Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ho There Is No Significant Difference Among The Means. Ha There Is A Significant Difference Among The Means

    Uploaded by

    Clarissa Teodoro
    636 views3 pages
    An oil company introduced a new gasoline brand in three major cities and collected daily sales data from 10 outlets in each city. An ANOVA test found a significant difference in average daily sales volumes between the cities at the 1% significance level. A marathon was held and completion times were collected from 12 competitors along with their occupation and training method. An ANOVA test found a significant difference in completion times between training methods but not between occupations at the 5% significance level.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Stat_07Lab01

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    An oil company introduced a new gasoline brand in three major cities and collected daily sales data from 10 outlets in each city. An ANOVA test found a significant difference in average daily sales volumes between the cities at the 1% significance level. A marathon was held and completion times were collected from 12 competitors along with their occupation and training method. An ANOVA test found a significant difference in completion times between training methods but not between occupations at the 5% significance level.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    636 views3 pages

    Ho There Is No Significant Difference Among The Means. Ha There Is A Significant Difference Among The Means

    Uploaded by

    Clarissa Teodoro
    An oil company introduced a new gasoline brand in three major cities and collected daily sales data from 10 outlets in each city. An ANOVA test found a significant difference in average daily sales volumes between the cities at the 1% significance level. A marathon was held and completion times were collected from 12 competitors along with their occupation and training method. An ANOVA test found a significant difference in completion times between training methods but not between occupations at the 5% significance level.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    TEODORO, CLARISSA C.

    BSA3A

    1. An oil company has introduced a new gasoline brand in its outlets in three (3) major cities. However, they are
    not sure how the new brand is selling at the three (3) places since there is a lot of difference in the driving habits
    of people in the three (3) cities. The company selected ten (10) outlets in each city and tabulated the data on an
    average daily sale (Volume-in Gallon) at each of the selected outlets. The data is presented in the table below.
    Items 1, 2, and 3 in the table represent the three (3) cities. Test the hypothesis at a 1% alpha level.

    1. State the Null and Alternative Hypothesis.

     Ho= There is no significant difference among the means.


     Ha= There is a significant difference among the means.

    2. Set the level of significance or alpha. The level of significance or the alpha is 0.01 or 1%.

    3. Calculate the degree of freedom (df), F- Critical Value and the F- Value.
    o Using the Microsoft excel the table shows the computation of the data.

    Anova: Single Factor

    SUMMARY
    Groups Count Sum Mean Variance
    Column 1 10 137.95 13.795 2.04802778
    Column 2 10 77.25 7.725 3.20513889
    Column 3 10 152.65 15.265 8.23891667

    ANOVA
    Source of Variation SS df MS F- value P-value F criitical
    Between Groups 319.5247 2 159.7623333 35.5235725 2.7481E-08 5.488117768
    Within Groups 121.4288 27 4.497361111

    Total 440.9534 29

    4. Make a statistical Decision.


    o Using the F-critical Value Approach
    -Since the computed f-value (35.52) is greater than to the f-critical value (5.49) we need to reject the
    null hypothesis.

    5. Make a conclusion.

    At (0.01)level of significance, there is enough evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference
    in the average daily sales volume of gasoline in each outlets in three(3) cities.

    2. An official marathon contest was held in a particular city. The table below gives the times taken, in hours, by
    twelve competitors to complete the course, together with their type of occupation and training method used.

    Carry out an analysis of variance and test, at a 5% level of significance, for differences between types of
    occupation and between training methods.

    1. State the Null and Alternative Hypothesis.


    Ho=
    Ho=
    Ha=

    2. Set the level of significance or alpha. The level of significance or the alpha is 0.05 or 5%.

    3. Calculate the degree of freedom (df), F- Critical Value and the F- Value.
    o Using the Microsoft excel the table shows the computation of the data.

    Anova: Two-Factor Without Replication

    SUMMARY Count Sum Average Variance


    Row 1 3 37.6 12.53333333 15.45333333
    Row 2 3 38.25 12.75 17.4375
    Row 3 3 33.8 11.26666667 18.01333333
    Row 4 3 33.8 11.26666667 12.49333333

    Column 1 4 55.7 13.925 0.755833333


    Column 2 4 29.85 7.4625 0.702291667
    Column 3 4 57.9 14.475 2.169166667

    ANOVA
    Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
    Rows 5.742291667 3 1.914097222 2.234535874 0.184764148 4.757062663
    Columns 121.6554167 2 60.82770833 71.0108634 6.66005E-05 5.14325285
    Error 5.139583333 6 0.856597222

    Total 132.5372917 11

    4. Make a statistical Decision.

    ANOVA
    Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit Decision
    Rows 5.742291667 3 1.914097222 2.234535874 0.184764148 4.757062663 Fail to Reject the Null
    Columns 121.6554167 2 60.82770833 71.0108634 6.66005E-05 5.14325285 Reject the Null
    Error 5.139583333 6 0.856597222

    Total 132.5372917 11
    o Using the F-critical Value Approach
    -Since the computed f-value (2.23) is less than to the f-critical value (4.76) we need to accept the null
    hypothesis at rows factor, while at column factor since the computed f-value (71.01) is less than to
    the f-critical value (5.14) we need to reject the null hypothesis

    5. Make a conclusion.

    You might also like