Professional Documents
Culture Documents
09 Lagon vs. Hooven
09 Lagon vs. Hooven
349, 363
JANUARY 17, 2001
Lagon vs. Hooven
Comalco Industries, Inc.
*
G.R. No. 135657. January 17, 2001.
_______________
* SECOND DIVISION.
364
364 SUPREME
COURT
REPORTS
ANNOTATED
366 SUPREME
COURT
REPORTS
ANNOTATED
BELLOSILLO, J.:
_______________
1 Decision penned by Associate Justice B.A. Adefuin-de la
Cruz, concurred in by Associate Justices Gloria C. Paras
(now retired) and Ricardo P. Galvez (now Solicitor General).
2 Resolution penned by Associate Justice B.A. Adefuin-de
368
369
_______________
5 26 August 1991 Decision penned by Judge Romeo D.
Marasigan, RTC-Br. 16, Davao City.
370
371
_______________
6 See Imperial v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 102037, 17
July 1996, 259 SCRA 65, 71.
7 Reyes v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 110207, 11 July
372
Exhibit “F”—Undated
Proposal:
I. For the
supply of
materials and
installation of
suspended
aluminum
ceiling
runners:
Area: 2,290 sq.
ft.
Materials: NU-
Main & Cross
runners
NU-5
Perimeter
mouldings
G.I. wire
hangers
Aluminum
straps
stiffeners
Blind P14,110.00
Rivets and
Screws
Labor 4,230.00
charge
18,440.00
II One (1) set: 1,150.00
65 x 68 YP
aluminum
cladding
P19,590.00
Delivery and 1,860.00
Installation
charge
P21,450.00
Exhibit “F-
1”—Proposal
dated 3 April
1981
“Hooven”
Aluminum
Casement
Windows
Anolok Finish
Manually
Operated, with
6.0 mm
Brozepane
Tinted Glass
Five x 126-
(5) 1/2” (w/
sets: transom)
65”
One x 126-
(1) 1/2” (w/
set: AC
65” provision)
Two x 125-
(2) 1/2” -do-
sets:
39-
1/2”
One x 87” -
(1) do-
set:
39-
1/2”
One x 223”
(1) -do-
set:
39-
1/2”
One x 57-
(1) 1/2” (w/
set: transom)
65”
One x 4” -
(1) do-
set:
65”
P42,530.00
“Hooven”
Aluminum
Entrances and
Fixed Windows
Anolok Finish,
with 6.0 mm
Bromepane
Tinted Glass
One (1) set:
100-1/2” x 76-
1/2,” double
sash, double
acting swing
door, with
transom.
Two (2) sets: 21,740.00
80” x 278,”
fixed panels
“Hooven”
Aluminum
Sliding
Windows
Fabricated
From SD-
Sections,
Anolok Finish,
with 6.0 mm
Bromepane
Tinted Glass
One (1) set: 54
x 191
One (1) set: 45 11,650.00
x 302
75,920.00
373
374
375
To change width
of one (1) set:
item 1
from 126-1/2
to 132-1/2.
To add: one (1)
set 65”H x 60”
aluminum
casement
windows with
6.0 mm tinted
glass.
To extend alum P8,640.00
tubulars of fixed
windows on
2nd floor by
29”L and
installation of
YP-aluminum
cladding
Exhibit “C-2”—
Delivery Receipt
dated
25 August
1983
Hooven Alum
Casement
Windows Anolok
Finish
Manually
Operated
with 6.0 mm
Bronzepane
Tinted
Glass:
Five x 126-1/2”
(5) with
sets: transom
65”
One x 126-1/2
(1) set: with AC
65” provision
Two x 125-1/2
(2) - do
sets:
39-1/2
One x 7” - do
(1) set:
39-1/2”
One x 223” -
(1) set: do
39-1/2”
One (l) x 57-1/2”
set: with
65” transom
One x 74” - do
(1) set: -
65”
P42,530.00
Hooven Alum
Entrances &
Fixed Windows
Anolok
Finish with
6.0 mm
Bronzepane
Tinted
Glass:
One (1) set: 100-
1/2 x 76-1/2,
double sash,
double acting
swing door, with
transom
Two (2) sets: 80” P21,740.00
x 278” fixed
panels
Exhibit “C-3”—
Delivery Receipt
dated
25 August
1983
Hoven Alum
Sliding Windows
Fabricated from
SD Sections
Anolok Finish
with 6.0 mm
Bronzepane
Tinted Glass:
One (1) set: 45” x
191”
One (1) set: 45” x P11,650.00
302”
Add: 7,500.00
Delivery
and
Installation
Less: 7% 6,256.50
Discount
P77,163.50
Exhibit “D-1”—
Delivery Receipt
dated
25 August
1983
For the supply of
materials and
installation of
aluminum
stucco embossed
sheet on spiral
376
staircase: P5,310.00
One (1) set
32” H x 304”
WL
Exhibit “E-
1”—Delivery
Receipt dated
25 August
1983
NU- main and
cross runners
NU-5
Perimeter
mouldings
G.I. Wire
Hangers
Aluminum
straps
stiffeners
Blind rivets P17,057.00
and screws
_______________
8 TSN, 8 September 1988, p. 98.
377
378
_______________
11 TSN, 9 October 1987, pp. 12-13 (Ocular Inspection).
382
_______________
12 Del Mundo v. Court of appeals,G.R. No. 104576, 20
January 1995, 240 SCRA 348; Development Bank of the
Philippines v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 110053, 16 October
1995, 249 SCRA 331; Del Rosario v. Court of Appeals, G.R.
No. 118325, 29 January 1997, 267 SCRA 158, 171.
383
_______________
13 Del Rosario v. Court of Appeals, id.
14 Art. 2208. In the absence of stipulation, attorney’s fees
384
384 SUPREME COURT
REPORTS
ANNOTATED
Logon vs. Hoouen
Comalco Industries, Inc.
Decision modified.
_______________
385
——o0o——