Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Close Reader

SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 151


Same; Once an information is filed in court, the courtÊs prior
Information | Reference
permission must be secured if fiscal wants to reinvestigate the case.
Copy Selection
·The preliminary investigation conducted by the fiscal for the
Case Title: Select some text within a
MARIO FL. CRESPO, petitioner, purpose of determining whether a prima facie case exists paragraph and click here to
vs. HON. LEODEGARIO L. warranting the prosecution of the accused is terminated upon the copy the selected text. Citation
MOGUL, Presiding Judge, included.
filing of the information in the proper court. In turn, as above
CIRCUIT CRIMINAL COURT OF
LUCENA CITY, 9th Judicial Dist., stated, the filing of said information sets in motion the criminal
THE PEOPLE OF THE action against the accused in Court. Should the fiscal find it proper
PHILIPPINES, represented by the
SOLICITOR GENERAL, RICARDO to conduct a reinvestigation of the case, at such stage, the
BAUTISTA, ET AL., respondents. permission of the Court must be secured. After such reinvestigation
Citation: 151 SCRA 462 the finding and recommendations of the fiscal should be submitted
to the Court for appropriate action. While it is true that the fiscal
More...
has the quasi judicial discretion to determine whether or not a
criminal case should be filed in court or not, once the case had
Search Result already been brought to Court whatever disposition the fiscal may
feel should be proper in the case thereafter should be addressed for
the consideration of the Court, The only qualification is that the
action of the Court must not impair the substantial rights of the
accused, or the right of the People to due process of law.
Same; Same.·Whether the accused had been arraigned or not
and whether it was due to a reinvestigation by the fiscal or a review
by the Secretary of Justice whereby a motion to dismiss was
submitted to the Court, the Court in the exercise of its discretion
may grant the motion or deny it and require that the trial on the
merits proceed for the proper determination of the case,
Same; Where the court refuses to grant the fiscalÊs motion to
dismiss, including a case where the Secretary of Justice ordered the
fiscal to move to dismiss the case, the fiscal should continue to
appear in the case although he may turn over the presentation of
evidence to the private prosecutor.·However, one may ask, if the
trial court refuses to grant the motion to dismiss filed by the fiscal
upon the directive of the Secretary of Justice will there not be a
vacuum in the prosecution? A state prosecutor to handle the case
cannot possibly be designated by the Secretary of Justice who does
not believe that there is a basis for prosecution nor can the fiscal be
expected to handle the prosecution of the case thereby defying the
superior order of the Secretary of Justice. The answer is simple. The

© Copyright 2020 Central Book Supply, Inc. All rights reserved.

You might also like