e-ISSN : 2620 3502

International Journal on Integrated Education

p-ISSN : 2615 3785

ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION STRATEGIES FOR

BOOSTING TEACHING AND LEARNING IN NIGERIA
SECONDARY SCHOOLS
AKOMOLAFE Oluwayemisi Damilola (PhD)1
1
Department of Educational Foundations,
Faculty of Education, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Oye, Ekiti State, Nigeria.
E-mail: [email protected]

ABSTRACT

This paper discussed secondary education as well as governments’ rationale for its establishment. The
paper also discussed assessment and the various strategies for the assessment of teaching-learning processes at
the level. Moreover, the paper discussed evaluation of teaching and learning, and the strategies that could be
employed in executing evaluation in schools, with explicit key differences between assessment and evaluation
highlighted. In all, the paper concluded that assessment and evaluation are vital procedures for boosting
teaching and learning activities in secondary schools in Nigeria; and suggested that assessment and
evaluation strategies be enshrined in the secondary school curriculum, teachers be regularly trained and re -
trained in the art of assessment and evaluation; government and education ministries should provid e the
needed tools and instruments for implementing assessment and evaluation of the teaching -learning
processes, and education inspectors should frequently visit secondary schools as to ascertain teachers’ level
of compliance with government policies on assessment and evaluation.
Key words: Assessment; Evaluation; Learning; Secondary schools; Strategies; Teaching.
1. Introduction
Secondary education is the conventional link between the primary and tertiary levels of education. It is
the level of education designed for the training of young minds who at the time; undergo varying emotional,
physiological and psychological changes. As cited in Molagun (2006); Taiwo (1985) defined secondary
education as an institution where students are admitted after the satisfactory completion of their primary
education as prescribed by the government education syllabi and curriculum. It is education received by children
between ages eleven plus to fifteen or twenty two years. The secondary school is a means through which
violence, chaos and conflict-oriented tendencies can be curtailed among students. It is also an avenue through
which such social negative behaviours can be prevented or eradicated completely (Molagun, 2006).
The rationale for government establishment of secondary education especially in Nigeria according to
Taiwo (1985) were:-
(a) To provide quality education for students regardless of their social background;
(b) To diversify the curriculum in meeting students’ needs and in catering for their talents;
(c) To instill versatility, industry and self-reliance among students;
(d) To enlighten students on their duties, obligations and privileges as citizens of Nigeria;
(e) To teach, develop and project the Nigerian culture, languages and arts among students;
(f) To develop a sense of spiritual and moral values, integrity and uprightness among students;
(g) To raise citizens with high thinking ability, respect for the views and feelings of others and respect
for the dignity of labour;
(h) To produce students who will foster the unity of Nigeria.
Learning can be referred as the process of knowledge, attitude and skills acquisition; involving
behavioral changes in an individual. Students’ learning is enhanced by their active involvement in the
learning activity; providing positive reward reinforcements; stimulating fresh experiences among students;
providing a rich and varied environment for learning; designing learning in a more structured pattern, and
where the knowledge obtained is transferable and applicable (Gbamaja, 1991). Secondary school students
learn a lot of subjects at the same time; as it can take the form of a regular or elective learning based on subjects.
The compulsory subjects are mandatory for all students in their different levels, whereas the elective
ones are mandatory throughout the school year for those students who opt for them. Usually, in the Nigeria
secondary school setting, students’ learning is divided into the sciences, the social sciences, the arts and the
commercials. Students aspiring to pursue a career from the aforementioned are to mandatorily enroll and attend
the classes so planned. In all, a minimum of seven subjects and a maximum of eleven subjects are allowed for
students.
The teacher is fundamental for the effective implementation of the curriculum. Teaching is an
activity done deliberately in a specialized manner, leading to a positive changes on the learner (Dorgu,
2015); it is the art of instilling knowledge and an a way of helping learner obtain the rig ht attitude and skills
through a series of planned activities (Buseri & Dorgu, 2011). Awotua-Efebo (2001) defined teaching as an
interface between a teacher and a student under the teacher’s guide, in order to bring about the expected

Volume 3, Issue XI, November 2020 | 103

 e-ISSN : 2620 3502
International Journal on Integrated Education
p-ISSN : 2615 3785

change in students behaviour. For teachers to teach well, they should be guided the necessary rules or
principles of teaching and learning, which will determines students’ learning outcomes.
Teachers at the secondary school level teaches a number of different classes made up of students of
different age groups, abilities, attitudes and experiences; and these teachers, more often than not, have the
opportunity to teach subjects reflecting their area of interest and specialisation. Teaching according to Omieibi-
Davies (2011) can bring about: increase in the understanding of and information on the subject matter,
obtaining psychomotor skills, habits and abilities. For teaching and learning to be exciting, enriching and
accessible, the teacher should be creative and hard working, funny, less demanding, inspiring and absorbing. A
successful secondary school teacher should also be career driven, resilient, excellent time managers, who is able
to work well under pressure either alone or as a team. Secondary school teachers are to possess the following
skills, amidst others: be a relationship builder, excellent communication skills, be a good role model, be brilliant
and intelligent, be versatile, be accommodating, be a problem solver, plan his or her teaching, be able to guild
students in attaining the objectives of the subject matter, to mention but a few.
These teachers have a freedom with regards to achieving the set of educational goals by adopting any of
these teaching methods: cognitive development methods (talk chalk/recitation method, discussion method,
field trip/excursion method, questioning/socratic method, team teaching method); affective dev elopment
methods (simulation method, modelling method, simulation games, role-playing method, dramatic method)
and the psychomotor development methods (discovery method, laboratory/experimentation method, inquiry
method, process approach method, project method, programmed learning method, demonstration method,
Dalton plan/assignment method, mastery learning method, microteaching method). For learning and
teaching to be effective and efficient, assessment and evaluation strategies must be entwined into it . Hence,
the purpose of this paper is to expose the various strategies for assessing and evaluating teaching and
learning activities in Nigeria secondary schools.
Assessing students’ learning is significant in the teaching-learning process (Earl, 2012). It is a
procedure for ascertaining the nature of teaching as well as directing the extent to which students achieve in their
learning endeavours (Wiliam, 2011). According to Tulu et al. (2018), assessment as the process of measuring
students’ knowledge within a subject context through a quiz, test or assignments. It concerns how students
perform at the end of an instruction (Mekonnen, 2014). Usually, classroom assessment is expected to promote
additional improvement in student learning by factoring learning experiences and procedures during instruction;
as classroom oriented assessments are likely to assist learners to know their areas of weaknesses and strengths
(Linn & Gronlund, 2005). Assessment for learning is a more teacher-centered and provides a platform for
determining how to improve students engagement, learning and performance (Black, Harrison, Lee, Marshall &
Wiliam, 2007).
Assessment Strategies are techniques applied to teaching and learning activities and are for gathering
information which can help teachers get the needed insight and feedback into their own teaching and that of
students learning activities (Black & Wiliam, 2005). The role of assessment is to ascertain students’ learning and
a tool of reflection for teachers for the purpose of improving their teaching. The students’ achievement
information that is gathered from an assessment process, if accurate and valid, will be an advantage towards
effective instruction while helping the teachers in providing appropriate feedback (Martínez, Stecher & Borko,
2009; Earl & Katz, 2006). Studies have shown that assessment of students is advantageous in encouraging them
with taking up learning responsibilities, to be proactive about learning, fostering good interactions between them
and their fellow students and teachers, providing opportunities for students’ self and peer assessment, and helps
students in understanding their next steps of learning (Mekonnen, 2014).
Assessment Strategies for Secondary schools
i. Diagnostic assessment: This assessment provides information on the strengths and weaknesses of
students within in a learning activity. The teacher can also apply this information in adapting to
better teaching practices that meets students’ needs. It provides school inspectors with information
to understand the needs of the schools within their districts or locality, enabling them to provide
relevant support to the teaching staff and for their professional development. The information can
also be shared with students’ parents with the aim of making them participate in the learning
activities of their wards. Diagnostic assessment is sometimes referred to as pre-assessment.
ii. Portfolio assessment: Portfolios refer to a collection of samples of student work from classroom
activities and can document a broad range of students’ competencies as they provide exact
evidence of what a student knows and can do, rather than time-pressured tests. Portfolio assessment
assists students in critically evaluating their work, abilities, growth and progress in learning.
iii. Formative assessment: A formative assessment is applied in the initial stage of instruction planning
and development. It is aimed at monitoring students’ learning for feedback purposes. It helps in
identifying gaps in teachers’ instructional plan. This assessment provides students with the timely,
specific feedback that they need to make adjustments to their learning. It is also known as
assessment for learning.

Volume 3, Issue XI, November 2020 | 104

 e-ISSN : 2620 3502
International Journal on Integrated Education
p-ISSN : 2615 3785

iv. Summative assessment: Summative assessment measures the effectiveness of learning, how
students react to the instruction and the benefits accruing from the teaching-learning activities. It is
an assessment aimed at measuring the extent to which the teaching and learning objectives is
achieved. It provides information about student achievement and it is also known as assessment of
learning.
v. Confirmative assessment: Confirmative assessment is carried out after instruction and is to find out
if the teachers’ instruction technique is still a success after a given time frame such as term, a
session etc. It is an extension of the summative assessment.
vi. Norm-referenced assessment: This is assessment aimed at comparing students’ performance
against an average norm (e.g. national, state or local government norm). It could also be when a
teacher compares the average grade of his or her students against the average grade of the entire
school.
vii. Criterion-referenced assessment: This assessment measures students’ performances against a fixed
set of predetermined criteria or learning standards. It checks what students are expected to know
and be able to do at a specific stage of their learning.
viii. Ipsative assessment: This is assessment in which a students’ present performance is measured
against his or her previous performances.
ix. Interim Assessment: This assessment is administered during instruction which is designed to
evaluate students’ knowledge and skills relative to a specific set of goals to inform decisions in the
classroom and beyond.
x. Peer and self assessment: This assessment is aimed at supporting students’ metacognitive skills. It
is a situation where students engage in measuring their prior knowledge while using it for new
learning. Self-assessment helps students develop critical awareness and reflexivity (Dearnley &
Meddings, 2007). Students use this information for making adjustments, improvements and
necessary changes (Kajander-Unkuri, Meretoja, Katajisto, Saarikoski, Salminen, Suhonene, &
Leino-Kilpi 2013). Peer assessment, on the other hand, is a process where individuals of similar
status evaluate the performance of their peers and provide feedback, can also help students develop
a critical attitude towards their own work and that of others (Mass, Sluijsmans, Van der Wees,
Heerkens, Nijhuis-van der Sanden, & van der Vleuten, 2014)
Evaluation of teaching and learning activities in secondary school is also necessary for the
efficiency of the educational system. It can take the form of teachers’ appraisal, school and system
evaluation. Evaluation can be defined as the process of determining the worth of a program or an
intervention. The main rationale for evaluation is to proffer a valid and reliable judgment for decision
making. Various strategies of evaluation are available depending on the information that needs to be
assessed at any point in time. These are outlined below:

i. Formative Evaluation: Formative evaluations are evaluations that occur during the process or
implementation state of a program (e.g. a learning activity). These evaluations are used to
measure how well the process is proceeding and if changes are necessary. It is a continuous,
diagnostic and focuses on what and where students are doing well and areas where they need to
improve in regard to their future performance (Gaberson, Oermann & Scellenbarger, 2015).
ii. Summative Evaluations: The summative evaluation occurs at the end of the program. The
evaluation considers the effectiveness of the program as a whole and makes suggestions on how
it can be improved. Summative evaluation summarizes how students have or have not achieved the
outcomes and competencies stipulated in course objectives.
iii. Process Evaluation: Process evaluations focus on how a program was implemented and how it
operates. Its goal is to see if the program is meeting its intended goals. It shows why and ho w a
program thrived or failed and whether such program could be replicated.
iv. Impact Evaluation: Impact evaluations measure the program's effects and the overall
effectiveness of realizing the goals of the program. It is implemented over a longer time
schedule.
v. Outcome Evaluations: Outcome evaluations measure the short-term impact of implementing
programs. The evaluation gives information on how well the program is reaching its target
audience.
Differences between Assessment and Evaluation
The significant differences between assessment and evaluation are discussed below:
i. Assessment entails collecting, reviewing and using information for the purpose of improving a
current performance while evaluation is the process of passing judgment, based on a set criteria and
evidence.
ii. Assessment is diagnostic in nature as it tends to identify areas of improvement while evaluation is
judgmental, as it aims at providing an overall grade.

Volume 3, Issue XI, November 2020 | 105

 e-ISSN : 2620 3502
International Journal on Integrated Education
p-ISSN : 2615 3785

iii. Assessment provides feedback on performance and ways to enhance performance in future while
evaluation ascertains whether the standards so set are met or not.
iv. Assessment is to increase quality whereas evaluation is to judge the quality of a programme.
v. Assessment is concerned with process, while evaluation focuses on product.
vi. In assessment, feedback is based on observation but evaluation feedback relies on the level of
quality as per set standard.
vii. In assessment, the relationship between the assessor and the assessee is reflective (internally
defined), while in evaluation, the evaluator and evaluatee share a prescriptive relationship
(Externally defined).
viii. Assessment criteria are determined by parties involved whereas in evaluation, the criteria are set by
the evaluator.
ix. In assessment, the measurement standards are absolute, which seeks but comparative in evaluation
(Surbhi, 2016).
2. Conclusion
Assessment and evaluation are vital procedures for boosting teaching and learning activities in
Nigeria secondary schools. The various assessment and evaluation strategies as detailed in this pap er can be
applied in the assessment and evaluation of teaching-learning endeavours at the level. Teachers, learners and
all other education stakeholders; should be familiar with the strategies for implementing teaching and
learning assessment and evaluation.
In view of these, the paper hereby suggests that:

i. A vivid assessment and evaluation strategies be enshrined in the secondary school curriculum;
ii. Teachers be regularly trained and re-trained in the art of assessment and evaluation;
iii. Government and education ministries should as a matter of urgency, provide the various tools
and instruments to the actual execution of teaching and learning assessment and evaluation;
iv. Officials and inspectors from the education ministries should make it a point of duty to always
visit secondary schools in their states and districts as to ascertain teachers’ level of compliance
with government policies on assessment and evaluation.

REFERENCES

1. Awotua-Efebo, E.B. (2001). Effective teaching: principles and practice. Port-Harcourt:

Paragraphics.
2. Black P and Wiliam D. (2005). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment:
Granada Learning.
3. Black P, Harrison C, Lee C, Marshall B, Wiliam D. (2007). Assessment for learning. UK: McGraw-Hill
International (UK) Limited.
4. Buseri, J.C. and Dorgu, T.E. (2011). The relevance of instructional materials for effective
Curriculum delivery n Nigeria. Journal of issues in professional Teacher Education (JTIPTE). 2 (2)
P 9.
5. Dearnley, C. & Meddings, F. (2007). Student self-assessment and its impact on learning: A pilot
study. Nurse Education Today, 27(4), 333–340.
6. Dorgu T. E (2015). Different Teaching Methods: A Panacea for Effective Curriculum
Implementation in the Classroom. International Journal of Secondary Education. Special
Issue: Teaching Methods and Learning Styles in Education. Vol. 3, No. 6-1, pp. 77-87. doi:
10.11648/j.ijsedu.s.2015030601.13
7. Earl L, Katz S. (2006). Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind: Assessment for
learning, assessment as learning, assessment of learning. UK: Manitoba Education, Citizenship &
Youth.
8. Earl L. (2012). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning.
London: Corwin Press.
9. Gaberson, K., Oermann, M. & Schellenbarger, T. (2015). Clinical teaching strategies in nursing (4th
ed.). New York: Springer.
10. Gbamanja, S.P.T. (1991). Essentials of curriculum and instruction: theory and practice. Port -
Harcourt: Pam Unique Publishers.
11. Kajander-Unkuri, S., Meretoja, R., Katajisto, J., Saarikoski, M., Salminen, L., Suhonene, R. & Leino-
Kilpi, H. (2013). Self-assessed level of competence of graduating nursing students and factors related to
it. Nurse Education Today, 34(5), 795 – 801.
12. Linn R, Gronlund N. (2005). Measurement and assessment in teaching. Engle wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentie
Hall.

Volume 3, Issue XI, November 2020 | 106

 e-ISSN : 2620 3502
International Journal on Integrated Education
p-ISSN : 2615 3785

13. Martínez JF, Stecher B, Borko H. (2009). Classroom assessment practices, teacher judgments, and
student achievement in mathematics: Evidence from the ECLS. Educational Assessment. 14(2):78- 102.
14. Mass, M., Sluijsmans, D., Van der Wees, P., Heerkens, Y., Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. & van der
Vleuten, C. (2014). Why peer assessment helps to improve clinical performance in undergraduate
physical therapy education: A mixed methods design. BMC Medical Education, 14, 117.
doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-117.
15. Mekonnen G.T. (2014). EFL classroom assessment: Teachers' practice and teaching techniques
adjustment in Ethiopia. Educational Research and Reviews; 9 (20):1071.
16. Mekonnen G.T. (2014). EFL classroom assessment: Teachers' practice and teaching techniques
adjustment in Ethiopia. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(20):1071.
17. Molagun H. M. (2006). The Role of Secondary Education In The Promotion of Peace-Culture in
Nigeria Kwara State Colleges of Education Women Journal (KWACOWOJ) Vol. 1 No. 1.
18. Omiebi-Davids, .I. (2011). Skills in effective teaching. Port-Harcourt: Minson Publishers Ltd.
19. Surbhi S. (2016). Difference between Assessment and Evaluation.
https://keydifferences.com/difference-between-assessment-and-evaluation.html
20. Taiwo C. O. (1985). The Purpose of Secondary Education in Nigeria. Adaralegbe, A.(Ed). A
philosophy for Nigerian education: proceeding of the Nigerian national curriculum conference. Lagos:
Heinemann.
21. Tulu G., Tolosa T. and J-F (2018). The Nature of Classroom Assessment in Ethiopian Public Secondary
Schools: Subject Teachers’ Views. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science 26(3): 1-11.
22. Wiliam D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in educational evaluation, 37(1):3-14.

Volume 3, Issue XI, November 2020 | 107