Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Core Subject Title: Introduction To The Philosophy of The Human Person
Core Subject Title: Introduction To The Philosophy of The Human Person
Learning Outcomes: At the end of this lesson, the learners are expected to:
-Demonstrate understanding of the interplay between freedom and
responsibility
Reference Books: - Corpuz, Brenda et al. 2016. Introduction to the Philosophy of the
Human Person, Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc.
- Ramos, Christine Carmela R., 2016. Introduction to the Philosophy
of the Human Person, 1st Edition. Quezon City: Rex Printing
Company, Inc.
- Calano, Mark Joseph, et al., 2016. Philosophizing and Being
Human: A Textbook for Senior High School. Quezon City. Sibs
Publishing House, Inc.
INTRODUCTORY ACTIVITY:
Submit your answer via Google Classroom
on or before December 7, 2020.
Introduction
We recall in the previous lesson how modern thinking made the human person more
aware of his/her capacity to transcend the cycle of nature. With this capacity comes a degree of
control over one’s life and environment. We have also seen how heightened awareness of this
capacity also highlighted the human being’s position of power and domination over nature.
In the last few centuries, we have seen how hunger for power turned into fierce
competition over positions of domination. As such the domination over nature extended further
to the systematic domination of fellow human beings. The atrocities in the recent century’s
World Wars and the continuing massive killings we read about today are a clear attestation to
this.
The question arises on how it has come to this point. How can it be possible for a species,
so intelligent and creative, to use his/her powers and capabilities towards the destruction of
his/her own kind? This is especially baffling because the said species is aware that in allowing or
contributing to the death of others, he or she also destroys himself or herself in the process.
ABSTRACTION:
Does freedom means…
The ability to choose our own government?
Being able to live our own personal lifestyle?
Being safe and secure from evils that threaten us like disease, poverty, and
political expression?
Does freedom mean the ability to do whatever we choose?
Or is it the ability to do what we ought to do?
free·dom | \ ˈfrē-dəm \
Definition of freedom
1: the quality or state of being free: such as
a: the absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice or action
b: liberation from slavery or restraint or from the power of another : INDEPENDENCE
c: the quality or state of being exempt or released usually from something onerous freedom from care
d: unrestricted use gave him the freedom of their home
e: EASE, FACILITY spoke the language with freedom
f: the quality of being frank, open, or outspoken answered with freedom
g: improper familiarity
h: boldness of conception or executionhttps://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/freedom
2a: a political right
b: FRANCHISE, PRIVILEGE
2 types of Freedom:
1. Negative Freedom - refers to “the absence of coercion, block or interference.”
2. Positive Freedom – a kind of freedom that requires active effort on the person who
is said to be free. Hence, a person who is deemed to be free in the positive sense is one who is
able to tame many different headed-monster that is within oneself, so that all may follow a
single direction.
Example:
a. I want to attend the barrio fiesta and yet it is examination time so I need to study for
the exams. I am free when I give up the fiesta for the sake of a more important goal.
b. But, I am not free when deep in my heart I know I should study for the exams and not
be absent and yet I go to the fiesta and enjoy and do not study for the exams.
A person who is free (possesses positive freedom) has control or mastery of herself and
so has the strength to do what is good. Policies, rules and regulations are there to ensure the
good of every person. Thus a person who is free is hardly aware of rules and regulations that
others think limit a person’s freedom. A person who is free is not allergic to rules and regulations.
Rules and regulations help her to grow in freedom since freedom is the power or the strength to
master herself to do well.
Existentialists argue that freedom should not only be conceived as an idea or a notion.
Freedom is something that is exercised through our choices. When a person exercises her
freedom, she becomes real.
This shows that a person is not “born free” rather, he/she is “born to be free.”
He/she is meant to grow in freedom. There is a tendency for young adults to feel lost like
a driftwood in a boundless sea. Because one realizes that one’s life direction is mostly up
to him/her choices. One tends to be paralyzed in the face of so many possibilities.
To some extent, this explain why some people rest content being a cog in a
machine, that is, to be simply defined by one’s function in a system. A system is a general
term for an organized whole comprised of an individual parts whose functions are
interdependent. A cog is just a small part. Separate from the machine, a cog has no use.
It is useful only when it functions as a part of the machine. Each part of the system, like a
cog, has a specific function and is required to act according to its function.
In all these examples, we have seen how the system in the life of a cog in a machine
imposes its weight on it by demanding that it fulfills its function well.
To assert your individuality and freedom would mean to move beyond the
dictates of a machine. We know that when a part does not act according to what the
machine specifies as its function, the whole machine is compromised. For this reason,
systems have a mechanism of eliminating individual freedom.
Existentialists argue that the human person must take care not to get lost in
anonymity, in a crowd. Existentialism highlights the word exist. To “exist” – ex stare – is
to stand out from facelessness and anonymity. Existence is more than mere biological
living. One who truly exists is one who owns up to his/her existence. The moment that
he/she does, he/she takes responsibility and steers the direction of his/her own life.
The main tenet of existentialism is that we are the authors of our lives. In every
story with its own plot twists, it is the author who creates those turning points. If we take
responsibility over our lives, then we can say those plots are not the products of fate or
destiny, but of own own choices.
Jean Paul Sartre argues that there is no essence that precedes existence. Essence
can be understood as a pre-given nature of a person. Existentialists argue that every
individual begins from birth as zero, nothing. A person begins to be somebody only as
Freedom therefore, means exercising our capacity to make decisions, choose our
life path and direct the course of our lives through our own steering.
2. From the Little Prince by Antoine Exupery – The little prince visited several planets
when he left his small planet. One of those planets that he visited was inhabited by an
alcoholic. The alcoholic was drinking liquor, no stop. Below is the conversation between
them:
Little Prince: What are you doing?
Alcoholic: “I am drinking!”
Little Prince: “Why are you drinking?”
Alcoholic: Because “I like to forget!”
Little Prince: “Forget what?”
Alcoholic: “That I am a drunkard!”
A student has been absent due to sickness as contained in her parents’ letter to
you. In your school, the school, the rule is nobody who has been absent, excused or
unexcused, can be admitted in class unless he/she has an admission slip from the Office
of Student Affairs. The sick student comes to class, was not able to obtain an admission
slip from the Office of Student affairs because the personnel in-charge was not there
when the student went. You are giving a quiz. If you send the study out because she has
no admission slip, she will miss the quiz. What should you do?
*Submit your answer via Google Classroom Tab on before December 7, 2020.
INTRODUCTION:
The story about human freedom is not yet complete. In addition to acting upon
our freedom by exercising our capacity to choose for ourselves, there
is the equally important task of holding ourselves responsible for the
consequences of our choices. Choosing our life direction is only the
first part of the story. The most challenging part of this freedom is
responsibility that comes with it. Without responsibility, the exercise
of freedom by asserting one’s personal choices is no different from
acting like a selfish teenager.
ABSTRACTION:
The exercise of freedom is a social act.
A responsible exercise of freedom takes the following questions in mind:
Am I aware of the consequences of my choices as soon as I act on them?
Will I be able to answer to the grievances of those who will be hurt by these
consequences?
Will I be able to face people with a dignified and resolved stance when I am chastised,
criticized for my choice?
Will I be prepared to give a reasonable answer to their questions?
Responsibility comes from two words: response and ability. Responsibility is the ability
to respond.
David currently has three girlfriend. He is 27-yearls-old, the age when you are mostly likely
to marry and settle down. But David does not want to get
married. He knows that marriage means finally committing to
only one person. This means he has to choose among the three.
David ends up answering to three women. He is different person
to each woman. He is unsure which side of him is the most
genuine among the three selves he presents to different
persons.
Most people in our society today would find nothing wrong with David’s actions. The truth
is, David is like an empty shell that is all noise deep inside. The macho brave move of shrinking
marriage only masks a deep seated fear. It is the fear of someone who has no solid bearings
deep within him. It is the fear of someone who does not know himself.
If someone evades commitment, we say in Filipino, “ayaw nyang pangatawanan.” The
word pangatawanan, which means “to be responsible” comes from the root katawan, which