Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Justin Kucera Lawsuit
Justin Kucera Lawsuit
JUSTIN KUCERA,
v. Hon.
Plaintiff, Justin Kucera, by and through his attorneys, CROSON, TAUB, &
MICHAELS, PLLC hereby brings this action against Defendants Walled Lake
Consolidated Schools, Ken Gutman, and Michael Lonze, and hereby states as
follows:
1
Case 2:21-cv-10418-MAG-RSW ECF No. 1, PageID.2 Filed 02/23/21 Page 2 of 17
INTRODUCTION
teacher and basketball and baseball coach who formerly taught at Walled Lake
Plaintiff strove to uphold the District’s mission to educate young people and prepare
former President Donald Trump during the 2020 election. In July 2020, Plaintiff
posted a series of political messages on his personal twitter account, including that
“Donald Trump is my president,” that schools should reopen in the fall, and that
political liberals were attempting to divide us and “suck”. Even though many
strongly disagree with these opinions, they are all political speech protected from
and illegally retaliated against Plaintiff and denied him equal protection under the
law. Due to his tweets—and his tweets alone—Plaintiff was summarily terminated
from his position with the District. Defendants made the decision to terminate
Plaintiff for such speech even though many other teachers had participated in the
long and proud history of educators being involved in politics and political activism
2
Case 2:21-cv-10418-MAG-RSW ECF No. 1, PageID.3 Filed 02/23/21 Page 3 of 17
4. Plaintiff thus brings this civil-rights action pursuant to the First and
employment and to ensure that public employees such as himself are free to speak
their views without fear of politically motivated reprisals based on their right to free
speech.
5. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343 as the claims asserted arise out of federal constitutional
and statutory law, namely 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and U.S CONST. AMEND. I, XIV.
the events giving rise to this claim took place in this district and Defendants are
either governmental entities within the district or individuals who reside in this
district.
created by and operated under the laws of the State of Michigan. It exercises
3
Case 2:21-cv-10418-MAG-RSW ECF No. 1, PageID.4 Filed 02/23/21 Page 4 of 17
County.
Oakland County.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
11. Plaintiff Justin Kucera is a former social studies teacher, baseball, and
12. In 2017, after graduating from the University of Michigan and receiving
his teaching Certificate, Plaintiff began teaching at Walled Lake Western High
School.
14. Mr. Kucera was dedicated to education, his students, and advancing the
15. Throughout his employment, Mr. Kucera was well qualified for the
16. At times relevant to this suit, Plaintiff taught social studies at Walled
Lake Western High School and coached the school’s baseball and basketball teams.
4
Case 2:21-cv-10418-MAG-RSW ECF No. 1, PageID.5 Filed 02/23/21 Page 5 of 17
17. Throughout his entire educational career, Plaintiff has treated all
students, parents, administrators, and co-workers with respect and dignity, no matter
important topics, Plaintiff posted many political messages to his personal Twitter
Trump’s message that “SCHOOLS MUST OPEN IN THE FALL!!!” and posting
21. Another Twitter user responded to this tweet by saying “it’s a shame
the liberals have been trying so hard to get him out of office instead of working with
him. he [sic] would’ve accomplished much more, and that is on top of the great
5
Case 2:21-cv-10418-MAG-RSW ECF No. 1, PageID.6 Filed 02/23/21 Page 6 of 17
accomplishments he has made for our nation. can’t [sic] wait to see sleepy joe [sic]
against him in the debates.” Plaintiff responded by saying, “liberals suck man.”
23. Plaintiff, however, did not discuss his political views in the classroom,
and all debate regarding this matter took place on social media outside of school
grounds.
24. Further, Plaintiff’s Twitter account was his own personal account and
was not owned by, maintained, or affiliated with Defendant Walled Lake
via zoom with Defendant Michael Lonze, the District’s Assistant Superintendent for
27. Plaintiff was questioned both over his Tweet supporting former
28. Plaintiff stated that the response to his Tweet had been 50/50 in terms
of support and that he had never brought his politics into the classroom.
6
Case 2:21-cv-10418-MAG-RSW ECF No. 1, PageID.7 Filed 02/23/21 Page 7 of 17
29. On July 15, 2020, Defendant Gutman met with Plaintiff via Zoom and
30. On July 16, 2020, Plaintiff refused Defendant Gutman’s demand that
Plaintiff resign his position because he had exercised his First Amendment rights.
31. Defendant Guttman and Defendant Lonze then made the decision to
32. On July 17, 2020 Plaintiff received a letter from Defendant Lonze
33. The sole motivation for Plaintiff’s termination was retaliation for his
34. Plaintiff then met with Defendant Gutman on July 22, 2020 after his
35. In that conversation, Mr. Gutman demanded that if Mr. Kucera wanted
do “better”.
37. Shortly after the meeting, Plaintiff informed Defendant Gutman that he
7
Case 2:21-cv-10418-MAG-RSW ECF No. 1, PageID.8 Filed 02/23/21 Page 8 of 17
39. Defendants terminated Plaintiff for his political speech despite other
CAUSES OF ACTION
COUNT I
FIRST AMENDMENT RETALIATION
42 U.S.C. § 1983: U.S. CONST. AMEND. I
(Against all Defendants)
41. The Defendants are all “persons” covered by the meaning of 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983.
42. At all relevant times, Individual Defendants acted under color of state
Lake Consolidated Schools, which is created by and operated under the laws of the
State of Michigan.
the United States Constitution by posting protected speech to his personal Twitter
account as a private citizen concerning issues of public concern including but not
8
Case 2:21-cv-10418-MAG-RSW ECF No. 1, PageID.9 Filed 02/23/21 Page 9 of 17
limited to coronavirus restrictions, his support of President Trump, and his opinions
on national politics.
45. The adverse action taken against Plaintiff was motivated in significant
46. But for Plaintiff’s exercise of his constitutionally protected right to free
constitutional right to be free of retaliation for speech under the First Amendment to
50. The actions of the Individual Defendants were all ratified and supported
decision.
9
Case 2:21-cv-10418-MAG-RSW ECF No. 1, PageID.10 Filed 02/23/21 Page 10 of 17
harmed, and continues to be harmed, in that he has suffered economic and non-
economic loss, including but not limited to, lost wages, damage to professional
52. The Individual Defendants’ actions were done intentionally and/or with
damages.
their official capacity reinstating Plaintiff to his position and preventing any further
COUNT II
EQUAL PROTECTION VIOLATION
42 U.S.C. § 1983: U.S. CONST. AMEND. XIV
(Against All Defendants)
allegations.
55. The Defendants are all “persons” covered by the meaning of 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983.
56. At all relevant times, Individual Defendants acted under color of state
Lake Consolidated Schools, which is created by and operated under the laws of the
State of Michigan.
10
Case 2:21-cv-10418-MAG-RSW ECF No. 1, PageID.11 Filed 02/23/21 Page 11 of 17
58. Plaintiff was treated differently than similarly situated teachers based
on his political beliefs and there was no rational basis for the differential treatment
59. Individual Defendants undertook these actions under color of state law.
constitutional right to equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S.
62. The actions of the Individual Defendants were all ratified and supported
decision.
continues to suffer damages, including loss of the value, use, and enjoyment of his
11
Case 2:21-cv-10418-MAG-RSW ECF No. 1, PageID.12 Filed 02/23/21 Page 12 of 17
64. The Individual Defendants’ actions were done intentionally and/or with
damages.
their official capacity reinstating Plaintiff to his position and preventing any further
COUNT III
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
MICH. CONST. OF 1963, ART. I, SEC. 5
(Against Defendant Walled Lake Consolidated Schools)
70. But for Plaintiff’s exercise of his constitutionally protected right to free
Plaintiff.
conduct, Plaintiff was harmed, and continues to be harmed, in that he has suffered
economic and non-economic loss, including but not limited to, lost wages, damage
74. Plaintiff also seeks an injunction reinstating Plaintiff to his position and
COUNT IV
EQUAL PROTECTION VIOLATION
MICH. CONST. OF 1963, ART. I, SEC. 2
(Against Defendant Walled Lake Consolidated Schools)
13
Case 2:21-cv-10418-MAG-RSW ECF No. 1, PageID.14 Filed 02/23/21 Page 14 of 17
78. Plaintiff was treated differently than similarly situated teachers based
on his political beliefs and there was no rational basis for the differential treatment
such that Defendant Walled Lake Consolidated Schools’ treatment of Plaintiff was
conduct, Plaintiff was harmed, and continues to be harmed, in that he has suffered
economic and non-economic loss, including but not limited to, lost wages, damage
81. Plaintiff also seeks an injunction reinstating Plaintiff to his position and
RELIEF REQUESTED
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Justin Kucera prays that this Honorable Court grant
14
Case 2:21-cv-10418-MAG-RSW ECF No. 1, PageID.15 Filed 02/23/21 Page 15 of 17
entitled;
c. A judgment for lost wages and benefits, past and future, in whatever amount
he is found to be entitled;
Respectfully submitted,
CROSON, TAUB, & MICHAELS, PLLC
15
Case 2:21-cv-10418-MAG-RSW ECF No. 1, PageID.16 Filed 02/23/21 Page 16 of 17
JUSTIN KUCERA,
v. Hon.
Plaintiff Justin Kucera, by and through his attorneys, CROSON, TAUB, &
Respectfully submitted,
CROSON, TAUB, & MICHAELS, PLLC
17