The Impact of Bias and Prejudice On The Decision
The Impact of Bias and Prejudice On The Decision
The ability of judges to combat the subjective biases and prejudices inherent in the
human perceptual and decision making processes is dependant upon identification and
heightened sensitivity to the various categories of potential bias and their manifestations.
This section of the article will discuss some of the more widely recognized forms of bias
and their manifestations within and among the judiciary.
The categories discussed herein by no means purport to be an inclusive list. Indeed,
biases and prejudices are largely subjective and can be extremely individualized. The
categories listed below, however, are areas that have been widely identified as common
manifestations of bias in the judicial system.
Categories of Bias:
1. Gender Bias
Over the past several decades, the judicial system has been scrutinized for gender-
discriminatory practices and policies.
Most recently, this scrutiny has been undertaken by the judiciary itself in the form
of a task force movement. Many state supreme courts have formed commissions
to study the extent and impact of gender bias on the judicial system.
a. Regional Bias
Individual Bias
With regard to general interpretive bias, a natural law judge is likely to view the
Constitution through a natural law lens.
Though acknowledging that some provisions of the original Constitution did not
reflect a sound natural law position, as in the case of slavery," a natural law judge
can be predicted to view more clauses of the Constitution as embodying natural
law principles than judges who adopt other interpretive styles.
For example, without regard to who is right, it is no surprise that natural law
judges tend to hold that the Eighth Amendment's ban against "cruel and unusual
punishment" embodies the natural law principle of proportionality of
punishment," while formalist judges tend to reject that view.
With regard to specific case bias, one must consult the past experiences and