Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ug MSW Hazard Analysis Procedure Chevron Pipe Line PDF
Ug MSW Hazard Analysis Procedure Chevron Pipe Line PDF
Analysis Procedure
Contents
1.0 Purpose and Objectives ..................................................................................................... 3
1.1 Scope ................................................................................................................................... 3
1.2 Requirements ...................................................................................................................... 3
1.3 Terms and Definitions......................................................................................................... 4
1.4 Roles, Responsibilities and Training Requirements ........................................................... 4
1.4.1 Initial Training ........................................................................................................ 5
2.0 Standard Instructions ......................................................................................................... 5
2.1 Performing a Planning Phase Hazard Analysis ................................................................... 6
2.1.1 Identifying the Task ................................................................................................ 7
2.1.2 Forming the Analysis Team .................................................................................... 7
2.1.3 Breaking-down the Task ......................................................................................... 7
2.1.4 Identifying Potential Hazards .................................................................................. 7
2.1.5 Developing Control Measures................................................................................. 8
2.2 Perform an On-site JSA ...................................................................................................... 8
2.2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 8
2.2.2 Completing an on-site JSA involves the following activities: ................................ 9
2.3 Performing a Personal Hazard Assessment......................................................................... 9
2.4 Monitoring Effectiveness .................................................................................................. 10
2.4.1 Planning Phase HA Document Reviews ............................................................... 10
2.4.2 JSA Document Reviews........................................................................................ 10
2.4.3 JSA Observation Reviews ..................................................................................... 10
3.0 Records............................................................................................................................ 10
3.1 Required Records .............................................................................................................. 10
3.2 Retention Requirements .................................................................................................... 11
4.0 Document Control Information ....................................................................................... 11
4.1 Document Change History ................................................................................................ 11
5.0 Document List ................................................................................................................. 11
Appendix A: CPL Planning Phase Hazard Analysis Worksheet ..................................................... 13
Appendix B: CPL Job Safety Analysis Form .................................................................................. 14
Appendix C: Risk Assessment......................................................................................................... 15
Appendix D: Risk Ranking Matrix (4x4) ........................................................................................ 16
Appendix E: Chevron Hazard Identification Tool ........................................................................... 17
Appendix F: Think Incident Free (TIF) Analysis ............................................................................ 19
Appendix G: On-site JSA Competency Development Model ......................................................... 20
Hazard Analysis
1.1 Scope
This Hazard Analysis Procedure covers work performed by Chevron employees and their
delegates and contractors within Chevron Upstream and Gas (U&G) operational control.
Operational Excellence reporting boundary definitions can be found in the OE Data Reporting
Standard. For contractor activities where Chevron does not have operational control, Chevron
will encourage contractors to use hazard analysis tools.
This procedure does not apply to Facilities and Operations HES design reviews, Integrated
Hazard Identification’s, or other risk assessment studies as defined in the Corporate OE
Standard Process – HES Risk Management.
1.2 Requirements
To comply with this procedure, SBUs will meet the following requirements:
1. A hazard analysis appropriate to the phase of work shall be conducted.
2. A hazard analysis must consider actions as well as physical and environmental conditions.
3. Personnel performing hazard analysis shall be trained and competent in the roles for
which they are responsible.
4. All JSAs must be developed or revised onsite by the personnel performing the work to
ensure the systematic identification and mitigation of site-specific hazards before work
begins.
5. A Job Safety Analysis (JSA) used onsite by an individual work crew shall address
specific tasks.
6. Content of the JSA must be communicated to the work team and other affected parties
immediately prior to beginning work. Communication must occur in a language
appropriate for the work team so that they clearly understand the task hazards, control
measures and actions required to conduct the work safely.
7. Individuals must perform a Personal Hazard Assessment before starting a work task.
these positions, consideration should be given to the candidate’s level of experience and past
performance.
For project work managed and performed by CPL, the CPL - Planning Phase Hazard
Analysis must be used to document the analysis.
For project work managed and performed by Contractors, the Contractor Job Safety Plan
(CJSP) (formerly Job Site Safety Plan (JSSP)) must be used to document the analysis.
For non-project work, the work planning activities performed by a competent Person in
Charge are considered to be the Planning Phase Hazard Analysis. These activities include,
but are not limited to the review of relevant CPL Safe Work Practices, Maintenance and
Inspection Procedures, and other relevant safety procedures.
Look at physical conditions (chemicals, tools, work space, etc.), environmental factors (heat,
cold, noise, lighting, weather conditions, etc.) and actions or behaviors (need to stand on a
slippery or unstable surface, extended reach to operate a valve, lifting bulky objects).
Additional information on increasing hazard identification skills is located in the MSW
Support Materials.
An example of identifying hazards using the Chevron Hazard Identification Tool can be
found incorporated into the form in Appendix A.
Environmental factors e.g. wind speed and direction may have an additional impact on the
work
Technical aspects of the job may introduce additional hazards that require onsite changes
to be considered. These additional hazards should be assessed using the same method as
previously used in the planning phase hazard analysis process
Other affected and/or knowledgeable persons may identify additional hazards
individual employees to reflect on, and take ownership of identifying and ensuring controls
are in place for the hazards to which they may be exposed.
The minimum steps of an effective Personal Hazard Assessment are:
Understanding the method to perform the task safely
Determining the potential hazards
Determining what can be done to eliminate the hazard
Acting to prevent any negative consequences
SBUs may use a variety of tools to support their Personal Hazard Assessments.
Appendix E contains an example of a Personal Hazard Assessment using the Think Incident
Free (TIF) tool.
3.0 Records
3.1 Required Records
The following records will be kept:
Copies of Planning Phase Hazard Analyses, JSAs and other associated documentation
should be maintained as defined by the SBU.
Control Number
An additional step that may be included in a hazard analysis is an assessment of the risk associated
with each job step. Control measures are intended to either eliminate the risk of the job (task) or
reduce it to an acceptable level. Using an approved Risk Matrix as shown on the next page, each
hazard identified in a planning phase hazard analysis or in a JSA is assessed for the risk before any
control measures are applied.
Once the control measures are applied, the Risk Matrix is used to determine the potential severity
and the likelihood of the risk for each step in the job, which leads to a residual risk ranking code of
Low, Medium or High (L, M, and H). The consequence effect from a hazard does not normally
change through the implementation of a control, only the likelihood of the consequence occurring.
Where residual risk is determined to be acceptable and as low as reasonably practicable, the work
may continue based on agreement from the hazard analysis team. If the residual risk is too high
then the work should be scheduled for an alternate time when the risk can be adequately controlled.
Hazard identification tools provide a structured approach for identifying hazards and may provide
assistance when creating a hazard analysis.
The Chevron Hazard Identification Tool is based on first identifying energy sources in the workplace,
which if contacted in an unwanted way or released in an unplanned manner can pose a hazard. Look
at physical conditions (chemicals, tools, stored pressure, elevation, etc.), environmental factors (heat,
cold, noise, lighting, wet conditions, etc.) and actions or behaviors (equipment or personnel
movement, etc.). Identify all energy sources associated with each step regardless of the level of
control present, and then identify potential hazards based on unwanted contact or an unplanned
release of energy.
Definitions
Competencies define the applied knowledge, skills and behaviors that enable people to
successfully perform their work.
Knowledge is the information that allows a person to perform from an informed perspective.
Skills are demonstrated abilities or proficiencies (e.g., Identification of Tasks at appropriate level
of detail, Hazard Identification, etc.)
Behaviors are the manner of conducting oneself, the response of an individual to his/her
environment (e.g., Communicates Clearly, Fosters Collaborative Relationships, etc.)
Development Plan
Competency is developed in stages, and while sometimes advantageous, not all personnel involved in
the JSA process require the same level of competency. A summary of competency levels is provided
in Table 1.
NOTE: All personnel should be able reach the Basic Application level, and be seen as active
participants in the on-site JSA process.
Table 1. Competency Level Summary
Competency Level Description Source
Awareness A basic conceptual Overview presentation, general
understanding of a JSA knowledge
Knowledgeable Understanding of the need Learning activities:
for a JSA, the steps required Web-based training
to complete a JSA, the task to Instructor-led/classroom
be performed, the typical coursework
hazards and controls Field discussions
associated with the task, and
the Hazard Identification
Tool
Basic Application Demonstrated understanding Participation in field activities as a
of JSA process member of a team
Demonstrated Demonstrate the ability to Observation and mentoring by work
Comprehension materially participate in team leader who leads development
development of a JSA and communication of JSA
Skilled Application Leading development (acting Observation and coaching by
as a facilitator) of JSAs, and competent personnel from outside
demonstrating ability to the work team, of leader of JSA
communicate with and development
engage all members of work
20 CPL Version 2.0 [effective January 1, 2013]
Printed 14 December 2012. Uncontrolled when printed
cpl_msw_hazard_analysis_procedure_(version 2.0 final).docx
team
Analysis and Evaluation Able to evaluate The prize! If we can get a sufficient
documentation for quality, “critical mass” of personnel to this
conduct observations on level, the process will be improved.
peers and provide coaching
to improve the process
Observations should be performed consistently, using a standardized form to focus observers on JSA
development and execution. The following elements are critical to a successful observation:
Identify specific jobs to be observed (high-risk, non-routine, incident history, etc.)
Gather background information
Schedule to observation with the work team
Establish a relationship with the Supervisor and work team
Get oriented to the job
Confirm the major job steps
Identify the hazards
Identify the mitigations/controls
Review the JSA form
Observe the pre-job meeting and communication
Observe the work
Provide feedback to the supervisor and work team
Document the observation
24
Printed 14 December 2012. Uncontrolled when printed
cpl_msw_hazard_analysis_procedure_(version 2.0 final).docx
U&G – Hazard Analysis Procedure