Greene V Demoss
Greene V Demoss
TAYLA GREENE
as administrators of the e§tate Of the decedent
RONALD GREENE
P獲ainti∬
Civil Action
Ⅴ. No.
PLAINTIFF) S COMPLAINT
Trooper Chris Hollingswo叫Master Trooper Kory York, Captain John Peters, Lieutenant
John Clary, Sergeant Floyd McElroy, and John Doe Corporations l-3 seeking judgment in her
favor for violations ofthe Decedent’s Fourth Amendment rights under the United States
Constitution and Louisiana State Law. In support thereof Plaintiff avers as follows:
PARTIHS
l. Ronald Greene, the Decedent, WaS at a11 relevant times a person of the full age and
2. PlaintiffTayla Greene is the daughter of Ronald Greene, a PerSOn Ofthe餌1 age and of
3. Trooper Dakota Demoss, WaS at all relevant times, a duly appointed Louisiana State
Police Trooper acting within the scope of his employment and under co10r Of law.
4・ Captain John Peters, WaS at a11 relevant times, a duly appointed Louisiana State Police
Captain acting within the scope of his empIoyment and under coIor of law.
5. Lieutenant John Clary, WaS at all relevant times, a duly appointed Louisiana State Police
Lieutenant acting within the scope of his empIoyment and under coIor of law.
6. Sergeant FIoyd McElroy was at all relevant times, a duly appointed Louisiana State Police
Sergeant acting within the scope of his empIoyment and under color of law.
7. Master Trooper Chris Hollingswofth, WaS at a11 relevant times, a duly appointed Louisiana
State Police Master Trooper acting within the scope of his employment and under coIor
oflaw.
8. Master Trooper Kory York, WaS at a11 relevant times, a duly appointed Louisiana State
Police Master Trooper acting within the scope ofhis empIoyment and under coIor oflaw.
9. Deputy Sherriff Christopher Harpin was at a11 relevant times, a duly appointed Union
Parish Deputy Sherriff,s O綿cer acting within the scope of his empIoyment and under
color of law.
Weapons.
Weapons.
12. John Doe Corporation 3 provides traihing to law enforcement on the use ofElectronic
Contro置Weapons.
Case 3:20-cv-00578-TAD-KLH Document 1 Filed 05/06/20 Page 3 of 11 PageID #: 3
13. Jurisdiction exists in this Honoral)le Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 133 1 and 1343 as this
Fourteenth Amendment rights ofthe decedent Ronald Greene. Plaintiff fu血er invokes the
intentional torts and otherwise violative conduct occurred within the Westem District of
Louisiana.
15. The Administrator ofthe Estate of Ronald Greene brings this matter before the court
seeking damages for the tragic and unnecessary death of their decedent Ronald Greene.
16. Greene was brutalized by Louisiana State Police and Union Parish Deputy O餌cers
17. The lethal ft)rCe uSed against Greene was unprovoked, ur可vstified, unreaSOnable,
excessive, and in violation of Greene’s rights under the United States Const血tion and
FACTS
18. On or about 12 a.m. on May lO, 2O19, Greene was driving a silver Toyota CH葛R on
19. Trooper Demoss contends that he attempted to initiate a tra餌c stop of Greene’s car.
20. Trooper Demos does not define any violation ofthe motor vehicle code that would
21. Greene did not stop his car and a vehic賞e pursuit ensued.
22. Greene traveled along US 80 to LA 143 and into Union Parish where his car swerved’
23. The front ofGreene’s car did not make impact with a tree and his airbag did not depIoy.
24. The highest level ofimpact sustained by the car occurTed in the rear driver side and said
26. Green was not ir可vred and could walk, SPeak and otherwise function in a healthy
27. Almost immediately thereafter, Trooper Demoss and Master Trooper Hollingsworth
28. Shortly thereafter, Captain Peters, Lieutenant Clary, Sergeant McElroy’Master Trooper
29. Greene exited his car and began to apoIogize to the o綿cers, telling them he knew he
30. Two o餌cers pinned Greene down on the ground while he screamed `Oh my God.’’’
3 1. Greene was moaning, begging the o餌cers to stop, and repeatedly saying “I’m sorry.”
McElroy, and Deputy SherriffHarpin individua11y and in concert used lethal force
against Greene.
33. Despite Greene’s contrition and s皿ender the Defendant officers used electronic
Case 3:20-cv-00578-TAD-KLH Document 1 Filed 05/06/20 Page 5 of 11 PageID #: 5
controI weapons against Green at least three times thus attacking his heart with massive
amounts of electricity.
34' It an efrort to conceal the identity or identities of the o館cer or o綿cers who depIoyed
electronic controI weapons, the Louisiana State Police has declined to produce or
release bodycam footage, dashboard cam footage, discharge logs, uSe Of force reports
or any number of investigative materials that would identify who used lethal force.
35. The force used against Greene was u互iustified, unreaSOnable, eXCeSSive, and in violation
36. The force used against Greene left him beaten, bloodied, and in cardiac arrest.
38. When the Emergency Medical Technicians arrived at 12:51 a.m・ they found Greene
39. Emergency Medical Technicians determined that Greene was in cardiac and respiratory
40. Greene was placed on a gurney and transported to Glenwood Medical Center. He
42. An initial report from Glenwood Medical Center listed the principle cause of Greene’s
death as cardiac arrest. He was also diagnosed with an “unspec誼ed i垂ury ofhead.”
43. O珊cers immediately began efforts to obfuscate the true nature ofthe conduct that
a. police persomel told Greene’s family that he had been killed in an auto accident.
b. One O綿cer told Greene’s mother that he had been ki11ed immediately after
hitting a tree'
c. The call for Emergency Medical Services concealed血e fact that lethal force had
beenused.
d. The sole police report produced to date does not indicate that force was used.
f O餌cers claimed that Greene was intoxicated prior to leaming that a toxicoIogy
autopsy, thereby denying the right ofthe family to have a representative observe
h. Denying Green’s family access to video footage ofthe use oflethal force.
44, Doctor Omokhuale, an emergenCy rOOm Physician at Glenwood confirms the O餌cers’
“upon obtaining more history from different law enforcement personnel [sic],
history seems to be di$ointed and does not add up. Different versIOnS are
present… family states they were told by law enforcement that patient died on
impact with three immediately after motor vehicle accident, but law enforcement
state to me that patient for out ofthe car and was runnlng and invoIved in a fight
and struggle where them where he was tased 3 times・’’
45. The O餌cers/ awareness of the unconstitutional nature oftheir conduct resulted in
persistent attempts to obfuscate the true nature of the conduct that caused Greene’s
de加h.
Case 3:20-cv-00578-TAD-KLH Document 1 Filed 05/06/20 Page 7 of 11 PageID #: 7
46. The autopsy revealed the true nature ofthe O触cers’conduct, nOting multiple signs of
recent trauma, blunt force i可uries to the head and fa・Ce, facia1 1acerations, facial
abrasions, facial contusions, SCalp lacerations, blunt force irjuries to the extremities, and
47. The O綿cers use of lethal force was malicious, unreaSOnable, and excessive.
49. The actions of the Defendants, Trooper Demoss, Master Trooper Hollingsworth Master
Harpin, and John Doe Corporations l-3 caused the death ofRonald Greene.
50. Plaintiff claims all available damages under the Louisiana Wrongful Death Statute for
financial contributions and the loss of future services, SuPPOrt, SOCiety, COmfort, affection,
have rendered but for his traumatic, untimely and umatural death.
5 1. Plaintiff claims damages for payment for all medical expense, funeral expenses, and burial
eXPenSeS.
52. Plaintiff hereby brings a Survival Action under the Louisiana Survival Statute’LA C.C.
A巾. 2315.l.
53. Plaintiffclaims all damages recoverable under the Statute’including but not limited to’
loss ofincome both past and future income potential’aS WeH as’Pain and suffering prlOr
to death, and for emotional distress suffered by Ronald Greene from the initiation ofthe
54. The preceding paragraphs are incorporated by ref料ence as though laid out餌Iy herein.
Lieutenant Clary, Sergeant McElroy, and Deputy She正ff Harpin’s punching, kicking,
beating, uSe Of an Electronic ControI Weapon, Or Other use offorce all ∞ntributing
caused Ronald Greene,s mental anguish, Pain, agOny and untimely death.
56. The actions ofTr∞Per Demoss, Master Trooper Ho11ingswo血Master Trooper York’
Captain Peters, Lieutenant Clary, Sergeant McElroy, and Deputy She正ff Harpin were
Lieutenant Clary, Sergeant McElroy, and Deputy Sherriff Harpin were acting under ∞lor
ofstatelaw.
58. Plaint肝seeks a11 available damages, including for the nature and extent of Decedent’s
l叩urleS, Pre-death pain and suifering, emOtional distress, and loss of life and enjoyment
pursuant to 412 U・S・C. § 1983, in an amount in excess ofOne Million Dollars ($1,OOO,OOO.OO),
survival and wrongful death danages’Punitive and exemplary danages as provided by law’
attomeys, fees under U.S・C. 1985 and 1988’and any other remedies lega11y appropriate.
Case 3:20-cv-00578-TAD-KLH Document 1 Filed 05/06/20 Page 9 of 11 PageID #: 9
59・ The preceding paragraphs are incorporated by reference as though laid out fully herein.
60. Trooper Demoss, Master Tr∞Per Hollingsworth Master Trooper York’Captain Peters,
Lieutenant Clary, Sergeant McElroy, and Deputy She正ff Harpin’s observed Ronald
Greene being punched, kicked, beaten, and abused with an Electronic ControI Weapon,
Which caused Ronald Greene’s mental anguish, Pain, agOny and untimely death.
Lieutenant Clary, Sergeant McElroy, and Deputy Sherriff Harpin, s knew that Ronald
Greene being punched, kicked, beaten, and abused with an Electronic ControI Weapon,
was un∞nStitutional but failed to intervene despite having the opportunity to do so.
62. Plaintiffseeks danages, including for the nature and extent ofDecedent’s i互iuries, Pre-
death pain and suffering, emOtional distress, and loss oflife and epjoyment oflife, aS
including interest, delay damages, COStS Of suit, general and spec沌c damages’including both
survival and wrongful death damages, Punitive and exemplary damages as provided by law’
attomeys, fees under U.S.C. 1985 and 1988, and any other remedies legally appropriate.
63. The preceding paragraphs are incorporated by ref料ence as though laid out fully herein.
64. Trooper Demoss, Master Trooper Hollingsworth Master Tr∞Per York, Captain Peters,
Case 3:20-cv-00578-TAD-KLH Document 1 Filed 05/06/20 Page 10 of 11 PageID #: 10
Lieutenant Clary, Sergeant McElroy, and Deputy Sherriff Harpin punched, kicked, beat,
and abused Ronald Greene with an Electronic ControI Weapon, Which caused him
65. The actions ofTrooper Demoss, Master Trooper Hollingsworth Master Trooper York’
Captain Peters, Lieutenant Clary, Sergeant McElroy, and Deputy She正ff Harpin were
66. Plaint肝seeks damages, including for the nature and extent ofDecedent’s i互uries, Pre-
death pain and suifering, emOtional distress, and loss of life and e垂oyment of life, aS We11
excess ofOne Million Dollars ($1,OOO,OOO.OO), including interest, delay damages, COStS Ofsuit,
67. The preceding paragraphs are incorporated by ref料ence as though laid out餌Iy herein・
68・ John Doe Corporations l-3 are the manufacturer, distributor’marketer’and training
providers ofElectronic ControI Weapons in the LOuisiana State Police Department and
69. John Doe Corporations hold their Electronic ControI Weapons out as a safおool for
70. John Doe Corporations were aware ofthat cardiac arrest and death are substantial risks
7l・ Nonetheless, John Doe Corporations continued to market and sell Electronic ControI
Weapons.
72. Upon information and belief an Electronic ControI Weapon produced by John Doe
73. As a result ofthe assault and defects or inherent dangers ofthe Electronic ControI
Weapons produced by John Doe Corporation, Ronald Greene died from cardiac arrest・
74. Plaintiff seeks damages, including for the nature and extent ofDecedent’s ir申vries, Pre-
death pain and suffering, emOtional distress, and loss oflife and e可oyment oflife, aS Well
excess ofOne Million Dollars ($l,OOO,OOO.OO), including interest, delay damages, COStS Ofsuit,
general and specific damages’including both survival and wrongful death damages’Punitive
Respect餌Iy Submitted,
Ronald Ha
HALEY A ASSOCIATES
8211 G○○ BIvd Ste E,
rk V. Maguire, Esquire
/監謹言PurELL
Philadelphia, PA 19109
Pro Hac Vice Petition forthcoming
Case 3:20-cv-00578-TAD-KLH Document 1-1 Filed 05/06/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 14
Case 3:20-cv-00578-TAD-KLH Document 1-1 Filed 05/06/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 15