Buddhist Mindful Vs Contemporary Psychology Paradox Article
Buddhist Mindful Vs Contemporary Psychology Paradox Article
in contemporary psychology:
A paradox of incompatibility and harmony
MALCOLM HUXTER
While Buddhism and science share a common foundation of empiricism, significant differences
remain between them. MALCOLM HUXTER explores these differences through a consideration of
how the Buddhist concept and practice of mindfulness has been incorporated into contemporary
psychology. Many Buddhists share a concern about a reductionist approach to mindfulness and
its separation from wisdom and ethics. This separation of mindfulness from its historical, social and
theoretical contexts shows the rift between Buddhism and contemporary mind sciences. Clinical
utility is limited when definitions of mindfulness do not include remembering and discernment,
as the failure to remember lessons from the past, and to develop future direction, renders the
role of wisdom meaningless. Without ethics, mindfulness can be reduced to a commodity, and a
palliative technique to ‘feel better’ that does not address the underlying causes of suffering. This
paper draws on a clinical example to explore how the ancient teachings of the Buddha can be
integrated harmoniously within the contemporary clinical setting.