
LCV
Toll
Exempted
Vehicle
Truck
Toll Exempted Vehicles : Government Vehicles (Police, VIP, Fire Brigade, Postal Vehicles etc.), Army Vehicles, Ambulence,
Mortury Van
Revision No.: 0
Location and Chainage : Date :
Direction : From: To : Sheet No :
Weather : FINE/CLOUDY/RAINY
ORIGIN DESTINATION Trip Monthly Round Trip on
Time of Reg Trip Commodity Weight Willing to
Vehicle Type Length Pass the same day
Interview No. Village/Town District State Village/Town District State Frequency Type (Tonnes) pay (Y/N)
86
Vehicle Type Code Trip Frequency Code
LCV 1 Daily D_
2-Axle Truck 2 Weekly W_
3-Axle Truck 3 Monthly M_
4 -6 Axle 5 Yearly Y_
7++ Axle 6
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY, PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR MAWNGAP (ON OLD NH 44E) - MAWPHLANG -
LAITMUSIANG - MAWKYRWAT - RANGTHONG - NONGNAH - DIRANG - KHADPHRA (RANIKOR) (NEAR BANGLADESH BORDER) IN STATE OF MEGHALAYA
Checked by :
Name of Enumerator: Signature: Time:
Annexure 3.4
Revision No.: 0
Location and Chainage : Date :
Direction : From: To : Sheet No :
Weather : FINE/CLOUDY/RAINY
ORIGIN DESTINATION Round Trip on
Time of Reg Trip Length Trip Monthly Pass Willing to
Vehicle Type the same day Purpose Occupation
Interview No. Village/Town District State Village/Town District State (KM) Frequency ( Y/N) pay (Y/N)
87
Vehicle Type Code Trip Frequency Code
LCV 1 Daily D_
2-Axle Truck 2 Weekly W_
3-Axle Truck 3 Monthly M_
4 -6 Axle 5 Yearly Y_
7++ Axle 6
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY, PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR MAWNGAP (ON OLD NH 44E) - MAWPHLANG -
LAITMUSIANG - MAWKYRWAT - RANGTHONG - NONGNAH - DIRANG - KHADPHRA (RANIKOR) (NEAR BANGLADESH BORDER) IN STATE OF MEGHALAYA
Checked by :
Name of Enumerator: Signature: Time:
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY, PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR MAWNGAP (ON OLD NH 44E) - MAWPHLANG -
LAITMUSIANG - MAWKYRWAT - RANGTHONG - NONGNAH - DIRANG - KHADPHRA (RANIKOR) (NEAR BANGLADESH BORDER) IN STATE OF MEGHALAYA
Annexure 3.5
CLASSIFIED TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
Name of Junction Arm Sheet No.: Date:
Direction From: To: Shift: Weather:
Time Interval (mins)
Vehicle type Total
00 to 15 15 to 30 30 to 45 45 to 00
2 Wheelers
3 Wheelers
Taxi
4 Tyres
LCV
6 Tyres
With Trailor
Agri
Without
Trailor
Cycle
Cycle Rickshaw
SLOW MOVING VEHICLE
Bullock cart
Animal
drawn
Horse
Hand Cart
Annexure 3.6
CLASSIFIED TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT (HEAVY VEHICLE)
Name of Junction Arm Sheet No.: Date:
Direction To: Shift: Weather:
Time Interval (mins)
Vehicle type Total
00 to 15 15 to 30 30 to 45 45 to 00
2 Axle truck
3 Axis truck
4-6 Truck
7++ Axle
Minibus
School Bus
Bus (Public)
Bus (Private)
Annexure 3.7
PEDESTRIAN CROSS TRAFFIC SURVEY
Location Weather: Clear/Cloudy/Rainy Date & Day of survey:
Chainage (Km) Sheet No.:
No. of pedestrians crossing the project road (Towards side)
Time Interval (mins)
Left to right Right to left
00 to 15
15 to 30
30 to 45
45 to 00
00 to 15
15 to 30
30 to 45
45 to 00
00 to 15
15 to 30
30 to 45
45 to 00
Checked By:
Annexure 3.8
TRUCK TERMINAL SURVEY
Location: Day:
Weather: Clear/Cloudy/Rainy Date:
Would you continue if some
Sr. No. Type of Truck Duration Frequency Purpose
charge is imposed ?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Checked By:
Annexure 3.9
SPEED DELAY SURVEY
Direction of Travel: Name of Recorder:
Date & Day of Survey: Run No: Sheet No:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Annexure 4.1
ROAD INVENTORY DATA SHEET
Road Name: Road No: Road Classification: Sheet No:
Date of Survey: Section From: Section To:
1 2 3 4 5
FROM Km
TO Km
Terrain (Plain/Rolling Hilly)
Land use (Built Up/ Agrt./ Left
Forest / Industrial/ Barren) Right
Name of Village/ Town
Formation Width (m)
Type* (BT/CC/GR/ER)
CARRIAGEWAY Width (m)
Condition ** (G/F/P/VP)
Type* (BT/CC/GR/ER)
SHOULDER + Width (m)
Condition ** (G/F/P/VP)
Revision No.: 0
DATE OF SURVEY: DISTRICT: Sheet No :
SECTION FROM: TO: Weather : FINE/CLOUDY/RAINY
CHAINAGE Pavement Composition Shoulder Riding Quality Pavement Condition
Rut
Type*
TO (KM)
Patching
Condition
Potholing
FROM (KM)
(Good/Fair/Poor)
Composition
Composition
Cracking (%)
Ravelling (%)
Speed (Km/Hr)
Thickness (mm)
(Fair/Poor/Failed)
Embankment Condition
Quality (G/F/P/VP)
Pavement Edge Drop (cm)
(None/Modereate/Severe)
Surface
94
Binder
Base
Sub-base
Subgrade
Surface
Binder
Base
Sub-base
Subgrade
Surface
Binder
Base
Sub-base
Subgrade
Surveyed by:
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY, PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR MAWNGAP (ON OLD NH 44E) - MAWPHLANG -
Note :
LAITMUSIANG - MAWKYRWAT - RANGTHONG - NONGNAH - DIRANG - KHADPHRA (RANIKOR) (NEAR BANGLADESH BORDER) IN STATE OF MEGHALAYA
* : BUSG=Built up Spray Grout; AC=Asphaltic Concrete; SDC=Semi Dense Concrete; PC=Premix Carpet; MSS=Mix Seal Surfacing; WMM=Water Mix Macadam, WBM=Water
Bound Macadam; DBM=Dense Bituminous Macadam; BM=Bituminous Macadam; BS=Brick Soling; SS=Stone Solling
**: No. and %/100m = Total number of potholing/patching and % area of Pothholing/Patching 100m of length of road
***: NE=Non Existing; PF = Partially Functional; F=Functional
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY, PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR MAWNGAP (ON OLD NH 44E) - MAWPHLANG -
LAITMUSIANG - MAWKYRWAT - RANGTHONG - NONGNAH - DIRANG - KHADPHRA (RANIKOR) (NEAR BANGLADESH BORDER) IN STATE OF MEGHALAYA
Annexure 4.3
PAVEMENT ROUGHNESS SURVEY
Name of the Road :
Road Classification :
Date of Survey :
Day :
Up Direction: Down Direction
Checked By:
Revision No.: 0
Det. of Protection Condition of various features of Culvert Height above
Type of Span Arrangement Width of Culvert Presence
Skew Slab CW Works (VG / G / F / P / VP) Bed level
Location Structures and Total Ventway (outer to outer of of Scour Adequacy of
# Angle Th Width Head wall Wing wall Return wall Parapet/ Handrail Remarks
(Km) (Pipe,Slab, (No of spans x Lgth headwall) Slab / Pipe/ U/S side D/S Side or silting Waterway
(degrees) (m) (m) Type Condition Length / Length / Length / Length /
Box,Arch) or pipe dia ) (m) (m) Box/ Arch (m) (m) observed
96
Bed LHS
Side Slope RHS
Bed LHS
Side Slope RHS
Bed LHS
Side Slope RHS
Bed LHS
Side Slope RHS
Bed LHS
Side Slope RHS
Bed LHS
Side Slope RHS
Bed LHS
Side Slope RHS
Note: VG = Very Good G= Good F=Fair P=Poor VP+Very Poor NA=Not Applicable Surveyed by ………………
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY, PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR MAWNGAP (ON OLD NH 44E) - MAWPHLANG -
LAITMUSIANG - MAWKYRWAT - RANGTHONG - NONGNAH - DIRANG - KHADPHRA (RANIKOR) (NEAR BANGLADESH BORDER) IN STATE OF MEGHALAYA
Prepared By Checked By
Annexure 4.5
Revision No.: 0
Road No.
Category of Road: Section: Sheet no.:
Details of
Name of Length of Type of Avg vertical Type of Bridge Details of Superstructure
PWD Year of Protection work Thickness Carriage
Sl CH River and Bridge / Span Bridge clearance Formation HFL Total Expansion Load
Structure Construc- of Girder / way Bearing Remarks
No. (m) Type of arrangement (Major/ (Vent Condition Level (m) (m) Width Joint (ton)
no. tion width
Sub
Features Type (VG/G/F/P/ Type Condition Slab
Super
Crossing c/c (m) Minor) Height) (m)
97
Cone
Wear Coat
Footpath
Floor
Railing
Deck
Cone
Wear Coat
Footpath
Floor
Railing
Deck
Cone
Wear Coat
Footpath
Floor
Railing
Deck
Cone
Wear Coat
Footpath
Floor
Railing
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY, PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR MAWNGAP (ON OLD NH 44E) - MAWPHLANG -
LAITMUSIANG - MAWKYRWAT - RANGTHONG - NONGNAH - DIRANG - KHADPHRA (RANIKOR) (NEAR BANGLADESH BORDER) IN STATE OF MEGHALAYA
Note: VG = Very Good G= Good F=Fair P=Poor VP+Very Poor NA=Not Applicable Surveyed by ………………
Prepared By Checked By
98
Revision No.: 0
Document No.: 3007/IR01-MR
1
27
PIER
2
Prepared By
28
29
FOUNDATION
30
31
32
APPROACH
PROTECTION WORK
33
34
35
ROAD FORMATION LEVEL (m) HIGH LEVEL OR SUBMERSIBLE
CLEAR ROADWAY WIDTH BETWEEN KERBS
36
10
DIRECTION OF FLOW
(m)
37
11
38
12
39
13
SLAB GRADIENT
Bridge Inventory
40
14
BEARINGS TYPE
PRESENT CONDITION OF BRIDGE
41
15
42
16
43
17
DESIGN OF LOADING MATERIAL OF SLAB
Checked By
HANDRAIL/PARAPET
44
18
HIGH FLOOD LEVEL (HFL)
THICKNESS & HEIGHT (m)
45
19
LOWEST WATER LEVEL (LWL) TYPE
COAT
WEARING
46
20
DESIGN DISCHARGE (Cu.m.) THICKNESS (m)
Road No :
DETAILS OF
Surveyed by ………………
MAXIMUM DESIGN VELOCITY
47
21
TYPE
Date of Survey :
(m/sec.)
22
TOP
PIER (m)
23
BOTTOM
THICKNESS ON
48
24
HEIGHT OF PIER & ABUTMENT
SUB-STRUCTURE
REMARKS
25
ABUTMENT
USED
26
Annexure 4.6
PIER
MATERIALS
QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
LAITMUSIANG - MAWKYRWAT - RANGTHONG - NONGNAH - DIRANG - KHADPHRA (RANIKOR) (NEAR BANGLADESH BORDER) IN STATE OF MEGHALAYA
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY, PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR MAWNGAP (ON OLD NH 44E) - MAWPHLANG -
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY, PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR MAWNGAP (ON OLD NH 44E) - MAWPHLANG -
LAITMUSIANG - MAWKYRWAT - RANGTHONG - NONGNAH - DIRANG - KHADPHRA (RANIKOR) (NEAR BANGLADESH BORDER) IN STATE OF MEGHALAYA
Annexure 6.1
AXLE LOAD SURVEY
Name of Road : Direction : Date & Day of survey :
Location : Weather : Clear/Cloudy/Rainy Day :
Chainage : Km Name of Recorder : Sheet No. :
Signature:
Checked By:
Annexure 7.1
BENKELMAN BEAM SURVEY
Name of Road : Date of survey :
Road Classification: Day :
Weather : Clear/Cloudy/Rainy Direction: Annual Rainfall:
Sr. Chainage with lane Type of Dial Gauge Reading (0.01 mm) Moisture Pavement
No Identification Soil and PI Initial Interim Final Content Temperature Remarks
(Km) (Ds) (Di) (Df) (%) (OC)
Checked By:
Annexure 8.1
DETAILS OF PAVEMENT CRUST
Name of Road : Date of study:
Signature:
Checked By:
Annexure 8.2
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION OF SOIL COLLECTED FROM BORROW AREA
Name of Road : Date of study:
Signature:
Checked By:
Revision No.: 0
Sample Location/ General Description Gradation % Atterberg's Limits Density CBR Value
OMC % Remarks
No. Chainage of Material 80mm 40mm 20mm 10mm 4.75mm Silt/ Sand LL % PL % PI % g/cc Unsoaked % Soaked %
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
103
Signature:
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY, PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR MAWNGAP (ON OLD NH 44E) - MAWPHLANG -
Checked By:
LAITMUSIANG - MAWKYRWAT - RANGTHONG - NONGNAH - DIRANG - KHADPHRA (RANIKOR) (NEAR BANGLADESH BORDER) IN STATE OF MEGHALAYA
Annexure 8.4
LABORATORY TESTING OF STONES OBTAINED FROM QUARRY
Name of Road : Date of study:
Aggregate Impact
Sample Location/ Type of Flakiness Index Elongation Los Angeles Stripping Soundness
Value % Remarks
No. Chainage Rock Index Abrasion Value % Value Test
Dry Test Wet Test 40mm 20mm
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Checked By:
Revision No.: 0
Modified Compaction CBR of remoulded soil at Field Dry Density at Depth of water table
Sample Location/ Gradation % Atterberg's limit I.S.Soil
test 97% of MDD subgrade level below subgrade under
No. Chainage Classification
Gravel Sand Silt+Clay L.L.% P.L% P.I.% MDD g/cc OMC % Unsoaked% Soaked% FDD g/cc FMC % worst condition
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
105
Surveyed by: Signature:
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY, PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR MAWNGAP (ON OLD NH 44E) - MAWPHLANG -
LAITMUSIANG - MAWKYRWAT - RANGTHONG - NONGNAH - DIRANG - KHADPHRA (RANIKOR) (NEAR BANGLADESH BORDER) IN STATE OF MEGHALAYA
Checked By:
Annexure 8.6
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION OF MATERIAL COLLECTED FROM TRIAL PIT FOR MINOR BRIDGE AND CULVERT
Name of Project: Date of study:
Revision No.: 0
Atterberg's
Gradation % Direct Shear Uniaxial
Sr. Sample Type of Location Type of Limit % IS Soil Silt
FDD g/cm3 FMC % compressive
No. No. Structure (Ch.) Material Silt + Classification Factor
Gravel Sand LL PL PI c kg/cm2 f Deg. strength kg/cm2
Clay
106
Surveyed by: Signature:
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY, PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR MAWNGAP (ON OLD NH 44E) - MAWPHLANG -
LAITMUSIANG - MAWKYRWAT - RANGTHONG - NONGNAH - DIRANG - KHADPHRA (RANIKOR) (NEAR BANGLADESH BORDER) IN STATE OF MEGHALAYA
Checked By:
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY, PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR MAWNGAP (ON OLD NH 44E) - MAWPHLANG -
LAITMUSIANG - MAWKYRWAT - RANGTHONG - NONGNAH - DIRANG - KHADPHRA (RANIKOR) (NEAR BANGLADESH BORDER) IN STATE OF MEGHALAYA
Annexure 9.1
DAILY DRILL REPORT
Project: Location: Feature:
Drill No. & Type: Pump No.:
Screw feed/ Hydraulic feed: Capacity and Pressure used:
Collar Elevation: Hole No.:
Ground Elevation: Co-ordinates:
Date: Bearing of hole:
Shift: From_____h to _______h Angle with horizontal:
Depth of water level: Depth drilled during the shift:
From To
At start of shift:
At end of shift:
Revision No.: 0
Name of Section: Bridge No. Location G.L. Borehole Depth Water Table Sheet No.
Description of strata
LEGEND
Porosity %
Uncompressive
REDUCED LEVEL
Specific Gravity
Strength kg/cm2
DEPTH BELOW GL
Core Recovery %
TYPE/SAMPLE NO.
DEPTH OF SAMPLE
Dry Density gm/cc
Water absorption %
108
ABBREVIATION : UDS-UNDISTURBED SAMPLE, DS-DISTURBED SAMPLE, DST-DIRECT SHEAR TEST, UCS-UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST, CD-CONSOLIDATED DRAIN TEST, CU-CONSOLIDATION UNDRAINED, R-
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY, PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR MAWNGAP (ON OLD NH 44E) - MAWPHLANG -
LAITMUSIANG - MAWKYRWAT - RANGTHONG - NONGNAH - DIRANG - KHADPHRA (RANIKOR) (NEAR BANGLADESH BORDER) IN STATE OF MEGHALAYA
Revision No.: 0
Bridge No. Location G.L. Borehole Depth Water Table Sheet No.
Name of Section:
DESCRIPTION
OF STRATA
LEGEND
N-VALUE
SILT FACTOR
REDUCED LEVEL
DEPTH BELOW GL
TYPE/SAMPLE NO.
DEPTH OF SAMPLE
I.S. SOIL CLASSIFICATION
109
ANGLE OF INT
15 cm.
15 cm.
15 cm.
FRICTION (DEGREE)
COHESION-('c) Kg/Cm2
GRAVEL (%)
SAND (%)
SILT (%)
CLAY (%)
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
PLASTIC LIMIT(%)
PLASTICITY INDEX (%)
DRY DENSITY (t/cum)
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
C.C.
P.C. Kg/CM2
ABBREVIATION : UDS-UNDISTURBED SAMPLE, DS-DISTURBED SAMPLE, DST-DIRECT SHEAR TEST, UCS-UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST, CD-CONSOLIDATED DRAIN TEST, CU-CONSOLIDATION UNDRAINED, R-REFUSAL, UU-
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY, PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR MAWNGAP (ON OLD NH 44E) - MAWPHLANG -
LAITMUSIANG - MAWKYRWAT - RANGTHONG - NONGNAH - DIRANG - KHADPHRA (RANIKOR) (NEAR BANGLADESH BORDER) IN STATE OF MEGHALAYA