Professional Documents
Culture Documents
USSC Certiorari Petition Re FSC20-1255
USSC Certiorari Petition Re FSC20-1255
WASHINGTON, DC 20543-0001
December 2, 2020
Neil Gillespie
8092 SW 115th Loop
Ocala, FL 34481
The above-entitled petition for writ of certiorari was postmarked November 23, 2020
and received December 1, 2020. The papers are returned for the following reason(s):
Pursuant to the Court's order in 18-7225, you are required to submit the $300.00
Please correct and resubmit as soon as possible. Unless the petition is submitted to
this Office in corrected form within 60 days of the date of this letter, the petition will
not be filed. Rule 14.5.
A copy of the corrected petition must be served on opposing counsel.
When making the required corrections to a petition, no change to the substance of the
petition may be made.
Sincerely,
( ." ¥.
Sc~tt S. Harris, Clerk~\,
By. ~ \~{?
Clayton R. Higgins, .
(202) 479-3019
Enclosures
Supreme Court of the United States
Washington, DC 20543-0001
Scott S. Harris
Clerk of the Court
(202) 479-3011
March 4, 2019
No. 18-7225
The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:
Sincerely,
~ J!;.JftWo
Scott S. Harris, Clerk
Clerk November 23,2020
Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543
Dear Clerk:
Original Petition for Writ of Certiorari; Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; and ten copies.
1 JoseI'. Gil1~:'e
8092 SW 115th Loop
Ocala, Florida 34481
Tel: 352-854-7807
Email: [email protected]
Enclosures
RECEIVED
DEC - 1 2020
No: _______________________
_______________________
IN THE
____________________
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL
Respondents.
________________________
____________________
by
1. Can a writ of habeas corpus free a criminal defendant in state criminal proceedings from
being restrained by forced appointment of counsel prohibited by Faretta v. California, 422 U.S.
806 (1975), where the Supreme Court of the United States held that criminal defendants have a
constitutional right to refuse counsel and represent themselves in state criminal proceedings?
2. Can a writ of habeas corpus free a criminal defendant in state criminal proceedings from
being restrained under threat of incarceration or submission to a competency evaluation?
3. Can a writ of habeas corpus free a criminal defendant in state criminal proceedings from
being restrained by a judge who failed to recuse on a meritorious motion to disqualify?
4. Can a writ of habeas corpus free a criminal defendant in state criminal proceedings from
being restrained by excessive bail?
LIST OF PARTIES
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA
ASHLEY MOODY, ATTORNEY GENERAL
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
WESLEY HEIDT, Assistant Attorney General
444 Seabreeze Boulevard, Suite 500
Daytona Beach, Florida 32118
(386) 238-4990/ (386) 238-4997 (fax)
[email protected]
[email protected]
TONIA WERNER, MD
Meridian Behavioral Healthcare
4300 SW 13th Street
Gainesville, FL 32608
(352) 374-5600; (800) 330-5615
[email protected]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OPINIONS BELOW.................................................................................................................1
JURISDICTION....................................................................................................................... 5
CONCLUSION.........................................................................................................................33
INDEX TO APPENDICES
STATE CASES
Jones v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 48 So. 3d 704 (Fla. 2010).............................
Floyd v. Parole and Probation Comm’n, 509 So. 2d 919 (Fla. 1987) ...............
Allen v. Cochran, 128 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 1961) ...................................................
Logan v. State, 846 So.2d 472 (Fla. 2003).........................................................
Salser v. State, 582 So.2d 12 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)............................................
Crooms v. Schad, 51 Fla. 168, 40 So. 497 (1906) .............................................
Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below.
OPINIONS BELOW
1
Filing # 112373330 E-Filed 08/25/2020 05:50:12 PM
APPENDIX A
Petitioner(s) Respondent(s)
A True Copy
Test:
td
Served:
WESLEY HEIDT
NEIL J. GILLESPIE
HON. DAVID R. ELLSPERMANN, CLERK
BRENDA HARTWRIGHT SMITH
CASE NO.: SC20-1255
Page Two
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
________________________/
ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed July 28, 2020, and
the Amended Petition, filed August 18, 2020, are denied on the merits.
cc:
5
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED
“The writ of habeas corpus shall be grantable of right, freely and without cost.” Art. I, §
13, Fla. Const. The writ is an original proceeding in this Court, Art. V, § 4(b)(3), Fla. Const.;
Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(3), and is governed by Fla. R. App. P. 9.100, and Chapter 79 of the
Florida Statutes.
ORDERED that Petitioner shall file, within ten days of the date
hereof, an Amended Petition.
The writ of habeas corpus addresses the legality of the restraint. In Jones v. Florida
Parole Comm’n, 48 So. 3d 704 (Fla. 2010), the Florida Supreme Court found that habeas corpus
was the proper remedy to determine the validity of a restraint under which a person is held. For
this reason, the petitioner must actually demonstrate that he or she is in custody or that the
petitioner is being restrained in some manner by the respondent. In other words, habeas corpus is
only an appropriate remedy if the petitioner is actually being detained. See Floyd v. Parole and
Probation Comm’n, 509 So. 2d 919 (Fla. 1987) and Allen v. Cochran, 128 So. 2d 608 (Fla.
1961).
6
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
My name is Neil Joseph Gillespie, a nonlawyer appearing pro se, a person with
disabilities, henceforth in the first person. I am age 64, with no prior criminal record. Before
educated with degrees in business (Wharton/UPenn) and psychology (The Evergreen State
In 2005 moved to Ocala Florida and cared for my Mother who later died of Alzheimer’s
disease in 2009. I have lived at the same address since 2005, my Florida residential homestead,
8092 SW 115th Loop, Ocala, Marion County, Florida 34481. (My home is in foreclosure).
In 2006 I contacted the Marion County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) to no avail about
financial fraud by Bank of America and my sister and a scheme that wrongly encumbered
In 2008 I replaced that loan and consolidated other debts with a Home Equity Conversion
Mortgage, also called a HECM reverse mortgage, currently in litigation. During this time I have
become a target of the MCSO, the Marion County Bar Association, The Florida Bar, the Courts,
and State Attorney Brad King, and have been denied rights under color of law.
GILLESPIE, Marion County Circuit Criminal Court, Case No. 2019-CF-004193-A-Z, and
My arrest was politically motivated by Marion Co. Sheriff Billy Woods, see,
7
Sheriff Woods was vice president of Marion Senior Services, Inc.
The complainant, Chonnie Phillips, is a temp employee of Marion Senior Services, Inc.
I did not intercept oral communication with Ms. Phillips while she was employed by
Marion Senior Services, Inc. Instead, I was a party to the telephone call with Phillips who
Attorney Samantha Shealy Rauba, FL Bar #59503, serves on the Board of Directors of
Marion Senior Services, Inc. A web page for Attorney Shealy Rauba states:
Mrs. Shealy Rauba is highly active in the Marion County legal and
professional community. She serves on the board of Marion Senior
Services...She has been married to her husband, Erik, since 2010 and
they have two daughters.
https://www.smrmlaw.com/samantha-shealy-rauba/
Mrs. Shealy Rauba was president and registered agent for the Marion County Bar
Association, Inc. when she refused to provide me the charter as required by F.S. § 617.1623. The
Florida Bar responded to my complaint October 22, 2019 and determined this is a civil dispute
best resolved through the civil system, see Samantha Shealy Rauba, RFA No. 20-5317.
The Marion County Bar Association, Inc. is housed in the State Attorney’s Office, 110
Mrs. Shealy Rauba is married to Erik John Rauba, FL Bar # 59429. Mr. Rauba is
employed by the State Attorney for the Fifth Judicial Circuit, 110 NW 1st Ave. Ste 5000, Ocala,
VS NEIL JOSEPH GILLESPIE, Marion County Circuit Criminal Court, Case No. 2020-CF-
8
Fla. Stat. sec. 784.03.1A1 Battery
Fla. Stat. sec. 812.131.2b Robbery by Sudden Snatching Without
Deadly Weapon
The alleged victim, Sarah May Thompson, is a convicted felon who served time in
Ms. Thompson is a 35 year-old unremarried widow, a homeless thief and commercial sex
worker, who trolls CR 484 from Summerfied Florida to Dunellon Florida in search of drugs,
Filed 07/13/2020 05:00:59 PM, provided Brady Evidence, the Victim's Criminal History, which
includes:
9
drugs, and she signed an admission statement for use of marijuana,
opiates, and benzodiazepines; while pregnant with her daughter.
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
Arrest/Charge Date 2007-02-08
Arresting/Charging Agency STATE POLICE SKOWHEGAN;
Subject Name(s) THOMPSON, SARAH MAE
Charge Description ASSAULT (Charge Class D)
Charge Comment Domestic Violence Involved
Statute 17-A MRSA SUBSECTION 207(1)(A)
Disposition 2007-04-25; DEFERRED DISPOSITION
2008-06-25; GUILTY
Sentence 2008-06-25: FINED $300.00
2008-06-25: INCARCERATED 180 days ALL
SUSPENDED
2008-06-25: PROBATION 1 years
DRUGS
Charge Number 650687A 001
Charge Tracking Number 650687A
Agency 7TH DISTRICT COURT AUGUSTA; ME006045J
Charge Description UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF SCHEDULED
DRUG (Charge Class D)
Statute 17-A MRSA SUBSECTION 1107-A(1)(C)
State Sequence Code 8571
Severity Misdemeanor
Disposition 2008-10-14; GUILTY
Sentencing Agency 7TH DISTRICT COURT AUGUSTA; ME006045J
Court Case Number AUGDCCR200802004
10
Charge Number 650687A 002
Charge Sequence Number 2
Charge Tracking Number 650687A
Sentence 2008-10-14: FINED $400.00
NOTE 2: Ms. Thompson was arrested August 31, 2020 in Sumter County Florida:
On July 14, 2020 I emailed ASA Jared Gainey about the State’s Discovery Exhibit:
Mr. Gainey:
Thank you for the State’s Discovery Exhibit. Regarding the Brady
Evidence for Ms. Thompson, I believe Thompson was convicted of
domestic violence against Carlton Robert Norwood (died Dec-31-
2011), her former common law husband. This information was
provided to me in January 2020 by her mother, Patricia Thompson.
The crime was committed in the state of Maine, either in Augusta
Maine or Vassalboro Maine, which I believe are located in Kennebec
County, Maine
https://www.courts.maine.gov/maine_courts/findacourt/kennebec_superior.shtml
11
Dolly Style, n.k.a. Roxy, who advertises "i love fetishes bdsm" and
"S&M" which I believe accounts for the bruising of her legs a week
after the incident shown in the arrest warrant. Personally I know
Thompson enjoys physical fighting with men from our conversations.
ttps://www.eroticmonkey.ch/roxy-escort-ocala-608178 ,
https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/dolly-style-escort-ocala-608178
Thompson also advertises as "Sadie" in Dunnellon, Services: Escort, S
& M https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/sadie-escort-dunnellon-868163
and Thompson advertises as "Dolly Stylz" in Dunnellon, Services:
Escort, S & M https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/dolly-stylz-escortdunnellon-
852990
From time to time I gave Ms. Thomspon occasional safe harbor when she had no where
12
outlet under the fuse box in the garage. Thompson was 8 feet away
when I confiscated the phone for theft of electricity and violation of
house rules. Thompson was armed with a metal T-ball bat she earlier
took from my vehicle. Thompson screamed for her phone when I
unplugged it from the electrical outlet, not taken from her person as
claimed.
In Florida court-appointed counsel is governed by Chapter 27, Florida Statutes, Part III,
Public Defenders and Other Court-Appointed Counsel (ss. 27.40 - 27.61) and consists of:
On November 10, 2019 I refused to sign an application for criminal indigent status
presented to me at the Marion County Jail because it wrongly stated I was homeless, and it
wrongly stated “I am seeking the appointment of the public defender”. I am not homeless. I have
lived at the same address in Marion Co. since 2005. Also, I knew I had a conflict with the Public
13
I was released on bond prior to the First Appearance (Rule 3.130), and in any event I was
not timely informed of it, so I did not attend First Appearance. The so-called First Appearance
On December 10, 2019 I attended an Arraignment (Rule 3.160) where Judge Herndon
my affidavit of indigent status was incomplete. (Exhibit 3). I knew I had a conflict with the
Public Defender (PD). I knew I had a conflict with the OCCCRC. But the Court discouraged
On December 16, 2019 the Public Defender filed a Notice of Appearance by and through
Kristina Belanger, FL Bar #1012137, Asst. Public Defender. On January 7, 2020 the Public
On Wednesday, June 19, 2019, I had emailed Susan D. Bailey, Assistant Public
Last week Ms. Thompson moved into my home as a live-in home health provider, see
attached. On June 16, 2019 Sarah admitted to taking prescription medication from my
room. Sarah apologized and promised not to take my pills again.
I don’t know what to do. I have no faith in the Marion County Sheriff’s Office, over
issues related to my home foreclosure (2013-CA-00115). I have no faith in the UDEST or
DCF. I do not want to report Sarah to L.E. (I support legalizing drugs). But I may not be
the best person to help Sarah. I am aware she placed a newborn for adoption in 2015. She
arrived at my door the result of mistaken identity through a website.
Initially Sarah seemed nice, and she needed a place to stay. I felt compassion for a
homeless, unremarried widow. And it is difficult for a single man age 63 with health
issues and limited income to find competent help. Previously two other providers did not
work out, one age 40 (drugs) and one age 43 (drinking/smoking).
Currently Sarah has a broken tooth that needs extraction, but she refuses medical
treatment I found, see https://www.truecaredentistocala.com/emergency-dentist.html
14
I don’t want to throw Sarah out into the street. I believe she needs stability, but the
people in her life may not be stable. I would appreciate any suggestions you may have.
Thank you.
Ms. Bailey did not respond then, or to subsequent contacts related to this case. A week or
so later Ms. Thompson met a man online, Matthew Smith, and soon moved into his home in
Dunnellon Florida. Ms. Thompson was seldom here after that, and was completely gone from
my home by July 15, 2019. I next saw her again on January 1, 2020 when she claimed domestic
(CONFLICT), that appointed the Office of Criminal Counsel and Civil Regional Counsel for the
5th D.C.A. (“OCCCRC”) to represent me, without following the safeguards established by
27.5303(1)(a).
On January 16, 2020 Zachary Glenn Phipps of the OCCCRC for 5th D.C.A. filed a notice
of appearance to represent me in this case, and other such. I still had not completed and executed
an application for criminal indigent status under § 27.52 required for appointment of counsel. I
was not found indigent under § 27.52. The appointment of the Public Defender and the
OCCCRC is without legal basis. The representation by Zachary Glenn Phipps and the OCCCRC
I fired Mr. Phipps on March 27, 2020, but he failed to recuse himself.
15
see Filing # 109909167 E-Filed 07/07/2020 06:50:44 PM.
On July 22, 2020 in Case No. 2019-CF-4193 I filed notice with the Court,
On July 31, 2020 in Case No. 2019-CF-4193 Judge Tatti struck 9 of my pro se motions,
see,
Because the Defendant is represented by counsel, his pro se motions are unauthorized.
Logan v. State, 846 So.2d 472 (Fla. 2003) (holding a Defendant is not entitled to
represent himself and have the assistance of counsel); Salser v. State, 582 So.2d 12 (Fla.
5th DCA 1991) (Defendant does not have the right to a “hybrid" representation).
16
6. Defendant's Request for Disability Accommodation filed on
July 9, 2020;
7. Defendant's Motion for Transcript and Video of Zoom Hearing
July 9, 2020 filed on July 22, 2020.
8. Defendant's Motion for Rule 3.133 Pretrial Probable Cause
Determinations and Adversary Preliminary Hearings filed on July 24, 2020; and
9. Defendant's Pro Se Motion for Order to Reassign Case Motion
for Rehearing Order to Revoke Bond filed on July 27,2020
In response, on Aug-06-2020 Judge Tatti entered Order Allowing The Office of Criminal
Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel To Withdrawal. The Order also appointed Brenda H. Smith,
17
3. I reject representation by Brenda H. Smith at this time. Rule
3.111(d)(5).
(3) Regardless of the defendant's legal skills or the complexity of the case, the court shall
not deny a defendant's unequivocal request to represent himself or herself, if the court
makes a determination of record that the defendant has made a knowing and intelligent
waiver of the right to counsel, and does not suffer from severe mental illness to the point
where the defendant is not competent to conduct trial proceedings by himself or herself.
6. The Defendant in this case was found competent to waive the right
to a lawyer and represent himself during two (2) Faretta hearings in
2020-CF-2417, by Judge Tatti on July 28, 2020 (arraignment) and
by Judge Craggs on June 14, 2020 (first appearance).
CF-4193 on July 9, 2020 during a hearing on the State’s motion to revoke bond. Due to COVID-
19 the hearing was conducted remotely with “Zoom”. I was not able to log into the Zoom
hearing, or testify on my behalf, because, inter alia, the hearing was over by the time I got Mr.
18
HEARING RESULTS: Bond revoked, the Sheriff shall take the Defendant into custody
and detain said Defendant at the County Jail, pending further order of this Court.
NOTE: I did not surrender or go to jail. On the advice of other counsel I went to a bunker
to continue working on my case, to fix the damage done by my ineffective “lawyer”.
On July 28, 2020 I appeared pro se for an arraignment in Case No. 2020-CF-2417. I
prepared for the hearing by filing a request for disability accommodation, with Appendix A,
COVID-19 complaint to the Florida Surgeon General and Florida Department of Health.
In Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), the appropriate standard for
ineffective assistance of counsel requires both that the defense attorney was objectively deficient
and that there was a reasonable probability that a competent attorney would have led to a
different outcome.
Mr. Phipps was objectively deficient during the hearing, which lacked preparation by
Phipps, and where he failed to zealously represent me with a compelling argument. Also, the
Zoom hearing was over by the time I got Mr. Phipps’ email with the login password.
HEARING RESULTS: Bond revoked, the Sheriff shall take the Defendant into custody
and detain said Defendant at the County Jail, pending further order of this Court.
19
GROUNDS FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF
On March 13, 2020 attorney Zachary Phipps filed a groundless Motion To Determine
Defendant’s Competency To Stand Trial. Phipps lied to me during the arraignment in 2019-CF-
4193 when he asked me, at the last moment, to agree to a review of disability. Phipps did not get
my informed consent. Phipps did not seek a review of disability; instead, he sought to determine
During a telephone call with me on July 30, 2020 at 12:26 PM, Mr. Phipps agreed to
withdrawal his Motion To Determine Defendant’s Competency To Stand Trial. Mr. Phipps said I
am competent to stand trial. However before he filed the motion to withdrawal his Motion To
Determine Defendant’s Competency To Stand Trial, Mr. Phipps moved to withdrawal from the
case. During our conversation Mr. Phipps also said the prosecution in 2020-CF-2417 was an
“abuse of discretion”.
Mr. Phipps said he refers all clients with prior traumatic brain injury for a competency
hearing. Mr. Phipps said he was initially concerned that I was not focused enough, but he
changed his mind when he saw the prosecution in 2020-CF-2417 was an “abuse of discretion”.
I was found competent to waive the right to a lawyer twice in 2020-CF-2417, by Judge
Tatti on July 28, 2020 (arraignment) and by Judge Craggs on June 14, 2020 (first appearance)
20
I am presumed by law to be competent. I have the inalienable right to freedom and
liberty. Amendments IV, V and XIV, Constitution of the United States; Article I, Sections 2, 9
hearing loss, and obstructive breathing/sleep apnea. I am at increased risk of being infected with
congenital defects including eustachian tube defect (L), and retracted eardrum (L).
A person with disabilities does not mean they are incompetent. A vulnerable adult under
415.102(28) does not mean the person is incompetent. By way of example, former President
Franklin D. Roosevelt was disabled with paralytic illness, and a vulnerable adult paralyzed from
On March 17, 2020 Judge Tatti entered Order Appointing Expert For Competency
Evaluation. I voiced concern with Dr. Krop over his public discipline by the Medical Board;
On July 31, 2020 Judge Tatti entered Order Appointing Expert For Competency
Evaluation. The Order appoints TONIA WERNER, MD, Meridian Behavioral Healthcare, 4300
On July 28, 2020 during an arraignment in Case No. 2020-CF-2417, Judge Tatti
Stand Trial. Mr. Phipps said I am competent to stand trial. But before he filed the motion to
21
withdrawal his Motion To Determine Defendant’s Competency To Stand Trial, Mr. Phipps
liberty that a motion to dismiss it or quash it is not permitted. See Crooms v. Schad, 51 Fla. 168,
. . . The respondent cannot move to quash the order or to dismiss the petition. . . . This is
the only civil proceeding in which the legal sufficiency of a pleading cannot be directly
attacked or in which the parties are not limited to the issues raised in the pleadings.
No one in the case has suggested I am not competent to stand trial. Therefore
The Petitioner filed two motions for an order to reassign the cases, as
required by Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(j), directing the clerk to
reassign the cases, whereupon Judge Tatti belatedly denied the pro se
motion to disqualify him in Case No. 2020-CF-2417. Judge Tatti then
denied the Petitioner’s motion for an order to reassign the case.
22
MOTION FOR ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE... Filing # 110867275 EFiled
07/27/2020 05:58:22 PM
Disqualification and Disclosure, Florida Judicial College, pages 6-7. "If the Judge fails to
rule on the motion to disqualify within 30 days after service of the motion, the motion is deemed
granted..."
Thirty (30) days have passed without a ruling; the motion is deemed granted, see Fla. R.
On July 31, 2020 in Case No. 2020-CF-2417, Judge Tatti entered Order Denying
Defendant’s Motion To Disqualify. Because more than 30 days have passed, attempts to refute
the motion by Judge Tatti are moot, so there is no need to address those misplaced responses.
The only thing that matters, was the motion served pursuant to Rule 2.330(c)?
In addition to filing with the clerk, the movant shall immediately serve
a copy of the motion on the subject judge as set forth in Florida Rule
of Civil Procedure 1.080.
My Certificate of Service states, I HEREBY CERTIFY the foregoing was served June
22, 2020 on the portal to Judge Tatti and to the names on the Notice of Service of Court
23
Documents. Judge Tatti was automatically served in 2020-CF-2417 on the Portal. I served the
Clerk on the Portal. Thus, the motion was served to the Judge and the Clerk on June 22, 2020.
Service was made according to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.080. Judge Tatti’s email
24
of documents includes electronic mail (“e-mail”) and any internetbased
transmission procedure, and may include procedures allowing
for documents to be signed or verified by electronic means.
(c) Documents Affected.
(1) All documents that are court records, as defined in rule
2.430(a)(1), must be filed by electronic transmission...
On July 27, 2020 I filed in Case No. 2019-CF-4193 DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
"If the Judge fails to rule on the motion to disqualify within 30 days after service of the
Thirty (30) days have passed without a ruling; the motion is deemed granted, see Fla. R.
25
of counsel); Salser v. State, 582 So.2d 12 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)
(Defendant does not have the right to a “hybrid" representation).
1. Defendant's Pro Se Motion for a hearing on State’s Motion to Revoke Bond filed
on June 19, 2020;
2. Defendant's Pro Se Verified Motion to Disqualify Circuit Judge Anthony Tatti
filed on June 22, 2020;
3. Defendant's Pro Se Request for Disability Accommodation filed on July 2, 2020
4. Defendant's Pro Se Motion to Dismiss all Charges in Case No.: 2019-CF-4193
filed on July 7, 2020;
5. Defendant's Pro Se Motion for Recognizance Bond filed on July 7, 2020;
6. Defendant's Request for Disability Accommodation filed on July 9, 2020;
7. Defendant's Motion for Transcript and Video of Zoom Hearing July 9, 2020 filed
on July 22, 2020.
8. Defendant's Motion for Rule 3.133 Pretrial Probable Cause Determinations and
Adversary Preliminary Hearings filed on July 24, 2020; and
9. Defendant's Pro Se Motion for Order to Reassign Case Motion for Rehearing
Order to Revoke Bond filed on July 27,2020
Because more than 30 days have passed, there is no need to address anything else. The
only thing that matters, was the motion to disqualify served pursuant to Rule 2.330(c)? The
In addition to filing with the clerk, the movant shall immediately serve
a copy of the motion on the subject judge as set forth in Florida Rule
of Civil Procedure 1.080.
My Certificate of Service states, I HEREBY CERTIFY the foregoing was served June
22, 2020 on the portal to Judge Tatti and to the names on the Notice of Service of Court
Documents. Judge Tatti was automatically served in 2019-CF-4193 on the Portal. I served the
26
Thus, the motion was served to the Judge and the Clerk on June 22, 2020. Service was
made according to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.080. Judge Tatti’s email address shown by
27
(c) Documents Affected.
(1) All documents that are court records, as defined in rule
2.430(a)(1), must be filed by electronic transmission...
The Petitioner is age 64, has never been convicted of a crime, has resided in
Marion County for over 15 years, is a former business owner, and educated
with degrees in business and psychology. Pursuant to Rule 3.131(b)(1), Fla.
R. Crim. P., “there is a presumption in favor of release on nonmonetary
conditions for any person who is granted pretrial release.”
Pursuant to Rule 3.131(b)(1), Fla. R. Crim. P., “there is a presumption in favor of release
On November 10, 2019, I was arrested and and released on a $4,000 bond total in case
no. 2019-CF-004193-A-Z. My arrest was politically motivated, see Affidavit of Neil J. Gillespie
The arrest warrant signed by Judge S. Sue Robbins on November 7, 2019 authorizes
At the time of my arrest on November 10, 2019 I was eligible for Recognizance Bond
28
On March 9, 2020 at 3:50 PM I emailed my appointed counsel, Zachary Glenn Phipps of
the OCCCRC for 5th D.C.A., and requested, “can you move for an order for release on my own
recognizance? (and end the bail bond).” Mr. Phipps failed to seek ROR on my behalf in March
Bail reduction is a legitimate function of defense counsel and zealous representation. The
foregoing example is evidence that Mr. Phipps and the OCCCRC for 5th D.C.A has not provided
On July 28, 2020, I made a spoken motion during the arraignment in Case No. 2020-CF-
2417 to be released on a recognizance bond. The money bail bond in that case is $5,000. Judge
Tatti denied my spoken motion, even though I appeared as required, and both charges were
downgraded.
The writ of habeas corpus is so important in connection with constitutional liberty that a
motion to dismiss it or quash it is not permitted. See Crooms v. Schad, 51 Fla. 168, 40 So. 497
(1906). Presently I am restrained by $9,000 total in money bail bonds. I am age 64 and have
29
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION - 1
There appears to be a conflict of laws, between The Florida Bar, and the Florida courts,
regarding Florida Bar Rule 4-3.8, Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor. See the Comment,
this part in particular: "Florida has adopted the American Bar Association Standards of Criminal
Justice Relating to Prosecution Function. This is the product of prolonged and careful
deliberation by lawyers experienced in criminal prosecution and defense and should be consulted
the Court has ruled against, see ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANTS PRO SE MOTIONS,
Because the Defendant is represented by counsel, his pro se motions are unauthorized.
Logan v. State, 846 So.2d 472 (Fla. 2003) (holding a Defendant is not entitled to
represent himself and have the assistance of counsel): Salser v. State, 582 So.2d 12 (Fla.
5th DCA 1991) (Defendant does not have the right to a "hybrid" representation).
Recent FSC Orders relying on Logan suggest it does not recognize the concept of Stand-
(a) An attorney whose assigned duty is to actively assist a pro se criminally accused
person should permit the accused to make the final decisions on all matters, including
strategic and tactical matters relating to the conduct of the case, while still providing the
attorney’s best advice.
(b) An attorney whose assigned duty is to assist a pro se criminally accused person only
when the accused requests assistance may bring to the attention of the accused steps that
could be potentially beneficial or dangerous to the accused, but should not actively
participate in the conduct of the defense unless requested by the accused or as directed by
the court.
(c) In either case, the assigned attorney should respect the accused’s right to develop and
present the accused’s own case, while still advising the accused of potential benefits and
30
dangers the attorney perceives in the course of the litigation. Such an attorney should be
fully prepared about the matter, in order to offer such advice and in case the court and the
accused determine that the full representation role should be transferred to defense
counsel at some point during the criminal proceedings.
Also see a Florida Bar Journal article attached with link below, Vol. 71, No. 9 October
https://www.floridabar.org/the-florida-bar-journal/self-representation-and-ineffective-assistance-
of-counsel-how-trial-judges-can-find-their-way-thro/
Also see Hackworth Law PA, and the article Plant City Criminal Lawyers: What Is Standby
Counsel, https://bhtampa.com/blog/plant-city-criminal-lawyers-standby-counsel/
“unelaborated decisions”
The Florida Supreme Court claims it doesn’t have jurisdiction to review unelaborated
decisions of the district courts. The FSC held in this case, SC20-1255: (Appendix A)
“no cause shall be dismissed because an improper remedy has been sought”
Existing law prohibits the Court from dodging its responsibility. Florida Supreme Court
justices get paid by taxpayers $220,600 annually; DCA judges get paid by taxpayers $169,554;
circuit judges by taxpayers $160,688; and county court judges by taxpayers $151,822.
31
We, the Citizens of Florida, employ judges to, inter alia, determine and decide issues.
The problem of "unelaborated decisions" amounts to a refusal by certain judges to perform their
sworn duty. The duty to determine and decide issues is shown below, 12A FlaJur2d § 144
32
CONCLUSION
Respectfully submitted,
~---
33
IN THE
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA ET AL
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Neil Josepl1 Gillespie, do swear or declare that on this date, November 23,
2020, as required by Supren1e Court Rule 29 I have served the enclosed MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and PETITION FOR WRIT OF
CERTIORARI on each party to the above proceeding or that party's counsel, and on
every other person required to be served, by depositing an envelope containing the above
documents in the United States mail properly addressed to each of them and with first
class postage prepaid, or by delivery to a third-party comn1ercial carrier for delivery
withit13 calendar days, and by E-service. The names and addresses of those served are:
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
APPENDIX C
Petitioner,
v. CASE NO.: 5D20-1632
STATE OF FLORIDA,
BRENDA H. SMITH, ESQUIRE
TONIA WERNER, MD,
Respondents.
___________________________/
Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES..................................................................
RECORDINGS OF HEARINGS...........................................................
INTRODUCTION................................................................................... 1.
JURISDICTION ..................................................................................... 2.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE .............................................................. 3.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS ........................................................... 9.
GROUNDS FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF ................................... 9.
The Petitioner filed two motions for an order to reassign the cases, as
required by Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(j), directing the clerk to
reassign the cases, whereupon Judge Tatti belatedly denied the pro se
motion to disqualify him in Case No. 2020-CF-2417. Judge Tatti then
denied the Petitioner’s motion for an order to reassign the case.
The Petitioner is age 64, has never been convicted of a crime, has
resided in Marion County for over 15 years, is a former business
owner, and educated with degrees in business and psychology.
Pursuant to Rule 3.131(b)(1), Fla. R. Crim. P., “there is a presumption
in favor of release on nonmonetary conditions for any person who is
granted pretrial release.”
STATE CASES
Jones v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 48 So. 3d 704 (Fla. 2010)................... 2
Floyd v. Parole and Probation Comm’n, 509 So. 2d 919 (Fla. 1987) ..... 2
Allen v. Cochran, 128 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 1961) .......................................... 2
Logan v. State, 846 So.2d 472 (Fla. 2003)................................................ 13
Salser v. State, 582 So.2d 12 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)................................... 13
Crooms v. Schad, 51 Fla. 168, 40 So. 497 (1906) ................................... 20
Due to COVID-19 the hearing was being conducted remotely with “Zoom”.
I was not able to log into the Zoom hearing, or testify on my behalf.
HEARING RESULTS: Bond revoked, the Sheriff shall take the Defendant
into custody and detain said Defendant at the County Jail, pending further
order of this Court.
person with disabilities, henceforth in the first person. I am age 64, with no
In 2005 moved to Ocala Florida and cared for my Mother who later
died of Alzheimer’s disease in 2009. I have lived at the same address since
avail about financial fraud by Bank of America and my sister and a scheme
In 2008 I replaced that loan and consolidated other debts with a Home
currently in litigation. During this time I have become a target of the MCSO,
the Marion County Bar Association, The Florida Bar, the Courts, and State
Attorney Brad King, and have been denied rights under color of law.
1
JURISDICTION
without cost.” Art. I, § 13, Fla. Const. The writ is an original proceeding in
this Court, Art. V, § 4(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(3), and is
ORDERED that Petitioner shall file, within ten days of the date
hereof, an Amended Petition.
In Jones v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 48 So. 3d 704 (Fla. 2010), the Florida
Supreme Court found that habeas corpus was the proper remedy to
determine the validity of a restraint under which a person is held. For this
is actually being detained. See Floyd v. Parole and Probation Comm’n, 509
So. 2d 919 (Fla. 1987) and Allen v. Cochran, 128 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 1961).
2
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
My arrest was politically motivated by Marion Co. Sheriff Billy Woods, see,
I did not intercept oral communication with Ms. Phillips while she
was employed by Marion Senior Services, Inc. Instead, I was a party to the
telephone call with Phillips who answered the phone when I called.
Board of Directors of Marion Senior Services, Inc. A web page for Attorney
Mrs. Shealy Rauba is highly active in the Marion County legal and
professional community. She serves on the board of Marion Senior
Services...She has been married to her husband, Erik, since 2010 and
they have two daughters.
https://www.smrmlaw.com/samantha-shealy-rauba/
3
Mrs. Shealy Rauba was president and registered agent for the Marion
County Bar Association, Inc. when she refused to provide me the charter as
October 22, 2019 and determined this is a civil dispute best resolved through
the civil system, see Samantha Shealy Rauba, RFA No. 20-5317.
Mr. Rauba is employed by the State Attorney for the Fifth Judicial Circuit,
served time in Florida prison, who is also addicted to heroin and other drugs.
4
commercial sex worker, who trolls CR 484 from Summerfied Florida to
5
Ms. Thompson relinquished her daughter at birth in 2015.
On July 14, 2020 I emailed ASA Jared Gainey about the State’s
Mr. Gainey:
Thank you for the State’s Discovery Exhibit. Regarding the Brady
Evidence for Ms. Thompson, I believe Thompson was convicted of
domestic violence against Carlton Robert Norwood (died Dec-31-
2011), her former common law husband. This information was
provided to me in January 2020 by her mother, Patricia Thompson.
The crime was committed in the state of Maine, either in Augusta
Maine or Vassalboro Maine, which I believe are located in Kennebec
County, Maine
https://www.courts.maine.gov/maine_courts/findacourt/kennebec_superior.shtml
6
Unfortunately court records in Maine are not provided online. Earlier
today I called the number for Michele Lumbert, (207) 213-2800,
Clerk of the Maine District Court - Augusta, and was referred to the
records center at 207-753-2901. Searching and obtaining records is
laborious and costly, see attached the attached form with pricing.
https://www.courts.maine.gov/maine_courts/findacourt/waterville_district.shtml
7
Mr. Gainey, in my view this prosecution (and the wiretapping case) is
an example of vengeance by a bad law enforcement agency, the
MCSO, against a senior citizen who speaks truth to power.
Sincerely,
Neil J. Gillespie
From time to time I gave Ms. Thomspon occasional safe harbor when
she had no where to go, before I realized the extent of her problems.
8
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
The facts relevant to my claims for habeas corpus relief are set forth
Statutes, Part III, Public Defenders and Other Court-Appointed Counsel (ss.
of the public defender”. (Exhibit 1). I am not homeless. I have lived at the
9
same address in Marion Co. since 2005. Also, I knew I had a conflict with
the Public Defender. I did not want the Public Defender to represent me.
I was released on bond prior to the First Appearance (Rule 3.130), and
in any event I was not timely informed of it, so I did not attend First
incomplete. (Exhibit 3). I knew I had a conflict with the Public Defender
(PD). I knew I had a conflict with the OCCCRC. But the Court discouraged
Assistant Public Defender, about her former client, Sarah May Thompson:
10
taking prescription medication from my room. Sarah apologized and
promised not to take my pills again.
Initially Sarah seemed nice, and she needed a place to stay. I felt
compassion for a homeless, unremarried widow. And it is difficult for
a single man age 63 with health issues and limited income to find
competent help. Previously two other providers did not work out, one
age 40 (drugs) and one age 43 (drinking/smoking).
Currently Sarah has a broken tooth that needs extraction, but she
refuses medical treatment I found, see
https://www.truecaredentistocala.com/emergency-dentist.html
I don’t want to throw Sarah out into the street. I believe she needs
stability, but the people in her life may not be stable. I would
appreciate any suggestions you may have. Thank you.
this case. A week or so later Ms. Thompson met a man online, Matthew
Smith, and soon moved into his home in Dunnellon Florida. Ms. Thompson
was seldom here after that, and was completely gone from my home by July
15, 2019. I next saw her again on January 1, 2020 when she claimed
11
On January 13, 2020 Judge Tatti entered ORDER SUBSTITUTING
and Civil Regional Counsel for the 5th D.C.A. (“OCCCRC”) to represent
On January 16, 2020 Zachary Glenn Phipps of the OCCCRC for 5th
such. I still had not completed and executed an application for criminal
indigent status under § 27.52 required for appointment of counsel. I was not
found indigent under § 27.52. The appointment of the Public Defender and
Phipps and the OCCCRC has been a complete and utter abomination.
I fired Mr. Phipps on March 27, 2020, but he failed to recuse himself.
GLENN PHIPPS AND THE OCCCRC FOR 5th D.C.A., see Filing #
12
On July 15, 2020 in Case No. 2019-CF-4193 I filed DEFENDANT’S
AND THE OCCCRC FOR 5th D.C.A., see Filing # 110282277 E-Filed
On July 22, 2020 in Case No. 2019-CF-4193 I filed notice with the
13
Judge Tatti’s Order struck the following in Case No. 2019-CF-4193:
Office Of Regional Criminal and Civil Counsel Conflict 5th District, see
14
Exhibit 9. The Order also appoints Brenda H. Smith, Esquire, to represent
15
record that the defendant has made a knowing and intelligent waiver
of the right to counsel, and does not suffer from severe mental illness
to the point where the defendant is not competent to conduct trial
proceedings by himself or herself.
6. The Defendant in this case was found competent to waive the right
to a lawyer and represent himself during two (2) Faretta hearings in
2020-CF-2417, by Judge Tatti on July 28, 2020 (arraignment) and
by Judge Craggs on June 14, 2020 (first appearance).
conducted remotely with “Zoom”. I was not able to log into the Zoom
hearing, or testify on my behalf, because, inter alia, the hearing was over by
the time I got Mr. Phipps’ email with the login password.
16
On July 28, 2020 I appeared pro se for an arraignment in Case No.
standard for ineffective assistance of counsel requires both that the defense
Mr. Phipps was objectively deficient during the hearing, which lacked
compelling argument. Also, the Zoom hearing was over by the time I got
17
GROUNDS FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF
review of disability. Phipps did not get my informed consent. Phipps did not seek a
During a telephone call with me on July 30, 2020 at 12:26 PM, Mr. Phipps
Trial. Mr. Phipps said I am competent to stand trial. However before he filed the
Trial, Mr. Phipps moved to withdrawal from the case. During our conversation Mr.
Mr. Phipps said he refers all clients with prior traumatic brain injury for a
competency hearing. Mr. Phipps said he was initially concerned that I was not
18
focused enough, but he changed his mind when he saw the prosecution in 2020-
2417, by Judge Tatti on July 28, 2020 (arraignment) (Exhibit 13) and by Judge
liberty. Amendments IV, V and XIV, Constitution of the United States; Article I,
death. My hearing loss is due to congenital defects including eustachian tube defect
A person with disabilities does not mean they are incompetent. A vulnerable
adult under 415.102(28) does not mean the person is incompetent. By way of
illness, and a vulnerable adult paralyzed from the waist down, but not incompetent.
19
On March 17, 2020 Judge Tatti entered Order Appointing Expert For
Competency Evaluation. I voiced concern with Dr. Krop over his public discipline
by the Medical Board; Krop withdrew from consideration by letter to Judge Tatti.
On July 31, 2020 Judge Tatti entered Order Appointing Expert For
Competency To Stand Trial. Mr. Phipps said I am competent to stand trial. But
20
Trawick, Fla. Prac. & Proc., Sect. 36-6 (2003).
No one in the case has suggested I am not competent to stand trial. Therefore
21
GROUNDS FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF
The Petitioner filed two motions for an order to reassign the cases, as
required by Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(j), directing the clerk to
reassign the cases, whereupon Judge Tatti belatedly denied the pro se
motion to disqualify him in Case No. 2020-CF-2417. Judge Tatti then
denied the Petitioner’s motion for an order to reassign the case.
22
Disqualification and Disclosure, Florida Judicial College, pages 6-7.
"If the Judge fails to rule on the motion to disqualify within 30 days after
Thirty (30) days have passed without a ruling; the motion is deemed
more than 30 days have passed, attempts to refute the motion by Judge Tatti
are moot, so there is no need to address those misplaced responses. The only
thing that matters, was the motion served pursuant to Rule 2.330(c)?
In addition to filing with the clerk, the movant shall immediately serve
a copy of the motion on the subject judge as set forth in Florida Rule
of Civil Procedure 1.080.
was served June 22, 2020 on the portal to Judge Tatti and to the names on
23
served in 2020-CF-2417 on the Portal. I served the Clerk on the Portal.
Thus, the motion was served to the Judge and the Clerk on June 22, 2020.
Judge Tatti’s email address shown by The Florida Bar is: [email protected]
24
imaging system, CD-ROM, flash drive, other electronic data storage
system, server, case maintenance system (“CM”), electronic court
filing (“ECF”) system, statewide or local electronic portal (“e-
portal”), or other electronic record keeping system authorized by the
supreme court in a format sufficient to communicate the information
on the original document in a readable format. Electronic transmission
of documents includes electronic mail (“e-mail”) and any internet-
based transmission procedure, and may include procedures allowing
for documents to be signed or verified by electronic means.
(c) Documents Affected.
(1) All documents that are court records, as defined in rule
2.430(a)(1), must be filed by electronic transmission...
"If the Judge fails to rule on the motion to disqualify within 30 days after
Thirty (30) days have passed without a ruling; the motion is deemed
25
party may seek an order from the court directing the clerk to reassign
the case.
26
July 9, 2020 filed on July 22, 2020.
8. Defendant's Motion for Rule 3.133 Pretrial Probable Cause
Determinations and Adversary Preliminary Hearings filed on
July 24, 2020; and
9. Defendant's Pro Se Motion for Order to Reassign Case Motion
for Rehearing Order to Revoke Bond filed on July 27,2020
anything else. The only thing that matters, was the motion to disqualify
In addition to filing with the clerk, the movant shall immediately serve
a copy of the motion on the subject judge as set forth in Florida Rule
of Civil Procedure 1.080.
was served June 22, 2020 on the portal to Judge Tatti and to the names on
Thus, the motion was served to the Judge and the Clerk on June 22, 2020.
Judge Tatti’s email address shown by The Florida Bar is: [email protected]
27
conformity with the requirements of Florida Rule of Judicial
Administration 2.516.
28
GROUNDS FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF
The Petitioner is age 64, has never been convicted of a crime, has resided in
Marion County for over 15 years, is a former business owner, and educated
with degrees in business and psychology. Pursuant to Rule 3.131(b)(1), Fla.
R. Crim. P., “there is a presumption in favor of release on nonmonetary
conditions for any person who is granted pretrial release.”
favor of release on nonmonetary conditions for any person who is granted pretrial
release.”
On November 10, 2019, I was arrested and and released on a $4,000 bond
motivated, see Affidavit of Neil J. Gillespie and Marion Senior Services, Inc.
29
B. I had a valid Florida driver’s license in good standing.
C. I lived at my Florida residential homestead property, 8092 SW 115th
Loop, Ocala, 34481, Marion Co., Florida, continuously and uninterruptedly
since February 5, 2005.
D. I was age 63 and suffering the infirmaries of aging, including type 2
diabetes.
E. My income was limited to Social Security disability payments.
F. I am educated, with undergraduate degrees in business and psychology.
Glenn Phipps of the OCCCRC for 5th D.C.A., and requested, “can you move for
an order for release on my own recognizance? (and end the bail bond).” Mr. Phipps
failed to seek ROR on my behalf in March 2019. Mr. Phipps failed to respond to
representation. The foregoing example is evidence that Mr. Phipps and the
OCCCRC for 5th D.C.A has not provided zealous advocacy on my behalf.
On July 28, 2020, I made a spoken motion during the arraignment in Case
that case is $5,000. Judge Tatti denied my spoken motion, even though I appeared
30
Schad, 51 Fla. 168, 40 So. 497 (1906). Presently I am restrained by $9,000 total in
money bail bonds. I am age 64 and have never been convicted of a crime.
31
CONCLUSION AND RELIEF SOUGHT
For all of the foregoing reasons, I respectfully request that this Court
provided by Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975), and Fla. R. of Crim.
P. 3.111(d)(3). In Faretta, the Supreme Court of the United States held that
disqualify within 30 days after service, the motions are deemed granted.
32
IV. Release me from the restraint of $9,000 in money bail bonds.
33
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
TONIA WERNER, MD
Meridian Behavioral Healthcare
4300 SW 13th Street
Gainesville, FL 32608
(352) 374-5600; (800) 330-5615
[email protected]
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
Petitioner,
v. CASE NO.: 5D20-1632
STATE OF FLORIDA,
BRENDA H. SMITH, ESQUIRE
TONIA WERNER, MD,
Respondents.
___________________________/
APPENDIX A
Fla. R. App. P. 9.220(c)
1
INDEX TO APPENDIX A, Fla. R. App. P. 9.220(c)
AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
TONIA WERNER, MD
Meridian Behavioral Healthcare
4300 SW 13th Street
Gainesville, FL 32608
(352) 374-5600; (800) 330-5615
[email protected]
3
Neil J. Gillespie
8092 SW 115 th Loop
Ocala, Florida 34481
A
VIA US CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
ARTICLE NO. 7005 2570 0000 4274 0515
Sheriff Ed Dean
Marion County Sheriff
692 NW 3Oth Avenue
Ocala, Florida 34475
Victim: Penelope M. Gillespie, age 75, date of birth, October 29, 1930.
Perpetrators:
1. Bank of America, 7975 SW SR 200, Ocala, FL 34476, telephone: (352) 861-2807,
Penelope D. Kinsey, Branch Manager, and Candice Methvin, Loan Specialist.
2. Elizabeth Bauerle, 6356 SW 106th PI., Ocala, FL 34476-4893, (352) 216-3934.
Synopsis of Exploitation:
Bank of America (BOA) breached its fiduciary duty to Penelope M. Gillespie, a depositor
and customer, when it failed to adequately secure Ms. Gillespie's interest in three
mortgage transactions. Then BOA created false loan documents to facilitate business
financing to Elizabeth Bauerle, Ms. Gillespie's daughter and co-applicant. BOA falsely
labeled the business loan as a home improvement loan in order to avoid the required
business loan documentation. As a result, BOA granted the loan, and Elizabeth Bauerle
promptly lost the $40,000.00 proceeds when the business failed. When she was not able
to make the loan payments, Elizabeth Bauerle sold her house securing the loan and took
$15,559.83 from the settlement rightfully belonging to Penelope Gillespie.
4
Sheriff Ed Dean
o Page -2
Marion County Sheriff February 15, 2006
Chronology of Events:
4. The payment for this mortgage was $490.13. (Exhibit 2). When added to the
$379.57 mortgage payment that Elizabeth Bauerle owed on Penelope Gillespie's house,
the combined payment was $869.70. When I asked Ms. Bauerle how she expected to pay
$869.70 a month, she said the money would come from the profits of the restaurant.
Ms. Bauerle's salary in her usual occupations, call center worker, lawn care, and pizza
delivery, could not support this payment. As such, how could the bank justify this loan?
The Bank of America breached its fiduciary duty to Penelope Gillespie, because the
bankers knew that this loan was not, in fact, for the purpose of home improvement, but
5
Sheriff Ed Dean
o
Page -3
Marion County Sheriff February 15, 2006
was for the purpose of investing in a higWy speculative business. Bank of America
participated in this sham solely to collect the associated fees, and with no regard for
Penelope Gillespie.
7. When the business failed and the money was gone, Ms. Bauerle could not make
the monthly payments of $869.70, and was forced to sell her home at 10836 SW 85 th
Terrace. The house sold on December 8, 2004 for $63,000.00, leaving $15,559.83 at
settlement, after loan #3 was paid. (Exhibit 4). This money rightfully belongs to
Penelope Gillespie, and should have been applied to the mortgage on her home at 8092
SW 115 th Loop, loan #2. But Ms. Bauerle kept the $15,559.83 for herself, and deposited
the money in her bank account. (Exhibit 5). Currently Penelope Gillespie has a mortgage
on her home in the amount of$35,325.55, loan #2. Ms. Bauerle should have paid
Penelope Gillespie $15,559.83, reducing the balance of loan #2 to $19,765.72.
My brother Mark Gillespie (Penelope Gillespie's other son) can collaborate the
information that I have provided. This is his contact information:
Mark J. Gillespie
7504 Summer Meadows Drive
Fort Worth, Texas 76123-1979
Telephone: (817) 361-6721
enclosures
6
1
7
2
8
3
9
Filing # 109766038 E-Filed 07/02/2020 11:48:43 PM
the first person, files Defendant'S Waiver ofRight To A Lawyer, and states:
1. I am the Defendant in this case. I am indigent but waive my right to a lawyer in this case.
2. The Court appointed substitute counsel Zachary Glenn Phipps, OCCCRC for 5th D.C.A.,
on January 13, 2020 to replace the Office of the Public Defender. Separately I will file,
3. During a Faretta Hearing June 14, 2020 before Judge Ann Melinda Craggs in another
case, Florida v. Neil Joseph Gillespie, Case No. 2020-CF-2417, Judge Craggs accepted my
Waiver ofRight to Lawyer. My Waiver is attached as Exhibit 1, and is signed by Judge Craggs,
who found "the above-named defendant is alert and intelligent and executed the above Waiver of
Right to Lawyer freely and voluntarily for the purposes therein expressed."
10
DEFENDANT'S WAIVER OF RIGHT TO A LAWYER CASE NO. 2019-CF-004193-A-Z
WITH TWO ATTESTING WITNESSES, RULE 3.111(d)(4)
(3) Regardless of the defendant's legal skills or the complexity of the case, the court shall
not deny a defendant's unequivocal request to represent himself or herself, if the court
makes a determination of record that the defendant has made a knowing and intelligent
waiver of the right to counsel, and does not suffer from severe mental illness to the point
where the defendant is not competent to conduct trial proceedings by himself or herself.
Tel. 352-854-7807
Email: [email protected]
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF MARION
~
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me, this 'i' day of July, 2020,
by Neil J. Gillespie, who is personally known to me, or who has produced r L / h L as
identification and states that he is the person who made this affidavit . ontents are
truthful to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.
I>•
,
My Commission Expires:
NOTARY PUBLIC
::!STATE OF FLORIDA
• Comm# GG098397
Expires 5/1812021
~ . \-0 · "Lo? \
NOTARY PUBLIC
WITNESSES: The witnesses attest to the voluntary execution of this waiver. Rule 3.111(d)(4)
11
DEFENDANT'S WAIVER OF RIGHT TO A LAWYER CASE NO. 2019-CF-004193-A-Z
WITH TWO ATTESTING WITNESSES, RULE 3.111(d)(4)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
July 2,2020
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing has been furnished
to Zachary Phipps, OCCCRC for 5th D.C.A., 307 NW 3rd St., Ocala, FL 34475-6638 at
[email protected]; and to the State Attorney's Office, 110 North West 1st Avenue,
Suite 5000 ([email protected]), Ocala, FL 34475, bye-service on July 2, 2020.
Tel. 352-854-7807
Email: [email protected]
12
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF T'HE FIFTH JUD~CI.AL CIRCUIT,
CRIMINAL DIVISION
~st Appearance
_ _Arraignment
_ _Plea
_ _Trial
STATE OF FLORIDA
V5.
GJi\\e5r~.Q. ~.L.\
Date
OCALA, FL 34481
Window - J1
('352)282-4660
07/02/2020 12:06 PM
Transaction 273712
Amount Fee
NOTARY 10.00
1D PRESENTED: FL DL G421630560990
Subtotal 10100
Tendered 20.00
Change (currency) 10.00
14
Filing # 110659309 E-Filed 07/22/2020 10:32:54 PM
Defendant NEIL JOSEPH GILLESPIE, a nonlawyer appearing pro se, in the first person,
files Defendant Not Indigent Per F.S. § 27.52 For Appointed Counsel, Court Must Revoke
cases. Today my Application For Criminal Indigent Status was DENIED. (Exhibit 1). I am not
indigent under F.S. § 27.52. I am not eligible for appointment of counsel under F.S. § 27.52.
2. Previously this Court appointed Zachary Glenn Phipps and the OCCRC For the 5th DCA
as substitute counsel to represent me, based on an incomplete application under F.S. § 27.52.
Now that I am found not indigent, the appointment of counsel must be immediately revoked.
WHEREFORE, because I am not indigent per F.S. § 27.52, and I want to represent
myself, this Court’s appointment of Mr. Phipps and the OCCRC must be immediately revoked.
furnished July 22, 2020 to Zachary Glenn Phipps, OCCCRC for 5th D.C.A., 307 NW 3rd St.,
15
DEFENDANT NOT INDIGENT PER F.S. § 27.52 FOR APPOINTED COUNSEL
COURT MUST REVOKE APPOINTMENT OF MR PHIPPS AND OCCCRC
Ocala, FL 34475-6638 at [email protected], and the State Attorney’s Office, 110 North
2
16
1
17
Filing # 109766038 E-Filed 07/02/2020 11:48:43 PM
Defendant NEIL JOSEPH GILLESPIE, an indigent nonlawyer appearing pro se, here in
the first person, files Defendant'S Waiver ofRight To A Lawyer, and states:
1. I am the Defendant in this case. I am indigent but waive my right to a lawyer in this case.
2. The Court appointed substitute counsel Zachary Glenn Phipps, OCCCRC for 5th D.C.A.,
on January 13, 2020 to replace the Office of the Public Defender. Separately I will file,
3. During a Faretta Hearing June 14, 2020 before Judge Ann Melinda Craggs in another
case, Florida v. Neil Joseph Gillespie, Case No. 2020-CF-2417, Judge Craggs accepted my
Waiver ofRight to Lawyer. My Waiver is attached as Exhibit 1, and is signed by Judge Craggs,
who found "the above-named defendant is alert and intelligent and executed the above Waiver of
Right to Lawyer freely and voluntarily for the purposes therein expressed."
18
DEFENDANT'S WAIVER OF RIGHT TO A LAWYER CASE NO. 2019-CF-004193-A-Z
WITH TWO ATTESTING WITNESSES, RULE 3.111(d)(4)
(3) Regardless of the defendant's legal skills or the complexity of the case, the court shall
not deny a defendant's unequivocal request to represent himself or herself, if the court
makes a determination of record that the defendant has made a knowing and intelligent
waiver of the right to counsel, and does not suffer from severe mental illness to the point
where the defendant is not competent to conduct trial proceedings by himself or herself.
Tel. 352-854-7807
Email: [email protected]
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF MARION
~
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me, this 'i' day of July, 2020,
by Neil J. Gillespie, who is personally known to me, or who has produced r L / h L as
identification and states that he is the person who made this affidavit . ontents are
truthful to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.
I>•
,
My Commission Expires:
NOTARY PUBLIC
::!STATE OF FLORIDA
• Comm# GG098397
Expires 5/1812021
~ . \-0 · "Lo? \
NOTARY PUBLIC
WITNESSES: The witnesses attest to the voluntary execution of this waiver. Rule 3.111(d)(4)
19
DEFENDANT'S WAIVER OF RIGHT TO A LAWYER CASE NO. 2019-CF-004193-A-Z
WITH TWO ATTESTING WITNESSES, RULE 3.111(d)(4)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
July 2,2020
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing has been furnished
to Zachary Phipps, OCCCRC for 5th D.C.A., 307 NW 3rd St., Ocala, FL 34475-6638 at
[email protected]; and to the State Attorney's Office, 110 North West 1st Avenue,
Suite 5000 ([email protected]), Ocala, FL 34475, bye-service on July 2, 2020.
Tel. 352-854-7807
Email: [email protected]
20
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF T'HE FIFTH JUD~CI.AL CIRCUIT,
CRIMINAL DIVISION
~st Appearance
_ _Arraignment
_ _Plea
_ _Trial
STATE OF FLORIDA
V5.
GJi\\e5r~.Q. ~.L.\
Date
OCALA, FL 34481
Window - J1
('352)282-4660
07/02/2020 12:06 PM
Transaction 273712
Amount Fee
NOTARY 10.00
1D PRESENTED: FL DL G421630560990
Subtotal 10100
Tendered 20.00
Change (currency) 10.00
22
6
23
24
Filing # 111365309 E-Filed 08/06/2020 09:07:28 AM
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA
COMES NOW, the undersigned counsel and moves this Court to enter an Order
permitting undersigned counsel to withdraw from representation of the Defendant, NEIL
JOSEPH GILLESPIE and files this Motion to Withdraw, and alleges the following in support
thereof:
25
Filing # 111365309 E-Filed 08/06/2020 09:07:28 AM
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION
COUNTY, FLORIDA
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
The Office of Regional Criminal Conflict and Civil Counsel hereby certifies that a conflict does
in fact exist based upon one or more of the following and therefore withdrawal of this office from this
case is appropriate:
____ 2. This office previously represented a witness involved in the current case.
____ 3. The attorney assigned to this case previously represented a codefendant or material
witness in this case.
____ 4. This office has material and irreconcilable differences with the client.
5. Other reasons requiring withdrawal. Specifically: The Regional Counsel's Office has
determined and is certifying that a conflict of interest exists that prohibits the Office of
Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, 5th District from representing the
Defendant.
____ 6. The office cannot act on behalf of one client without materially affecting the
representation of another client, Thomas v State 785 So 2d 626 (FLA 2d DCA, 2001).
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY, that the foregoing document has been furnished to: The Marion County
Clerk of Court, this 5 day of August, 2020.
/S/ Zachary G. Phipps___________
Zachary G. Phipps Esq.
Assistant Regional Counsel
Florida Bar No.: 065936
Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional
Counsel, 5th District
[email protected]
307 N.W. 3rd Street
Ocala, Florida 34475
Px: 352-732-1230 Fx: 352-732-1228
26
9
27
28
Filing # 111470516 E-Filed 08/07/2020 03:14:33 PM
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Plaintiff,
Vs. CASE NO. 2019-CF-4193
Defendant NEIL JOSEPH GILLESPIE, a nonlawyer appearing pro se, here in the
first person, files Defendant’s Motion to Refuse Counsel and Appear Pro Se, and Motion
1. This Court granted a motion by attorney Zachary Phipps and the Office Of
Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel (OCCCRC) to withdraw as counsel in this
2. I hereby assert my right to refuse counsel, and appear pro se, as provided by
Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975), and Fla. R. of Crim. P. 3.111(d)(3).
4. In Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975), the Supreme Court of the United
States held that criminal defendants have a constitutional right to refuse counsel and
(3) Regardless of the defendant's legal skills or the complexity of the case, the
court shall not deny a defendant's unequivocal request to represent himself or
herself, if the court makes a determination of record that the defendant has made a
knowing and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel, and does not suffer from
29
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REFUSE COUNSEL AND APPEAR PRO SE Case #2019-CA-4193
Motion to Strike Order Appointing Expert for Competency Evaluation
severe mental illness to the point where the defendant is not competent to conduct
trial proceedings by himself or herself.
6. The Defendant in this case was found competent to waive the right to a lawyer
and represent himself during two (2) Faretta hearings in 2020-CF-2417, by Judge Tatti on
July 28, 2020 (arraignment) and by Judge Craggs on June 14, 2020 (first appearance).
March 13, 2020 attorney Zachary Phipps filed a groundless Motion To Determine
Defendant’s Competency To Stand Trial. During a telephone call with me last week
Phipps agreed to withdrawal the motion; Mr. Phipps agreed I am competent to stand trial.
However before he filed the motion, Mr. Phipps moved to withdrawal from the case.
During our conversation Mr. Phipps also said the prosecution in 2020-CF-2417 was an
“abuse of discretion”
Refuse Counsel and Appear Pro Se, and GRANT Motion to Strike Order Appointing
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE:
I HEREBY CERTIFY the foregoing was filed August 7, 2020 on the Florida
Portal and served to the names on the Portal Notice of Service of Court Documents.
/s/
Neil J. Gillespie
2
30
Filing # 109989605 E-Filed 07/09/2020 10:38:34 AM
Revoke Bond, filed herein by the State of Florida and dated June 15, 2020, and the Court being
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant's bond be revoked and that the Sheriff
of Marion County shall take said Defendant (NEIL JOSEPH GILLESPIE(A), W/M,
OCALA, FL 34481-3567) into custody and detain said Defendant at the County Jail, pending
further order of this Court as this Court finds probable cause to believe Defendant committed a
DONE AND ORDERED at Ocala, Marion County, Florida, this 9 day of July, 2020.
________________________________
ANTHONY M TATTI
CIRCUIT JUDGE
31
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the above has been furnished to Zachary G Phipps,
Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, 307 NW 3rd Street, Ocala, FL 34475, and Office of
State Attorney, 110 NW 1 Ave, Suite 5000, Ocala, FL 34475, [email protected], by
hand or mail delivery or electronic service, this 9 day of July, 2020.
________________________________
32
12
33
34
35
13
36
14
37
Filing # 110873226 E-Filed 07/28/2020 05:58:53 AM
Defendant NEIL JOSEPH GILLESPIE, an nonlawyer appearing pro se, in the first
BMI >40, hearing loss, and obstructive breathing/sleep apnea. I am at increased risk of being
2. The Florida Supreme Court, and all inferior Florida courts, are subject to compliance
The Fifth Judicial Circuit Florida, and all its judges, are subject to the ADA. The ADA is unique in that
wrongdoing courts and judges cannot hide behind immunity. Section 12202. State immunity,
A State shall not be immune under the eleventh amendment to the Constitution of the
United States from an action in?[1] Federal or State court of competent jurisdiction for a
violation of this chapter. In any action against a State for a violation of the requirements
of this chapter, remedies (including remedies both at law and in equity) are available for
such a violation to the same extent as such remedies are available for such a violation in
an action against any public or private entity other than a State.
Also see F.S. § 768.28 Waiver of sovereign immunity in tort actions; s. 13, Art. X, Fla Const.
38
DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR DISABILITY ACCOMMODATION 2020-CF-2417
8. I fired Mr. Phipps as counsel on March 27, 2020. His continued presence as
counsel in my case is a severe stressor to my disability of PTSD.
9. I request Mr. Phipps and the OCCCRC be removed as counsel from my case as
an disability accommodation.
10. I also need accommodation to understand beforehand “ZOOM” and how it
works.
9. I fired Mr. Phipps as counsel on March 27, 2020. His continued presence as
counsel in my case is a severe stressor to my disability of PTSD.
10. I request Mr. Phipps and the OCCCRC be removed as counsel from my case
as an disability accommodation.
11. I also need additional disability accommodation to understand beforehand
“ZOOM” and how it works. Currently Zoom is not working for me, and less than
30 minutes remain until the hearing is scheduled to begin using Zoom. My
microphone is not working, so I cannot be heard.
4. The Department of Health is responsible for the state’s public health system which shall
be designed to promote, protect, and improve the health of all people in the state. (Fla. Stat. §
381.001). The Duties and powers of the Department of Health are found in Fla. Stat. § 381.0011.
The Department of Health declared coronavirus is a disease or condition to be reported, see FAC
COVID-19 Executive Orders governing this communicable disease (381.003). Under 381.0012
5. The Court demands my personal appearance July 28, 2020 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 4A
of Judicial Center 110 NW 1st Ave., Ocala, FL. This in-court hearing is against the most recent
COVID-19 Administrative Order of the Florida Supreme Court, No. AOSC20-23 Amendment 5:
D. Essential and Critical Trial Court Proceedings. Essential and critical trial court
proceedings should continue to be conducted remotely or, if necessary, in person.
2
39
DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR DISABILITY ACCOMMODATION 2020-CF-2417
(1) All circuit and county courts shall continue to perform essential court proceedings,
including but not limited to: first appearance; criminal arraignments;...
https://www.floridasupremecourt.org/ezs3download/download/639134/7265622
• I was denied use of my diabetic footwear worn to the jail. Instead I was forced to wear
plastic slippers with ridges in the sole, “torture shoes” for a person with diabetic neuropathy.
• On June 14, 2020, while held in the Marion County Jail, MCSO Jailer Gonzalez claimed
COVID-19 is a "fake virus" and refused to follow COVID-19 rules. I made a complaint on
the Inmate Request Form, see attached. However I was released from jail prior to time
permitted for submission of the Inmate Request Form.
• A "nurse" at the jail refused to wear gloves while performing glucose tests on inmates. This
alleged "nurse" instructed inmates to pass the glucose test meter from one to the next, none of
the inmates wore gloves or even washed hands. While I am type 2 diabetic, I skipped that risk.
• I was forced to suffer conditions that denied me the precautions and protections necessary to
mitigate the severe threat of COVID-19, including:
• During a visit to the jail in 2019 I became hypoglycemic when my glucose number reached
41. I knew I was becoming increasingly ill, when Jailer Miller demanded I take a “stick” of
insulin. I refused, and saved my life, because taking a “stick” of insulin while hypoglycemic
@41 would likely result in death. I needed food, and ate a piece of bread.
• Upon release, with no money or access to transportation, I was expected to walk home, 15
miles. In 2019 I was released at 3:00 AM on a cold November night in a t-shirt and pants.
The foregoing violates the state constitution. (I have never been convicted of a crime in 64 years)
3
40
DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR DISABILITY ACCOMMODATION 2020-CF-2417
• After release, Timothy T. McCourt, General Counsel, Marion County Sheriff’s Office
refused to provide COVID-19 information, and blocked Sgt. Paul Bloom, Director of the
Public Information Office, from providing me Coronavirus or COVID-19 information:
This is a request for the number of Coronavirus or COVID-19 cases among the
following:
1. Inmates incarcerated at the Marion County Jail
2. Employees working at the Marion County Jail
3. Sworn Officers of the Marion County Sheriff’s Department.
On July 10, 2020, Ocala.com reported “More Ocala jail inmates test positive for COVID-19”.
https://www.ocala.com/news/20200710/more-ocala-jail-inmates-test-positive-for-covid-19
“The number has gone from 44 to 49 to the current 74. Fifteen jail workers also have tested
positive.” Mr. McCourt is hiding an outbreak of COVID-19 in the Marion County Jail.
6. My hearing loss is due to congenital defects including eustachian tube defect (L), and
retracted eardrum (L). On April 24, 2020 I visited the Beltone hearing care center located at
9590 SW SR200, Suite 12, Ocala, FL 34481. Doug Ressler, tester, said I have moderate hearing
loss, and suggested a Beltone Amaze 9.63 DEW ($5,200) a Rechargeable Directional Wireless
Remote Hearing Aid. During my visit, I tired a Beltone Amaze hearing aid and was amazed with
the difference it made to my ability to hear. I would have bought one but could not afford to.
7. My hearing loss was previously brought to the attention of Judge Tatti, and, Zachary
Glenn Phipps, OCCCRC for 5th D.C.A., 307 NW 3rd St, Ocala, FL 34475-6638
4
41
DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR DISABILITY ACCOMMODATION 2020-CF-2417
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
July 28, 2020
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 28, 2020 a copy of the foregoing has been furnished
by filing on the Portal to the following names by e-service:
State Attorney’s Office, 110 North West 1st Avenue, Suite 5000 ([email protected]),
Ocala, FL 34475.
Jonathan Lin, Trial Court Administrator, Marion County Judicial Center, 110 N.W. 1st Avenue,
Ocala, FL 34475 ([email protected])
Kristina Valdez, Disability Coordinator, Marion County Judicial Center, 110 N.W. 1st
Avenue, Ocala, FL 34475 ([email protected])
5
42
Filing # 110450463 E-Filed 07/20/2020 08:23:52 AM
NEIL JOSEPH GILLESPIE, . Case Number: 20CF002417AX
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL. CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY FLORIDA
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Charges:.
SEQ# CNT# CHARGE LVLDGR
1 2 784.03 BATTERY Misdemeanor
NOTICE TO APPEAR
Notice: A warrant will be issued and bail bond forfeited as provided by and in compliance
with the statutes and laws of Florida, for any person who fails to appear.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of this Notice was furnished to the above addressee, by
U.S. Mail/hand delivery on 07 /20/2020
David R Ellspermann
Clerk oft · "t Court and Comptroller
43
NEIL JOSEPH GILLESPIE, Case Number: 20CF002417AX
IMPORTANT NOTICES
Prior to your court event please contact your . For all those attending
attorney or visit ·www .marioncountyclerk.org to confirm court, face coverings
the status of your hearing.
that cover the nose and
Pursuant to F.S. 316.193(8), you are hereby notified
that the driving privileges of any person convicted of DUI or mouth are required.
DUBAL will be suspended or revoked and that such person
should make arrangements for transportation at any court DEFENDANT'S
proceedings at which the Court may take such action. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The undersigned Defendant
If you are a per~on with a disability who
does hereby acknowledge
needs any accommodation in order to participate receipt of a copy of the
in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to . foregoing Order on the below
you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please date.
contact the ADA Coordinator at the Office of the
Trial Court Administrator, Marion County XMO:\~ -6 dQ_~~ '.
Signature
Judicial Center, 110 NW First Avenue, Ocala,
Florida 34475, Telephone (352)401-6710, at least --bo°tJ.- ~ llSlruf
7 days before your scheduled court appearance, Mailing Address
or immediately upon receiving this notification if
the time before the scheduled appearance is less (j~ 1El 'btf4."S'
;
than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, City State, Zip Code
'
call 711.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Order has been furnished to the following parties
in the manner and on the date(s) indicated below.
~
DEFENDANT
1~\1Y'CP
STATE ATTORNEY
\0 ®-
1/?P~eiv ~ (Q ...
DEFENSE ATTORNEY
BAIL BONDSMAN
1 \'l-P~ 'l.P ~( ~ l~ ('}1 n:e--e. y @ ..
OTHER ,,
OTHER
44
•• • • • • • • •
081922
II]
•
SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Marion County
Inmate Request Form
TO:
FOOD SERVICES D CANTEEN/INMATE ACCOUNTS D
LAW LIBRARY D CLASSIFICATIONS D
PROGRAMS D PUBLIC DEFENDER D
PROPERTY D DISCIPLINARY REPORT APPEALS D
CHAPLAIN D OTHER D
(Pin Number)
(Date) t f (Pod/Section/Cell #)
REQUEST/COMPLAINT:
-:5A;""~ GoN2A(e~
RESPONSE:
46
47
48
49
~
-,
DISQUALIFICATION
I
&
DISCLOSURE"
I
17
.. - .: .. ,
I. '.;'
lJ"/~ f"f,,.;,t.
"'.
I(
I
I
I i
I
!
.
I
f Lisa Davidson
I
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit
f·······
Senior Trial Court Slaff Attorney in th~ Eighteenth judicial Circuit - Outline updated through January 12,2007 •
50
.1
.1
f 3. the judge knows he or she (or his or her spouse, parent, child, or other
member of the judge's household) has an economic interestin the subject
I( matter in controversy or is a party or has more than a de minimis interest
-flhat could be substantially affected by the pr~ceeding; or
5. The judge's spouse or a person within the third degree of the relationship
to the judge participated as a lower court judge in a decision to be
reviewed by the judge.
6. The judge. while a judge or a candidate for judicial office has made a
public statement that commits or appears to commit the judge with respect
( - - - I This outline has been adopted and modified from the Outline entitled DISCLOSURE, DISQUALIFICATION.
, AND EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS, prepared by the Honorable Judge Daniel T. K. Hurley, United States
District Court for the Southern District of Florida and the Honorable Judge John Antoon II, United States District
Court for the Middle District of Florida.
30f47
51
I
The commentary to 3E(l) states that a judge should disclose on the record
I
information that the judge believes the parties or their lawyers might
consider relevant to the question of disqualification, even if the judge
believes there is no a real basis for disqualification.
I
If a lawyer or party has previously filed a complaint against the judge with
the JQe. that fact does not automatically require disqualification of the
I
4.
judge. Fla.. Code Jud.. Conduct, Canon 3E(I) Commentary.
If the Judge offers to the parties to recuse himself/herself, then the judge
I
must fulfill the offer ifone of the parties accepts it. Deloach Va State, 911
So. 2d 888 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). I
c. PLAIN LANGUAGE OF CANON 3E IS NOT EXCLUSIVE
I
The plain language of Canon 3E is not exclusive. For example, Fla.. JEAC Ope 99
"
c-
mortgage foreclosure or uncontested dissolution of marriage.
4of47
,
I
52
I:
1.1
\ D. REMITTAL - CANON 3F, FLA. CODE OF JUD. CONDUCT
r REMITf AL: A judge disqualified by the tenns of Canon JE may disclose on the
record the basis of the judge's disqualification and may ask the parties and their
lawyers to consider. out of the presence of the judge. whether to waive
Ii disqualification. If following disclosure of any basis for disqualification other
than personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, the parties and lawyers,
without participation by the judge. all agree the judge should not be disqualified.
Ii and the judge is then willing to participate. the judge may participate in the
proceeding. The agreement shall be incorporated in the record of the proceeding.
Fla. Code Jud. Conduct, Canon 3F.
Ii As a practical matter a judge may wish to have all parties and their lawyers sign
the remittal agreement although the commentary indicates that parties may act
II through counsel if counsel represents on the record that the party has been
consulted and consents. Fla. Code Jud. Conduct, Canon 3F, Commentary.
II Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330 (Note: Although mle 2.330 is entitled "Disqualification
I
of Tna)' Judges," it alsO applies to a trial judge sitting as a circuit appellate judge.)
See Smith v. Santa Rosa Island Auth., 729 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
i (
I
i A. RULE 2.330(d), FLA. R. JUD. ADMIN. (former 2.160)
Rule 2.330ldl sets forth the following bases for a disqualification motion:
1. the party fears that he or she will not receive a fair trial or hearing because
of specifically described prejudice or bias of the judge;
2. the judge before whom the case is pending. or some person related to said
judgc by consanguinity or affinity within the third degree, is a party
thereto or is interestcd in the result thcreof;
3. the judge is related to an attorney or counselor of record in the cause by
consanguinity or affinity within the third degree; or
4. the judge is 8 material witness for or against one of the parties to the
cause.
I. Whenever a party makes and files an affidavit stating fear that the party
will not receive a fair trial on account of prejudice of the judge, the judge
shall proceed no further, but another judge shall be designated.
2. Every affidavit shall state the facts and the reasons for the belief that any
such bias or prejudice exists and shall be accompanied by a certificate of
counsel of record that such affidavit and application are made in good
faith. .
3. ~equirements consistent with Rule 2.330, Florida Rules of Judicial
Administration.
50f47
53
I
· (
disqualified on account of- alleged prejudice against the party making the
suggestion in the first instance, or in favor of the adverse party, unless
such judge admits and holds that it is then a fact that he or she does not
I
stand fair and impartial between the parties.
C···
I 2.300(j) is not implicated. Harrison v. Johnson. 934 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 1st
DCA 2006).
I ( a
"does not require a hearing, oral argument, the presentation of evidence, or
review of prior court proceedings. The legal sufficiency of the motion
and affidavits is purely a question of law." Larimer v. State, 50 Fla.
70f47
I
55
I
. { I
The danger· of holding a hearing is illustrated by Clark Auto l.,easing &
Rentals, Inc. v. Luoo,547 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 4~th DCA 1989), where the
trial judge denied the motion and thetlt at the request of plaintifr s counsel,
I
administered an oath to permit counsel to address and refute the factual
allegations in the motion and affidavits. The appellate court ruled,
uAJthough the trial judge stressed that her ruling was based upon the legal
I
sufficiency of the motion and affidavits, the transcript reveals that she
indirectly took an active role in addressing the truthfulness of the
allegations." Therefore, the writ of prohibition was granted. Another
I
example is Cave v. State" 660 So. 2d 70S (Fla. 1995), in which the- court
called witnesses to rebut the defendant's allegations contained in his
motion to disquaJify. Notwithstanding the fact that the motion may have
I
been deficient, the murder conviction was reversed.
In Nathanson v. Nathanson, 693 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 4th DCA 1.997), the
I
trial judge was disqualified for improperly allowing the guardian ad litem
to respond regarding the truthfulness of the allegations in the motion to
disqualify. •
IF you do hold I bearing (strongly diseouraged), you mllst assume
tbat the facts in the motion are true aDd you should limit argument to •
the issue ofwbether the Itated groualls are legally sufficient to require
disqualification. .If you dilpute the facts in the motion, th.t alone will
require you to dlsqoalify younelf. See Randolph v. State, 626 So. 2d •
1006 (FJa. 2d DCA 1993) (The trial- judge conducted a hearing on the
motion to disqualify an~ asked if the prosecutor wished to be beard. The
•
•
prosecutor made comments which were inappropriate because they went
beyond the question of .the legal sufficiency of the motion. Nonethelesst
the appellate court ruled that Uthe prosecutor's comments.•• should not be
•
attributed to the trial judge." The trial court's denial of the motion was
affirmed because the judge ruled on the motion without -disputing the
facts.); Niebla v. State, 832 So. 2d 887, 888 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
•
(Although it is impermissible for a trial judge to refute the charges in a
motion to disqualify, a court is pennitted to state the status of the record.
Held: Trial judge .could state that he imposed consecutive life sentences
•
after defendant's trial.); Shuler v. Green Mounlain Ventures, Inc., 791 So.
. 2d 1213, 1215 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (explaining that while a trial judge
may not pass on the facts of the truth alleged, the judge may explain the
•
status of the record).
..
I
80f47 •
III
56
18
57
58
59
Filing # 109909167 E-Filed 07/07/2020 06:50:44 PM
Defendant NEIL JOSEPH GILLESPIE, an indigent nonlawyer appearing pro se, in the
first person, files Defendant’s Motion For Recognizance Bond, and states:
1. Pursuant to Rule 3.131(b)(1), Fla. R. Crim. P., “there is a presumption in favor of release
2. On November 10, 2019, I was arrested and charged with two non-violent felony crimes,
and released on a $4,000 bond total in case no. 2019-CF-004193-A-Z. My arrest was politically
motivated, see Affidavit of Neil J. Gillespie and Marion Senior Services, Inc.
Fla. Stat. sec. 934.03.1a Interception of Oral Communication; ($2,000 surety bond)
Fla. Stat. sec. 934.03.1c Disclosure of Communication ($2,000 surety bond)
3. The arrest warrant signed by Judge S. Sue Robbins on November 7, 2019 authorizes
4. At the time of my arrest on November 10, 2019 I was eligible for Recognizance Bond
60
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECOGNIZANCE BOND CASE NO. 2019-CF-4193
the OCCCRC for 5th D.C.A., and requested, “can you move for an order for release on my own
recognizance? (and end the bail bond).” Mr. Phipps failed to seek ROR on my behalf in March
6. It appears Mr. Phipps did not want me released on a recognizance bond at that time.
8. The foregoing example is evidence that Mr. Phipps and the OCCCRC for 5th D.C.A has
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing has been furnished
July 7, 2020 to Zachary Glenn Phipps, OCCCRC for 5th D.C.A., 307 NW 3rd St., Ocala, FL
34475-6638 at [email protected], and the State Attorney’s Office, 110 North West 1st
Avenue, Suite 5000 ([email protected]), Ocala, FL 34475, by e-service July 7, 2020.
2
61
Page 1 of 2
Neil Gillespie
Mr. Gainey:
Thank you for the State’s Discovery Exhibit. Regarding the Brady Evidence for Ms. Thompson, I
believe Thompson was convicted of domestic violence against Carlton Robert Norwood (died Dec-31-
2011), her former common law husband. This information was provided to me in January 2020 by her
mother, Patricia Thompson. The crime was committed in the state of Maine, either in Augusta Maine or
Vassalboro Maine, which I believe are located in Kennebec County, Maine
https://www.courts.maine.gov/maine_courts/findacourt/kennebec_superior.shtml
I believe Thompson’s crime/conviction involving Mr. Norwood occurred about 15 years ago, and
apparently resulted in Thompson loosing her student aid and ending her college enrollment. This is what
Thompson’s mother told me while I was visiting her brother Andrew Coutu after his drug overdose
while he was in intensive care at AdventHealth Ocala, 1500 Southwest 1st Avenue, Ocala, FL 34471.
Unfortunately court records in Maine are not provided online. Earlier today I called the number for
Michele Lumbert, (207) 213-2800, Clerk of the Maine District Court - Augusta, and was referred to the
records center at 207-753-2901. Searching and obtaining records is laborious and costly, see attached the
attached form with pricing.
https://www.courts.maine.gov/maine_courts/findacourt/waterville_district.shtml
I also believe Brady Evidence should include her arrest February 6, 2020 (felony drugs) where your
office failed to file an information; theft and vandalism shown in MCSO19OFF028747; theft of my new
HP laptop computer recovered by Dunnellon Police Officer E.J. Raines (an example of police I love);
and Thompson’s damage and theft during her home invasion (812.135) June 7, 2020.
Separately, Ms. Thompson is a self-employed Ocala prostitute, f.k.a. Dolly Style, n.k.a. Roxy, who
advertises "i love fetishes bdsm" and "S&M" which I believe accounts for the bruising of her legs a
week after the incident shown in the arrest warrant. Personally I know Thompson enjoys physical
fighting with men from our conversations. https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/roxy-escort-ocala-608178 ,
https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/dolly-style-escort-ocala-608178 Thompson also advertises as "Sadie" in
62
8/18/2020
Page 2 of 2
Regarding NICHOLAS AUSTIN (B), Marion County Sheriff Dept., on January 30, 2020 I made a
Federal Civil Rights Complaint against him, see attached. Tellingly, rather than defend my right to know
the pharmacist working at the Walmart Pharmacy, Austin and then Lt. Welch collaborated to have me
trespassed from Walmart. Welch also had me trespassed from his office for leaving Sarah’s perishables
outside the SW Substation in an ice cooler for her to get, see attached. I was compelled to make an
ethics complaint against Welsh for his refusal to accept US mail from me. Seriously, what is wrong with
Deputy Austin, Lt. Welch and certain other MCSO people?
Mr. Gainey, in my view this prosecution (and the wiretapping case) is an example of vengeance by a bad
law enforcement agency, the MCSO, against a senior citizen who speaks truth to power.
Sincerely,
/s/
Neil J. Gillespie
8092 SW 115th Loop
Ocala, Florida 34481
Tel. 352-854-7807
Email: [email protected]
63
8/18/2020
Filing # 110167557 E-Filed 07/13/2020 05:00:59 PM
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY
COMES NOW the State of Florida, by and through its undersigned Assistant State Attorney,
pursuant to Rule 3.220(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and in response to the Notice of
Discovery filed herein by the Defendant and discloses the following information and/or material
within the State's possession or control:
The names and addresses of all persons known to the undersigned Assistant State Attorney
to have information which may be relevant to any offense charged, or any defense thereto. The
letter in parentheses following the name of each witness indicates the category witness of that
individual pursuant to Rule 3.220(b):
M-2020-25844
64
Page 2
DR EXHIBIT
NEIL JOSEPH GILLESPIE
2020-CF-002417-A-Z
M-2020-25844
65
Page 3
DR EXHIBIT
NEIL JOSEPH GILLESPIE
2020-CF-002417-A-Z
"YES" is indicated below for each subparagraph identifying information and/or material
that is presently in the State's possession or control. The said information and/or material is
available for inspection and copying upon reasonable notice to the undersigned. "NONE" is
indicated below for each subparagraph identifying information and/or material that is not presently
in the State's possession or control. The name(s) of confidential informant(s) will only be disclosed
when the State intends to use same as witness(es) at the trial or when required by Order of Court.
YES NONE
M-2020-25844
66
Page 4
DR EXHIBIT
NEIL JOSEPH GILLESPIE
2020-CF-002417-A-Z
CO-DEFENDANT STATEMENTS
NONE
TANGIBLE EVIDENCE
N. ROSACI - NEIL.PDF*
N. ROSACI - NEIL.M4A*
K. FAIRMAN BODY CAM VIDEOS (2)*
N. AUSTIN BODY CAM VIDEOS (2)*
K. CHARTIER BODY CAM VIDEO*
*A/V ON EVIDENCE.COM
NOTE: Photographs, video and audio recording supplied may have suffered degradtion
from the original due to copying.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing State's Discovery Exhibit has been
furnished by U.S. Mail/Hand Delivery/Electronic Service to: Neil Joseph Gillespie, Defendant, Pro
Se, Marion County Jail, 3290 NW 10th St, Ocala, FL 34475-4550 this 13th day of July, 2020.
BRAD KING
STATE ATTORNEY
FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
Jared Gainey
Assistant State Attorney
Fla. Bar # 1010232
110 NW 1 AVE, SUITE 5000
OCALA, FL 34475
(352) 671-5800
[email protected]
M-2020-25844
68
Filing # 109043203 E-Filed 06/18/2020 10:37:13 AM
appearing pro se, in the first person, gives Defendant’s Notice of Claim of Immunity Under
I hereby give Notice to the State Attorney of my Claim of Immunity in this prosecution
Under Section 776.032 Florida Statutes. A copy of Section 776.032 is attached.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing has been furnished
to the State Attorney’s Office, 110 North West 1st Avenue, Suite 5000,
([email protected]), Ocala, FL 34475, by e-service this 18th day of June, 2020.
Neil J. Gillespie
8092 SW 115th Loop
Ocala, FL 34481
Tel. 352-854-7807
Email: [email protected]
69
6/18/2020 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine
70
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0700-0799/0776/Sections/0776.032.html 1/1
Filing # 110432892 E-Filed 07/17/2020 05:00:03 PM
Defendant NEIL JOSEPH GILLESPIE, a nonlawyer appearing pro se, in the first person,
files Motion To Drop All Charges and Release Defendant, and states,
1. Earlier today I notified Assistant State Attorney Jared Gainey to immediately drop the
charges against me, and inform Judge Tatti so he may revoke the arrest warrant for me. My
email and attachments to ASA Gainey appear at Exhibit 1 and state in substance:
Jared Gainey
Assistant State Attorney
Fla. Bar # 1010232
110 NW 1 AVE, SUITE 5000
OCALA, FL 34475
(352) 671-5800
Mr. Gainey:
As you know, I waived my right to counsel in 2020-CF-2417 and I appear pro se.
Attached you will find DOC-28 date July 9, 2020 Subpoena Returned Not Served, for the
alleged victim, Sarah May Thompson. The subpoena return of service shows "non
served" and "could not be found in Marion County Florida".
It appears the state no longer has a victim in 2020-CF-2417. Therefore, I request you
immediately drop the charges against me, and inform Judge Tatti so he may revoke the
arrest warrant for me.
71
MOTION TO DROP ALL CHARGES AND RELEASE DEFENDANT
2. On July 6, 2020 I filed, with the cooperation of the State Attorney Brad King,
Notice: Property in Storage For Defendant Thompson appears at Exhibit 2. My pleading shows
at Exhibit 1 email I received from Ms. Thompson June 18, 2020 at 8:09 AM:
Mr. Gillespie,
As I'm sure you know I showed up at ypur house yesterday June 17th in an
attempt to retrieve my personal property from you. I made 1 telephone call and
left a message. Since there is an injunction pending and due to the nature of our
last encounter this will be my last communication with you. If you could put my
stuff in storage unit like you had said and then have the storage people call me
then this matter will be resolved. My cell phone # is 352-356-5666.
Thank you
Sarah Thompson
The operative words of Ms. Thomspon are “If you could put my stuff in storage unit like you had
said and then have the storage people call me then this matter will be resolved.”
3. The alleged victim, Sarah MayThompson, considers this matter resolved because she got
what she wanted: To put her stuff in storage. Apparently in her view the ends justify the means,
4. The ARREST AFFIDAVIT in this case is a work of fiction. First, Sarah May Thompson
was not a lawful resident of 8092 SW 115th Loop Ocala on June 7, 2020. Ms. Thompson vacated
the property on May 16, 2020 because I refused to drive her to buy drugs. Second, I did not take
Ms. Thompson’s smart phone from her by sudden snatching. The phone was unattended and
charging at an electrical outlet under the fuse box in the garage. Thompson was 8 feet away
when I confiscated the phone for theft of electricity and violation of house rules. Thompson was
armed with a metal T-ball bat she earlier took from my vehicle. Thompson screamed for her
phone when I unplugged it from the electrical outlet, not taken from her person as claimed.
2
72
MOTION TO DROP ALL CHARGES AND RELEASE DEFENDANT
5. Ms. Thompson played the Marion County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) to assist her
deception, and she was able to do so because of prejudice of the MCSO against me.
It appears the state no longer has a victim in 2020-CF-2417. Therefore, I request you
immediately drop the charges against me, and inform Judge Tatti so he may revoke the
arrest warrant for me.
WHEREFORE, I move the Court to drop all charges in 2020-CF-2417 against me, and
Neil J. Gillespie
8092 SW 115th Loop
Ocala, Florida 34481
Tel. 352-854-7807
Email: [email protected]
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July17, 2020 a copy of the foregoing has been furnished to
the following names by e-service:
• State Attorney’s Office, 110 North West 1st Avenue, Suite 5000
([email protected]), Ocala, FL 34475.
• Wesley HEIDT, State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, to:
[email protected], [email protected], and to tanya.murray-
[email protected]
• Zachary Glenn Phipps, OCCCRC for 5th D.C.A., 307 NW 3rd St.
([email protected]) Ocala, FL 34475-6638.
3
73
Page 1 of 1
Neil Gillespie
Mr. Gainey:
As you know, I waived my right to counsel in 2020-CF-2417 and I appear pro se. Attached you will find
DOC-28 date July 9, 2020 Subpoena Returned Not Served, for the alleged victim, Sarah May
Thompson. The subpoena return of service shows "non served" and "could not be found in Marion
County Florida".
It appears the state no longer has a victim in 2020-CF-2417. Therefore, I request you immediately drop
the charges against me, and inform Judge Tatti so he may revoke the arrest warrant for me.
Sincerely,
/s/
Neil J. Gillespie
8092 SW 115th Loop
Ocala, Florida 34481
Tel. 352-854-7807
Email: [email protected]
74
7/17/2020
75
76
Filing # 109797405 E-Filed 07/06/2020 11:05:39 AM
NEIL J. GILLESPIE,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 2020-CA-934
Plaintiff NEIL J. GILLESPIE, an indigent nonlawyer, here in the first person, gives
2. As of this Notice, the Court has not responded to my Emergency Motion. The Court has
not responded to anything concerning this case, filed June 8, 2020, that I know about.
3. On July 2, 2020 I emailed the Clerk: “Do you know if the Court plans to take any action
in Case No. 2020-CA-934?” The Clerk responded: “This office has no reason or ability to know
4. Therefore too expedite this matter in the interest of justice, Defendant Sarah May
Thompson (“Ms. Thompson”) may retrieve her belongings at the storage facility she designated:
US Storage Center
2853 S. Pine Avenue
Ocala, FL 34471
(352) 274-9798
Storage Unit No. C0195
77
NOTICE: PROPERTY IN STORAGE FOR DEFENDANT THOMPSON CASE NO. 2020-CA-934
5. Storage Unit No. C0195 is available now through July 31, 2020. Ms. Thompson’s
property is inside the storage unit, which is locked. One key to the lock, and the Gate/Access
Code, has been shipped the State Attorney, who has agreed to provide it to Ms. Thompson:
Mr. Gillespie,
As I'm sure you know I showed up at ypur house yesterday June 17th in an
attempt to retrieve my personal property from you. I made 1 telephone call and
left a message. Since there is an injunction pending and due to the nature of our
last encounter this will be my last communication with you. If you could put my
stuff in storage unit like you had said and then have the storage people call me
then this matter will be resolved. My cell phone # is 352-356-5666.
Thank you
Sarah Thompson
7. While the foregoing statement is not accurate, I want to bring finality to the matter of Ms.
8. There is no lien on Ms. Thompson’s property. There are no charges with the storage
center, so long as she vacates Unit No. C0195 and removes her property by July 31, 2020.
9. Ms. Thompson will be provided a key for the lock, and the Gate/Access Code, for
Storage Unit No. C0195 from the State Attorney as shown above.
2
78
NOTICE: PROPERTY IN STORAGE FOR DEFENDANT THOMPSON CASE NO. 2020-CA-934
10. Photos of Ms. Thompson’s property in Storage Unit No. C0195, US Storage Center store,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was served on the
Portal July 6, 2020 to the names on the Portal Notice of Service of Court Documents.
3
79
Page 1 of 1
Neil Gillespie
As I'm sure you know I showed up at ypur house yesterday June 17th in an attempt to retrieve my
personal property from you. I made 1 telephone call and left a message. Since there is an injunction
pending and due to the nature of our last encounter this will be my last communication with you. If you
could put my stuff in storage unit like you had said and then have the storage people call me then this
matter will be resolved. My cell phone # is 352-356-5666.
Thank you
Sarah Thompson
1
80
6/22/2020
7/6/2020 Create a Shipment | UPS - United States
1. Ensure there are no other shipping or tracking labels attached to your package. Select the Print button on
the print dialog box that appears. Note: If your brow ser does not support this function select Print from the File menu to
print the label.
2. Fold the printed label at the solid line below . Place the label in a UPS Shipping Pouch. If you do not have a pouch,
affix the folded label using clear plastic shipping tape over the entire label.
FOLD HERE
81
https://www.ups.com/uis/create?ActionOriginPair=default___PrintWindowPage&key=labelWindow&type=html&loc=en_US&instr=A&doc=shipment_937553856:la… 1/1
Drop-Of f Package Receipt: 1 of 1
THIS IS NOT A SHIPPING LABEL. PLEASE SAVE FOR YOUR RECORDS.
DROP-OFF LOCATION: DROP-OFF DATE/TIME:
The UPS Store #5520 Man 6 Jul 2020 10:45 AM
11100 SW 93 COURT RD
STE 10 ESTIMATED PICKUP DATE:
UPS Man 6 Jul 2020 1pkg
(352) 402-0099
CUSTOMER:
GILLESPIE
ID Type: Not Provided TOTAL PACKAGES: 1pkg
This .. eceip~ is~s each package .. ecei .... ed by The UPS S~o .. e .. sszm and
I
indica~es ~he info .. ma~ion fo .. each package has been ~ .. ansmi~~ed ~o each
da~a sys~em
ca .... ie .. 's This .. eceip~ is no~ confi .. ma~ion ~he ca .... ie .. has
picked up ~he package To .... e .. i f 'I ~he s~a~us of a package. go ~o
h~~p:ll~heupss~o.. e.com. selec~ T .. acking. ~hen en~e .. T .. acking ... I f you
selec~ed a no packaging op~ion fo .. you .... e~u .. ned i~em, ~he T .. acking .. may
no~ p .. o .... ide ~ .. acking .. esul~s Please con~ac~ ~he .... endo .. 's websi~e fo .. mo .. e
info .. ma~ ion on .. e~u .. nl .. efund s~a~us. The UPS S~o .. e does no~ main~ain
.. ei:u .. n/ .. efund si:ai:us for .... endo .. s. You acknowledge ~ha~ ~he shipmen~ se ...... ices
p .. o .... ided by The LIPS S~o .. e .. 55Zm fo .. ~he I isi:ed packages a .. e subJec~ i:o and
go .... e .. ned by each Ca .... ie .. Ag .. eemen~, i f applicable, ~he Ra~es and Se ...... ice
Guide fo .. each ca .... ie .. , and ~he ~a .. i f f in effec~ a~ i:he ~ ime of shipmen~.
Powe .. ed by iShip( .. )
m7/m6/ZmZm m7:45 AM Pacific Time
iI
SEE NOTICE ON REVERSE regarding UPS Terms. and notice of limitation of liability. Where allowed by law. shipper authorizes UPS to act as forwarding agent for export control and
I customs purposes. If exported from the US. shippper certifies that th~ commodillles. technology or software were exported from the US In accordance with the Export Administration
Regulations. Diversion contrary to law Is prohibited. KR0520
82