Princople of Procurement Loka 1
Princople of Procurement Loka 1
3. Buying Situations:
A buying situation relates to the circumstances surrounding a purchase that can
be defined by the quality of information and experience that the buyer has
concerning the products and vendors available, as well as the effort it will take to
make the purchase decision.
Straight rebuy is the situation under which the buyers are engaging in the routine
purchase of standard products from a familiar supplier where you don’t make any
modifications from the most recent order.
A perfect example is ordering some boxes of copier paper, pens and pencils from
your office supplier. It doesn’t take much effort except to confirm the sales order
has been satisfied.
Modified rebuy is the situation where the purchaser is going to buy a similar
product but there is a significant difference in the purchase from the previous
purchase. The difference may include a change in the product specifications or a
new supplier.
An example may be switching to a different type of software provided by a
different vendor. This buying situation involves more effort because you are going
to have to research product specifications and evaluate vendors, as well as
possibly negotiate new contracts.
1. New Tasks:
The first-time buyer seeks a wide variety of information to explore alternative
purchasing solutions to his organizational problem. The greater the cost or
perceived risks related to the purchase, the greater the need for information and
the larger the number of participants in the buying centre.
2. Modified Rebuy:
The buyer wants to replace a product the organisation uses. The decision making
may involve plans to modify the product specifications, prices, terms or suppliers
as when managers of the company believe that such a change will enhance quality
or reduce cost.
In such circumstances, the buying centre proved to require fewer participants and
allow for a quicker decision process than in a new task buyclass.
3. Straight Rebuy:
The buyer routinely reorders a product with no modifications. The buyer retains
the supplier as long as the level of satisfaction with the delivery, quality and price
is maintained. New suppliers are considered only when these conditions change.
The challenge for the new supplier is to offer better conditions or draw the buyer’s
attention to greater benefits than in the current offering.
The buyphases are:
Based on field research, Robinson, Faris and Wind divided the buyer
purchase process into eight sequential, distinct but interrelated
buyphases:
(i) Recognition of the organizational problem or need.
(ii) Determination of the characteristics of the item and the quantity needed.
(iii) Description of the characteristics of the item and the quantity needed.
(iv) Search for and qualification of potential sources.
(v) Acquisition and analysis of proposals.
(vi) Evaluation of the proposals and selection of suppliers.
(vii) Selection of an order routine.
(viii) Performance feedback and evaluation.
The most complex buying situations occur in the upper left quadrant of the buy
grid matrix where the largest number of decision makers and buying influences
are involved. A new task that occurs in the problem recognition phase (1) is
generally the most difficult for management.
The buying process can vary from highly formalized to an approximation
depending on the nature of the buying organisation, the size of the deal and the
buying situation.
The relationship between the buyer and seller is initiated in phases 1 and 2.
Assessing the buyer’s needs and determining gaps between the current and
desired situation is important. Buyers need assistance in forming realistic
perceptions of both the current and the desired situation.
The relationship needs to be developed during phases 3 to 7. A sales person must
be aware that a buyer not only has functional needs, but psychological, social,
knowledge and situational needs as well.
These components should be addressed in meetings in order to obtain
commitment. The purchase can be a one-time transaction of a repetitive nature.
When there are multiple deliveries, the supplier and buyer must agree on an
order routine.
As buyphases are completed, the process of ‘creeping commitment’ occurs and
reduces the likelihood of new suppliers gaining access to the buying situation.
During the performance feedback and evaluation phase, the relationship between
the seller and buyer can develop into a longer term engagement. Buyer loyalty
and customer satisfaction are primarily determined by the sales activities during
this last phase.
Pros of Buy Grid Model:
The major implication of Robinson, Faris and Wind’s research is that industrial
buying behaviour depends more on the buying situation than on the type of
product.
The model explains the likely interaction between buyer and seller activities given
the purchase needs of an organisation. It helps sales personnel deliver the correct
message at the right time.
Suppliers need to fill out this matrix for their firm’s specific situation.
For each cell in the matrix (buy situation and buy phase), the
following questions must be answered:
1. Is this combination of situation and phase relevant?
2. Which organisation members influence this purchase decision?
3. What are the used performance indicators?
4. What are the information sources?
The buying side of the model can be used for both consumer and business related
buying processes. It applies to all purchase situations.
The model is based on the observation that buyer’s expectations and behaviour
change according to whether the purchase is new, a modified rebuy or a straight
rebuy.
The model can provide the basis for a formal selection process (e.g. request for
information and request for proposal).
The buy grid framework proved its worth to the scientific community as one of
the few industrial marketing models.
Cons of Buy Grid Model:
The organizational buying model focuses mainly on products and not on services.
A shortcoming of the organizational buying approach is the negligence the
supplier’s side and the influence this party wields on the customer’s
organizational decision process.
The model neglects the importance of acquisition in sales processes.