Notes On Crim Law 1
Notes On Crim Law 1
2. Spanish text > English Translation Territoriality –penal laws of the Philippines are
In the construction or interpretation of enforceable only within the territory, including
the provisions of the RPC, the Spanish its atmosphere, interior waters and maritime
text is controlling, because it was zone.
approved by the Philippine Legislature
in its Spanish Text. Prospectively - penal laws cannot make an act
punishable in a manner in which it was not
7. Scope of Application and Characteristics of punishable at the time of their commission,
Criminal Law except where the new law are more favorable the
1. General accused as long as he is not a habitual delinquent
Criminal law is binding on all persons or the law otherwise expressly provides.
who live and sojourns in the Philippine
Territory.
Person subject to military law, Articles
of war is applied and not the RPC.
II.FELONIES
(Refer to Sect 1 R.A. No. 7055 page 8) 1. Art 3. Felonies
General Rule: To punish persons for Felonies - are acts and omission punishable by
offence committed within its territory, the RPC. This are committed by means of
regardless of the nationality of the deceit (dolo) and by means of fault (culpa).
offender.
Elements of felonies: (AOPDC)
1
Means innocent until proven.
2|Page
CRIMINAL LAW 1
a. There must be an act or omission (must be The wrongful act results from
1 2
voluntary) imprudence , negligence , lack of foresight
b. That the act or omissions must be or lack of skill
punishable by the RPC.
c. That the act is performed and omission 3. Crimes penalized by special laws
incurred by means of dolo or culpa.
2. Dolo or Malice (Intent to do an injury)
Note:
Crimes – is punishable by law in general. Requisites of Dolo or Malice: (to be considered
Felonies – is punishable by the RPC as having been performed or incurred with
Offenses – is punishable by special laws deliberate intent)
a. Freedom (voluntary)
Felony by Omission b. Intelligence
There must be a law requiring the doing or c. Intent (being purely mental process, is
performance of an act. presumed and the presumption arises from
a. In Uninhabitable place when the person is the proof of the commission of an unlawful
wounded and in danger of dying. – You can act – killing/Death)
be liable for abandonment of the person in
danger. Criminal Intent is necessary in felonies
b. Officer of collection – voluntarily fails to committed by means of dolo.
issue receipt – Guilty of illegal exaction Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea – the
c. Every one owing allegiance to the dact itself doest nt make a man guilty unless his
Philippines having knowledge of intentions were so.
conspiracy against the government- if not
disclose, you can be liable for misprision Actus me invite factuse non est meus actus –
or treason. an act done by me against my will is not my act.
Identity of accused (immaterial when the Mistake in the blow, when the offender
accused has been positively identified) intending to do an injury to one person actually
Antagonistic theories (2 theories or versions of inflicts it on another. (aberration ictus)
the killings- gives rise to variant crimes) The act exceeds the intent, that is the injuries
No Eyewitnesses result is greater than that intended (praeter
Circumstantial evidence or sufficient evidence intentionem)
Motive is established by the testimony of
witnesses on the acts or statements of the d. Mistake in identity – error in personae
accused before or immediately after the (People vs Oanis 74 Phil 257)
commission of the offense. e. Mistake in the blow – aberratio ictus
(People vs Mabugat 51 Phil 967)
9. Art. 4 f. Injurious result is greater than what is
Par 1 – a person who performs a criminal act is intended – praeter intentionem
responsible for ALL the consequences of said act (People vs Cagoco 58 Phil 524)
regardless of his intention. (People vs. Mariano
No. L-45966) Par 1 Requisite:
1. That an intentional felony has been committed
Doctrine: “El que es causa de la causa es causa del 2. Wrong done must be direct, natural and
mal causado” - he who is the cause of the cause is logical consequence of felonious act.
the casuse of the evil caused. - Blow was efficient cause of death
- Blow accelerated death
The act or omission should not be punished by a - Blow was proximate cause of death
special law, because the offender violating a
special law may not have the intent to do an No Felony committed:
injury to another. In such cases the wrongful act When act or omission not punishable by
done could not be different as the offender did the RPC
not intend to do any other injury. When the act is covered by any of
justifying circumstance enumerated in Art
Committing Felony 11.
- Not merely performing an act
- must be punishable by the RPC ** Act of defense or fulfillment of duty must be
- should be committed by means of dolo (deceit) exercised with due care, otherwise, the accused
with malice will be liable for culpable felony.
Although the wrongful act done be different Any person, who creates in another mind an
from that which he intended immediate sense of danger which causes the
Mistake in the identity of the victim (error in latter to do something resulting in the latter
personae) injuries, is liable for the resulting injuries.
Ex. Jeepney robbery, threats to shoots passengers
if they don’t bring out their money, (Felony is
5|Page
CRIMINAL LAW 1
committed) if one passenger escapes and the Act was done with evil intent
escapes cause injury/ death the robber is liable Its accomplishment is inherently
for attempted robbery with intimidation. impossible or that the means employed is
(PEOPLE VS PAGE 77 SCRA 348 355) either inadequate or in effectual
Act performed should not constitute a
US VS VALDEZ, 41 PHIL 497 – page 69 violation of another provision of the
RPC.
10. Doctrine of Proximate Cause (E.g. if there is a grave threats which is
punishable under Art 282 or attempted
Felony committed must be the proximate cause felony)
of the resulting injury.
If act performed against person or property
PROXIMATE CAUSE would be an offense there is no impossible
That cause which in natural and continuous crimes.
sequence, unbroken by any efficient intervening
cause produces the injury and which the result Inherent impossibility of its accomplishment,
would not have occurred. there must be:
Legal impossibility
PROXIMATE LEGAL CAUSE Physical impossibility
Is that acting first and producing the injury, either
immediately, or setting other events in motion all Purpose of punishing impossible crimes
constituting a natural and continuous chain of To suppress criminal propensity or criminal
events ,each having a close casual connection tendencies objectively, the offender has not
with its immediate predecessor. committed a felony but subjectively he is a
criminal.
FELONY COMMITTED IS NOT THE PROXIMATE
CAUSE: 12. Art 5
Not direct, natural and logical “IN CONNECTION WITH ACTS WHICH SHOULD
consequence of the felony committed. – If BE REPRESSED BUT WHICH ARE NOT COVERED
there is an active force that intervened BY THE LAW”
between the felonies and the result. That TRIAL OF A CRIMINAL CASE REQUIRES:
active force is distinct or absolute foreign The act committed by the accused appears
from felonious act. not punishable by any law
The resulting injury is due to the But the court deems it proper to repress
intentional act of the victim. such act.
In that case the court must render the
11. Impossible Crimes proper decision by dismissing the case and
Requisites: acquitting the accused
The act performed would be against The judge must them make a report to the
person and property Chief Executive stating the reasons which
6|Page
CRIMINAL LAW 1
induce him too believe that the said act reason of some cause or accident other than his
should be made the subject of penal own spontaneous desistance.
legislation.
Development Crime Stages (stage from
“IN CASE OF EXESSIVE PENALTY”, REQUIRES: conceiving to realization):
The court after trial finds the accused 1. Internal Act – Ideas (Intention and effects must
guilty concur)
Penalty provided by law and which the 2. External Acts
court imposes for the crime committed a. Preparatory Act (ordinarily not punishable)
appear to be clearly excessive A proposal and Conspiracy to commit felony is
o Accused acted with lesser degree of not punishable.
malice XPN:
o There is no injury or the injury When the law provides for their
caused is less gravity punishment in certain felonies ( Art 8)
Court shall not suspend the execution of Preparatory act which are considered by
the sentence law independent crimes punishable
Judge should submit a statement to Chief o Example: Possession of picklocks
Executive through the Secretary of Justice under Art 304 is a preparatory act
recommending clemency to the commission of Robbery (Art
299 or 303)
* Although the petitioner was convicted under b. Acts of Execution (punishable under the RPC)
special law, the court is not precluded from giving Stages – Attempted, Frustrated and
the RPC suppletory application in light of Art 10 Consummated
and our ruling in PEOPLE VS SIMON, 234 SCRA
55, 574 14. Attempted Stage
ELEMENTS:
13. Art 6 Stages of Execution Commence the commission directly by
overt acts
1. Consummated – when all the elements He does not perform all acts of execution
necessary for its execution and accomplishment which should produce the felony
are present. Non-performance of all acts was due to
2. Frustrated – when the offender performs all cause or accident other than his
the acts of execution which would produce the spontaneous desistance
felony as a consequence but which, do not
produce it by reason of causes independent of COMMENCE COMMISSION OF A FELONY
the will of the perpetrator. DIRECTLY BY OVERTACTS, REQUISITES:
3. Attempted – when the offender commence There be external acts
the commission of a felony directly by overt Such external acts have direct connection
acts, and does not perform all the acts of with the crime intended to be committed.
execution which should produce the felony by
7|Page
CRIMINAL LAW 1
Attempted Felony – offender never passed Theft is produced when there is deprivation of
subjective phase of the offense. personal property due to its taking by one with
intent to gain.
SUBJECTIVE PHASE – it is the portion of the acts
constituting the crime starting from the point Unlawful taking is deemed complete from the
where the offender begins the commission of moment the offender gains possession of the
the crime to that point where he has still thing, even if he has no opportunity to dispose of
control over his acts; including their natural the same. (People vs Obillom 411 Phil 139,
course. 150[2001]; People vs Bernabe, 448 Phil 269,
8|Page
CRIMINAL LAW 1
10 | P a g e
CRIMINAL LAW 1
REQUISITES: (URL)
1. Unlawful Aggression- indispensable requisite
2. Reasonable necessity of the means to
employed to prevent or repel it
3. Lack of sufficient provocation on the part of
the person defending himself
4 Subjects of self-defense:
1. Person
2. Rights
3. Property
4. Honor
Article 12
IV. CIRCUMSTANCES
AFFECTING CRIMINAL
LIABILITY
11 | P a g e