Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bail App. Final
Bail App. Final
Bail App. Final
VERSUS
FIR : Under section 188, 269, 270 r/w section 3 of Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897.
I with utmost reverence humbly request this hon’ble court to kindly consider the following
grounds mentioned hereinafter and enlarge the accused on bail on the terms it deems fit:
1. The accused was arrested on 10.04.2020, while he was resting beside the bypass road near
interstate travel and is booked under section 188, 269, 270 r/w section 3 of Epidemic
2. Admittedly, the accused was beaten black and blue by the Police officer while he was being
arrested, which poses a humongous threat to the life and liberty of the accused as he is
languishing in the Police custody. There can be no gainsaying to the fact that custodial
torture is a death knell to the salutary principle of rule of law and it infringes Art. 21 of the
Constitution as well as the basic human rights. Supreme Court in the celebrated case of
Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration 1 held that the most “important right of the imprisoned
the facts above-mentioned it is abundantly clear that the swords of damocles are hanging on
3. The law governing bail has to dovetail two competing demands, on one hand the
requirement of protection of society from the hazards of such nefarious acts and on the other
hand the fundamental canon of criminal jurisprudence i.e presumption of innocence. Bail is
recognition of this seminal principle. The provision of the bail protects the liberty of the
4. Taking cue from the first schedule of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973(Hereinafter will be
1
AIR 1980 SC 1579.
referred as Cr.PC), all the offences which are registered against the accused are catergorized
as bailable by the schedule, which underscores the fact that the accused is entitled to be
enlarged on bail as a matter of right provided that the accused is ready to execute a bond
5. It is humbly submitted that in cases of bailable offences the Police or the court is bound
release the accused, as provided under section 436 of Cr.PC, for this purpose the counsel
for the accused is heavily relying of the judgment of Talab Haji Hussain v. Madhukar
Purshottam Mondkar2.
6. It must be humbly stated at this juncture that the accused is migrant labor, working at a
textile mill at Navi Mumbai. Due to the unprecedented lockdown imposed across the
country, the migrant labors are forced to leave their place of work due to the unavailability
of food and shelter. As most of industries are suspended, the laborers are not getting their
wages, because of which they are compelled to flee from their working places to their home.
7. The abovementioned scenario explained fits aptly to the fact of the matter. Due to the sheer
penury and unavailability of food and shelter the accused was also forced to leave for his
hometown, Darbhanga. This underscores the fact that the act of accused was devoid of
culpable intent and is in consonance with the classical principle of law that “necessity
knows no law”.
8. The accused is a migrant labour and his financial condition is not good. Thereby it is
humbly submitted that the same should be considered while fixing the bond amount.
9. Resultantly, the accused is ready and willing to accept any condition imposed by this
2
AIR 1956 SC 376.
hon’ble court in connection with this case.
PRAYER
In the light of the looming threat of custodial torture, provision of mandatory grant of bail and
other facts and circumstances of the case it is most respectfully prayed before this Hon’ble
Court that it may graciously be pleased to enlarge the accused on bail in the interest of justice.
Any other order which the hon’ble court may deem fit and proper may be passed in favour of
the accused.
Varanasi
I. I, Prem Kumar, the afore-mentioned applicant do earnestly and solemnly agree that the
stated facts of the petition, save and except that the legal submission, is true to my
knowledge.