Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In Opposition To Defendants Motion To Dismiss
In Opposition To Defendants Motion To Dismiss
Abrams
_____________________________________________________________________________________
___
Baron Montero Jones,
The Plaintiff, Baron Montero Jones, who appears pr se, hereby files this MEMORADUM OF LAW
PURSUANT TO MINN.GEN.PRAC. 115.03(b) under penalty of perjury (28 USC § 1746 and
Minn.Stat. § 358.116).
I. MOTION TO DISMISS
1. Defendants by and or through their attorney's Ian M. Welsh (attorney for State Defendants) and
Beth A. Stack (attorney for Hennepin County Defendants) hereby moves to dismiss all Plaintiff's
claims pursuant to insufficiency of service of process, see Minn.R.Civ.P. 12.02 (d), and further
moves to dismiss all claims because Plaintiff had allegedly failed to state a claim upon which
relief can be granted, see Minn.R.Civ.P. 12.02(e). Additionally the Defendants assert that the
2. A defendant can move the district court to dismiss a claim for insufficient service of process.
served is jurisdictional question of law." Amdahl v Stonewall Ins. Co., 484 N.W.2d 811, 814
(Minn.App. 1992), review denied, (Minn. July 16, 1992). A claim must be dismissed if proper
service of process has not been complete. In re Skyline Materials, Ltd., 835 N.W.2d 472, 477-78
1
Baron Jones v Mike Rogosheske, et seq., 27-CV-15-17798 Judge Ronald L. Abrams
(Minn. 2013). In addition, the district court must dismiss a case where the statute of limitations
has run. See Johnson v Winthrop Labs. Div. Of Sterling Drug, Inc., 291 Minn. 145, 151, 190
N.W.2d 77, 81 (1971) ("Courts have no power to extend or modify statutory limitations